3 minutes ago, jas007 said:

 So, I try to keep it simple. Clear, concise, and capable of only one interpretation.  Easy to read and it works well. 

There was no better training for that than in the Twitter old days when you could post only a maximum 140 characters.

53 minutes ago, jas007 said:

Would it make you feel better to read convoluted, obfuscatory nonsense and gibberish?  

 

If I write in what seems to be an overly simplistic fashion, it's done for a reason.  KISS. Keep it simple, stupid. From my days of legal writing.  Produce a bunch of dense, convoluted nonsense designed to confuse or mislead, and one of two things will happen:  your audience will be immediately turned off and you'll fail to convince anyone of anything, or, they won't read it at all and they'll draw their own conclusions.  So, I try to keep it simple. Clear, concise, and capable of only one interpretation.  Easy to read and it works well. 

Try reading Socialist mumbo jumbo.

8 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Try reading Socialist mumbo jumbo.

So those are the only 2 options? Either Hanson or socialist mumbo-jumbo?

11 hours ago, placeholder said:

So those are the only 2 options? Either Hanson or socialist mumbo-jumbo?

You need to get with the program bro and check what the statement and my response was one more time

2 hours ago, Yagoda said:

You need to get with the program bro and check what the statement and my response was one more time

You need to read what you write. Preferably, before posting it.

On 1/8/2025 at 6:34 AM, Yagoda said:

He would be a perfect Democrat then. That's Kamala Harris's position too she embraced Liz Cheney and hell, Joe Biden gave her a medal.

 

Got anything more to say about Professor Hansons and Analysis LOL?

You admire the writing of a perfect Democrat? You're making progress.

12 minutes ago, placeholder said:

You admire the writing of a perfect Democrat? You're making progress.

Thats not what I said, so as usual with your lot, you misinterpret to mislead.

 

Tell us where Professor Hanson is wrong.

22 minutes ago, placeholder said:

You need to read what you write. Preferably, before posting it.

Translation: Im limited in my ability to interpret the obvious.

I read the Hanson link in the OP. Less than 140-character summary:

Trump et al were not the threat to democracy; those who opposed were the threat to democracy.