4 minutes ago, MalcolmB said:

Now I am confused.

I think you will find more on the right hate Jews. It is across the political spectrum. 
And across the world.

 

Why do you think that is?

I dont know, why? Because they’re successful?

13 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

She has more rallies because:

 

(a) Trump is noticeably low energy

 

(b) The Dems don't have to pay Harris's legal bills. The GOP is low on funds to pay for rallies.

 

(c) Some cities won't let Trump hold a rally until he pays his bills for the last one. The mayor of Erie, Pennsylvania demanded payment up front for garbage collection and traffic control.

 

The rally barb from Harris lives on rent-free in Trump's head. And some supporters, apparently.

delusional . com

1 hour ago, animalmagic said:

But he is the same as most politicians nowadays.  Soon to be replaced as his policies become more meaningful to him but not anyone else.  

There you go I've helped you with your post.  Sorry to appear sexist but I thought them/they might be too woke!

Trump is not a politician. With him what you see and hear is what you get. Hate was too strong a word to use however, for many people, Swift is a pain in the neck, with little talent, and generally a waste of time when compared with genuinely great performers. 

16 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

why, Trump wants to stop wars, those 2 named are pro war, no wonder they have switched, Dems are the pro-war party now

 

They have not switched and remain Republicans. The Republican party has been taken over by Russian enablers and is not the party of responsible government .

45 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

That ditzy woman filleted Trump like a trout in the debate. He was reduced to rabbiting on about immigrants eating dogs.

 

First you are saying Taylor Swift is of no account, now Harris. I'd say you have a problem with successful women.

Ohh please. That debate as you call it was so one-sided. Asking Harris simple yes and no questions. downplaying and retorting everything Trump said. As well as only fact checking only Trump when Harris lied so many times. The people controlling the debate gave their own opinions against Trump and sided with all Harris said. When they were only supposed to ask the questions. You need to look at that debate with a different set of eyes. It was made for Harris to save face. Scripted for the most part. 

3 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

 

They have not switched and remain Republicans. The Republican party has been taken over by Russian enablers and is not the party of responsible government .

ahh, if in doubt, roll out the ol'  Russia Russia Russia nonsense. 

A post attempting to derail  the topic into, Gaza, Jews, History and Hamas has been removed. Please stop now.

59 minutes ago, Tug said:

Hate to break it to ya (not really) as I type opera Winfrey is holding a large ralley to help Harris so…..Obama/opera/swift/lots of trumps old cabinet members/liz and dick Cheney are endorsing Harris……and just who is endorsing poor little donney?nobody and Taylor swift the mega star for years allready only has to remain popular till Nov……I don’t see that changing hummm?flush the orange tu&d enough!!

Hey WOW... and Jane Fonda is going door to door.. What does that have any meaning for with the would-be President? They are as gullible as you. You should follow them all until you die. But for so me. I see a woman whose only accomplishments in her profession as well as VP to be one-sided. A prosecutor following procedures given to her by another person so she can make someone look bad enough to imprison. As VP she had no accomplishments and failed miserably at running her mouth on her own as well as with the jobs she was told to do. 

 

1 hour ago, herfiehandbag said:

Was she a Trump supporter? She certainly was in Biden's camp last time round, and Trump's claim that she endorsed him just a couple of weeks ago has been exposed as a pack of lies.

 

If you look carefully at what she said, yes she said that she personally would vote for Harris/Waltz, her message to young people was to register and vote! She said that they must make their own decisions as to who they vote for.

 

She rather appears to have the cat vote!

Can i eat her pussy? 

2 minutes ago, Thingamabob said:

Trump is not a politician. With him what you see and hear is what you get. Hate was too strong a word to use however, for many people, Swift is a pain in the neck, with little talent, and generally a waste of time when compared with genuinely great performers. 

 

Unfortunately for you, Lawrence Welk died sometime ago and the Branson Mo.  type of entertainment just isn't attracting the kinds of  crowds that can  keep the entertainment venues open. As more of them close, it contributes to Republican Branson's unemployment rate of 9.1%.·  Republican Branson has seen the job market decrease by -10.7% over the last year. 

