Thailand Eyes UN Human Rights Council Seat with Optimism

[bubblegum]

Just now, frank83628 said:

she denied the laptop was real, go and what the interview.. your whole thread is just you lying

She denied it had to do with Russia, your information source sucks. You are very quick calling other liars! Nasty habit.

[bunnydrops]

55 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

He was busy honouring the Jewish victims of the murderous Hamas animals. 

 

BTW, Didnt see Kamala doing that. Shes already lost the Muslim vote, but doesnt want to offend her Jew hating leftist base.

2. Jewish adults identify predominantly as liberal and with the Democratic Party

3. Jewish adults are also more likely to identify as Democrats and liberal when compared to
the national average.

https://ajpp.brandeis.edu/documents/2020/nationalprofileofthejewishelectoratein2020.pdf

[Yagoda]

1 minute ago, bunnydrops said:

2. Jewish adults identify predominantly as liberal and with the Democratic Party

3. Jewish adults are also more likely to identify as Democrats and liberal when compared to
the national average.

https://ajpp.brandeis.edu/documents/2020/nationalprofileofthejewishelectoratein2020.pdf

Your point makes no sense at all as a response to my post. 

[Yagoda]

3 minutes ago, bubblegum said:

She denied it had to do with Russia, your information source sucks. You are very quick calling other liars! Nasty habit.

LOL. How Ironic. Nasty LOL

[mdr224]

6 minutes ago, bunnydrops said:

2. Jewish adults identify predominantly as liberal and with the Democratic Party

3. Jewish adults are also more likely to identify as Democrats and liberal when compared to
the national average.

https://ajpp.brandeis.edu/documents/2020/nationalprofileofthejewishelectoratein2020.pdf

Not everyone votes for whats in their best interest. Trump is getting more jewish voters now than he did last time though

[Yagoda]

5 minutes ago, mdr224 said:

Not everyone votes for whats in their best interest. Trump is getting more jewish voters now than he did last time though

Well he sure as hell has Chabad now. Supposedly they are very influential among all spectrums of American jews.

[HappyExpat57]

13 hours ago, frank83628 said:

he already said he wouldn't do it unless they apologised for the way they behaved last time

The two main reasons 45 said he won't do the interview:

 

1.  He asked Lesley Stahl to apologize for something she never said. Cognative slippage to the max or made up bullsh!t.

 

2.  He didn't want them fact checking. EVERYONE gets fact checked by 60 minutes. Harris was able to go through their interview process - you shouldn't be worried about fact checking if you DON'T LIE!

 

This is beyond cult blindness, it's just plain ridiculous. Close your eyes and imagine if Obama had done ANY of the atrocities you people defend 45 of doing.

 

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/donald-trump-2024-60-minutes-interview-what-happened/

 

Just click past the ad blocker question if you use one.

[frank83628]

16 minutes ago, bubblegum said:

She denied it had to do with Russia, your information source sucks. You are very quick calling other liars! Nasty habit.

so you have just clicked on the 1st search result that came up and ran with that.

why not just link to the video to prove it instead, don't worry, i did it for you, so you can see for yourself.

the part in question starts at 12.50, Trump is referring to the laptop and the Bidens alleged payments, she denies it and argues with him, no mention of Russia. 

i linked the video or you can read a transcript of it in the Fox link after so you can also read it incase you're still in denial.
 

 

https://www.foxnews.com/media/60-minutes-defends-handling-hunter-biden-laptop-coverage-hits-trump-skipping-interview 

 

you really should look verify things a bit before posting, save embarrassing yourself in front of us stupid magas...AGAIN!.

 

all of your informations sources suck, but you still lap up everything you hear & read.

[frank83628]

12 minutes ago, HappyExpat57 said:

The two main reasons 45 said he won't do the interview:

 

1.  He asked Lesley Stahl to apologize for something she never said. Cognative slippage to the max or made up bullsh!t.

 

2.  He didn't want them fact checking. EVERYONE gets fact checked by 60 minutes. Harris was able to go through their interview process - you shouldn't be worried about fact checking if you DON'T LIE!

 

This is beyond cult blindness, it's just plain ridiculous. Close your eyes and imagine if Obama had done ANY of the atrocities you people defend 45 of doing.

 

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/donald-trump-2024-60-minutes-interview-what-happened/

 

Just click past the ad blocker question if you use one.

you should check you sources too, the 1st google search result is not always the best one.  i have posted the video and transcripted version for you to see. 

