Jump to content

Housing Benefit Freeze Leaves Low-Income Renters Struggling as Rent Soars, Experts Warn


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Truncating posts to remove context Jonny.

 

 

Isn't that what you do?

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

So no arguments then from you about the previous 14 years of failure to deal with the housing shortage.

Isn't this whataboutery Chomper?

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

So no arguments then from you about the previous 14 years of failure to deal with the housing shortage.

 

But you want it fixed in 4 months.

 

I am simply asking how the new house building programme is getting on.

I don't expect it to be complete in four months .

I am asking whether Labour will keep to their election  promises or just forget about what they promised

  • Agree 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

I am simply asking how the new house building programme is getting on.

I don't expect it to be complete in four months .

I am asking whether Labour will keep to their election  promises or just forget about what they promised

They'd love to do it but the Tories left a 22bn hole in the finances and they need that 22bn for carbon capture  obviously many newly formed consultancies will have to be paid also.

  • Haha 1
Posted
7 hours ago, john donson said:

I wonder how thai people cope, with no handout

 

the moo baan I lived for 15 years, saw rent increases from 25.000 baht just after covid, to 40.000 baht now, for exactly the same old houses

By moving in with others where there is little to no privacy. Anything split 4 ways becomes affordable.

Posted
7 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Redirecting money from supporting rents to building affordable homes makes sense.

 

Far too much tax payer’s money is being piped through to the pockets of buy to let landlords.

 

Time to build the affordable homes the nation needs and stop funding private profits from public need.

 

 

 

I wouldnt live next to "affordable" housing if you paid me..........its council houses disguised under a trendy name, theyll end up being  dumps and demolished in 30 years, rinse and repeat, thats whats been done since the 50's council house by me  built in the 70's demolished as slums even though well built.  Dont see any privately owned  houses demolished  in such a short time frame.Its money down the drain, if they dont own it and get cheap rent they couldnt care less about it. Its not the houses its the type of people who live in them.

  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

I am simply asking how the new house building programme is getting on.

I don't expect it to be complete in four months .

I am asking whether Labour will keep to their election  promises or just forget about what they promised


Time will tell.

 

And 4 months is very clearly not enough time.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Rampant Rabbit said:

I wouldnt live next to "affordable" housing if you paid me..........its council houses disguised under a trendy name, theyll end up being  dumps and demolished in 30 years, rinse and repeat, thats whats been done since the 50's council house by me  built in the 70's demolished as slums even though well built.  Dont see any privately owned  houses demolished  in such a short time frame.Its money down the drain, if they dont own it and get cheap rent they couldnt care less about it. Its not the houses its the type of people who live in them.

That seems like a broad pejorative generalization.

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:


Time will tell.

 

And 4 months is very clearly not enough time.

Nobody claimed 4 months was enough time though, you are having trouble reading posts again.

  • Like 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Redirecting money from supporting rents to building affordable homes makes sense.

 

Far too much tax payer’s money is being piped through to the pockets of buy to let landlords.

 

Time to build the affordable homes the nation needs and stop funding private profits from public need.

 

 

 

if they stemmed the flow illegal immigration, there would be less to house and more houses for UK citizens in need.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
4 hours ago, JonnyF said:

 

You think these people who cannot afford to pay rent can afford to buy homes?

 

House prices are astronomical in the UK. Largely due to a massive supply and demand issue caused by the influx of huge numbers of immigrants. 

 

What they are doing is removing much needed assistance for low income indigenous people and handing it out to (often illegal) immigrants. 

 

Once again, betraying the British people, especially poor ones. 

 

 

Wow Jonny you're quick out of the blocks to weave your racial bigotry into the subject.

You're wrong of course, as usual.

The reason for Britain's housing crisis definitely goes back to Thatcher's "right to buy" policy. The catchy 3 word mantra resonated with Sun readers and was understandably popular.

