Jump to content

Trump pays $175 million bond


CharlieH

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, stevenl said:

As I thought, nothing on the bond, only deflections. Although it's maybe more trolling than deflecting.

I thought we agreed that the bond was shady, no?

 

Do you not agree that all of Trump's property should be seized immediately, and he should be incarcerated until the state gets their money? 

 

Do you not agree the state needs to punish the company that posed the bond, and make sure any company considering posting a bond for Trump thinks twice?

 

Do you not agree that anyone that tries to help Trump needs to be crushed and disallowed from doing business in New York? 

 

Do you not agree that when it's decided the bond is fraudulent that more charges should be brought against Trump for attempting to use fraudulent bond? 

 

Do you not agree that criminal illegal aliens that commit violent crimes should continue to be released on their own recognizance while all this is going on? 

 

  • Confused 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

10 days. Some reason you can't wait?

Strange post 

 

Do you think he'll try and get a alternative bail ready in case his present one gets rejected?

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Roo Island said:

Not sure they will have to look very hard. That company is dodgy.

Maybe there'll be a different company.

 

Any bond option Trump has right now will be very expensive but the alternative is that 'Tish' James has a $500 million shopping spree at Trump's expense.

Edited by jerrymahoney
  • Love It 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, jerrymahoney said:

Maybe there'll be a different company.

 

Any bond option Trump has right now will be very expensive but the alternative is that 'Tish' James has a $500 million shopping spree at Trump's expense.

She wouldn't have to do anything if Trump abided by the law. Not sure why Trumpers are ok with breaking the law?

 

Sadly, many connected to him pay the price for his misdeeds. Another one bites the dust.

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68782176

 

Allen Weisselberg: Ex-Trump financial chief sentenced on perjury charges

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Roo Island said:

She wouldn't have to do anything if Trump abided by the law. Not sure why Trumpers are ok with breaking the law?

 

Sadly, many connected to him pay the price for his misdeeds. Another one bites the dust.

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68782176

 

Allen Weisselberg: Ex-Trump financial chief sentenced on perjury charges

 

 

Or had he been a leftist...

  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Roo Island said:

Perhaps being a leftist would mean less of a criminal. The right are falling like flies due to their crimes. Not very smart people, or just too greedy?

Or at least less prosecuted. When a leftist commits perjury or breaks campaign finance laws, they get a pass, or a fine. 

 

 

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another in Trump's orbit breaking the law.

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/trump-media-director-accused-hacking-files-attempted-corporate-coup-la-rcna147289

 

Trump Media director accused of ‘hacking’ files in attempted corporate ‘coup’: lawsuit

 

Investment firms led by the former CEO of the SPAC that merged with Donald Trump’s media company allege that their files were hacked and stolen by a current member of the media company’s board of directors.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Roo Island said:

Give me an example...

Andrew McCabe for lying under oath. 

Andrew McCabe’s settlement with the Department of Justice is a signal to John Durham | The Hill

Hillary Clinton for campaign finance violations.

DNC, Clinton campaign agree to Steele dossier funding fine | AP News

Barack Obama for campaign finance violations.

Obama 2008 campaign fined $375,000 - POLITICO

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Roo Island said:

Trying to prove leftists are bad and you have to go back to 2008? The list of people associated with Trump who are either in jail or been arrested is a long one. Hundreds.

 

You're really grasping here...but typical from those who fall for the misinformation.

You asked me to provide examples of leftists that committed perjury and or election finance violations that were not procicuted and I provided three. 

1. Andrew McCabe for lying under oath. 

2. Hillary Clinton for campaign finance violations.

3. Barack Obama for campaign finance violations.

 

Now you want to deflect to brag about how Biden has weaponized the justice department. Whatever. 

 

 

 

Give me an example...

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

You asked me to provide examples of leftists that committed perjury and or election finance violations that were not procicuted and I provided three. 

1. Andrew McCabe for lying under oath. 

2. Hillary Clinton for campaign finance violations.

3. Barack Obama for campaign finance violations.

 

Now you want to deflect to brag about how Biden has weaponized the justice department. Whatever. 

 

 

 

Give me an example...

Weaponized the justice department? Nothing like Trump did. Sad those on the far right don't care about the law. Luckily. Our judicial system is dealing with some.

