3 hours ago, candide said:

So Juries legally convicting rioters who assaulted the Capitol in an attempt to stop a legitimate democratic  process and to overturn the election, are the same as the Gestapo arresting political opponents or Mao's political police arresting Chinese peasants protesting because they were starving!? 😆

You’re the only one that said that. 

 

 

6 hours ago, riclag said:

History lesson ,what regimes jailed and used lawfare  towards political opposition in mass for rioting!

Bidens

Mao’s

Hitlers

 

10 minutes ago, mogandave said:

You’re the only one that said that. 

 

 

So waht does what does that mean? 🙂

"History lesson ,what regimes jailed and used lawfare  towards political opposition in mass for rioting!

Bidens

Mao’s

Hitlers

8 minutes ago, candide said:

 

So waht does what does that mean? 🙂

"History lesson ,what regimes jailed and used lawfare  towards political opposition in mass for rioting!

Bidens

Mao’s

Hitlers

 

 

Guessing he meant en masse.....but who knows?

2 hours ago, rasg said:

Hilarious!! You obviously have NO idea at all of what went on that day. By the way. All of the RAW CCTV footage has been released to the public.

 

https://nypost.com/2023/03/06/jan-6-footage-shows-cops-bringing-qanon-shaman-to-senate-floor/

The rioters have been convicted by juries who had access to all the avaible evidence. The defendant's lawyers also had access to all the avaible evidence and had the opportunity to present evidence to the jury. They also had the right to appeal.

You have nothing, as usual. 🙂

10 minutes ago, candide said:

 

So waht does what does that mean? 🙂

"History lesson ,what regimes jailed and used lawfare  towards political opposition in mass for rioting!

Bidens

Mao’s

Hitlers

“You’re the only one that said that.” means no one said that but you. 

 

 

1 minute ago, candide said:

The rioters have been convicted by juries who had access to all the avaible evidence. The defendant's lawyers also had access to it all the avaible evidence and had the opportunity to present evidence to the jury. They also had the right to appeal.

You have nothing, as usual. 🙂

No, the jury only has access to the evidence the judge allows them access to. 

 

 

4 minutes ago, candide said:

The rioters have been convicted by juries who had access to all the avaible evidence. The defendant's lawyers also had access to it all the avaible evidence and had the opportunity to present evidence to the jury. They also had the right to appeal.

You have nothing, as usual. 🙂

They’ve been pardoned, time to move on.

 

But but but Biden issued over 8,000 pardons, so Trump has a long way to go to catch up.

1 minute ago, mogandave said:

No, the jury only has access to the evidence the judge allows them access to. 

 

 

So what is your proof/source showing that the judge did not allow this evidence to be presented?

6 minutes ago, mogandave said:

They’ve been pardoned, time to move on.

 

But but but Biden issued over 8,000 pardons, so Trump has a long way to go to catch up.

Lame distraction. It's not what I was discussing.

44 minutes ago, candide said:

Lame distraction. It's not what I was discussing.

What were you discussing?

46 minutes ago, candide said:

So what is your proof/source showing that the judge did not allow this evidence to be presented?

Judges almost never let all the evidence in. 

1 minute ago, mogandave said:

What were you discussing?

Read Riclag's post.

Just now, candide said:

Read Riclag's post.

 

You read them??????

2 minutes ago, mogandave said:

Judges almost never let all the evidence in. 

So you have no evidence that the cited video footage was not accepted by the Judge. 

1 minute ago, Will B Good said:

 

You read them??????

It's often funny!

Just now, candide said:

It's often funny!

 

Do you have to be over a certain (mental) age to post on this site....or can anyone post?

14 minutes ago, candide said:

So you have no evidence that the cited video footage was not accepted by the Judge. 

Lame distraction. I never said it wasn’t. 

2 minutes ago, mogandave said:

Lame distraction. I never said it wasn’t. 

Judges almost never let all the evidence in. 

10 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

Judges almost never let all the evidence in. 

Exactly 

2 hours ago, candide said:

The rioters have been convicted by juries who had access to all the avaible evidence. The defendant's lawyers also had access to all the avaible evidence and had the opportunity to present evidence to the jury. They also had the right to appeal.

You have nothing, as usual. 🙂

Delusional. You do know that the J6 committee was made up of Nancy Pelosi, Liz Cheney and other Rinos? 

5 minutes ago, rasg said:

Delusional. You do know that the J6 committee was made up of Nancy Pelosi, Liz Cheney and other Rinos? 

I'm talking about the Juries of the Jan 6 rioters trials.

