Three more prominent Republicans ‘put country over party’ and endorse Harris

[Inderpland]

49 minutes ago, mogandave said:

So for every old has been Republican that comes out against Trump, there’s a million that support Trump, and ten Democats that come out against Harris, but none of them make the news. 

So how do you know about these dems coming out against Harris if it doesn't make the news? 

[mogandave]

9 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

Let's see:

 

Russia engaged in two wars in Chechnia that devastated Grozny;

 

The war with Georgia;

 

And the disaster in Ukraine.

 

But that doesn't bother you?

Does it bother you that Obama did nothing about Donbas? 

 

Does Obama’s hot-mike agreement with Putin bother you? 

 

Does it bother you that Obama refused to provide Ukraine with weapons? 

 

Does it bother you that Trump provided Ukraine with weapons after Obama did not?

 

Does it bother you that when Biden took office he canceled weapons to Ukraine?

 

 

 

 

 

[Inderpland]

2 minutes ago, mogandave said:

Does it bother you that Obama did nothing about Donbas? 

 

Does Obama’s hot-mike agreement with Putin bother you? 

 

Does it bother you that Obama refused to provide Ukraine with weapons? 

 

Does it bother you that Trump provided Ukraine with weapons after Obama did not?

 

Does it bother you that when Biden took office he canceled weapons to Ukraine?

 

 

 

 

 

What bothers me are posters making a string of claims without even trying to back them up.

[Cameroni]

Quote

Three more prominent Republicans ‘put country over party’ and endorse Harris

 

They're hardly "prominent", but they are all women.

 

It is becoming increasing clear that this election is the battle of the sexes, women against men.

 

Any man voting for Kamala Harris is a traitor to his gender.

[Inderpland]

1 minute ago, Cameroni said:

 

They're hardly "prominent", but they are all women.

 

It is becoming increasing clear that this election is the battle of the sexes, women against men.

 

Any man voting for Kamala Harris is a traitor to his gender.

It's becoming clearer and clearer that I need to spend less time on this particular forum. I don't surround myself with ****** in real life so why should I engage with them online.

[Cameroni]

2 minutes ago, Inderpland said:

It's becoming clearer and clearer that I need to spend less time on this particular forum. I don't surround myself with ****** in real life so why should I engage with them online.

 

That would be very welcomed, awesome news.

 

Start today!

[nauseus]

19 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

It's amazing to me how little influence "reasonable" Republicans have on the party as a whole. Probably 90% of Republicans are flat Earth ears these days, metaphorically speaking.

 

They might be earth ears but certainly not flat:

 

[Hanaguma]

On 9/28/2024 at 6:26 PM, Inderpland said:

Good to see there are still a few that haven't sold their souls.

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/three-more-prominent-republicans-put-151103096.html

hmmm.

 

My definition of "prominent" usually doesn't include an ex state insurance commissioner. But maybe that's just me. 

 

It is true that this is not the Republican party of Bob Dole or Eisenhower. Then again, today's Democratic party is not the party of JFK or Harry Truman. Both have evolved and grown more extreme.

[Inderpland]

The Republicans who are voting for Kamala Harris: ‘We don’t want someone that’s cavorting with dictators’

[Mazungu]

2 hours ago, mogandave said:

So for every old has been Republican that comes out against Trump, there’s a million that support Trump, and ten Democats that come out against Harris, but none of them make the news. 

 

Any old has-been Republcan can get a bit of the attention they crave coming out against Trump. 

Spoken like a true cultist. 

[Mazungu]

2 hours ago, mogandave said:

So for every old has been Republican that comes out against Trump, there’s a million that support Trump, and ten Democats that come out against Harris, but none of them make the news. 

 

Any old has-been Republcan can get a bit of the attention they crave coming out against Trump. 

Spoken like a true cultist. 👍

[Mazungu]

2 hours ago, mogandave said:

So for every old has been Republican that comes out against Trump, there’s a million that support Trump, and ten Democats that come out against Harris, but none of them make the news. 

 

Any old has-been Republcan can get a bit of the attention they crave coming out against Trump. 

Spoken like a true cultist. 👍

[Mazungu]

4 minutes ago, Mazungu said:

Spoken like a true cultist. 👍

Apologies. I guess I'm getting like Biden or Trump. 

[bubblegum]

1 hour ago, Cameroni said:

 

They're hardly "prominent", but they are all women.

 

It is becoming increasing clear that this election is the battle of the sexes, women against men.

 

Any man voting for Kamala Harris is a traitor to his gender.

You are a little scared boy. Afraid of women with power and homeless immigrants. Where's my gun? I need my gun to protect myself from these awful people.

[Danderman123]

3 hours ago, mogandave said:

So for every old has been Republican that comes out against Trump, there’s a million that support Trump, and ten Democats that come out against Harris, but none of them make the news. 