 

There are always  Cruises  for your type of fun with their cruise line  spectacular shows.

 

 

12 minutes ago, thesetat2013 said:

Can i eat her pussy? 

12 year olds are giggling along with you.

2 hours ago, thesetat2013 said:

She has the appeal now. But she is the same as most singers nowadays. Soon to be replaced as her songs become more meaningful to her but not to anyone else.

5555....funny.  Yeah, in 20 years, Taylor Swift will not be as big as she is today.  But in 2024, she's the biggest star on the planet.  So yeah, she might matter in the 2024 election.

Trump is not without his own 'A' List supporters. This picture of the crowd at a recent Trump rally shows several 'movie stars' enjoying themselves.555

 

16 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

 

Unfortunately for you, Lawrence Welk died sometime ago and the Branson Mo.  type of entertainment just isn't attracting the kinds of  crowds that can  keep the entertainment venues open. As more of them close, it contributes to Republican Branson's unemployment rate of 9.1%.·  Republican Branson has seen the job market decrease by -10.7% over the last year. 

 

There are always  Cruises  for your type of fun with their cruise line  spectacular shows.

 

 

No idea what you're talking about.

 

For your info my favourite group was the Stones, later Queen.

 

BTW us oldies really knew how to party, in spades. Some of us still do, age notwithstanding.

 

Have a nice day.

2 hours ago, mdr224 said:

Democrats are antisemitic and antiamerican. The party is looney tunes now

Look in the mirror, Republicans are a Joke as long as you support Roe Wade you will continue to LOSE , Women will change the demographics, Watch and Learn 

7 hours ago, Social Media said:

 

Donald Trump's recent outburst declaring "I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT" is more than just an ill-advised comment; it’s an unwinnable fight against a cultural force too powerful to be easily dismissed. Trump has never shied away from picking fights, but this one, involving the world’s biggest pop star, seems destined to backfire. So, why would he and his supporters provoke such an influential figure?

 

The answer may lie in Trump's keen awareness of how deeply intertwined culture and politics are. Trump, himself a former reality TV star, knows that public figures with immense cultural sway—like Taylor Swift—can impact political landscapes. Unlike most celebrity endorsements, which often go unnoticed, Swift wields an unusual level of influence, much like Oprah Winfrey in her heyday. Her fan base spans generations, with crossover appeal from her country music beginnings to her current dominance as a pop icon. 

 

Swift's visibility is at an all-time high. With NFL season in full swing and Swift dating Kansas City Chiefs’ tight end Travis Kelce, the cameras follow her wherever she goes—especially when she’s cheering on the Chiefs. This added exposure means her presence is unavoidable, even for those uninterested in her music. 

 

But where Swift truly becomes a formidable opponent for Trump is in her ability to galvanize young voters. Young women in particular feel a deep connection to Swift, a bond that’s difficult to quantify but undeniable. Any attempts by parents or political figures to criticize or boycott her are futile. These fans, many of whom have reached voting age in the last four years, are poised to make an impact in the 2024 election. Swift’s influence isn’t about convincing middle-aged voters to change sides; it’s about inspiring young people, especially women, to register and vote.

 

Swift's power is already showing. Reports have surfaced that her endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris drove hundreds of thousands of new voter registrations on Vote.gov. And in key swing states, where just a few thousand votes can swing the outcome, Swift’s involvement could be pivotal. For instance, Wisconsin saw a surge in new voter registrations after Swift voiced her support for Harris, according to data from the Wisconsin Elections Commission.

 

Trump’s attack on Swift could end up driving even more voters to the polls—voters who may not have otherwise been engaged politically. These include not only Swift's young fans but also groups Trump has struggled with: suburban women and others already uneasy about his politics. Harris and her running mate, Governor Tim Walz, have embraced the opportunity. In fact, Walz recently posted an Instagram video referencing Swift’s music and wearing one of her signature friendship bracelets, a playful yet strategic nod to her fans.

