Democracy has failed the US,maybe it's time for a King

[thaibeachlovers]

3 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

I am sure many countries in Europe will realize more and more that they should be more independent from the USA.

What's stopping them? No one is forcing them to bend over for the USA.

[OneMoreFarang]

4 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

What's stopping them? No one is forcing them to bend over for the USA.

There was a time when they thought they could have friendly relations with the USA as partners. That would be nice for everybody, or not?

But then Americans voted for Busch, and Busch again. And then for Trump and Trump again.

There is not much hope for friendship with a county with such a leader.

[thaibeachlovers]

7 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

There was a time when they thought they could have friendly relations with the USA as partners. That would be nice for everybody, or not?

But then Americans voted for Busch, and Busch again. And then for Trump and Trump again.

There is not much hope for friendship with a county with such a leader.

Their own lot are no better than Bush or Trump, IMO. Cabal of incompetents IMO. Does Starmer light your fire?

[NanLaew]

Lot's being said about the impossibility of any form of demagogic dictatorship in the US due to this magical separation of the executive, the legislative, and the judicial, all protected and upheld by this wonderful Constitution.

 

Right now the executive appears to have the judicial in his pocket, as will any Republican leader that succeeds him, so it must be quite upsetting to the hard-core MAGA clique that their grip on the legislative is all a bit tenuous due to those damn RINO's in the herd.

 

Talking of the Constitution, I heard that the word 'democracy' doesn't get mentioned in that vaunted document at all. Is that correct? I don't have a copy in my wallet.

 

 

 

[jas007]

2 hours ago, NanLaew said:

Lot's being said about the impossibility of any form of demagogic dictatorship in the US due to this magical separation of the executive, the legislative, and the judicial, all protected and upheld by this wonderful Constitution.

 

Right now the executive appears to have the judicial in his pocket, as will any Republican leader that succeeds him, so it must be quite upsetting to the hard-core MAGA clique that their grip on the legislative is all a bit tenuous due to those damn RINO's in the herd.

 

Talking of the Constitution, I heard that the word 'democracy' doesn't get mentioned in that vaunted document at all. Is that correct? I don't have a copy in my wallet.

 

 

 

Oftentimes, the Executive thinks it has the judiciary on its side, only to find out it isn't always so easy.  For example, a Supreme Court judge nominated by a Republican president and approved by the Senate may turn out to be a liberal, or one of those votes on the court that could go either way.  And federal judges are approved for life, so things can be slow to change, one way or the other. 

 

As for the RINOS?  Not much can be done about that.  They can always be voted out the next time they run, if that's what the people want. 

 

 

[save the frogs]

10 hours ago, Hummin said:

It is not that easy, they did not vote for yes or no to abortion,

Let everyone have 1 vote?

 

But my point is that people are deluded in thinking that "democracy" is some magic thing where everyone will be blissful all the time. It's impossible for everyone to agree with everything the govt does, no matter what type of system is in place.

 

Maybe the best form of govt is a (drum roll) .... "BENEVOLENT DICTATORSHIP" ?

 

 

[RetiredNavy71]

On 1/12/2025 at 9:41 PM, SiSePuede419 said:

Democracy has failed the US.  It began to get captured by lobbyists in the late 70s.  Then in the 80s all the crazy people were set free from mental hospitals with no mental health monitoring or treatment. That's when you started seeing homeless people on the streets. Also in the 80s, the rich people who ran universities decided to make tuition unaffordable for the middle class.  They saw the inside corporate plans to outsource factory jobs to Asia and automation from robots so they knew there would be fewer jobs in the future in America so they wanted to make it more difficult to compete with their upper middle class Biff and Muffy.

Housing was pretty reasonable priced until late 90s.  That's when the corporate greed exploded in real estate and increasing profit every year became their god they worshipped and they started creating derivative securities based on total bull<deleted>.

All the while they figured out how to make themselves richer while middle class people got poorer.

Like eliminating the rule preventing corporations from buying back their own stock and using the money to reinvest in their factories. 

 

That's when they decided to outsource and pay themselves huge "dividends". 

 

Basically sucking the blood of middle class Americans like capitalist vampires.

 

Democracy failed us because it let our infrastructure degrade because all the money went to tax cuts for rich people.

 

Democracy failed us because it let the prices for real estate escalate far beyond wage increases to become unaffordable.

