Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, susanlea said:

You will be dead before it becomes a problem. 

As usual, you've missed the point. Fossil fuels are now replaceable. 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
Just now, placeholder said:

As usual, you've missed the point. Fossil fuels are now replaceable. 

Not totally and not without cost. You are not a CEO, engineer or scientist. Go back to your cheap beer and flip flops. You will be dead before renewables takeover.

Posted
1 minute ago, susanlea said:

Not totally and not without cost. You are not a CEO, engineer or scientist. Go back to your cheap beer and flip flops. You will be dead before renewables takeover.

But here is news about a report from scientists:

Getting to 100% renewables requires cheap energy storage. But how cheap?

To spoil the ending: The answer is $20 per kilowatt hour in energy capacity costs. That’s how cheap storage would have to get for renewables to get to 100 percent. That’s around a 90 percent drop from today’s costs. While that is entirely within the realm of the possible, there is wide disagreement over when it might happen; few expect it by 2030.

https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2019/8/9/20767886/renewable-energy-storage-cost-electricity

Form Energy to begin manufacturing iron air batteries in Weirton to stabilize electrical grid

https://www.wesa.fm/environment-energy/2024-02-19/weirton-form-energy-battery-manufacturing

 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, placeholder said:

But here is news about a report from scientists:

Getting to 100% renewables requires cheap energy storage. But how cheap?

To spoil the ending: The answer is $20 per kilowatt hour in energy capacity costs. That’s how cheap storage would have to get for renewables to get to 100 percent. That’s around a 90 percent drop from today’s costs. While that is entirely within the realm of the possible, there is wide disagreement over when it might happen; few expect it by 2030.

https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2019/8/9/20767886/renewable-energy-storage-cost-electricity

Form Energy to begin manufacturing iron air batteries in Weirton to stabilize electrical grid

https://www.wesa.fm/environment-energy/2024-02-19/weirton-form-energy-battery-manufacturing

 

So there is wide disagreement on inferior energy sources.

 

 

Posted
Just now, susanlea said:

So there is wide disagreement on inferior energy sources.

 

This is like saying there's wide disagreement about the effects of greenhouse gasses on global warming. Only if you count the ignoramuses who deny any connection between the 2.  There isn't wide disagreement that the costs  of solar has beaten coal for the past few years. And it's now beating gas as well.

Solar Is Cheapest Energy Source Says IEA
By Irina Slav - May 28, 2023, 10:00 AM CDT
IEA: new solar projects are the cheapest source of power on a LCOE basis.
Substantial cost related to renewables that gets overlooked on a regular basis is the need for storage capacity to offset the intermittency problem.
The IEA calculates that on a value-adjusted basis—and with cost assumptions in place—solar comes in at $60 per MWh while gas is $20 more expensive at $80 per MWh.
https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Solar-Is-Cheapest-Energy-Source-Says-IEA.html

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, susanlea said:

You are the one making up claims. You got destroyed. 12,000 climate deaths only. That is nothing. Scaremongering nonsense.

Yeah, there are people like that:

 

"If you don't install a ground wire for your water heater, someone is going to get electrocuted while taking a shower".

 

"No one has died yet, I'm not spending any money on that".

 

The future is always a surprise to people who cannot anticipate problems.

Posted
On 4/26/2024 at 2:11 AM, connda said:

Source?  It's hearsay without a source that explains the big picture.

Then wake me up when the Biden's, Obama's (including all the properties on Martha's Vineyard), and the Gore's properties are condemned as uninsurable - or - when the sell them and find they can't obtain title insurance.  Ain't gonna happen.

Impressive self-control how you managed to get through that MAGA brain fart without mentioning Soros and the Clintons. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Yeah, there are people like that:

 

"If you don't install a ground wire for your water heater, someone is going to get electrocuted while taking a shower".

 

"No one has died yet, I'm not spending any money on that".

 

The future is always a surprise to people who cannot anticipate problems.

Nothing over the last 20 years regarding climate has been much of a problem. Your comments are just whataboutism.

Posted
4 minutes ago, placeholder said:

 

This is like saying there's wide disagreement about the effects of greenhouse gasses on global warming. Only if you count the ignoramuses who deny any connection between the 2.  There isn't wide disagreement that the costs  of solar has beaten coal for the past few years. And it's now beating gas as well.

Solar Is Cheapest Energy Source Says IEA
By Irina Slav - May 28, 2023, 10:00 AM CDT
IEA: new solar projects are the cheapest source of power on a LCOE basis.
Substantial cost related to renewables that gets overlooked on a regular basis is the need for storage capacity to offset the intermittency problem.
The IEA calculates that on a value-adjusted basis—and with cost assumptions in place—solar comes in at $60 per MWh while gas is $20 more expensive at $80 per MWh.
https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Solar-Is-Cheapest-Energy-Source-Says-IEA.html

Bit of a nothing post. I have no issues with using some solar products. Solar cars are terrible though and solar planes would crash.

