Jump to content

Kamala Harris supports the Radical Trans and Homosexual Agenda


Yagoda

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Rob Browder said:

I think it should be made-clear that there is no difference of significance on this issue with Trump.  Look at what Trump supported in 2021, at his annual "Log Cabin Republicans" - Peter Thiel's** group - event at Mar-A-Lago:
https://www.19fortyfive.com/2021/11/donald-trump-is-now-one-with-the-gop-establishment/

 

Trump has supported this "movement" since well before he ran for President, which has long been a problem with the socially-conservative wing of the party. 

 

It remains to be seen if Peter Thiel's creation, JD Vance, can provide him with that support as well as Mike Pence did - with Pence's "Christian First, Conservative Second, Republican Third - in that order" stump-speeches.

** (long-tangent to Thiel's Palentir 3-letter-agency surveillance-systems skipped - web-search Whitney Webb's reporting on that, if interested.)

Project 2025 is radically anti LGBT.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kamala Harris supports the Radical Trans and Homosexual Agenda

 

😴 Who cares? With the way the western world is going down the pan (largely through the likes of this and other SJ tat), the sooner the rest of society (most people) gets put out of its misery. Asia is where it's at. Accepted and acknowledged, yes, but not tripping over themselves and hamstringing everyone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rob Browder said:

I suggest you read the book "After the Ball" - written by a couple of Harvard guys in the 1990s, on exactly how they were going to accomplish pushing their "agenda" - which was carried out exactly as they outlined - complete with not including transgenders until the end of the process, as that would be most offensive to the "normals."   

 

One of the authors had written a piece titled "The Gay Agenda," published in a pro-gay magazine, prior.  This is the origin of the "agenda" term.

 

As with "Replacement Immigration," you are an "evil bigot" if you criticize it, even as those carrying out the policy admit, publicly, that this is their intent / goal. 

 

If there was no intent to "groom," then there would be no policy / propaganda targeting children - period.  "Transitioning" is a very PROFITABLE business, as well, so we get all those incentives in the mix.  Let them grow up and go through puberty normally, and only a tiny-fraction will become "customers."

And what was the gay agenda that the achieved? Non-discrimination? Marriage equality? How does this affect you? If you do not want a gay marriage, don't get one. nobody is forcing you to do anything.

 

If you accept the replacement theory of immigration you are an evil bigot. It is patently anti-Semitic and racist. It is also nonsense.

 

What policies are targeting children? I have not seen anything that does not start with requests from the children. HRT and SRT are explicitly prohibited for minors.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Lacessit said:

Dog-whistling homophobic sh!t from a troll.

 

Just another feeble attempt to throw mud at Harris, hoping some will stick.

 

Unnecessary with Trump, he's covered in it already. Self-applied.

Another supporter of grooming and genital mutilation I see. Thank god you arent an American

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Project 2025 is radically anti LGBT.

Not that you ever read it, but Im sure that their policy positions dont include genital mutilation of children, something that you clearly favour

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, cjinchiangrai said:

There is no genital mutilation of minors. It is illegal and always has been. It is a lie spread by right wing bigots to scare people into abusive positions.

You sure you want to take that position? 

 

What "abusive" positions by the way? Opposing the imposition of fantasy as law?

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Yagoda said:

You sure you want to take that position? 

 

What "abusive" positions by the way? Opposing the imposition of fantasy as law?

Absolutely, I actually know trans people. You obviously don't.

 

Laws and regulations that discriminate against the rights of LGBTQ persons. Project 2025 has plenty of them.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Yagoda said:

Well I know mentally ill folks and I dont talk to their demons, so whats your point? Trans are nice people? Im sure. So was Ted Bundy, talking the analogy to an absurd, yoet telling point.

 

You cant name one thing out of Project 2025 that "discriminates against the rights" of folks with abnormal sexuality

That would be incorrect on too many levels.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Yagoda said:

I dont know how you equate objections to the societal normalization of personal mental illness to the detriment of women and children to "stalking and assault", but fine, no sense arguing, clearly, you support the trans agenda and are perfectly fine with teenage girls being forced to change in locker rooms with men pretending to be women, among other things.

 

This is how a Strawman argument works. Accuse people of holding a position no one has actually stated.

 

It goes the other way. It could be said that those who have a general objection to homosexuality are obviously in favour of pink triangle badges, work camps, and, eventually, extreme methods.

 

800px-Gedenktafel_Rosa_Winkel_Nollendorf

 

But I realise the US can be a bit strange. Its not uncommon in the US to find a public toilet, the gents, where there are no doors on the stalls, presumably because Americans like watching each other take a dump.

 

Walmart toilet. At least its clean

 

cjbks30gldf91.jpg?width=1080&crop=smart&

99473-a467ab686c0ab7573830dce739b6934f.j

 

How do you lot manage it?

 

Of course, given your obsession with the toilet and girl's changing rooms, this could be just the thing to civilise public facilties, where we are forced to watch disgustingly fat old people waddle around starkers, or be super awkward at the trough with the bloke who is clearly knocking one out. In much of Continental Europe, you don't have a stall, you have a proper floor to ceiling room, with your own sink. At the public swimming baths, you can struggle into your cossie in the privacy of your own room. Governments will finally spend some money on the ghastly facilities many schools here; many will recall the stone cold khazis, where you stared up at the sky, coz there was no roof.

