Kamala Harris Faces Historical Odds a Sitting VP Has Won Once in 188 years

[WoodyKenny]

5 hours ago, EVENKEEL said:

The upcoming interview will be interesting. Wonder if Harris will be asked the reason for her flip flopping on major issues.

You know the won't ask her any tough questions..  my country has become a Liberal Democratic Woke Nation... That's why I left.   The Hate they have for one Man is disgusting. Right or wrong, what ever he did.  They loved him prior to coming down the escalator... You tell me Clinton's, Pelosi, Newsome, Obama, and all the others haven't done anything wrong...  It's pathetic paid for by people like Bill Gates and Warren Buffett..

  

[retarius]

Not only that, but a person named Tim Walz has never been elected VP.

[thesetat2013]

 

In china, they are passing along in chat groups that Harris may win the election but that she is not going to run the country simply because she does not know how. They are saying if she wins that the US will become an oligarchy because she will be controlled by unseen and unvoted for people. This all makes sense which is the reason why the Democrats approved her to run for the election. They are using her being a colored woman to manipulate the people. She has no interviews nor does she say anything meaningful and related to a goal if she wins As VP she was controlled and when confronted about topics she was speechless. Expect the same if she is elected. 

[EVENKEEL]

1 hour ago, earlinclaifornia said:

You stiil believe what yo said that Trump has too much baggage to win?

 

I realise hope is eternal Harris screws it still a possibility

Depends if Harris is given the questions beforehand. Or if her and Tampon Tim are asked about their prior positions on matters.

[Callmeishmael]

52 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:

Just out of interest, how often has a sitting President who was rejected after losing an election managed to return to the Presidency in a subsequent election?

Just once.  Grover Cleveland was the 22nd and 24th president back in the 1880's and 1890's.

[Hanaguma]

The interview will be massaged and packaged and produced more than any Hollywood movie in the past 50 years. This is Kamala's "coming out party" and it will be made to look amazing.  However professional Dana Bash may be (and usually she is pretty good), she will be on a very short leash and only given a select list of questions to ask. Follow ups will be non-existent.

 

And the Emotional Support Governor will be by Kamala's side to jump in if she starts windmilling her hands and talking like a kindergarden teacher.

[DougieMax]

5 hours ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

I think Dana Bash has a good reputation as a tough but fair interviewer - no free rides. 

Don't bet the house on it. Taped. Why? Allows for massive editing out of unfavorable stuff. Likely to be softball questions with no followup with K having been given them in advance. And why the chaparone? I'll bet Dana Bash does not ask her why either. The interview will be a farce like everything else since November 2020.

[DougieMax]

4 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Her "magic" is running against a twice impeached, 34 times convicted felon, insurrectionist, adjudicated rapist, admirer of anti democratic dictatators, disgraced former president.

There is no historical precedent for any of that from his side.

Wow, you are going to be one unhappy camper come November.

[DougieMax]

4 hours ago, Srikcir said:

Passed by Congress June 4, 1919, and ratified on August 18, 1920, the 19th amendment granted women the right to vote. 

A woman POTUS would be well deserved for gender and nation.

The country has spent the last large number of years trying exactly this with various external attributes being the sole criteria. It's failed everywhere: in academia, sports, politics, judiciary. The last four years have been record setting in this regard. What is needed is some good old fashioned meritocracy to slow down the process of abject failure.

[riclag]

kharris was not elected by the people she  was  installed by  a sick dem democracy hell bent in the uses of lawfare to destroy their adversaries!
 

“The primary system came into play fully after World War II. Incumbent President Harry S. Truman lost in the 1952 New Hampshire presidential primary, amid poor popularity numbers, and dropped from the race. Sen. Estes Kefauver of Tennessee won 12 of 15 Democratic primaries, but the Democratic convention instead chose Illinois Gov. Adlai Stevenson, who skipped the entire primary season”…

 

Notice any similarities ?

Dem democracy installs their choices ,despite what the common folk want.

 

https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/a-brief-history-of-presidential-primaries

Edited August 29 by riclag

[marin]

15 minutes ago, DougieMax said:

The fallacy of this article is the assumption that the election will be free and fair. After absolute farce of fraud that was the 2020 election, nobody can ever make that assumption again.

 

14 minutes ago, DougieMax said:

True, except election fraud was not a thing back then. Trump would have won in 2020 but for it. 

You are something else!! Pushing these false election conspiracy theories. Proven false in over 60 court cases.  

 

https://campaignlegal.org/results-lawsuits-regarding-2020-elections

 

The various claims of evidence alleging a stolen 2020 election have been exhaustively investigated and litigated. Judges heard claims of illegal voting and found they were without merit. (Learn more about how the changes that have happened since 2020 will affect the 2024 election and beyond.)

Rep. Liz Cheney, the former chair of the House Republican Conference, stated on February 23, 2021: "The president and many around him pushed this idea that the election had been stolen. And that is a dangerous claim. It wasn't true," she said. "There were over 60 court cases where judges, including judges appointed by President Trump and other Republican presidents, looked at the evidence in many cases and said there is not widespread fraud."

