.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png.8488ab72b8bb2e508209bfe3211b6e08.png)
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
-
Latest posts...
-
263
Photos of destruction as a result of the incompetent world leader & his party
No he is just being a smart ars, everyone likes a little but no one likes a smart -
263
Photos of destruction as a result of the incompetent world leader & his party
You must understand, Lacessit, that it's a fact for you. But not for everyone. There are scientists who strongly disagree and have made quite rational arguments countering climate change claims. And I should be very specific and say "human induced" climate change, for no one disagrees with the fact that the climate is in constant flux. As long as there is contentious debate then, to be fair, no side gets to claim their theories are fact. Until such time as there is definitive proof beyond a reasonable doubt then, sorry to say, it's all in the realm of belief. It's not to say, though, that your belief cannot be true. But until proven conclusively it is considered belief. Perhaps one day you'll be vindicated and you'll get to say, "I told you so." Until then, show respect for others who believe otherwise, for whatever reasons. You cannot fairly disparage them as long as doubts remain. One point I'd like to raise with you, and other human induced climate change proponents, is the aspect of honesty. For those who believe in human induced climate change are quick to throw out the "95% of scientists agree" argument, as even that percentage has been up for debate. The true percentage aside, it's a dishonest argument for one solid reason: it's a well known logical fallacy. The ad populum fallacy is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone claims something is true because many people believe it is. It's also known as the bandwagon fallacy, appeal to popularity, or appeal to numbers. Put simply, it is the fallacy in which it is argued that consensus equates to truth. It's a blatant falsity. I'd be very wary about using false arguments to simply bolster your position. That risks credibility. For if one is willing to use a known false argument once then the question naturally begs, what other false arguments are being used. If too many false arguments are used then your credibility is lost forever. Just a word of fair warning. -
129
Democracy has failed the US,maybe it's time for a King
Churchill said” democracy is the worst form of government apart from all those other forms that have been tried from time to time”. -
13
Homeless Man with blowtorch, suspected of arson during the Los Angeles wildfires
Deport the illegal and the convicted criminals that started these different fires and crimes. They need to be doing something that shows them that this isn’t acceptable in the USA -
0
Do Thais Ever Really Say That They Are Sorry?
Although the title of this topic might appear like it is intended to stir the pot, I assure you that it's not, and the question here is one that is more philosophical than literal. In the Thai language there are two primary phrases that are regularly used to express being sorry: kaw tod (ขอโทษ) and kaw upai (ขออภัย). There are of course many other slight variations of these two main phrases, some perhaps stronger in meaning or more polite in context, but they are fundamentally merely all variations of the same. At first glance, these phrases might seem like equivalents to “I’m sorry” in English, but I believe that they are both different. And their meanings and implications actually reveal something deeper about Thai cultural values. Kaw tod literally means “I ask for the blame” or “I take the blame.” This expression focuses on accepting responsibility for a mistake, akin to saying, “I acknowledge that this was my fault.” Meanwhile, kaw upai translates to “I ask for forgiveness.” This phrase is less about taking blame and more about seeking to repair a relationship or restore harmony after an offense has occurred. What’s particularly interesting is that neither phrase contains an explicit emotional element of regret or, in a Western sense, sorrow. They focus more on social dynamics, either accepting blame or repairing the connection, rather than addressing personal feelings of guilt. By comparison, English expressions of apology, such as “I’m sorry” or “I apologize,” emphasize the guilty party's emotional state, thus highlighting their regret or remorse. This distinction raises an interesting question: does the concept of apology, as Westerners understand it, an emotional act of expressing regret, truly even exist in Thai culture? Or is the Thai approach less about personal feelings and more about restoring balance and maintaining face in relationships? As one might gather, Thai culture is often influenced by Buddhism, which is in itself a philosophical Asian approach that values humility and the acceptance of man's imperfection. Mistakes that are made are often viewed as natural and partially unavoidable, being part of the human condition. In this context, kaw tod can be seen as an acknowledgment of karma, a way of saying, “I accept the consequences of my actions.” Similarly, kaw upai is about seeking release from the disruption caused by those actions, not just for oneself but for the other party and the bilateral relationship as a whole. This cultural difference can sometimes lead to misunderstandings for Westerners interacting with Thais. To a Westerner, a Thai apology might feel somewhat insincere, lacking the emotional depth typically associated with saying that one is “sorry.” But for a Thai person, the act of apologizing is less about expressing regret and more about fulfilling a social obligation to restore harmony between two people and to move on beyond a conflict. On the flip side, one could argue that the Western emphasis on emotional apologies can lead to excessive dwelling on guilt and regret. Thus, is it better to focus on personal remorse, or to prioritize smoothing over relationships and moving forward? The Thai approach, rooted in humility and practicality, might offer a valuable lesson in simply letting go. In the end, the Thai language’s nuanced approach to saying “sorry” offers a fascinating insight into Thai culture and social values. It reminds us that even universal experiences, like apologizing, are shaped by deeply ingrained philosophies about life, relationships, and human nature from both a Buddhist and Asian perspective. -
37
Another go with Monurol to kill my prostatitis...
Some patients will feel an ease after a week, some after a month.
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now