Jump to content

Judge Denies Trump's Mistrial Request Over Stormy Daniels Testimony


Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Keep it classy why don’t you.


Similar to your fellow compadres?  
 

Strange how your advice only goes in one direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Vulgar fantasizing your own daughter is not pervert. Maga distorted Christianity. No wonder real Christians despise them. 

Where is the evidence of this? Somone on CNN paraphrasing? 

 

I say he'll be convicted, do are you stocked up on tissue and lotion for his first night in jail? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, candide said:

The same lame false equivalence again. She did not write anything off. You are wrong from the start. 😀

Well, that proves it. Trump didn't write it off either, quit pretending he did. 😀😀😀

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
47 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

When anyone tells a hooker she reminds him of his teenage daughter.............that's getting pretty perverted.

Stormy Daniels is not a hooker. She works in the American adult film industry (aka pornography, but Americans get upset about that term), one of the biggest in the world.

Edited by Presto
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Well, that proves it. Trump didn't write it off either, quit pretending he did. 😀😀😀

That was his own business. It's still a false equivalence. 😀

The DNC is not Hillary's own business. 

Edited by candide
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Presto said:

Stormy Daniels is not a hooker. She works in the American adult film industry (aka pornography, but Americans get upset about that term), one of the biggest in the world.

Dude spare us the Captain Saveaho schtick. If you offered her a half a million to star in Homeless Gang Bang without cameras she would buy extra lysol wipes.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Dude spare us the Captain Saveaho schtick. If you offered her a half a million to star in Homeless Gang Bang without cameras she would buy extra lysol wipes.

Like I said, you've got serious issues. One of them is persistent hypocrisy. Are you American by any chance?

Edited by Presto
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Presto said:

Stormy Daniels is not a hooker. She works in the American adult film industry (aka pornography, but Americans get upset about that term), one of the biggest in the world.

So, assuming she had sex with Trump it was because she was in love, yes? 

 

Hell holds no wrath...

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, candide said:

That was his own business. It's still a false equivalence. 😀

The DNC is not Hillary's own business. 

But the DNC and Hillary were both found guilty. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Presto said:

Like I said, you've got serious issues. One of them is persistent hypocrisy. Are you American by any chance?

What is hypocritical about conservatives supporting Trump over Biden? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Trump is not a conservative. 

Nor is Biden a liberal. That said, I did not ask if Trump was a conservative, what I asked was: "What is hypocritical about conservatives supporting Trump over Biden? "

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

So, assuming she had sex with Trump it was because she was in love, yes? 

 

Hell holds no wrath...

She was invited to have dinner with Trump. Read the transcripts. It seems you have little life experience considering women.

Edited by Presto
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Presto said:

She was invited to have dinner with Trump. Read the transcripts. It seems you have little life experience considering women.

So, at dinner they fell in love and then had sex, or Stormy has sex with anyone that buys her dinner? 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

But the DNC and Hillary were both found guilty. 

Her campaign. And no falsification of business records as it is not a business.

 

But let's assume she made the decision to declare it as legal expenses, instead of opposition research (no evidence of it, it may have been decided by someone else).

Is declaring it in the wrong category equivalent to not declaring it at all? Can't legal expenses be counted as campaign expenses (in particular when they are not personal legal expenses)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Presto said:

Like I said, you've got serious issues. One of them is persistent hypocrisy. Are you American by any chance?

Of course, thats why Im able to call a whore a whore, a man a man, a woman a woman, etc

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

So, at dinner they fell in love and then had sex, or Stormy has sex with anyone that buys her dinner? 

Her pet name for her you know what is "my little moneymaker".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, candide said:

Her campaign. And no falsification of business records as it is not a business.

It's a campaign finance violation, which is what the felony in the Trump case. So when it the Trump campaign it's Trump, but when it's the Clinton campaign, it the campaign, got it.  

Just now, candide said:

But let's assume she made the decision to declare it as legal expenses, instead of opposition research (no evidence of it, it may have been decided by someone else).

She hid the payment, which is want Trump is accused of. 

 

Just now, candide said:

Is declaring it in the wrong category equivalent to not declaring it at all?

Declaring it in the wrong category is the same as the charges against Trump, yes? 

Just now, candide said:

Can't legal expenses be counted as campaign expenses (in particular when they are not personal legal expenses)?

They were not legal expenses, it was operation research.

 

Trump paying for the NDA was a personal matter, which is why it should not be classified as a campaign expense. And again, had Trump classified it as a campaign expense they would be prosecuting him for that. 

 

But yeah, he'll be convicted. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Of course, thats why Im able to call a whore a whore, a man a man, a woman a woman, etc

Please don't get me going about American culture and values. You're the laughing stock of the civilized world.

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Presto said:

Please don't get me going about American culture and values. You're the laughing stock of the civilized world.

We much dont care Mr. Changeoh, whatever little pathetic country you come from just jumps to our whistle anyway.

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

It's a campaign finance violation, which is what the felony in the Trump case. So when it the Trump campaign it's Trump, but when it's the Clinton campaign, it the campaign, got it.  

She hid the payment, which is want Trump is accused of. 

 

Declaring it in the wrong category is the same as the charges against Trump, yes? 

They were not legal expenses, it was operation research.

 

Trump paying for the NDA was a personal matter, which is why it should not be classified as a campaign expense. And again, had Trump classified it as a campaign expense they would be prosecuting him for that. 

 

But yeah, he'll be convicted. 

 

 

 

1. It's not Trump campaign  it's Trump's business. False equivalence.

2. Declaring it in the wrong category of campaign expense is not the same as not declaring it at all as a campaign expense. The Clinton campaign dud declare it, Trump did not. False equivalence again. 

3. I have no idea about what would have happened if he had declared it as campaign expense. But there would have been no falsification of business records for a start.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Because that was when Stormy chose to shake Trump down. Trump did not approach her and ask her to keep quiet. 

 

But you been told that countless times already, yes? 

My point is if Trump wanted to keep Stormy Daniels from telling Melania, why didn't he tell her to keep quiet in 2006? Why was it so important to keep her quiet in 2016, but not 2006?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

We much dont care Mr. Changeoh, whatever little pathetic country you come from just jumps to our whistle anyway.

Thanks for showing American values so openly! Appreciate it!

Next you're going to: if we hadn't liberated you, you'd all be speaking German!

Well, I can speak German. And French. And English. Thanks to decent education, which is sorely lacking in America. 

People like you can hardly manage their own English language.

Edited by Presto
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...