 

Edited 8 hours ago by frank83628

[bubblegum]

@frank83628 Dude he is just whining about though questions and then he leaves. That al it shows. You'd be a bad lawyer.

Edited 7 hours ago by bubblegum

[Wrwest]

17 hours ago, Celsius said:

Why does he need a debate? He is gonna win biggie.

I lean toward thinking it could be a squeaker but ... I am starting to think that this election will actually be an overwhelming defeat for Trump and his Project 2025 ilk. And this will be due to traditional Republicans voting against the current Trump party or not voting. Nope, not betting money or my life on it but my country is lost to me if my fellow citizens vote in the majority for Trump (he lost the popular vote by some 3 million in 2016, 7 million in 2020 and I am hopeful of 10 million+ in 2024).

[billd766]

3 hours ago, nauseus said:

 

Your accusation is not much of a "topic", let's face it.

And your response is far less.

 

3 hours ago, nauseus said:

I have no link because it was just shown on TV.

And where is YOUR link denying it?

[TheFishman1]

Why would anybody want all the drama and bigotry that Trump brings with him and all the baggage the guy lied to his wife. She was giving birth to his child. He lies about everything. I remember hearing a phone call where he called in saying he was richer than he really was, the thief he has no morals he’s not qualified to be the president and now all the phone calls to Putin. Trump is bad America. Trump is bad all the way around. 

[nauseus]

3 hours ago, bubblegum said:

She denied it had to do with Russia, your information source sucks. You are very quick calling other liars! Nasty habit.

 

The return of the calling pot!

[Look Chang]

4 hours ago, MalcolmB said:

Gee, Trump is a weak old lying clown.

Harris is useless. 
 

Voters have to decide who will be the least bad. 
 

Just shows how bad the USA is if these are best two people they could find to be President.

 

 

 

Yes, I am sincerely sorry to see that the people of this wonderful country will be led by an old liar or by a woman poorly competent for this noble task.

[nauseus]

11 minutes ago, billd766 said:

And your response is far less.

 

And where is YOUR link denying it?

 

If you want to defend your bubbly friends that's up  to you.

 

But I thought you were smarter than that.

[Etaoin Shrdlu]

4 hours ago, Yagoda said:

He was busy honouring the Jewish victims of the murderous Hamas animals. 

 

BTW, Didnt see Kamala doing that. Shes already lost the Muslim vote, but doesnt want to offend her Jew hating leftist base.

 

In between Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur, Tump honors the Jewish victims of October 7 by playing Village People's YMCA.

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-ends-october-7-memorial-144146452.html

 

Real class, huh?

 

[scorecard]

16 hours ago, frank83628 said:

he already said he wouldn't do it unless they apologised for the way they behaved last time

 

Does that have any substance?

[LosLobo]

 

4 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

Godwin's Law in action. A classic page from the leftist playbook.  

 

Ah, pulling out Godwin’s Law—classic. But let’s be real: that doesn’t magically invalidate my point; it’s just a dodge. Godwin’s Law is about how often Nazi comparisons come up, not whether they’re appropriate. If the comparison is reasonably accurate, it doesn’t violate Godwin’s Law; it’s a fair use of historical context.
 

Your “classic leftist playbook” remark? That’s a Tu Quoque Fallacy, or the “No, you!” tactic. Rather than addressing my point about projection, you deflect by accusing the other side. You’re not playing chess; you’re flipping the board and blaming me for the pieces on the floor.
 

And the False Equivalence—not every Nazi analogy is equal. Comparing tactics accurately isn’t “leftist”; it’s historically informed.
 

In short, you’ve avoided the argument with distractions. Try engaging with the actual content next time

[theshu25]

36 minutes ago, TheFishman1 said:

Why would anybody want all the drama and bigotry that Trump brings with him and all the baggage the guy lied to his wife. She was giving birth to his child. He lies about everything. I remember hearing a phone call where he called in saying he was richer than he really was, the thief he has no morals he’s not qualified to be the president and now all the phone calls to Putin. Trump is bad America. Trump is bad all the way around. 

Totally agree with you,The orange animal is a scumbag of the higest order. Can only hope he gets jail soon.

[mushroomdave]

Another month to go Orange Man!

The snake oil runneth low.

Tick Tock, Tick Tock!!
"Lock Him Up, Lock Him Up !!"
 

[Yagoda]

1 hour ago, Etaoin Shrdlu said:

 

In between Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur, Tump honors the Jewish victims of October 7 by playing Village People's YMCA.

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-ends-october-7-memorial-144146452.html

 

Real class, huh?

 

His audience seemed to like it. Thats what counts, not anonymous net trolls with an agenda.

