Popular Post proton Posted February 8 Popular Post Posted February 8 3 hours ago, Jingthing said: First they came for the transgenders .. Divide and conquer. Nobody came for the transgenders, we are just tired of their screaming and shouting for rights they already have. Now they can no longer cheat in womens sports or invade womens spaces, thats a positive change, nobody is going to 'die' over it or for not having their silly pro nouns respected. 1 2 1 1
proton Posted February 8 Posted February 8 3 hours ago, scorecard said: What amuses me is that no matter what title / acronym people use the fact is that gay people exist and in much bigger numbers than most realize, world wide. Trump and his gang seem to be hoping they can rid the USA of homosexual people in the military, in government and in daily life. They just show their ignorance. Also in the 'mix' is that folks like trump, and all in his party, just don't know who might be gay in their family, their company, amongst their friends, this generation, previous generations or next generation, whether out or not out, and probably in their ignorance have never thought about it. Changing the acronym back to a previous version is also showing their ignorance. Trump has not banned Gays from the military, only trans nutters, who being non deployable were useless as a fighting force anyway. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14331975/Gay-combat-veteran-reveals-Trump-ban-transgender-troops-military.html 1 1
Popular Post BangkokReady Posted February 8 Popular Post Posted February 8 4 hours ago, Jingthing said: First they came for the transgenders Stop lying. This is about protecting women and children from trans lunacy. 8
Popular Post impulse Posted February 8 Popular Post Posted February 8 I'm a big fan of the 2nd amendment, and I personally own quite a few firearms. But you won't ever see mine, and I cringe when I see some of the zealots parading down the street in camo carrying their AR15s. They do not speak for me. I imagine that's the same way that reasonable gay people feel when they see the ridiculous displays of the flaming LGBTQ+ crowd. 2 1
Yellowtail Posted February 8 Posted February 8 Just now, impulse said: I'm a big fan of the 2nd amendment, and I personally own quite a few firearms. But you won't ever see mine, and I cringe when I see some of the zealots parading down the street in camo carrying their AR15s. They do not speak for me. I imagine that's the same way that reasonable gay people feel when they see the ridiculous displays of the flaming LGBTQ+ crowd. Please let the LGBTQ+ take to the streets and riot for this nonsense. 1
parallelman Posted February 8 Posted February 8 3 hours ago, Jingthing said: First they came for the transgenders .. Divide and conquer. Not really, Transgender is a transformation, hence the term. Gay people (I use 'gay' as a general category here) have an affinity for same sex relationships. As far as I am aware there is no definitive asnwer as to why this happens, plenty of hypotheses sure, But then again, we can;t define many things that are related to the physical-mental states and their attractions. And not all gay people want to change.
Popular Post impulse Posted February 8 Popular Post Posted February 8 5 minutes ago, Yellowtail said: Please let the LGBTQ+ take to the streets and riot for this nonsense. Any excuse to show off that new costume... 5
Patong2021 Posted February 8 Posted February 8 At some point, I expect that more than a few Republicans are going to wish this wasn't an issue as their rentboys and shemale companions start sharing information. 2
WDSmart Posted February 8 Posted February 8 The acronym is not "LGBT." It's "LGBTQIA+" LGBTQIA+ Meaning of Each Letter & Acronym Breakdown | SFGMC
impulse Posted February 8 Posted February 8 9 minutes ago, WDSmart said: The acronym is not "LGBT." It's "LGBTQIA+" LGBTQIA+ Meaning of Each Letter & Acronym Breakdown | SFGMC That explanation is so 2023. They've moved on. 1
Chomper Higgot Posted February 8 Posted February 8 2 hours ago, Luuk Chaai said: more like just stay in your lane.. no need for the world to bend over backwards or genuflect at the whim of anybody that does not fit the standard definition .. do your thing.. and shut your trap, nobody really cares what you wear or what your choice of lifestyle is the "alphabet" squad is not owed or entiteld to anything special .. Well you obviously care. The question is why?!