 

As for Swift, she’s likely to continue handling Trump's attacks with her characteristic grace, “shaking it off” in public while her fans rally behind her. For Trump, picking a fight with the world’s biggest pop star may ultimately alienate voters he desperately needs—and in an election as tight as the upcoming one, those lost votes could make all the difference.

 

Credit: The Hill 2024-09-20

 

 

 

Dream on...

7 hours ago, Social Media said:

 

Donald Trump's recent outburst declaring "I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT" is more than just an ill-advised comment; it’s an unwinnable fight against a cultural force too powerful to be easily dismissed. Trump has never shied away from picking fights, but this one, involving the world’s biggest pop star, seems destined to backfire. So, why would he and his supporters provoke such an influential figure?

 

The answer may lie in Trump's keen awareness of how deeply intertwined culture and politics are. Trump, himself a former reality TV star, knows that public figures with immense cultural sway—like Taylor Swift—can impact political landscapes. Unlike most celebrity endorsements, which often go unnoticed, Swift wields an unusual level of influence, much like Oprah Winfrey in her heyday. Her fan base spans generations, with crossover appeal from her country music beginnings to her current dominance as a pop icon. 

 

Swift's visibility is at an all-time high. With NFL season in full swing and Swift dating Kansas City Chiefs’ tight end Travis Kelce, the cameras follow her wherever she goes—especially when she’s cheering on the Chiefs. This added exposure means her presence is unavoidable, even for those uninterested in her music. 

 

But where Swift truly becomes a formidable opponent for Trump is in her ability to galvanize young voters. Young women in particular feel a deep connection to Swift, a bond that’s difficult to quantify but undeniable. Any attempts by parents or political figures to criticize or boycott her are futile. These fans, many of whom have reached voting age in the last four years, are poised to make an impact in the 2024 election. Swift’s influence isn’t about convincing middle-aged voters to change sides; it’s about inspiring young people, especially women, to register and vote.

 

Swift's power is already showing. Reports have surfaced that her endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris drove hundreds of thousands of new voter registrations on Vote.gov. And in key swing states, where just a few thousand votes can swing the outcome, Swift’s involvement could be pivotal. For instance, Wisconsin saw a surge in new voter registrations after Swift voiced her support for Harris, according to data from the Wisconsin Elections Commission.

 

Trump’s attack on Swift could end up driving even more voters to the polls—voters who may not have otherwise been engaged politically. These include not only Swift's young fans but also groups Trump has struggled with: suburban women and others already uneasy about his politics. Harris and her running mate, Governor Tim Walz, have embraced the opportunity. In fact, Walz recently posted an Instagram video referencing Swift’s music and wearing one of her signature friendship bracelets, a playful yet strategic nod to her fans.

 

As for Swift, she’s likely to continue handling Trump's attacks with her characteristic grace, “shaking it off” in public while her fans rally behind her. For Trump, picking a fight with the world’s biggest pop star may ultimately alienate voters he desperately needs—and in an election as tight as the upcoming one, those lost votes could make all the difference.

 

Credit: The Hill 2024-09-20

 

 

 

Dream on...

11 minutes ago, Irish star said:

Republicans are a Joke as long as you support Roe Wade you will continue to LOSE

If Roe VS Wade was such an important issue for "democrats"  then why did Clinton,Obama and Biden  all fail to codify the ruling into law ?

2 hours ago, mdr224 said:

Democrats hate jews while at the same time virtue signal for them. How bizarre

So why is Trump complaining that he gets a minority of the Jewish vote?

 

How bizarre is that?!

 

Maybe you’re wrong.

 

https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/sep/19/trump-jewish-voters-election

46 minutes ago, johng said:

If Roe VS Wade was such an important issue for "democrats"  then why did Clinton,Obama and Biden  all fail to codify the ruling into law ?

Well I guess we woke up to 2025 Agenda lol

1 hour ago, Berkshire said:

5555....funny.  Yeah, in 20 years, Taylor Swift will not be as big as she is today.  But in 2024, she's the biggest star on the planet.  So yeah, she might matter in the 2024 election.