  • Confused 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Roo Island said:

Weaponized the justice department? Nothing like Trump did. Sad those on the far right don't care about the law. Luckily. Our judicial system is dealing with some.

Your judicial system, it hates me. 

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, candide said:

Lol! Nice try!

 

1. Not Clinton or Obama! Their campaign and DNC. A lame false equivalence again. No falsified business records by Clinton or Obama.

The RNC or Republican campaign also got "only" fined for finance violation several times. It's peanuts!

 

2. McCabe

- the settlement was not about a perjury charge, but about a wrongful termination lawsuit

- a Grand Jury previously refused to indict him,

- what was he lying about? The fact that he disclosed information that the DOJ was investigating the Clinton Foundation. It was no a pro-Dem leak, but an anti-Dem leak!

You mean Yellowtail presented alternative facts? 😜

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

You asked me to provide examples of leftists that committed perjury and or election finance violations that were not procicuted and I provided three. 

1. Andrew McCabe for lying under oath. 

 

The Department of Justice has told lawyers for former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe that he will not face criminal charges for allegedly lying to investigators about a leak to the media, the ex-official's attorneys said Friday.

 

Only a Trump supporter would claim that McCabe committed perjury when he was never even charged with perjury. Note that this was the Trump DOJ.

 

Under your criteria, anyone can be alleged to have committed a crime, and the proof is that they were not indicted.

 

 

Edited by Danderman123
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/11/2024 at 7:41 PM, Danderman123 said:

Only a Trump supporter would claim that McCabe committed perjury when he was never even charged with perjury. Note that this was the Trump DOJ.

 

And only a DT supporter would be accepting of the Mueller Report.  That needs to be revisited. 

IMO the only reason DT hasn't already been tried and convicted is that somewhere in the works there are people who think it would shame the US to be seen as a banana republic if it moved too hastily.  Around the time of the 2021 inauguration Ecuador had election and the day after the loser was arrested; it would have been too to easy to say "see what the US has become?" 

But back to the bond.  The guy seems to attract scoundrels like garbage draws vermin.  Look at that pack of grifters that suddenly appeared between the 2020 election and 1/6.  We need to be considering what happens next.  If DT loses in November do you think he is going to walk away gently, "the best man won," etc?  The next crew of slime is going to be more adept.

The guy who wrote him that bond himself needs a bond to cover his own bond.  This should be watched closely.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/12/2024 at 9:41 AM, Danderman123 said:

The Department of Justice has told lawyers for former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe that he will not face criminal charges for allegedly lying to investigators about a leak to the media, the ex-official's attorneys said Friday.

 

Only a Trump supporter would claim that McCabe committed perjury when he was never even charged with perjury. Note that this was the Trump DOJ.

 

Under your criteria, anyone can be alleged to have committed a crime, and the proof is that they were not indicted.

 

 

You're hilarious. 

 

You asked me to provide examples of leftists that committed perjury and or election finance violations that were not prosecuted and I provided three. 

1. Andrew McCabe for lying under oath. 

2. Hillary Clinton for campaign finance violations.

3. Barack Obama for campaign finance violations.

 

Then you went on the brag about how Biden has weaponized the justice department. 

 

Now, you are claiming that "...only a Trump supporter would claim that McCabe committed perjury when he was never even charged with perjury."

 

You ask for examples of leftists that committed perjury and or election finance violations that were not prosecuted, and then I provide examples, you say they don't count because the liars and cheaters were not charged.

 

You can pretend otherwise, but Andrew McCabe clearly lied under oath, and both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton violated campaign finance laws. 

 

And of course, the leftists all claim Trump is a rapist, even though he has never been indicted, much less convicted of rape. How funny is that? 

 

 

 

 

  • Confused 2
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

You're hilarious. 

 

You asked me to provide examples of leftists that committed perjury and or election finance violations that were not prosecuted and I provided three. 

1. Andrew McCabe for lying under oath. 

2. Hillary Clinton for campaign finance violations.

3. Barack Obama for campaign finance violations.

 

Then you went on the brag about how Biden has weaponized the justice department. 

 

Now, you are claiming that "...only a Trump supporter would claim that McCabe committed perjury when he was never even charged with perjury."

 

You ask for examples of leftists that committed perjury and or election finance violations that were not prosecuted, and then I provide examples, you say they don't count because the liars and cheaters were not charged.

