Canada's ruling Liberals mount a comeback with Trump threats, polls show

OTTAWA, Feb 26 (Reuters) - Canada's ruling Liberals, who a few weeks ago looked certain to lose an election this year, are mounting a major comeback amid the threat of U.S. tariffs and are tied with their rival Conservatives, according to three new polls.

An Ipsos survey released late on Tuesday showed the left-leaning Liberals have 38% public support and the official opposition right-of-center Conservatives have 36%. The Liberals have overturned a 26-point deficit in six weeks, and run advertisements comparing the Conservative leader to Trum

 

https://archive.ph/R3sZu

4 minutes ago, placeholder said:

 

 

Canada's ruling Liberals mount a comeback with Trump threats, polls show

OTTAWA, Feb 26 (Reuters) - Canada's ruling Liberals, who a few weeks ago looked certain to lose an election this year, are mounting a major comeback amid the threat of U.S. tariffs and are tied with their rival Conservatives, according to three new polls.

An Ipsos survey released late on Tuesday showed the left-leaning Liberals have 38% public support and the official opposition right-of-center Conservatives have 36%. The Liberals have overturned a 26-point deficit in six weeks, and run advertisements comparing the Conservative leader to Trum

 

https://archive.ph/R3sZu

Nice cherry pick. You would be a good fruit picker.

2 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

Nice cherry pick. You would be a good fruit picker.

Do you understand what cherry picking means? The article cited the three latest polls. You got that? Not one but three. Now a person with a high IQ would try to offer evidence that there were other polls taken about the same time that had sharply different results. Or, perhaps, they would some evidence that these three polls, or some subset of them, have a history of bias. In other words, a person with an IQ ranging from 127 to 143 would offer something called evidence. They woould definitely not believe that offering a negative characterization unbacked by evidence would have any dispositive value.

8 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Now a person with a high IQ would try to offer evidence that there were other polls taken about the same time that had sharply different results.

Person with high IQ (me) says all polls only show what the polling organisation was paid for them to show, and are therefore worthless.

6 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Person with high IQ (me) says all polls only show what the polling organisation was paid for them to show, and are therefore worthless.

Another person a alleging themselves to have a high IQ but somehow doesn't understand the need for evidence to back up their claim.

5 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Another person a alleging themselves to have a high IQ but somehow doesn't understand the need for evidence to back up their claim.

I backed up my claim. You are afraid to do a test. You must spend each day looking for leftist polls that say what you want. Sad.

5 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

I backed up my claim. You are afraid to do a test. You must spend each day looking for leftist polls that say what you want. Sad.

For those of you who may not be aware of what test Harrisfan is referring to, it's an online IQ test which Harrisfan claims gave him an IQ ranging between 127 to 143. It seems bizarre that someone claiming to have a high IQ would believe that such a claim coming from an anonymous person should have valid evidentiary value. The proof is in the pudding, and to mix metaphors, given the quality of his posts, Harrisfan's claim is very weak tea. 

I can imagine Harris as a schoolboy who gets an "F" on a test and then tells his teacher "I don't care if my examples weren't relevant and I didn't offer evidence to back up my claims. The fact is I have an IQ between 127 and 143, and that is enough to qualify me for an "A".

Harrisfan once again offers evidence of his mental incapacity by claiming that the polls are leftist without offering any evidence. Apparently, if the results of a poll or polls aren't to his liking, that makes them leftist. This kind of thinking, if you want to dignify such mental processes with that word, clearly undercuts any claim to superior mental acuity.

 

5 minutes ago, placeholder said:

For those of you who may not be aware of what test Harrisfan is referring to, it's an online IQ test which Harrisfan claims gave him an IQ ranging between 127 to 143. It seems bizarre that someone claiming to have a high IQ would believe that such a claim coming from an anonymous person should have valid evidentiary value. The proof is in the pudding, and to mix metaphors, given the quality of his posts, Harrisfan's claim is very weak tea. 

I can imagine Harris as a schoolboy who gets an "F" on a test and then tells his teacher "I don't care if my examples weren't relevant and I didn't offer evidence to back up my claims. The fact is I have an IQ between 127 and 143, and that is enough to qualify me for an "A".

Harrisfan once again offers evidence of his mental incapacity by claiming that the polls are leftist without offering any evidence. Apparently, if the results of a poll or polls aren't to his liking, that makes them leftist. This kind of thinking, if you want to dignify such mental processes with that word, clearly undercuts any claim to superior mental acuity.

 

Intelligent people know which polls are leftist. They say who paid for it on websites. Hard to believe you know next to nothing after years of looking at them 

57 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Now a person with a high IQ would try to offer evidence that there were other polls taken about the same time that had sharply different results

You are not dealing with someone with a high IQ, just someone with a high post count and a high desire to to get “likes” 

18 minutes ago, placeholder said:

For those of you who may not be aware of what test Harrisfan is referring to, it's an online IQ test which Harrisfan claims gave him an IQ ranging between 127 to 143. It seems bizarre that someone claiming to have a high IQ would believe that such a claim coming from an anonymous person should have valid evidentiary value. The proof is in the pudding, and to mix metaphors, given the quality of his posts, Harrisfan's claim is very weak tea. 

