Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 8/5/2024 at 12:34 PM, CashMoon said:

 

They're just allowed to work illegally. The vast majority are from Myanmar. 2 million of them are irregular migrants.  They're everywhere in Bangkok. 

Expand  

 

back up your crap with proof. link? statistics? 

nothin' i knew it

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
  On 8/5/2024 at 2:41 PM, MalcolmB said:

Or aborigines. 
Don’t give them a say whatever you do. They might want some rights.

Expand  

I guess you don't live in OZ they have more rights than white people and yes I lived here for about 40 years. Tell me what have they built or invented Digeridoo and Boomerang? Great, what a good invention.

Posted
  On 8/5/2024 at 2:38 PM, Pouatchee said:

 

you clearly post nonsense on any thread that has to do with immigration, dont you?

Expand  

 

  On 8/5/2024 at 2:41 PM, Pouatchee said:

 

back up your crap with proof. link? statistics? 

nothin' i knew it

Expand  

 

You're still spouting nonsense even though the moderator had to delete your nonsense. I don't have to prove anything to you. Go research! 

  • Haha 1
Posted
  On 8/5/2024 at 2:58 PM, CashMoon said:

 

 

You're still spouting nonsense even though the moderator had to delete your nonsense. I don't have to prove anything to you. Go research! 

Expand  

 

half the nonsense deleted was yours, remember? stick to the topic. dont hijack it. oh... if you stick to the topic youll have nothing to bait anyone on...

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
  On 8/5/2024 at 3:10 PM, BangkokReady said:

 

It isn't a bias.  It's asking a simple question.  "Why isn't Thailand full of economic migrants posing as refugees?" could be an equally valid title.

 

It's well established that the UK is being flooded by illegal immigrants who are posing as refugees, under the impression that simply by setting foot in the UK they will be given a free house and free money.

 

The original question is answered by the above, as Thailand is not perceived as offering the same financial reward.

Expand  

 

Fair point, although I think your altternative title hints much less at any underlying bias. Thanks anyway.

  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
  On 8/5/2024 at 3:01 PM, Woof999 said:

Why is the thread title "so called Asymlum Seekers"? It hints at a strong bias.

Expand  

Maybe because an Asylum seeker is supposed to be a political refugee as opposed to a financial migrant (which a huge number of them are) claiming to be a political refugee. 

  • Agree 2
Posted

And there was me thinking all the Burmese illegals were entering Thailand by sneaking across the border into Laos when all along they were using KAYAKS down the Mekong.

Posted
  On 8/5/2024 at 3:14 PM, sanmyintmaung said:

 

There are many refugee camps inside Thailand to housing the large population of Myanmar nationals feeling the ongoing civil war. They were given housing and food by the UN hopefully until their country become peaceful again.

Unfortunately, peace never come to Myanmar and many are still living in those camps for generations. 

image.thumb.png.2df30cb8e5353479b63776f16c62f626.png

Expand  

 

nice info. just curious though, how many asylum seekers are granted permanent residency, citizenship and even social security benefits? 81 241 refugees pales in comparison to the total the uk takes in year on end

Posted

During Syrian crisis there were many families seeking refugee status (that building near UN HQ at Ratchada Damnueng rd). All refused. They tried visa-runs, working ilegaly at kebab-shops. Many ended up in IDC. The story was tearful. The whole families went to detention.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
  On 8/5/2024 at 3:19 PM, Pouatchee said:

 

nice info. just curious though, how many asylum seekers are granted permanent residency, citizenship and even social security benefits? 81 241 refugees pales in comparison to the total the uk takes in year on end

Expand  

They were given food and shelter in refugee camps and told to wait in limbo until their home country become peaceful again. Sadly, many are second or third generation residents of the camp. 

Posted
  On 8/5/2024 at 3:29 PM, sanmyintmaung said:

They were given food and shelter in refugee camps and told to wait in limbo until their home country become peaceful again. Sadly, many are second or third generation residents of the camp. 

Expand  

 

totally agree it is sad... very few compared to the west yet they cant go anywhere. i think the reason there is rage in the uk right now is that rather than having to wait, the refugees get passports too easily. if there were peace in their countries, would the uk asylum seekers give up their newly acquired benefits and go back home?

anyways the topic is about thai asylum seekers not uk... just warrants the question, why doesnt thailand grant them citizenship like our countries do?

Posted
  On 8/5/2024 at 2:00 PM, itsari said:

Difference between Australia and Thailand is Australia has signed an agreement with the UN on asylum which they do not follow. 

Expand  

Fake people. Jumping across countries for handouts

  • Agree 1
Posted
  On 8/5/2024 at 3:30 PM, proton said:

 

Asylum used to be for spies and ballet dancers, now it's little more than a scam to stay and get housed and fed for life by the dross of the world. Thailand has the right Idea you will never see them putting up ilegals in nice hotels and giving them cash every week.

Expand  

Or Electric bikes for them to use delivering food.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...