 

You can pretend otherwise, but Andrew McCabe clearly lied under oath, and both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton violated campaign finance laws. 

 

And of course, the leftists all claim Trump is a rapist, even though he has never been indicted, much less convicted of rape. How funny is that? 

 

 

 

 


You have to remember who you are dealing with here.  90% delusional liberal nutters.

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

You're hilarious. 

 

You asked me to provide examples of leftists that committed perjury and or election finance violations that were not prosecuted and I provided three. 

1. Andrew McCabe for lying under oath. 

2. Hillary Clinton for campaign finance violations.

3. Barack Obama for campaign finance violations.

 

Then you went on the brag about how Biden has weaponized the justice department. 

 

Now, you are claiming that "...only a Trump supporter would claim that McCabe committed perjury when he was never even charged with perjury."

 

You ask for examples of leftists that committed perjury and or election finance violations that were not prosecuted, and then I provide examples, you say they don't count because the liars and cheaters were not charged.

 

You can pretend otherwise, but Andrew McCabe clearly lied under oath, and both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton violated campaign finance laws. 

 

And of course, the leftists all claim Trump is a rapist, even though he has never been indicted, much less convicted of rape. How funny is that? 

 

 

 

 

The same distorted facts again

 

1. A grand jury refused to indict McCabe. It should be also noted that he lied about a leak which was unfavourable to Hillary Clinton.

 

2. and 3. The same lie again. It wasn't Clinton and Obama, it was the DNC and their campaign. It should be noted that the RNC and GOP campaigns have also been "only" fined for campaign violations.

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, candide said:

The same distorted facts again

 

1. A grand jury refused to indict McCabe. It should be also noted that he lied about a leak which was unfavourable to Hillary Clinton.

McCabe lied under oath. 

3 minutes ago, candide said:

 

2. and 3. The same lie again. It wasn't Clinton and Obama, it was the DNC and their campaign. It should be noted that the RNC and GOP campaigns have also been "only" fined for campaign violations.

 

The Clinton and the Obama campaigns were fined, and the DNC was fined. 

 

Now you can argue that Clinton and Obama are not their campaigns, but then you want to turn around and claim that Trump is his campaign. 

 

 

 

 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

McCabe lied under oath. 

The Clinton and the Obama campaigns were fined, and the DNC was fined. 

 

Now you can argue that Clinton and Obama are not their campaigns, but then you want to turn around and claim that Trump is his campaign. 

 

 

 

 

My point was that there was nothing suspect about the fact that McCabe was not indicted, and that he lied about a leak which was unfavourable to the left (Clinton). So no left-wing bias.

 

Another attempt at making a false equivalence.

As far as I know, Clinton and Obama were not in charge of accountancy details.

 

+ another lame attempt at trolling: in this case, Stormy was not paid by Trump's campaign. She was paid by Cohen (convicted for that), who was paid by Trump who falsified business records about this payment

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, candide said:

My point was that there was nothing suspect about the fact that McCabe was not indicted, and that he lied about a leak which was unfavourable to the left (Clinton). So no left-wing bias.

Do you not think people that lie under oath to Congress should be prosecuted? 

21 minutes ago, candide said:

Another attempt at making a false equivalence.

As far as I know, Clinton and Obama were not in charge of accountancy details.

Yet of course Trump was in charge of accountancy details, right? 

21 minutes ago, candide said:

 

+ another lame attempt at trolling: in this case, Stormy was not paid by Trump's campaign. She was paid by Cohen (convicted for that), who was paid by Trump who falsified business records about this payment

Then if Trump had his lawyer make the payment because he did not want to have his wife and family embarrassed, the case should be dismissed, correct? 

  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Do you not think people that lie under oath to Congress should be prosecuted? 

Yet of course Trump was in charge of accountancy details, right? 

Then if Trump had his lawyer make the payment because he did not want to have his wife and family embarrassed, the case should be dismissed, correct? 

1. A Grand Jury decided not to indict him. 

2. This was a personal matter, not a business matter. Who else than Trump would have asked his company to pay for it? Of course, the prosecution will need to prove it. They will or won't. We need to wait to see what comes up from testimonies.

3. I have not consulted a lawyer about it. Let's see what the court decides about it.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...