 

Maybe it's time to try a Dictator...?

 

In a week, it's the Find Out phase.

 

Will the slim majority of American voters (<2%) "find out" that they voted for a liar?  That's he's not really going to be a dictator on Day 1.  Not then, not never.

 

Mexico was never going to pay for the wall.  He knew it.  He just said it to make the "mark" (the gullible victim) feel good.  That's all that matters to the victims as they get addicted to "feeling good" every time their hero says something disgusting or tells some crazy lie like the governor of California signed a law preventing LA from getting enough water --there is no such thing he just told a lie because that's what Fascists do.

 

Don't worry.

 

(Toxic nicknames removed) Donnie is a total loudmouth lying <deleted> he's good at making rambling speeches at his hate rallies but actually running government efficiently?

 

"Administrative chaos" 

 

Running the federal government is hard work and the <deleted> just wants to play golf bang porn stars and disco dance to the gayest song ever by the Village People that he plays all the time.

 

And there's significant uhhh "challenges" for him to uhhh "overcome" to become as successful as Hitler was at destroying Germany's democracy within only 2 months.

 

His Billionaire buddies like Elmo & Rama Dama Ding Dong need tax cuts.

 

When you give money to poor people it makes them dependent and lazy.

 

But when you give money to Rich people it makes them bold and independent and entrepreneur and stuff. 🤑

 

ChatGPT says slow your roll, homie.

 

The historical context of Adolf Hitler's rise to power in Germany and the legal mechanisms he used to consolidate authority are unique to the Weimar Republic's fragile political system. In the United States, there are significant differences in constitutional structure, legal safeguards, and political culture that make such a rapid and total consolidation of power far more difficult. Here's why:

 

1. Constitutional Framework

The U.S. Constitution provides a strong system of checks and balances between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches.

Even with majority support in Congress, U.S. presidents do not have the same level of control over legislation and state powers as Hitler gained under the Enabling Act.

 

2. Federalism

Power is divided between the federal government and the states, making it harder for

a single

Adolf Hitler's rise to dictatorship in Germany was enabled by a combination of factors that made it uniquely possible under the Weimar Constitution and the socio-political conditions of 1933. His consolidation of power involved legal maneuvers like the Reichstag Fire Decree and the Enabling Act, which effectively dismantled checks and balances and gave him dictatorial powers.

In the United States, the situation is vastly different due to its strong constitutional framework, established separation of powers, and a long history of democratic norms. Here are some key points to consider:

Why It’s More Difficult in the U.S.

1. Checks and Balances: The U.S. Constitution divides power between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, making it harder for any single individual to consolidate power.

2. Federalism: Power is distributed across federal, state, and local governments, which creates additional barriers to authoritarian control.

3. Legal Protections: The U.S. has robust legal protections for civil liberties, and changes to these require navigating complex legislative or judicial processes.

4. Military and Law Enforcement: The U.S. military and law enforcement agencies are designed to serve the Constitution, not individual leaders, reducing the risk of them being co-opted for political purposes.

Could Trump Attempt It?

Donald Trump, like any political leader, could theoretically attempt to consolidate power. However, such a move would likely face significant resistance from:

Congress: Even a partisan Congress would be unlikely to fully abdicate its power, as doing so would undermine its members' authority.

The Judiciary: Federal courts, including the Supreme Court, serve as a bulwark against executive overreach.

The Media and Public: A free press and active civil society provide additional barriers to authoritarianism.

Personality Factors

While Trump has shown an interest in pushing the boundaries of executive power, his approach has often been characterized by legal challenges, administrative chaos, and reliance on loyalists rather than systematic restructuring of institutions. This contrasts sharply with Hitler's methodical and strategic approach to dismantling the Weimar Republic's democratic structures.

Conclusion

While Trump could attempt to undermine democratic norms, the structure of the U.S. government, combined with his historical tendencies toward disorganization, makes it highly unlikely that he could replicate Hitler's rapid consolidation of power. However, the erosion of democratic norms over time is always a concern, and vigilance is key to preserving institutional integrity.

 

I'm not even going to attempt a response to all this aforementioned garbage but I will say this....all of your facts can be verified by factcheck.org.  Nuff said 

[Gobbler]

I can guarantee you, that A King wouldn't last 1 day.  They would have to manufacture them daily.