.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png.8488ab72b8bb2e508209bfe3211b6e08.png)
Thinking about a sex change before trip to Malaya: Any words of advice?
-
Recently Browsing 1 member
Announcements
-
Topics
-
-
Latest posts...
-
6
Trump's Pick, Mike Huckabee’s Ambassadorship: What It Means for U.S.-Israel Relations
What? Who started it?! -
15
Thailand plans 14 new floating solar farms to boost renewable energy
You're correct, except the ergs out /ergs in always show a net "loss" of ergs. These ergs are called "lost' because they are unusable by humans and are called "pollution." Most of them are egrs in the form of heat. -
56
Why experts are blasting Trump for 'already breaking the law'
Another well thought out response from the high IQ left. -
4
Houthis Missile Attack on 2 U.S. Destroyers in Bab el-Mandeb Strait, Pentagon Confirms
Read the article they intercepted all -
44
A Police Visit on Remembrance Sunday Reveals the Reality of Our Two-Tier Justice System
Not quite If you beat him to death in your home, you will be charged, tried and probably acquitted. If you chase him 500. metres up the street, then beat him to death. You will be charged, tried and probably convicted of manslaughter. I agree, the UK does need a revolution, or at least drastic action taken before it is too late ( Although, it may well be too late ) -
85
Trump's 'huge lie' shows 'he’s taking everyone for an idiot': analysis
Seems my previous lessons in logic and reasoning didn’t quite stick—let's try this again, with your latest mixed salad: Straw Man Fallacy: You’ve oversimplified leftism, reducing it to just “power” and “brainwashing,” instead of addressing the actual policy positions or ideas. That’s a classic misrepresentation, making your argument easier to defeat without engaging with the full complexity of the topic. False Dilemma: You’ve set up a false choice: either embrace the left’s “manipulation” or support Trump’s “hard truths.” This leaves out the fact that there are plenty of positions in between, and politics isn’t as binary as you’re presenting it. Ad Hominem: Rather than directly engaging with the facts or policies, you attack the left as being about “brainwashing” and “fake news.” This doesn’t address the actual arguments but shifts the focus to attacking your opponent's personally. Appeal to Emotion: You throw in emotionally charged terms like “assassination attempts” and “lawfare” without evidence, hoping to stir up fear and outrage rather than provide logical support for your claims. Circular Reasoning: You claim that Trump’s policies were obviously better, but that’s based on assuming your conclusion is true without offering any substantial evidence to back it up. It’s a closed loop of reasoning that doesn’t actually prove anything. Hasty Generalization: You’ve generalized leftism as a whole based on selective instances or extreme examples, failing to account for the diversity of thought within the left and reducing complex issues to a single, biased narrative. Red Herring: Bringing up celebrities like Beyoncé, Oprah, and Bruce Springsteen distracts from the actual argument. It’s an irrelevant point that serves to divert attention away from the core issues at hand. Appeal to Popularity (Bandwagon): You claim that the fact leftist politicians are getting voted out proves your side is right. This assumes that popularity equals correctness, which is a logical misstep. A majority vote doesn’t necessarily mean the argument is sound or based on fact. Tu Quoque Fallacy (Appeal to Hypocrisy): When you say “as in your own case,” you’re attempting to deflect by accusing me of the same thing. It’s a typical tactic to avoid dealing with the substance of the discussion and instead focus on criticizing the person making the argument. In short, your argument, a la Trump, leans heavily on emotional manipulation, misrepresentation, and logical fallacies to push a narrative that doesn’t engage with the real complexities of the issues. -
85
Trump's 'huge lie' shows 'he’s taking everyone for an idiot': analysis
I do wish Trumpsters would post a credible source rather than sneering. I'd happily admit the OP's source is wrong. -
16
new Wise account details, bank says fraud
No. Are you sure the messages you are getting are really from wise? I have a code word that Wise uses with every message they send me so that I know it is from them.
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now