6 hours ago, animalmagic said:

That will annoy 45. It's a waste of 4,000 usd that he could have grifted for his campaign/pocket!

Imagine how he might feel in a few years time when it's worth increases by many multiples of what he paid for it. It's value will probably outstrip inflation.

4 minutes ago, phetphet said:

Imagine how he might feel in a few years time when it's worth increases by many multiples of what he paid for it. It's value will probably outstrip inflation.

That would be terrible 😇

6 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

No Jonny you can’t be prosecuted for ‘vandalizing your own property’

 

Despite having done so.

 

 

 

No Chomps.

 

If it's your property then it is not vandalism. 

 

https://www.mayestelles.com/legal-blog/2024/march/criminal-damage-understanding-the-legal-implicat/

 

 

It seems your remote diagnosis of his mental health issues was built on an incorrect premise.

 

Care to try again? 

7 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

No Chomps.

 

If it's your property then it is not vandalism. 

 

https://www.mayestelles.com/legal-blog/2024/march/criminal-damage-understanding-the-legal-implicat/

 

 

It seems your remote diagnosis of his mental health issues was built on an incorrect premise.

 

Care to try again? 

Again you resort to the definitions that apply to prosecutable vandalism, your chosen citation even starts by explaining it is refers to ‘Criminal Damage’. Doh!

 

Of course you can’t be prosecuted for vandalizing your own property, but it’s still vandalism as defined by the Oxford English Dictionary.

 

 

5 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

No not at all, you simply exposed your self stroked grievance.

There's no Swift in your last name🥸

3 minutes ago, mr336 said:

There's no Swift in your last name🥸

Well no.

 

Next.

It's just a nearly insane super freak, with too much cash on his hands, showing fealty to his political master. Be obedient my boy. You know me if someone says something bad about me I hate them, and If I don't like someone, you shouldn't either! 

16 hours ago, impulse said:

Just $4,000?  That's not much.  She could get 10x that much for a signed bra.  God only knows how much for a pair of....

 

 

.....used I hope?

12 hours ago, phetphet said:

Imagine how he might feel in a few years time when it's worth increases by many multiples of what he paid for it. It's value will probably outstrip inflation.

 

if Trump wins it might.

$4,000 is peanuts. The guitar obviously wasn't that treasured or unique. 

No doubt Ms Swift is really really upset by this.  Not.

This shmuck carries a hammer around?

 

On 10/2/2024 at 10:26 AM, Emdog said:

Taylor guitars aren't cheap and I assume that if she sold a stage played guitar it would be one of their more spendy models with a superior set up. here's a pic of her with one of hers on stage (doubt it was this model: goes for $10k)

Lovely picture, but you really shouldn't post it, it will only wind up the barking mad political fringe merchants!

 

Of course it is his property, to do with as he wants; but he is still a pillock!

On 10/2/2024 at 8:27 AM, impulse said:

Just $4,000?  That's not much.  She could get 10x that much for a signed bra.  God only knows how much for a pair of....

 

 

Funny you mention that, last time she was round at my place she left...

On 10/2/2024 at 3:33 AM, Social Media said:

As of now, Taylor Swift has yet to comment on the viral video, leaving fans and critics alike to continue debating the motivations and implications behind the shocking act.

She is busy writing up the lyrics for her latest song which is about someone who smashed up one of her guitars ..🤣

On 10/2/2024 at 7:26 AM, Gandtee said:

Who's Taylor Swift?😉

 

Bimbo billionaire singer mostly followed by teenage girls, and the British PM! 

13 hours ago, proton said:

 

Bimbo billionaire singer mostly followed by teenage girls, and the British PM! 

Some teenage girls can vote.