Jump to content

Kamala Harris Running Mate Update: Jim Clyburn Names Three Governors as Potential VP Picks


Social Media

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, placnx said:

Several analysts remarked that it would be better for there to be a mini-primary to affirm Harris or select someone else as the nominee. This would keep voters from thinking that the grassroots is being ignored in the choice of Biden's replacement.

Time wasted not getting on Trump, while she has wrapped it up in record time.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, sqwakvfr said:

Well Doug Emhoff, the now Second Gentlemen and potential First Gentleman was born Jewish.  So the Democratic Candidate for President has a Jewish Husband. This could mean something or it could mean nothing if Mr. Emhoff is no longer a practicing member of the Jewish faith. 

It means nothing either way.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Shapiro. Pennsylvania is a swing state and bigger than Michigan in terms of electors. No sense bringing in a senator, most are not big names outside their state and =most are pretty useless as people or politicians. Just don't give us another useless DEI pick....I have no interest for numbskull given jobs they are unable to fulfil. Just look at Harris.....zero personal achievements, worse than nobody as the czar of southern migration and running Joe's record. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, earlinclaifornia said:

How many times have you listened to an interview with him defending Trump

Mini me choice.

Deplorable is a step up.

I do agree his rise frompoverty is amazing 

Can you specifiy on what issue Vance defended Trump?  In 2016 Vance was not a fan of Trump.  What changed then? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Keep Right said:

Harris has had some nefarious relationships in the past that are going to expose her compromising morals to the voting public. Harris choice as a running mate will not matter. 

Epstein.jpg

Never mind.

 

  • Like 1
  • Love It 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, sqwakvfr said:

Can you specifiy on what issue Vance defended Trump?  In 2016 Vance was not a fan of Trump.  What changed then? 

Republican Senator John Barrasso of Wyoming, whom Vance has described as a mentor, told Reuters that Vance shifted his views on Trump because “he saw the successes that President Trump as president brought to the country.”

 

I was agast at his commiment at defending Trump now.

Let me see if I can share an example.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jingthing said:

So you must condemn Harris, a strong proud black woman. 

 

She has certainly focused on that side of her family now that it is politically advantageous to do so.

 

I guess the black vote is more powerful than the Tamil vote...

 

image.png.5c6880ef208ec7c30220d33640d8834e.png

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Yep, as expected, and from the usual source.

 

 

 

Pointing out the truth? I know you hate that Chomps.

 

Maybe you can point out another reason why she is always referred to by the Democrats as a Black woman as opposed to a Tamil woman? 

 

Maybe the Dems just hate Tamils? Or maybe, just maybe, it's a cynical strategy to ignore the Tamil side of her heritage in order to get more black votes? Imagine that...

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, RichardColeman said:

I mean seriously, if the US elect this idiot woman the first US woman president then it just shows the quality of American women ! Surely there must be more intelligent women in the states than this rambling fool. 

Hmmh, you just showed us more the quality of men. No further comments allowed☹️

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Pointing out the truth? I know you hate that Chomps.

 

Maybe you can point out another reason why she is always referred to by the Democrats as a Black woman as opposed to a Tamil woman? 

 

Maybe the Dems just hate Tamils? Or maybe, just maybe, it's a cynical strategy to ignore the Tamil side of her heritage in order to get more black votes? Imagine that...

Jonny, like very many Americans she’s of mixed race, she is proud of her mixed heritage:

 

CLAIM: Harris is not Black.

THE FACTS: This is false. Harris is Black and Indian. Her father, Donald Harris, is a Black man who was born in Jamaica. Shyamala Gopalan, her mother, was born in southern India. Harris has spoken publicly for many years, including in her 2019 autobiography, about how she identifies with the heritage of both her parents.”

 

Forgive the linked article Jonny, while it corrects your customary ill informed nonsense, it also includes a few ‘trigger words’ that might set you off.


https://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/wireStory/fact-focus-false-claims-kamala-harris-campaign-white-112178476

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

She has certainly focused on that side of her family now that it is politically advantageous to do so.

 

I guess the black vote is more powerful than the Tamil vote...

 

image.png.5c6880ef208ec7c30220d33640d8834e.png

She will get both the black and Indian American votes. That’s the beauty of it. 
 

By the way, there are many ethnic groups in India and Tamil is a small minority. American Indians traditionally vote Democrat. 
 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Jonny, like very many Americans she’s of mixed race, she is proud of her mixed heritage:

 

CLAIM: Harris is not Black.

THE FACTS: This is false. Harris is Black and Indian. Her father, Donald Harris, is a Black man who was born in Jamaica. Shyamala Gopalan, her mother, was born in southern India. Harris has spoken publicly for many years, including in her 2019 autobiography, about how she identifies with the heritage of both her parents.”