The part of that policy that was just downright wrong was that local authorities were not allowed to use  the money from these sales to replace the housing stock. She knew full well where this would lead the nation and here we are the world's 6th largest economy with 10s of thousands living on the streets while "buy to let" landlords prosper.

Back to GB "news" for your next tranche of far right drivel Jonny.

  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Red Forever said:

Wow Jonny you're quick out of the blocks to weave your racial bigotry into the subject.

You're wrong of course, as usual.

The reason for Britain's housing crisis definitely goes back to Thatcher's "right to buy" policy. The catchy 3 word mantra resonated with Sun readers and was understandably popular.

The part of that policy that was just downright wrong was that local authorities were not allowed to use  the money from these sales to replace the housing stock. She knew full well where this would lead the nation and here we are the world's 6th largest economy with 10s of thousands living on the streets while "buy to let" landlords prosper.

Back to GB "news" for your next tranche of far right drivel Jonny.

So it was all Thatcher and millions of immigrants coming in had no effect?

  • Agree 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

if they stemmed the flow illegal immigration, there would be less to house and more houses for UK citizens in need.

I thought the ‘illegal immigrants’  were all living in five star hotels?

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I thought the ‘illegal immigrants’  were all living in five star hotels?

 

 

They get moved into social housing as and when it becomes available. Also due to benefit caps for UK citizens it more profitable to let housing to Government subsidised immigrants. Immigration is A BUSINESS.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Red Forever said:

Wow Jonny you're quick out of the blocks to weave your racial bigotry into the subject.

You're wrong of course, as usual.

The reason for Britain's housing crisis definitely goes back to Thatcher's "right to buy" policy. The catchy 3 word mantra resonated with Sun readers and was understandably popular.

The part of that policy that was just downright wrong was that local authorities were not allowed to use  the money from these sales to replace the housing stock. She knew full well where this would lead the nation and here we are the world's 6th largest economy with 10s of thousands living on the streets while "buy to let" landlords prosper.

Back to GB "news" for your next tranche of far right drivel Jonny.

Precisely.

 

Government policy directly favoring the buy-to-let sector, followed by buy-to-let landlords complaining about ‘Government Control’ and moaning because the Government is freezing the rate at which tax payers’ money is being piped into their pockets.

 

 

  • Sad 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

if they stemmed the flow illegal immigration, there would be less to house and more houses for UK citizens in need.

They need to stem the flow of legal immigration, which is much higher numbers.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, mokwit said:

They get moved into social housing as and when it becomes available. Also due to benefit caps for UK citizens it more profitable to let housing to Government subsidised immigrants. Immigration is A BUSINESS.

‘illegal immigrants’ are receiving benefits?

  • Sad 1
Posted
12 hours ago, Social Media said:

Low-income renters in the UK are expected to face mounting financial challenges due to the government's decision to freeze housing benefits, despite escalating rent prices.

They need the money to house illegal immigrants and to send weapons to Ukraine and Israel.

  • Confused 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

Well they do need the billions of UK£ to give to Ukraine and to pay all inclusive stay for the Ukrainians who come over to Europe or the UK...so the others not getting their social housing, will have to leave England and more will come to Thailand leading to more tatoos, pub brawls and drunks all over.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Red Forever said:

. She knew full well where this would lead the nation and here we are the world's 6th largest economy with 10s of thousands living on the streets .

 

   It is actually less than 4000 people  who live on the streets in the UK and many of those choose that lifestyle as they don't like the restrictions of living in hostels 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

‘illegal immigrants’ are receiving benefits?

So called Asylum seekers recieve money directly and have their housing paid for them. Who did you think was paying?

  • Agree 2
Posted
12 minutes ago, Red Forever said:

Wow Jonny you're quick out of the blocks to weave your racial bigotry into the subject.

You're wrong of course, as usual.

The reason for Britain's housing crisis definitely goes back to Thatcher's "right to buy" policy. The catchy 3 word mantra resonated with Sun readers and was understandably popular.