400,000 new voter registrations 

55 minutes ago, johng said:

If Roe VS Wade was such an important issue for "democrats"  then why did Clinton,Obama and Biden  all fail to codify the ruling into law ?

Silly question.  Everyone believed Roe to be settled law. 

6 hours ago, herfiehandbag said:

It was a pathetic outburst from an entirely self centred sad old man, who has just realised that politically and in terms of celebrity status, the image he has of himself has crumbled. An image as fake and unconvincing as his improbably incredibly coloured fake hairstyle!

 

Taylor Swift of course also has an image, carefully constructed and burnished, but one altogether more credible, appealing and attractive than Trump.

She also has nicer legs!

 

As you may have gathered, I don't like the fellow.

 

Your loss.

Billie Eilish has added her endorsement of Harris.

49 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

lets tally up the Trump threads compared to Harris threads, or even Biden ones (remember him?) the Trump ones will be X20 of any of the others.

i think you will find it's El Trumpo that is living rent free in all your heads..... you cannot go a day without getting all frothy mouthed and spewing your anger in writing here.
it's commonly know as ......  (insert acronym)

And yet here you are constantly supporting the loser.

49 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

lets tally up the Trump threads compared to Harris threads, or even Biden ones (remember him?) the Trump ones will be X20 of any of the others.

i think you will find it's El Trumpo that is living rent free in all your heads..... you cannot go a day without getting all frothy mouthed and spewing your anger in writing here.
it's commonly know as ......  (insert acronym)

More Trumpers here because they don’t fit in USA Fringe Voters  , Freaks 

58 minutes ago, Berkshire said:

Silly question.  Everyone believed Roe to be settled law. 

Except the three trump court appointees who testified under oath that they did.  They were nominated for the same reason as Clarence Thomas whose only qualification was he was anti Roe v Wade and willing to lie to congress about it.  

9 hours ago, Social Media said:

But where Swift truly becomes a formidable opponent for Trump is in her ability to galvanize young voters.

 

And yet, and yet...:

 

"In the national poll, Harris and Trump were tied at 47% among the 2,437 likely voters polled Sept. 11-16, according to a survey by The New York Times, The Philadelphia Inquirer and Siena College."

 

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/polls-shows-harris-trump-tied-nationally-tight-race-pennsylvania-2024-09-19/

 

So after Swift's "formidable" endorsement, the candidates are ......tied.

 

Lol. So perhaps Swift's influence on politics is, well, zero...since Harris was actually doing better before her endorsement...

 

I guess somebody needs to tell The Hill that young voters were always going to vote Harris anyway, this was never a key demographic for Trump. How do they get away with writing this nonsense?

2 hours ago, thesetat2013 said:

Ohh please. That debate as you call it was so one-sided. Asking Harris simple yes and no questions. downplaying and retorting everything Trump said. As well as only fact checking only Trump when Harris lied so many times. The people controlling the debate gave their own opinions against Trump and sided with all Harris said. When they were only supposed to ask the questions. You need to look at that debate with a different set of eyes. It was made for Harris to save face. Scripted for the most part. 

MAGA precept: when you are losing, find a conspiracy theory! 🤣

7 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

And yet, and yet...:

 

"In the national poll, Harris and Trump were tied at 47% among the 2,437 likely voters polled Sept. 11-16, according to a survey by The New York Times, The Philadelphia Inquirer and Siena College."

 

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/polls-shows-harris-trump-tied-nationally-tight-race-pennsylvania-2024-09-19/

 

So after Swift's "formidable" endorsement, the candidates are ......tied.

 

Lol. So perhaps Swift's influence on politics is, well, zero...since Harris was actually doing better before her endorsement...

 

I guess somebody needs to tell The Hill that young voters were always going to vote Harris anyway, this was never a key demographic for Trump. How do they get away with writing this nonsense?

Considering the margin of error, one single poll is meaningless.

Having said that, It's quite possible that this endorsement has little impact. However, Trump seems to believe it may have an impact, as he is furious about it. 😁

https://www.racetothewh.com/president/polls#google_vignette