 

The fossil fuels are still king.

Posted
Just now, susanlea said:

Bit of a nothing post. I have no issues with using some solar products. Solar cars are terrible though and solar planes would crash.

 

The fossil fuels are still king.

More irrelevant nonsense from you. Who is promoting cars or planes that run solely on solar power? And far more new renewable power plants are being built than fossil fuel power plants.

At a Glance: How Renewable Energy Is Transforming the Global Electricity Supply
Even as Fossil Energy Still Provides Most of the World’s Electricity, New Electricity Generating Capacity Is Dominated by Renewable Energy Projects

https://www.nrel.gov/news/program/2023/how-renewable-energy-is-transforming-the-global-electricity-supply.html

 

Massive expansion of renewable power opens door to achieving global tripling goal set at COP28

https://www.iea.org/news/massive-expansion-of-renewable-power-opens-door-to-achieving-global-tripling-goal-set-at-cop28

Posted
8 hours ago, susanlea said:

Insurance companies lying and you believe them. That is just sad.

Sad for the homeowners  that didn't believe the science    now they pay.

Posted
28 minutes ago, placeholder said:

More irrelevant nonsense from you. Who is promoting cars or planes that run solely on solar power? And far more new renewable power plants are being built than fossil fuel power plants.

At a Glance: How Renewable Energy Is Transforming the Global Electricity Supply
Even as Fossil Energy Still Provides Most of the World’s Electricity, New Electricity Generating Capacity Is Dominated by Renewable Energy Projects

https://www.nrel.gov/news/program/2023/how-renewable-energy-is-transforming-the-global-electricity-supply.html

 

Massive expansion of renewable power opens door to achieving global tripling goal set at COP28

https://www.iea.org/news/massive-expansion-of-renewable-power-opens-door-to-achieving-global-tripling-goal-set-at-cop28

Another nothing post from a guy using fossil fuels every minute.

Posted
1 hour ago, susanlea said:

You will be dead before it becomes a problem. 

False , it already is a problem ,you posted an article detailing the problems . You know the article you didn't fully read.

Posted
5 minutes ago, charleskerins said:

Sad for the homeowners  that didn't believe the science    now they pay.

More nonsense. 

Posted
Just now, charleskerins said:

False , it already is a problem ,you posted an article detailing the problems . You know the article you didn't fully read.

Nothing post. You got nothing. 

Posted
41 minutes ago, susanlea said:

Nothing over the last 20 years regarding climate has been much of a problem. Your comments are just whataboutism.

And no one has been electrocuted in the shower, despite the water heater not being grounded.

 

This is a classic mentality of only dealing with a problem after a disaster.

Posted
Just now, Danderman123 said:

And no one has been electrocuted in the shower, despite the water heater not being grounded.

 

This is a classic mentality of only dealing with a problem after a disaster.

Nothing post. I'm going to the beach. Great weather again today. Enjoy sitting in your chair complaining about climate.

Posted
Just now, Danderman123 said:

UAH_LT_1979_thru_March_2024_v6_20x9.jpg

 

In a couple of months, this chart will go through the roof.

 

 

Your chart shows a 0.35 increase in 26 years. I can't even feel a 0.35 increase. Neither can you. 

Posted

33 degrees now, forecast rain tomorrow and a 2 degree temperature drop.

 

Why isn't it 55 with seas 6m higher? Gore was wrong.

  • Like 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, susanlea said:

Nothing post. I'm going to the beach. Great weather again today. Enjoy sitting in your chair complaining about climate.

it's getting closer     enjoy it    future generations will not.        

Posted
23 minutes ago, susanlea said:

Another nothing post from a guy using fossil fuels every minute.

One sure way to know that someone has got nothing is when they make it personal.

  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, charleskerins said:

it's getting closer     enjoy it    future generations will not.        

That's what they said 20 years ago. In 20 years time it will only be 0.3 degrees warmer which is nothing. Tomorrow is forecast to be 2 degrees cooler.

  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, placeholder said:

One sure way to know that someone has got nothing is when they make it personal.

I just used your words. 

Posted
1 minute ago, susanlea said:

33 degrees now, forecast rain tomorrow and a 2 degree temperature drop.

 

Why isn't it 55 with seas 6m higher? Gore was wrong.

Gore was correct  “The majority of scientists have been telling us for years that the long-term warming trend greatly increases the odds that any given year will produce a much larger number of 100-degree days,” Gore said. “And that trend has been borne out over the last several years. We’ve seen records broken with regularity.” 

Posted
1 minute ago, susanlea said:

That's what they said 20 years ago. In 20 years time it will only be 0.3 degrees warmer which is nothing. Tomorrow is forecast to be 2 degrees cooler.

Tomorrow ?  you are quite the scientist  

Posted
2 minutes ago, charleskerins said:

Tomorrow ?  you are quite the scientist  

Yes tomorrow. Normal people focus on today and tomorrow. Only crazies talk about 2100.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...