I can imagine Harris as a schoolboy who gets an "F" on a test and then tells his teacher "I don't care if my examples weren't relevant and I didn't offer evidence to back up my claims. The fact is I have an IQ between 127 and 143, and that is enough to qualify me for an "A".

Harrisfan once again offers evidence of his mental incapacity by claiming that the polls are leftist without offering any evidence. Apparently, if the results of a poll or polls aren't to his liking, that makes them leftist. This kind of thinking, if you want to dignify such mental processes with that word, clearly undercuts any claim to superior mental acuity.

 

Ever since the internet was invented village idiots have become the forum idiots.

11 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

Intelligent people know which polls are leftist. They say who paid for it on websites. Hard to believe you know next to nothing after years of looking at them 

I've noticed that you support Trump yet are a Harrisfan. Does this mean Kamala Harris, Harris County, Texas, Xander Harris, Emmylou Harris or do you just like the name Harry, which Harris is a derivative of?

2 minutes ago, MalcolmB said:

Ever since the internet was invented village idiots have become the forum idiots.

Speaking of which, youve been consistently wrong about everything. I dont think youve ever been correct about a single thing youve ever posted here

7 minutes ago, MalcolmB said:

You are not dealing with someone with a high IQ, just someone with a high post count and a high desire to to get “likes” 

127 to 143. Yours would be 95 or so.

1 hour ago, placeholder said:

Do you understand what cherry picking means? The article cited the three latest polls. You got that? Not one but three. Now a person with a high IQ would try to offer evidence that there were other polls taken about the same time that had sharply different results. Or, perhaps, they would some evidence that these three polls, or some subset of them, have a history of bias. In other words, a person with an IQ ranging from 127 to 143 would offer something called evidence. They woould definitely not believe that offering a negative characterization unbacked by evidence would have any dispositive value.

Hope they were different polls to the ones that kept telling you Harris was going to win

1 minute ago, hotsun said:

Speaking of which, youve been consistently wrong about everything. I dont think youve ever been correct about a single thing youve ever posted here

Correct, he's a 33% poster. D-

1 minute ago, frank83628 said:

Hope they were different polls to the ones that kept telling you Harris was going to win

He's not smart enough to figure that out. Took me an hour. He's had 9 years of studying Trump polls and still no idea.

2 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

Correct, he's a 33% poster. D-

He said trump was cooked. His social media usage told him that harris was the sure winner. What an idiot

6 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

I've noticed that you support Trump yet are a Harrisfan. Does this mean Kamala Harris, Harris County, Texas, Xander Harris, Emmylou Harris or do you just like the name Harry, which Harris is a derivative of?

Many people named Harris 

3 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

He's not smart enough to figure that out. Took me an hour. He's had 9 years of studying Trump polls and still no idea.

Got to be very thick skinned to keep posting as much as he does after being proved Wrong practically every time

Great title, since Trump is the true Liberal and the Socialists are on the run.

 

The shrieking of the Socialists from the cesspool of history that occurs every time the American people flush is music to my ears.

1 minute ago, Yagoda said:

Great title, since Trump is the true Liberal and the Socialists are on the run.

 

The shrieking of the Socialists from the cesspool of history that occurs every time the American people flush is music to my ears.

100 cycle on socialism. The pests keep coming back. Maybe a war in 2039? 

20 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

I've noticed that you support Trump yet are a Harrisfan. Does this mean Kamala Harris, Harris County, Texas, Xander Harris, Emmylou Harris or do you just like the name Harry, which Harris is a derivative of?

I always thought it was a deritive of 'arse' from cockney rhyming slang. Arse = bottle and glass = bottle = Aristotle =  Aris

1 hour ago, Harrisfan said:

Nice cherry pick. You would be a good fruit picker.

At least he'd have a job and be contributing to society, rather than being a serial poster and uploading pics of his meals like a modern teenage girl.

25 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

I've noticed that you support Trump yet are a Harrisfan. Does this mean Kamala Harris, Harris County, Texas, Xander Harris, Emmylou Harris or do you just like the name Harry, which Harris is a derivative of?

He's just the latest iteration of the shut-in who has gone by such names as Sparktrader, Bignok, susanlea, uttradit, etc.

 

2200 post in 20 days. Oh my!

1 minute ago, Walker88 said:

He's just the latest iteration of the shut-in who has gone by such names as Sparktrader, Bignok, susanlea, uttradit, etc.

 

2200 post in 20 days. Oh my!

I see the resemblance in some of those names for sure as far as posting habits, and especially as they were all Trump supporters.

7 minutes ago, Walker88 said:

At least he'd have a job and be contributing to society, rather than being a serial poster and uploading pics of his meals like a modern teenage girl.

Yes old men who insult Trump like 14yo girls are such an amazing contribution to society.

1 hour ago, Harrisfan said:

Nice cherry pick. You would be a good fruit picker.

What are you good at picking besides awful replies?

Just now, Harrisfan said:

Yes old men who insult Trump like 14yo girls are such an amazing contribution to society.

Why would you insult 14 year old girls like that? Sad. 

1 minute ago, FriscoKid said:

Why would you insult 14 year old girls like that? Sad. 

First time I agree. Yes girls are more intelligent.

9 minutes ago, Walker88 said:

At least he'd have a job and be contributing to society, rather than being a serial poster and uploading pics of his meals like a modern teenage girl.

But it needs to be a cheap bargain meal too, otherwise Susan won't eat it.