The part of that policy that was just downright wrong was that local authorities were not allowed to use  the money from these sales to replace the housing stock. She knew full well where this would lead the nation and here we are the world's 6th largest economy with 10s of thousands living on the streets while "buy to let" landlords prosper.

Back to GB "news" for your next tranche of far right drivel Jonny.

 

   We need to solve the problem .

Need to look ahead 

Rather than doing nothing and saying its all someone else's fault .

Problems need to be solved, rather just doing nothing and trying to apportion blame for the problem 

Posted
14 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   We need to solve the problem .

Need to look ahead 

Rather than doing nothing and saying its all someone else's fault .

Problems need to be solved, rather just doing nothing and trying to apportion blame for the problem 

Refer the Labour Manifesto for the plan.

  • Haha 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, mokwit said:

They'd love to do it but the Tories left a 22bn hole in the finances and they need that 22bn for carbon capture  obviously many newly formed consultancies will have to be paid also.

 

   I do believe that the claim of a 22 Billion black hole has been disproved and shown to have beena  lie by Labour .

   They made the claim up so they can blame everything on the Tories and the imaginary black hole 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   I do believe that the claim of a 22 Billion black hole has been disproved and shown to have beena  lie by Labour .

   They made the claim up so they can blame everything on the Tories and the imaginary black hole 

Surely not, Reeves said she would go through it line by line, but we are still waiting. (only joking, of course it was).

 

I think there will be a shortfall going forward as revenue is not raised as they expected from taxing business via NI. The problem with the Left is that they think the economy is static and not dynamic and will stand for higher taxes, rather than ceasing to invest. "business can pay for the NHS" will ring hollow.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
2 hours ago, JonnyF said:

 

Probably.

 

It's easy to promise though. Look at Sadiq Khan and how he is getting on.

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/sadiq-khan-affordable-homes-housing-statistics-london-b2596188.html

 

image.png.6e9c41cf759e5e67e1c03e8ea1e60dc6.png

 

The way Labour has broken most of their election promises since gaining power, who really cares what they promise at this point?

 

May be best not to mention broken promises ...

 

https://www.bigissue.com/news/politics/tories-conservatives-broken-promises-levelling-up-nhs-housing/

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
9 hours ago, JonnyF said:

After freezing pensioners they've now gone after low income renters. 


 😄

 

Did you miss this bit, "This freeze extends a trend seen over the past decade, with the Conservative Party having previously frozen LHA for seven of the last twelve years, before briefly increasing rates earlier in 2024".

 

I wonder if 3 of those other 5 years happened to be the election years of '15, '17 and '19? If so, I'm sure that it was purely coincidental.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Precisely.

 

Government policy directly favoring the buy-to-let sector, followed by buy-to-let landlords complaining about ‘Government Control’ and moaning because the Government is freezing the rate at which tax payers’ money is being piped into their pockets.

 

 

 

   Many landlords have sold off their properties are are now investing in other businesses , being a landlord isnt a good business to be in these days 

Posted

Massive amounts of money given to Ukraine. High inflation all over Europe and UK due to the US led sanctions against Russia that are plainly destroying growth and economy in Europe-UK (thanks to America!!). Consequently, governance and the UE parliament in Bruxelles are trying their best and looking for new schemes to generate cash flow,  by increasing taxes or in cutting welfare for their own citizens,

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
3 hours ago, ElwoodP said:

They used to have rent control on many UK properties in the 1970s.

Yes......they were called council houses.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Topics

  • Latest posts...

    1. 3

      Is It Better to Date a “6” Than a “10” in Thailand?

    2. 108

      Japan dethrones Thailand as top tourist spot

    3. 3

      Is It Better to Date a “6” Than a “10” in Thailand?

    4. 108

      Britain’s Sharia Courts and the Challenge of Religious Freedom

    5. 0

      Saudia Airlines - Choose Carefully

    6. 108

      Japan dethrones Thailand as top tourist spot

    7. 3

      Is It Better to Date a “6” Than a “10” in Thailand?

  • Popular in The Pub


×
×
  • Create New...