4 hours ago, mogandave said:

They are someone’s opinions that you regurgitate here. 

your making ridiculous statements and obviously not knowledgeable at all. Here's some light reading which Im sure you will claim is fabricated. Its a running history of a variety and scope seldom seen in others. Have fun with it if your brain doesnt melt

 

Personal and business legal affairs of Donald Trump - Wikipedia

Just now, Dan O said:

your making ridiculous statements and obviously not knowledgeable at all. Here's some light reading which Im sure you will claim is fabricated. Its a running history of a variety and scope seldom seen in others. Have fun with it if your brain doesnt melt

 

Personal and business legal affairs of Donald Trump - Wikipedia

So now you're regurgitating someone else's opinions. 

 

Are you not able to speak for yourself? Oh, that's right, you're a leftist, you have to be told what to say.

 

2 hours ago, candide said:

So what is your proof/source showing that the judge did not allow this evidence to be presented?

Aaah. Interesting question because the J6 committee destroyed it but they will pay for it. In spades. Biden pardoned Liz Cheney but that won’t help her.

 

35 minutes ago, candide said:

I'm talking about the Juries of the Jan 6 rioters trials.

Tee hee. They don't actually have any juries in Washington DC that would deemed to be non biased. Or judges for that matter. Unless you are a leftie of course.

1 hour ago, rasg said:

Aaah. Interesting question because the J6 committee destroyed it but they will pay for it. In spades. Biden pardoned Liz Cheney but that won’t help her.

 

Tee hee. They don't actually have any juries in Washington DC that would deemed to be non biased. Or judges for that matter. Unless you are a leftie of course.

1. More MAGA lies. They did not destroy it. The transcripts have been kept per relevant regulation. 

https://www.factcheck.org/2024/10/meme-rehashes-old-false-claim-that-j6-committee-destroyed-evidence/

 

2. B.S. , as usual 

 

https://www.dccourts.gov/jurors/

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_proceedings_in_the_January_6_United_States_Capitol_attack

 

Your problem is that that you make claims based on the propaganda you are fed with, without cheking  anything.

 

10 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

So now you're regurgitating someone else's opinions. 

 

Are you not able to speak for yourself? Oh, that's right, you're a leftist, you have to be told what to say.

 

I'm not a leftist to start with so you can stop trying to gaslight me on that. Trump is a POS pretty simple and clear.

 

I have stated all these same issues with his character and facts myself but unknowledgeable or challenged people continue to claim they are made up and fabricated.  What was posted where facts with supporting detail, not opinions. You obviously dont know the difference.

 

Seems like you're the one that's challenged and unable to respond with facts and truth. Facts are fact and have nothing to do with me but all to do with your boy trump.  You should stop replying when you have nothing relevant to say on the post or troll someone else because it doesnt work on me

1 hour ago, Dan O said:

I'm not a leftist to start with so you can stop trying to gaslight me on that. Trump is a POS pretty simple and clear.

 

I have stated all these same issues with his character and facts myself but unknowledgeable or challenged people continue to claim they are made up and fabricated.  What was posted where facts with supporting detail, not opinions. You obviously dont know the difference.

 

Seems like you're the one that's challenged and unable to respond with facts and truth. Facts are fact and have nothing to do with me but all to do with your boy trump.  You should stop replying when you have nothing relevant to say on the post or troll someone else because it doesnt work on me

So, how do you like J.D. Vance for 2028? 

 

The Hegseth conformation was great news huh? 

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

So, how do you like J.D. Vance for 2028? 

 

The Hegseth conformation was great news 

Couldn't care less about 2028, too far away.  Trumps crap is unraveling as we speak. Mexico refusing deported planes, Panama telling Trump to stuff it, Vivek and lead lawyer leaving Doge already, Canada threatening to cut fuel supplies to US over traffic threats. Executive order on birthright getting shot down as unconstitutional. More to come so stay tuned.  How's it going for you?  

 

2 minutes ago, Dan O said:

Couldn't care less about 2028, too far away.  Trumps crap is unraveling as we speak. Mexico refusing deported planes, Panama telling Trump to stuff it, Vivek and lead lawyer leaving Doge already, Canada threatening to cut fuel supplies to US over traffic threats. Executive order on birthright getting shot down as unconstitutional. More to come so stay tuned.  How's it going for you?  

 

Life's great for me. 

 

How do you feel about Vance as VP now?

 

Are you happy about the Hegseth conformation? 

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

Life's great for me. 

 

How do you feel about Vance as VP now?

 

Are you happy about the Hegseth conformation? 

Don't care about it in least