CLC’s researched the cases. Some, as referenced by Rep. Cheney, were withdrawn by the Trump team before the courts ever ruled or dismissed on procedural grounds. But many were decided on the merits.

 

 

 

[watthong]

26 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

The interview will be massaged and packaged and produced more than any Hollywood movie in the past 50 years. This is Kamala's "coming out party" and it will be made to look amazing.  However professional Dana Bash may be (and usually she is pretty good), she will be on a very short leash and only given a select list of questions to ask. Follow ups will be non-existent.

 

 

In short just the appropriate settings to the spectacle of Trump melting down on live TV. (With medics standing by in case of self-induced heart attack.)

 

Edited August 29 by watthong

[billd766]

2 hours ago, 300sd said:

I wonder when they'll do the next planned move and remove poor old Joe as current president and insert this Kamala sham before the election! Someone needs to be running the country and of course it's not Joe. (won't be Kamala either) haha

And it certainly won't be Trump, Vance or the gop.

[Rimmer]

Some off topic, troll and unattributed posts have been removed also replies

@DougieMax

[earlinclaifornia]

2 hours ago, thesetat2013 said:

 

In china, they are passing along in chat groups that Harris may win the election but that she is not going to run the country simply because she does not know how. They are saying if she wins that the US will become an oligarchy because she will be controlled by unseen and unvoted for people. This all makes sense which is the reason why the Democrats approved her to run for the election. They are using her being a colored woman to manipulate the people. She has no interviews nor does she say anything meaningful and related to a goal if she wins As VP she was controlled and when confronted about topics she was speechless. Expect the same if she is elected. 

Link? 

 

Edited August 29 by earlinclaifornia

[thesetat2013]

8 minutes ago, earlinclaifornia said:

Link? 

LLLLLLLOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

You have chat groups in China? I can send link to the group of foreigners there posting these things. 

This is an opinion OP.. Not a fact checking OP. I only posted what I see in my Chinese chat groups that are relevant and do not care of you seek clarification. I have no intention of adding you to my Chinese chat groups. 

Edited August 29 by thesetat2013

[earlinclaifornia]

Go Get Them, as we will never go back

https://www.foxnews.com/official-polls/fox-news-poll-harris-closes-gap-trump-sun-belt-states

[frank83628]

i see she now wants to build a border wall, after halting Trumps and allowing millions to enter illegally

[earlinclaifornia]

Just now, thesetat2013 said:

You have chat groups in China? I can send link to the group of foreigners there posting these things. 

 

How did you get past the Russians?

[earlinclaifornia]

1 minute ago, thesetat2013 said:

You have chat groups in China? I can send link to the group of foreigners there posting these things. 

 

Pure QAnon

BS

[earlinclaifornia]

https://elections2024.thehill.com/national/harris-trump-general/

[candide]

5 hours ago, HK MacPhooey said:

Oh, so not on actual ability but just another box ticking DEI appointment - if the US electorate fall for this scam then prepare for four years of even more rapid economic decline and an even more dangerous and unstable world than we have had since Biden’s election…

Economic decline? That's a ridiculous statement. The U.S. has overperformed the other

 advanced economies, by large.

I guess you believe everything Trump claims! 😃

https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn02784/

[earlinclaifornia]

Carole King to Speak at ‘Swifties for Kamala' Kickoff Event (msn.com)

[Chomper Higgot]

9 hours ago, Callmeishmael said:

One could also say that Donald Trump faces exactly the same odds.  Only one other president has served non-consecutive terms in the past 225 years!

 

 

And no convicted felon has ever been elected President.

[candide]

4 hours ago, thesetat2013 said:

 

In china, they are passing along in chat groups that Harris may win the election but that she is not going to run the country simply because she does not know how. They are saying if she wins that the US will become an oligarchy because she will be controlled by unseen and unvoted for people. This all makes sense which is the reason why the Democrats approved her to run for the election. They are using her being a colored woman to manipulate the people. She has no interviews nor does she say anything meaningful and related to a goal if she wins As VP she was controlled and when confronted about topics she was speechless. Expect the same if she is elected. 

An we all know that (censored) Wechat groups in China are a highly reliable source of information about U.S. politics! 🤣

Edited August 29 by candide

[Irish star]

Registration of New Voters are up 175% , She’s  going against a Pedo , felon , Grifter , conman , Christian 55555, insurrectionist ,  Debtor , Dictator Lover , thief of Classified material , Traitor 

[metisdead]

A post with unattributed content that was copy and pasted from some site without providing a link to the source of information has been removed.

[herfiehandbag]

8 hours ago, thesetat2013 said:

They are saying if she wins that the US will become an oligarchy because she will be controlled by unseen and unvoted for people

Well, a concept with which China is familiar!

[stevenl]

6 hours ago, thesetat2013 said:

You have chat groups in China? I can send link to the group of foreigners there posting these things. 

This is an opinion OP.. Not a fact checking OP. I only posted what I see in my Chinese chat groups that are relevant and do not care of you seek clarification. I have no intention of adding you to my Chinese chat groups. 

We have our local trolls, now you're introducing us to Chinese trolls. No thanks.

[metisdead]

Posts with unattributed content that was copy and pasted from some sites without providing a link to the sources of information have been removed.