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, cjinchiangrai said:

And what was the gay agenda that the achieved? Non-discrimination? Marriage equality? How does this affect you? If you do not want a gay marriage, don't get one. nobody is forcing you to do anything.

 

If you accept the replacement theory of immigration you are an evil bigot. It is patently anti-Semitic and racist. It is also nonsense.

 

What policies are targeting children? I have not seen anything that does not start with requests from the children. HRT and SRT are explicitly prohibited for minors.

So, I should just ignore all those saying they ARE replacing us in our homelands, and it is a "good thing" to do so?   Is "gentrification" of a neighborhood bad?  But doing the same thing to entire nations is not, somehow? 

 

Why are some people's cultures and traditions to be revered and respected, while others are to be derided and destroyed, even where the culture/traditions being attacked are of the indigenous people? 

 

Why are some people encouraged to celebrate having a homeland for their people, and others are condemned for the same? 

 

And, why is being CONSISTENT on this - supporting homelands + preservation of Culture and Traditions for ALL peoples - a "bad thing" - vs the Hypocritical position?

 

And, what does being Lebanese, Palestinian, or Israeli (= Semite) have to do with it?  What an ODD thing to say.  I doubt all of those which this comment ostensibly "defends" would want this association directed at them as a group.

On the "Gay Agenda" thing - are you really saying school districts did not include this propaganda in their official "curriculum" - rather than leave it to parents to discuss such matters with their children when THEY feel it is appropriate?   Have you missed the school board meetings where parents tried to read from the books in their school libraries, and were shut down for it being too pornographic?   Gay or Straight, that is INAPPROPRIATE for children - up to 18 years old.       

 

Once again, I have the CONSISTENT position - opposing ANY sexual-content directed at children.  Yet those who support pushing "gay" porn on kids will call that "bigoted." 

As bad as all that is, taking away a child's hope of EVER being a parent in a marriage with their own biological children, with castrating-drugs (which Trump supported in 2021) or surgical removal of parts of their bodies, is much, much worse.

  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Jingthing said:

You are very naive and/or a shameless Trump propagandist.

Trump is lazy.

He's a frail feeble completely insane old man who likes to golf, eat fast food, and is only running to dodge prison. 

If he wins, the Project 2025 people will actually do the work. 

I despise Trump, because he is a liar and con-man, who betrayed ALL the pro-middle-class policies he promised in 2016.  He flipped on all of it, instead.  That will be his legacy.

 

Prison?   LOL!!!  You mean the "trials" psy-op used to get him through the Republican primary without EVER addressing policy?    Any conviction will get flipped on appeal.  He won't be doing any "hard time," is for sure.

 

Like Russiagate, this is yet another trick to con people into thinking Trump is their guy, after he did everything which those they claim to hate wanted for 4 years as president.  When did Trump EVER stand-up to those the Trump-fans hate?  He hired them to run every agency, and backed their every play.  He even kept backing their policies AFTER leaving the WH.  Have you seen the idiotic "4D-Chess" excuses they still make for all this?

 

The same people will "do the work" in a next Trump administration who did it the last time.  They are around him right now in his campaign.  This time, he doesn't even have someone like Bannon talking populism, who he would then throw under the bus, after using them to get votes.  Trump will support Big-Pharma, the MIC / Neocons, "socially progressive" policies - the same as the last time - the opposite of what his supporters want on every policy. 

 

Trump fans will support him as he betrays us, just as Harris fans will support her, as she betrays us with many of the very same policies.  There is no real choice on the ballot.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Project 2025 is a Heritage Foundation fascist manifesto developed by former Trump staffers. Trump himself does not care about gays or abortion other than that is the price of his fascist minions giving him more power. He will screw over anyone to gain power and avoid prison.

 

If you are willing to trust a convicted felon, sexual predator and thief then you are a fool. Thousands have been stabbed in the back by Trump over the years and the MAGA morons do not yet see that they are being fleeced by a conman. It is not about you or any of his sycophants, it is about lining Trumps pockets and avoiding prison. If he manages to win or steal the election, he will turn over the business to the likes of Stephan Miller and just take a cut of the grift.

Agree on the 1st part - Trump has no honor, principles, etc - is just a con-man. 

 

But the "felon" bit - LOL!!  Those silly show-trials to make him look like the enemy of the big evil deep-state?   Never mind he did everything they wanted as president, without exception, the last time.

 

I am always surprised how Trump fans and haters will both buy the same propaganda-moves, simply taking opposite sides on the same thing.  

 

I just stick to policy - not personalities and the psy-ops run to build "energy" around them.  Either the candidate supports the policies I support, or they don't.  Neither Harris or Trump remotely support anything good for average Americans, so why would I support either? 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Keep in mind that this is a Thai forum, not American. Everyone in Thailand knows some trans people and have no desire to remove their personal freedoms. This argument will get you and your Russian masters nowhere.

Keep in mind that this forum is in English and has a section for people to discuss world politics. This topic has nothing to do with Thailand, if their country likes and encourages sex changes it should be respected.  similarly  the rules of countries where gays are executed for perversion should also be respected, right?

 

I don't know how the Russians got involved but that's a typical trip of the morally and intellectually bankrupt, blame the Russians for everything.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...