Popular Post Yellowtail Posted February 8 Popular Post Posted February 8 3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: Well you obviously care. The question is why?! Maybe he has a daughter and does not want creeps in their showers and bathrooms. 7
Dionigi Posted February 8 Posted February 8 53 minutes ago, brewsterbudgen said: Why would ABC or the BBC want to do anything that the current, short-term, occupant of the White House does? Because BBc and ABC have become infected with the woke culture. Nearly every tv series depicts mixed marriages between black and white , asian and black or some such combination. They show every top cop is a woman, every lowly cop is male. They show large numbers of Asian, or coloured people in the police force probably many more than are actually there and they show many more gays than there are on average. This leads to a backlash because people start to believe that these populations are lager than they actually are. There was a surey in America where people were asked what percentage of the population were black. They came up with an average of 50% rather than the real lower figures. For example Midsomer Murders, a police drama in the UK. was taken to task because it did not have a representative number of minorities shown. The result was much larger numbers of 'minorities' being represented. The problem was that the area being depicted in the show,in actuality, did not have a large number of these minorities and so the impression given was a lie. 1 1
brewsterbudgen Posted February 8 Posted February 8 3 minutes ago, Dionigi said: Because BBc and ABC have become infected with the woke culture. Nearly every tv series depicts mixed marriages between black and white , asian and black or some such combination. They show every top cop is a woman, every lowly cop is male. They show large numbers of Asian, or coloured people in the police force probably many more than are actually there and they show many more gays than there are on average. This leads to a backlash because people start to believe that these populations are lager than they actually are. There was a surey in America where people were asked what percentage of the population were black. They came up with an average of 50% rather than the real lower figures. For example Midsomer Murders, a police drama in the UK. was taken to task because it did not have a representative number of minorities shown. The result was much larger numbers of 'minorities' being represented. The problem was that the area being depicted in the show,in actuality, did not have a large number of these minorities and so the impression given was a lie. Yes, the UK and Australia are multi-cultural countries and their State broadcasters rightly reflect this. They are not the USA! 1
Chomper Higgot Posted February 8 Posted February 8 6 minutes ago, Yellowtail said: Maybe he has a daughter and does not want creeps in their showers and bathrooms. Maybe. Or maybe he wants to see the transgender makes back in the men’s room? Who knows? It’s strange tenant nobody cares while obviously caring.
WDSmart Posted February 8 Posted February 8 19 minutes ago, impulse said: 20 minutes ago, WDSmart said: The acronym is not "LGBT." It's "LGBTQIA+" LGBTQIA+ Meaning of Each Letter & Acronym Breakdown | SFGMC That explanation is so 2023. They've moved on. What Trump and his sycophants are trying to do is move us backward to when even LGs were treated as outcasts, and denying the existence of any such thing as BTQIA+s... 1
Popular Post BangkokReady Posted February 8 Popular Post Posted February 8 4 hours ago, Jingthing said: First they came for the transgenders First they came for the straight White men But I did not speak out because I was told that straight White men were bad. Then they came for the women But I did not speak out because I was told that trans people's feelings mattered more than women's safety. Finally they came for the children But this was the last straw, and Donald Trump was called upon to save the children. 2 3 4 1
Popular Post Yellowtail Posted February 8 Popular Post Posted February 8 9 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: Maybe. Or maybe he wants to see the transgender makes back in the men’s room? Who knows? It’s strange tenant nobody cares while obviously caring. Everyone but the left cares when you go after their kids. I don't care if you are a "man" that wants to dress up and pretend you're a woman. I do care if you are a "man" that wants to dress up and pretend you're a woman that wants to share a shower with my daughter. See the difference? No, you don't, because you want to attack everyone that does not agree with you that creepy men should be allowed in girls showers and whatnot and call them closet homosexuals or some such. 5 1 1
Popular Post impulse Posted February 8 Popular Post Posted February 8 7 minutes ago, WDSmart said: What Trump and his sycophants are trying to do is move us backward to when even LGs were treated as outcasts, and denying the existence of any such thing as BTQIA+s... If you say so. 1 2
Popular Post Yellowtail Posted February 8 Popular Post Posted February 8 6 minutes ago, WDSmart said: What Trump and his sycophants are trying to do is move us backward to when even LGs were treated as outcasts, and denying the existence of any such thing as BTQIA+s... No, Trump is trying to get men out of girls' showers and sports. YOU and the left want to turn it into something else. If men were not getting into girls' showers and sports, there would be no issue, and the hideously terrible Harris would likely have been elected. 1 2 1