 

Forgive the linked article Jonny, while it corrects your customary ill informed nonsense, it also includes a few ‘trigger words’ that might set you off.


https://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/wireStory/fact-focus-false-claims-kamala-harris-campaign-white-112178476

 

She is not black, she is mixed race. Her father is Irish Jamaican/Afro Jamaican and her mother is Tamil.

 

It doesn't get much more mixed race than that.

 

The reason she is constantly referred to as "black" by the Dems is to get the "black vote". Her Asian heritage is ignored. Very disrespectful to Tamil people IMO. As someone in a mixed race relationship with an Asian woman I find this anti Asian racism from the Dems disgusting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

She will get both the black and Indian American votes. That’s the beauty of it. 

 

Beauty? What is beautiful about people being stupid enough to vote based on the race of the candidate as opposed to their character and policies. 

 

That would be like me voting for Starmer instead of Sunak because Starmer is white. Sounds a little racist to me. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Jingthing said:

There is zero chance AOC will be picked for VP.

True, she is far more useful in the House of Representatives! Someone is needed to replace Bernie Sanders as the "enfant terrible" to make the "Christian Nationalists" ( such a less perjorative term than "Fascists") wake up in a sweat at night!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

She is not black, she is mixed race. Her father is Irish Jamaican/Afro Jamaican and her mother is Tamil.

 

It doesn't get much more mixed race than that.

 

The reason she is constantly referred to as "black" by the Dems is to get the "black vote". Her Asian heritage is ignored. Very disrespectful to Tamil people IMO. As someone in a mixed race relationship with an Asian woman I find this anti Asian racism from the Dems disgusting. 

Your ignorance in these matters is so profound, providing you with a linked article specifically addressing the subject can’t penetrate it.

 

You really haven’t got a clue what you are on about.

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Pointing out the truth? I know you hate that Chomps.

 

Maybe you can point out another reason why she is always referred to by the Democrats as a Black woman as opposed to a Tamil woman? 

 

Maybe the Dems just hate Tamils? Or maybe, just maybe, it's a cynical strategy to ignore the Tamil side of her heritage in order to get more black votes? Imagine that...

Same with Obama who is mulatto, half white half black. So he should be called mulatto. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Your ignorance in these matters is so profound, providing you with a linked article specifically addressing the subject can’t penetrate it.

 

You really haven’t got a clue what you are on about.

 

 

 

Let's keep it simple.

 

Is she black or mixed race?

 

If you consider her black, I assume you are applying the one drop rule. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, morrobay said:

Same with Obama who is mulatto, half white half black. So he should be called mulatto. 

 

Obama is mixed race. 

 

Those are the facts. If you wish to call him black, that's your perogative but I am dealing with the facts. 

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Beauty? What is beautiful about people being stupid enough to vote based on the race of the candidate as opposed to their character and policies. 

 

That would be like me voting for Starmer instead of Sunak because Starmer is white. Sounds a little racist to me. 

Thats the beauty. Trump has no policies and a flawed character. No sensible educated voters will vote Trump. Trump will not get the black, women and young generation votes. Tough pill to swallow but that is the reality. Too bad it sound racist. 

Edited by Eric Loh
wrong word
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Eric Loh said:

Thats the beauty. Trump has no policies and a flawed character. No sensible educated voters will vote Trump. Trump will not get the black, women and young generation votes. Tough pill to swallow but that is the reality. Too bad it sound racist. 

 

Trump has plenty of policies. You might not like them but that does not mean they do not exist.

 

Yes, voting for a candidate based on their race is by definition, racist. If a white man came on here and said they were voting for Trump ahead of Harris because Trump is white and Harris is not, every Liberal on here would be screaming Racist at them. Can't have it both ways. 

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Let's keep it simple.

 

Is she black or mixed race?

 

If you consider her black, I assume you are applying the one drop rule. 

In response to your earlier post I provided you a link to an article that references Kamala Harris’ own frequently expressed views on the matter.

 

But as I say and as you demonstrate, your profound ignorance on the matter is impermeable to facts presented in linked articles that address the very subject.

 

 

 

 

Edited by Chomper Higgot
  • Thumbs Up 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

In response to your earlier post I provided you a link to an article that references Kamala Harris’ own frequently expressed views on the matter.

 

But as I say and as you demonstrate, your profound ignorance on the matter is impermeable to facts presented in linked articles that address the very subject.

 

 

 

 

Of course, because it is convenient for her to not remember that her mother is from the Brahmin caste, the most elite and some would say racist caste in India.  That certainly would not go over well with her Democratic Socialist buddies. Nor would her father's assertion that he is descended from one of Jamaica's largest slave owners.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hanaguma said:

Of course, because it is convenient for her to not remember that her mother is from the Brahmin caste, the most elite and some would say racist caste in India.  That certainly would not go over well with her Democratic Socialist buddies. Nor would her father's assertion that he is descended from one of Jamaica's largest slave owners.

If you say so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now









×
×
  • Create New...
""