 

Any old has-been Republcan can get a bit of the attention they crave coming out against Trump. 

Former Republican Sen. Jeff Flake (Ariz.) announced Sunday he would be endorsing Vice President Harris in the upcoming election.

[Inderpland]

'JD Vance said Trump ‘thoroughly failed to deliver’ his economic agenda in uncovered 2020 messages'

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/jd-vance-said-trump-thoroughly-144707683.html

 

'In 2021, while campaigning for the US Senate seat he now holds, Vance asked people “not to judge me based on what I said” previously about the man he called, variously, a “cynical a**hole,” a “moral disaster,” a “total fraud,” an “idiot,” and “America’s Hitler.”'

[mogandave]

1 hour ago, Danderman123 said:

Former Republican Sen. Jeff Flake (Ariz.) announced Sunday he would be endorsing Vice President Harris in the upcoming election.

He is nothing if not aptly named. 

 

Support Harris: Fawning press.

 

Support Trump: DOJ investigation. 

[Danderman123]

Larry Hogan confirms he won’t vote for Trump, despite the former president’s endorsement

 

How many Trumpers will claim next year that they didn't vote for Trump?

[still kicking]

51 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Larry Hogan confirms he won’t vote for Trump, despite the former president’s endorsement

 

How many Trumpers will claim next year that they didn't vote for Trump?

At least halve on AN?

[thaibeachlovers]

19 hours ago, Mazungu said:

Judged by whom? I guess you didn't read the whole post...that means checking out the links. 

 

Since it doesn't seem you are an American (apparently you love Russia & China) here's a little lesson on the US-Mexican border. 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQc31eREO68&ab_channel=TheDailyShow

 

 

Seems you are another that deflects and makes things up.

[thaibeachlovers]

11 hours ago, Cameroni said:

 

That would be very welcomed, awesome news.

 

Start today!

+1

[mdr224]

So politicians and pop stars are what this forum says are good indications of who to follow,  not the average american who cant afford groceries and losing their benefits to illegals

[Danderman123]

42 minutes ago, mdr224 said:

So politicians and pop stars are what this forum says are good indications of who to follow,  not the average american who cant afford groceries and losing their benefits to illegals

Name one US citizen who has lost their benefits to illegals.

 

BTW, Trump's tariffs would make things even more expensive, so you are clearly misinformed.

[mdr224]

Just now, Danderman123 said:

Name one US citizen who has lost their benefits to illegals.

 

BTW, Trump's tariffs would make things even more expensive, so you are clearly misinformed.

I think anyone with common sense would rather take the risk than stick with more of the same. Americans either vote trump or they get priced out of their own country and have to move somewhere like thailand

[Danderman123]

46 minutes ago, mdr224 said:

So politicians and pop stars are what this forum says are good indications of who to follow,  not the average american who cant afford groceries and losing their benefits to illegals

Here is the impact of Project 2025 on the average American:

 

Project 2025’s Tax Plan Would Raise Taxes on the Middle Class and Cut Taxes for the Wealthy

 

"Specifically, Project 2025’s tax reform plan would:

 

Enact a two-income tax bracket system that would raise taxes by $3,000 for the median family of four—which makes about $110,000 a year—and raise taxes by $950 for the typical single-person household, which makes about $40,000 a year. (see Appendix for state-specific data)

 

Provide an average $1.5–2.4 million tax cut for the 45,000 U.S. households making more than $10 million annually from the combination of the “two-bracket” system and cuts to taxes on the wealthy’s investment income.

 

Cut the corporate tax rate to 18 percent, which amounts to a $24 billion tax cut for the Fortune 100."

[Danderman123]

2 minutes ago, mdr224 said:

I think anyone with common sense would rather take the risk than stick with more of the same. Americans either vote trump or they get priced out of their own country and have to move somewhere like thailand

In other words, you can't back up your nonsense post.

[mdr224]

Just now, Danderman123 said:

In other words, you can't back up your nonsense post.

Common sense > leftwing sources

[Danderman123]

1 minute ago, mdr224 said:

Common sense > leftwing sources

Tell us, using your common sense, what would be the financial impact of Trump's tariffs on the average American.

[mogandave]

16 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

Name one US citizen who has lost their benefits to illegals.

 

BTW, Trump's tariffs would make things even more expensive, so you are clearly misinformed.

If millions more people feeding at the same public trough, there is less to go around. 

 

It’s just arithmetic. 

[Danderman123]

3 hours ago, mogandave said:

If millions more people feeding at the same public trough, there is less to go around. 

 

It’s just arithmetic. 

Please give an example of a US citizen who lost benefits to an illegal immigrant.

 

Note that illegals mostly don't get government benefits, because of that "illegal" thing.