Chomper Higgot Posted February 8 Posted February 8 2 minutes ago, Yellowtail said: Everyone but the left cares when you go after their kids. I don't care if you are a "man" that wants to dress up and pretend you're a woman. I do care if you are a "man" that wants to dress up and pretend you're a woman that wants to share a shower with my daughter. See the difference? No, you don't, because you want to attack everyone that does not agree with you that creepy men should be allowed in girls showers and whatnot and call them closet homosexuals or some such. That simply doesn’t make sense. It departs from reality with the opening sentence and doesn’t get better. 1
Yellowtail Posted February 8 Posted February 8 3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: That simply doesn’t make sense. It departs from reality with the opening sentence and doesn’t get better. Exactly. 1
Popular Post EVENKEEL Posted February 8 Popular Post Posted February 8 2 hours ago, Jingthing said: That isn't liberal logic. That's transphobic exaggeration and fear mongering. Forget the sports issue for a moment which in reality actually involved a TINY number of people. Consider what the fascist Trump regime just did. They ordered the complete erasure of any reference to trans (or non binary etc.) in all government documents. Basically, telling trans people that they don't exist. You may hate or be ignorant about trans people but they DO exist and the government is supposed to be for ALL the people. Consider what they did at the CDC. They ordered all research which presumably cost a lot of money that referred to gay people to be wiped. Erased. That's why I said, first they came for the trans. That research was used to promote health of gay people worldwide and yes (duh) gay people have specific health concerns, just as black people do, etc. This is evil. This is fascism. Look at history if you don't believe me. Yeah I know maga types will say this is hyperbole, this is paranoid. No. It's not paranoia if they're really out to get you and or ERASE reference to your very existence. You're correct about the TINY number. So, why does a small minority need so many concessions from the majority? 2 2 1 1
Popular Post Thingamabob Posted February 8 Popular Post Posted February 8 3 hours ago, Jingthing said: With maga cruelty is the point. Trans people are being used as one of the easiest initial scapegoating targets. Fascist movements always need scapegoats. Weird comment. The move of the current US govt to stop men from competing in womens' sport, using women's restrooms etc is surely good. Unbelievable that anybody would not support the new legislation. 1 2
WorriedNoodle Posted February 8 Posted February 8 7 hours ago, Social Media said: Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2025-02-08 Shouldn't this read " Based on opinion of a conservative news source"?
Popular Post connda Posted February 8 Popular Post Posted February 8 3 hours ago, hotsun said: With liberal logic, any guy can just walk into a womans bathroom and claim he identifies as a woman. This stuff got so bad it would have turned the NCAA into a circus! What if my daughter wants to be an olympic track and field runner but had her dreams crushed by losing in nationals to a man? That's coming to an end. Considering the 2028 Olympics are in LA, expect the Trump administration to have already shut-down the transgender males in women's sports regardless of what the Olympic Committee wants. I don't ever want to see another man beating the snot out of women in an Olympic boxing ring - ever. 4
connda Posted February 8 Posted February 8 I have known and been close friends with many, many gay people over the years. But here's the difference. Almost none of them were LGBTQ+++ activists. The daughter of some of my best friends is gay and married to her female partners. But she is a LGBTQ+++ activist, and she is one of the unhappy, angry people I know. Her family loves her and her partner, I love her like a daughter, a lot of people really care about her. But she is chewed up inside because she want's the world to accept her while she rants on about evil cis-gendered straight people. The acceptance isn't a two-way street. The reality of this world is that some people have no problem with gays etc, and some people do, and their is no changing that. I don't have any issue with other's sexuality, what I do care about is having their ideology crammed down my throat, and even worse, at the end of a gun once a government see an opportunity to have an excuse to take up a cause that allows them to move toward authoritarianism, much like the UK and EU are right now. Learn to ignore the people who don't like you and embrace those who love you. Then you can find happiness. 2
Popular Post seajae Posted February 8 Popular Post Posted February 8 The LGB community is well accepted , there life, their choice, the problem is the trans groups that try to push their gender preference onto everyone else. There are only 2 sexes, male & female and these cannot be changed, this is scientific fact, men do not have internal female body parts, they cannot get pregnant, they cannot have menstruation etc, females claiming to be male are still female so trying to claim that them being pregnant shows men can have babies is a load of bunk. I have no problems with gay people and respect their choices, I also have no problems with those that live as the opposite gender, the problem is those that demand they be accepted as the opposte gender and that they have the same rights as that gender and be referred to as that gender. They are still the original gender they were born as, having gender dysphoria does not give them any special treatment, what Trump has done males this law, it doesnt detract from the gay community only those that are pushing their activist BS. 3 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now