[LosLobo]

Interesting part of 60 Mins directly addressing chicken Trump, not in other videos posted here.
 

 

[candide]

5 hours ago, frank83628 said:

so you have just clicked on the 1st search result that came up and ran with that.

why not just link to the video to prove it instead, don't worry, i did it for you, so you can see for yourself.

the part in question starts at 12.50, Trump is referring to the laptop and the Bidens alleged payments, she denies it and argues with him, no mention of Russia. 

i linked the video or you can read a transcript of it in the Fox link after so you can also read it incase you're still in denial.
 

 

https://www.foxnews.com/media/60-minutes-defends-handling-hunter-biden-laptop-coverage-hits-trump-skipping-interview 

 

you really should look verify things a bit before posting, save embarrassing yourself in front of us stupid magas...AGAIN!.

 

all of your informations sources suck, but you still lap up everything you hear & read.

According to your source, she did not directly claim the laptop was fake, she denied that Biden was in the mist of the scandal. She justified her reply by the fact that she could not verify the content, which was true as Giuliani only gave a copy to the NYPost at that time.

Quote from the article:

At the time, Trump insisted that then-candidate Joe Biden was "in the midst of a scandal," referring to reports about the email's contents showing his involvement in his son's overseas business dealings.

"He's not," Stahl replied. 

"Of course he is, Lesley," Trump sternly doubled down. 

"No, c'mon," Stahl continued to reject the president's claim, before lecturing him, "This is '60 Minutes' and we can't put on things that we can't verify."

 

Interestingly enough, the article confirms that CBS was only able to verify the content in 2022, after it got a copy!

[billd766]

2 hours ago, scorecard said:

 

Does that have any substance?

Only to Trump and not to real people.

[frank83628]

49 minutes ago, candide said:

According to your source, she did not directly claim the laptop was fake, she denied that Biden was in the mist of the scandal. She justified her reply by the fact that she could not verify the content, which was true as Giuliani only gave a copy to the NYPost at that time.

Quote from the article:

At the time, Trump insisted that then-candidate Joe Biden was "in the midst of a scandal," referring to reports about the email's contents showing his involvement in his son's overseas business dealings.

"He's not," Stahl replied. 

"Of course he is, Lesley," Trump sternly doubled down. 

"No, c'mon," Stahl continued to reject the president's claim, before lecturing him, "This is '60 Minutes' and we can't put on things that we can't verify."

 

Interestingly enough, the article confirms that CBS was only able to verify the content in 2022, after it got a copy!

my 'source' being the 60 minute video itself, well Lesley Stahl's narrated version.  

 

i watched it, i know exactly what was said, neither of them mentioned the laptop directly, however that was the scandal Trump referred at that point of the interview

[thailand49]

In all fairness after what happened to him first debate along with Harris not answering any of the question what really is the point.

60 minutes is a good program but has shown in interviews within politics they are bias and their bosses sadly are calling all the shots.

With Fox, the two the network  are good but have shown a bit soft on questions. Trump suggested hangup he wanted Jessie and Hannity, Harris camp wanted nothing to do with the two and do you blame her. When the shoe is on the other foot No one likes to be set up.

[Deputy7]

He never chickens out! She is to stupid to be in a debate, he’s not wasting his time!  Watch FoX news will you?

[Fat is a type of crazy]

1 hour ago, candide said:

According to your source, she did not directly claim the laptop was fake, she denied that Biden was in the mist of the scandal. She justified her reply by the fact that she could not verify the content, which was true as Giuliani only gave a copy to the NYPost at that time.

Quote from the article:

At the time, Trump insisted that then-candidate Joe Biden was "in the midst of a scandal," referring to reports about the email's contents showing his involvement in his son's overseas business dealings.

"He's not," Stahl replied. 

"Of course he is, Lesley," Trump sternly doubled down. 

"No, c'mon," Stahl continued to reject the president's claim, before lecturing him, "This is '60 Minutes' and we can't put on things that we can't verify."

 

Interestingly enough, the article confirms that CBS was only able to verify the content in 2022, after it got a copy!

If only the Trump supporters could read this post and similar ones and stop pulling out the Hunter censorship argument every five minutes. 

[candide]

1 hour ago, frank83628 said:

my 'source' being the 60 minute video itself, well Lesley Stahl's narrated version.  

 

i watched it, i know exactly what was said, neither of them mentioned the laptop directly, however that was the scandal Trump referred at that point of the interview

Ok. However, Trump now claims she said the laptop was from Russia, which she didn't.