BREAKING NEWS Biden lifts restrictions on Ukraine using US weapons to strike deep inside Russia.

[scottiejohn]

1 minute ago, BarraMarra said:

https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=Awr.RBqFAztnhiE44w53Bwx.;_ylu=Y29sbwMEcG9zAzIEdnRpZAMEc2VjA3Ny/RV=2/RE=1731949574/RO=10/RU=https%3a%2f%2fwww.bbc.co.uk%2fnews%2farticles%2fc988qjje02eo/RK=2/RS=E1YJTlAD6zdHrUVSfkmzCihLs3o-

It would help if you added a lead into a reference/link!

Do you expect people to click on links which have no obvious description?

Edited 2 hours ago by scottiejohn

[frank83628]

35 minutes ago, Paul Catton said:

However if NATO attacks "Mother Russia", KYA goodbye and the fallout will reverberate "Globally".

The war mongering member here don't seem to realise this. They are in theIR bubble far from harm

[BarraMarra]

Well if you climb through the ropes in a Boxing contest Expect a bloody nose. Seems someone is confused let me simplify if you threaten someone or use aggression on others be ready for the reply coming your way. 

Edited 2 hours ago by BarraMarra

[BarraMarra]

1 minute ago, scottiejohn said:

Do you expect people to click on links which have no obvious description?

its A BBC News link.

[frank83628]

32 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

The first Nuke sent by Putin will be the last Russia will be reduced to Hiroshima.

I dont think you understand the severity of what you are saying, perhaps you should join Liz Cheney and have some bullets shot at ya, you might wake up then

[Eric Loh]

First order of the day after given permission by Biden is to trained the ATACMS towards the 50,000 Russian and North Korean troops in the Kursk region. Push the invaders out of Kursk and Ukraine will have a stronger bargaining power at the table.

[scottiejohn]

Just now, BarraMarra said:

its A BBC News link.

About what?

A comment about a link would be very useful in deciding if it is worth looking at!

[transam]

3 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

The war mongering member here don't seem to realise this. They are in theIR bubble far from harm

"War mongering", you support Putin's invasion, talk about hypocrite........

[Paul Catton]

1 minute ago, frank83628 said:

The war mongering member here don't seem to realise this. They are in theIR bubble far from harm

Nobody appears to be safe today, 

[frank83628]

24 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

Do you seriously think Biden woke up and gave permission  to allow the use of these Missiles Frank ? No he ran it through his team before announcing it.

His team ran though it and told him what to say to the camera, if you thunk Biden is in control of anything then you are rather foolish.

The guy can barely speak

[BarraMarra]

A typical response Deflection.

[scottiejohn]

16 minutes ago, Paul Catton said:

Biden is advocating an a NATO attack.

 

On who, where, when and why?

PS; any proof?

[frank83628]

20 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

Is that your best response to a request for a reliable source (other than Putin)?

Please provide a (non Putin)  reliable source regarding the guidance required to use the version(s) of ATACMS provided to Ukraine!

You asked for military source then inked Wikipedia,  I found it amusing

[Caldera]

The lame duck strikes. Amazing.

[Paul Catton]

4 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

On who, where, when and why?

PS; any proof?

Subject matter.

[BE88]

 

Stupefied  and irresponsible decision of a bad loser

Edited 2 hours ago by BE88

[frank83628]

27 minutes ago, transam said:

Like you, supporting Putin in a safe country.......

I support Putin, told you a 100 times, you need to get over it.   have you seem me once egging the war on? No, I have always said negotiations are needed. Also said war could have ended back in 2022 if it weren't fro BoJo stopping the arranged talks

[scottiejohn]

Just now, frank83628 said:

You asked for military source then inked Wikipedia,  I found it amusing

I asked YOU for a military source although I suspected that you cannot find one!

By "Military source" I do not mean the Pentagon but a reliable Military publication!

All you have quoted is a statement made by Putin, not exactly a reliable source on anything!

[frank83628]

2 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

I asked YOU for a military source although I suspected that you cannot find one!

By "Military source" I do not mean the Pentagon but a reliable Military publication!

All you have quoted is a statement made by Putin, not exactly a reliable source on anything!

You're mistaken, that was posted by Paul catton. Not me

[scottiejohn]

Just now, Paul Catton said:

Subject matter.

