Jump to content








If AN members could vote in the USA election, who would we vote in?


MalcolmB

Who would you give your vote to?  

39 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

This is basically Kremlin propaganda.

We already know Trump's so called peace plan. Vance leaked it.

Total surrender of Ukraine to Russia.

Everything for Russia.

Nothing for Ukraine.

In such a temporary solution that Ukraine would never agree to anyway, the current lines would be frozen, allowing Russia to regroup for their next assault.

It would reward them for their villainy. No friggin way!

The nuke threats from Putin are BLUFFS. 

 

No, it's Kamala propaganda.

 

She said it in the debate, remember? Unqualified, unlimited, total support for Ukraine to fight Russia. So she wants to pour gasoline on the fire.

 

Net result, if Russia is forced to use a nuclear device at some point, the US and NATO response will determine if we all live or die. I can guarantee you now if the US or NATO make it a hot war Russia would use nuclear bombs if her survival is threatened.

 

So clearly, Trump's option to end the UKraine war is an option that is safer for all of us. Including, above all Ukrainians. As President Pavel reminded Zelensky, if you kill half the population of Ukraine it will never be a victory, no matter what happens. Zelensky does not seem to get it.

 

Reward Russia for "villainy"? Declaring war is the right of every state, it is no way "villainous". The lies and deception NATO served Russia for decades was villainous.

 

Whether Russia's threats of nuclear bombs is a bluff or not is not something you want to find out, Jinghthing. Trust me.

 

Let's end the war instead. It's safer.

Edited by Cameroni
Link to comment
Share on other sites


10 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

No, it's Kamala propaganda.

 

She said it in the debate, remember? Unqualified, unlimited, total support for Ukraine to fight Russia. So she wants to pour gasoline on the fire.

 

Net result, if Russia is forced to use a nuclear device at some point, the US and NATO response will determine if we all live or die. I can guarantee you now if the US or NATO make it a hot war Russia would use nuclear bombs if her survival is threatened.

 

So clearly, Trump's option to end the UKraine war is an option that is safer for all of us. Including, above all Ukrainians. As President Pavel reminded Zelensky, if you kill half the population of Ukraine it will never be a victory, no matter what happens. Zelensky does not seem to get it.

 

Reward Russia for "villainy"? Declaring war is the right of every state, it is no way "villainous". The lies and deception NATO served Russia for decades was villainous.

 

Whether Russia's threats of nuclear bombs is a bluff or not is not something you want to find out, Jinghthing. Trust me.

 

Let's end the war instead. It's safer.

Trump doesn't want to end the war. He wants to make Putin happy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Cameroni said:

 

He does want to end it, question is if he actually can.

His peace plan is NOT ending it!

Do you seriously not get that?

His plan is a freeze, giving Russia everything, meaning there is nothing to stop them after being rewarded like that, to continue their barbaric attempt at genocide of Ukraine at a later date.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

His peace plan is NOT ending it!

Do you seriously not get that?

His plan is a freeze, giving Russia everything, meaning there is nothing to stop them after being rewarded like that, to continue their barbaric attempt at genocide of Ukraine at a later date.

 

Russia does not want a genocide of is Slav brethren in Ukraine. Russia merely wants a neighbour that is not pro American, pro Western and is not a member of NATO. It's a national security issue, not an ideology or racial issue.

 

They have not indicated they want the rest of Ukraine.  Whatever happens Russia will keep Donbass and Crimea. The only question is how many Ukrainian soldiers and civilians have to die. The sooner the Ukraine negotiates the better it will be for the Ukrainians.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cameroni said:

 

No, it's Kamala propaganda.

 

She said it in the debate, remember? Unqualified, unlimited, total support for Ukraine to fight Russia. So she wants to pour gasoline on the fire.

 

Net result, if Russia is forced to use a nuclear device at some point, the US and NATO response will determine if we all live or die. I can guarantee you now if the US or NATO make it a hot war Russia would use nuclear bombs if her survival is threatened.

 

So clearly, Trump's option to end the UKraine war is an option that is safer for all of us. Including, above all Ukrainians. As President Pavel reminded Zelensky, if you kill half the population of Ukraine it will never be a victory, no matter what happens. Zelensky does not seem to get it.

 

Reward Russia for "villainy"? Declaring war is the right of every state, it is no way "villainous". The lies and deception NATO served Russia for decades was villainous.

 

Whether Russia's threats of nuclear bombs is a bluff or not is not something you want to find out, Jinghthing. Trust me.

 

Let's end the war instead. It's safer.

I don't believe even you believe that. Bye.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...