Your post is the "Subject matter" or have you forgotten?

Please give a logical, if possible, answer to my post which you have just responded to!

For reference here is a copy of the questions! 

 

"On who, where, when and why?

PS; any proof?"

[Eric Loh]

The man putiing down his marker in USA Presidential history even as his White House days are winding down. Good decision to lift the restriction and blunt Russian and North Korea attacks and force Putin to the negotiating table. Joe is also busy with dispensing infrastructure funds as Trump pledge to erdicate those unspent fundings. Then it is off to Brazil to mark his climate legacy and the G20 summit to talk about climate change, poverty reduction and other global problems. Lame duck he is not.  

[Hamus Yaigh]

2 hours ago, novacova said:

What is up with all the delusional war mongering…playing the game of nuclear chicken touché is utterly insane. Completely irrelevant as to who is right or wrong, every move on either side is wrong.

Who said anything about nuclear? All Pootin has to do is the right thing and pull his arse out of Ukraine.

[scottiejohn]

Just now, frank83628 said:

You're mistaken, that was posted by Paul catton. Not me

Sorry about that but the response is still the same!

[transam]

5 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

I support Putin, told you a 100 times, you need to get over it.   have you seem me once egging the war on? No, I have always said negotiations are needed. Also said war could have ended back in 2022 if it weren't fro BoJo stopping the arranged talks

And I will keep pointing it out, just to keep folk on here up to date on a for no reason invader, supporter.

 

You egg the war on by supporting the INVADER, the KILLER of innocent civilians........😬

 

You are a hypocrite, who should be ashamed of himself.......

 

[G_Money]

55 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

Well you dont bother looking do you G-Money Google is your friend.

 
I have no reason to look.  I’m not predicting nor putting out false information.

You brought the subject up.  I don’t believe a word that comes out of your mouth

 

[BarraMarra]

 You do realize that Putin is committing a war crime targeting infrastructure Frank don't you? is it an act of war deliberately targeting Civilians,  there are no arms being stored in a Restaurants frequented by locals.

[Lacessit]

1 hour ago, ModdaPunk said:

 

I'm not expert but I highly doubt that.

There's a reason why north korean troops were sent to Kursk and not Ukraine. Probably some sort of mutual assistance treaty between the two countries.

But hey!

No doubt I should trust a 5-stars armchair general like you :))

I'd say it would be highly embarrassing for both Putin and Kim for North Korean troops to be captured in Ukraine. Even more so if some of them decided to defect.

 

Possibly not the reason you would arrive at, but we can't all think outside the square.

[Paul Catton]

22 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

On who, where, when and why?

PS; any proof?

 

10 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

Your post is the "Subject matter" or have you forgotten?

Please give a logical, if possible, answer to my post which you have just responded to!

For reference here is a copy of the questions! 

 

"On who, where, when and why?

PS; any proof?"

1 hour ago, Paul Catton said:

Re-posting my input, from what is a now a "Closed Forum Thread"  for redirection of any discourse to this current thread.

 

It is not simply, just a question of allowing use.

 

Putin has previously said that giving Ukraine the green light on missile use would effectively mean that the U.S. and NATO are "in the war."

"Flight assignments for these missile systems can, in fact, only be entered by military personnel from NATO countries. Ukrainian servicemen cannot do this. And therefore, it is not a question of allowing the Ukrainian regime to strike Russia with these weapons or not. It is a question of making a decision whether NATO countries directly participate in the military conflict or not," Putin said in September.

"If this decision is made, it will mean nothing less than the direct participation of NATO countries, the United States, and European countries, in the war in Ukraine," he added.

 

Source.https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-authorizes-ukraine-use-us-long-range-missiles-strike-inside-russia-report

•  

   

 

[G_Money]

1 hour ago, BarraMarra said:

The first Nuke sent by Putin will be the last Russia will be reduced to Hiroshima.

When is Putin going to launch the first nuke?

[BarraMarra]

3 minutes ago, G_Money said:

 
I have no reason to look.  I’m not predicting nor putting out false information.

You brought the subject up.  I don’t believe a word that comes out of your mouth

 

So you don't believe the claims that Putin has not had a warrant for his arrest issued by the International Criminal Courts In the Hague yes or No G-Money ?