Jump to content

Tesla’s Sales Plummet, Marking Lowest Numbers in Three Years


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Boycott Tesla, don't buy anything that he is associated with, knock him off his pedestal,

Maybe you should give Zelensky a call and tell him to stop using Starlink. Of course as it is Space X is covering the cost.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
2 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Show me some evidence that he's actually saving money and not simply cutting jobs for people who were supervising the treatment of Alzheimer patients, and providing medicine for the poorest kids in the world, resulting in their deaths.

 

Show me some evidence of cuts in divisions that deserve to be cut. I don't care about jingos I don't care about slogans. I want some hard evidence provide me some links please. 

 

Did you need hard evidence that tax money wasn't being wasted?  Are you so naive to base it on trust?  Do you have hard evidence that (already) kids are dying purely due to cuts Musk has made in the last month?  I want some hard evidence provide me some links please.  

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
7 hours ago, JonnyF said:

although personally I wouldn't buy any EV of any brand.

Quite wise too. It's a <deleted > technology that is going to be consigned to the bin along with VDO tape once hydrogen takes off. All those believers that bought overpriced toy cars and can't sell them for a $1. :cheesy:

 

Meanwhile I'll stick to my ICE car. I can drive far as I like and carry spare fuel in the car- don't need to spend valuable time waiting for a charge point and longer for a charge. EVs are OK for the city, but a nonsense for long distance travel. Baaaaah.

  • Agree 1
Posted
3 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Even a Ford Ranger is made of parts from 24 different countries.

If I needed proof that the world has gone mad that is it. What person with a brain cell thinks that is a good idea. Can you remember when cars were entirely made in the US, and US jobs were not outsourced to poor countries to exploit poor workers for more profit to US shareholders? I can.

  • Like 1
Posted

The product is <deleted>e, so many recalls.

 

I hope it goes bankrupt and it should because the unelected piece of scum who's not even a Yank deserves to feel the full fury of the consumer.

 

No new products launched in over 5 years, he's been sitting on his fat arse thinking people will continue to buy crap that's out of date.

 

Getting a endorsement from Trump is the same as feeling the rope around your neck.

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Posted

The product is <deleted>e, so many recalls.

 

I hope it goes bankrupt and it should because the unelected piece of scum who's not even a Yank deserves to feel the full fury of the consumer.

 

No new products launched in over 5 years, he's been sitting on his fat arse thinking people will continue to buy crap that's out of date.

 

Getting a endorsement from Trump is the same as feeling the rope around your neck.

  • Love It 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Andycoops said:

The product is <deleted>e, so many recalls.

 

I hope it goes bankrupt and it should because the unelected piece of scum who's not even a Yank deserves to feel the full fury of the consumer.

 

No new products launched in over 5 years, he's been sitting on his fat arse thinking people will continue to buy crap that's out of date.

On that I agree. Before the election Musk was just a loser that tried to make the Thai use a submarine to rescue kids in a flooded cave, and insulted the real hero when it was rejected. If he didn't have a lot of money he'd be a bad joke.

  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Andycoops said:

The product is <deleted>e, so many recalls.

 

I hope it goes bankrupt and it should because the unelected piece of scum who's not even a Yank deserves to feel the full fury of the consumer.

 

No new products launched in over 5 years, he's been sitting on his fat arse thinking people will continue to buy crap that's out of date.

 

Getting an endorsement from Trump is the same as feeling the rope around your neck.

On top of which he hasn’t yet figured out he’s Trump’s fall guy.

 

 

 

 

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
4 hours ago, fredwiggy said:

I agree but he has people behind him that give him advice, and are more knowledgeable on things.

One would certainly think that that's the case, but these current policies are not a reflection of that on any level. Never forget, one of the reasons why America became the world's leading economy was due to low tariffs which sparked a very dynamic economy.

 

Trump appears to be putting out that fire with a vengeance. 

 

 

FB_IMG_1743268135269.jpg

  • Confused 1
Posted
35 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

If I needed proof that the world has gone mad that is it. What person with a brain cell thinks that is a good idea. Can you remember when cars were entirely made in the US, and US jobs were not outsourced to poor countries to exploit poor workers for more profit to US shareholders? I can.

You seem to be living in yesteryear, yes you can argue that the 50s to the 70s were a good time for America, but a lot has changed since then and there's a multitude of reasons why many products are not being made in the US anymore. That's not going to change, the tariffs are not going to change that, nothing's going to change. 

 

Have you ever heard of the concept of economic ecosystems? 

 

It’s a total mess. As the Ford Motor chief executive Jim Farley courageously (compared to other chief executives) pointed out, “Let’s be real honest: Long term, a 25 percent tariff across the Mexico and Canada borders would blow a hole in the U.S. industry that we’ve never seen.”

 

Trump is going to get a crash course in the hard realities of the global economy as it really is — not how he imagines it.

 

Ecosystems? Listen a bit to Beinhocker, who is also the executive director of the Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School. In the real world, he argues, “There is no such thing as the American economy anymore that you can identify in any real, tangible way. There’s just this accounting fiction that we call U.S. G.D.P.” To be sure, he says, “There are American interests in the economy. There are American workers. There are American consumers. There are firms based in America. But there is no American economy in that isolated sense.”

 

The old days, he added, “where you made wine and I made cheese, and you had everything you needed to make wine and I had everything I needed to make cheese and so we traded with each other — which made us both better off, as Adam Smith taught — those days are long gone.” Except in Trump’s head.

 

Instead, there is a global web of commercial, manufacturing, services and trading “ecosystems,” explains Beinhocker. “There is an automobile ecosystem. There’s an A.I. ecosystem. There’s a smartphone ecosystem. There’s a drug development ecosystem. There is the chip-making ecosystem.” And the people, parts and knowledge that make up those ecosystems all move back and forth across many economies.

 

As NPR noted in a recent story about the auto industry, “carmakers have built a vast, complicated supply chain that spans North America, with parts crossing back and forth across borders throughout the auto manufacturing process. … Some parts cross borders multiple times — like, say, a wire that is manufactured in the U.S., sent to Mexico to be bundled into a group of wires, and then back to the U.S. for installation into a bigger piece of a car, like a seat.”

 

Trump just waves off all of this. He told reporters that the U.S. is not reliant on Canada. “We don’t need them to make our cars,” he said.

 

Actually, we do. And thank goodness for that. It not only enables us to make cars cheaper, but also better. All that a Model T did was get you from point to point faster than a horse, but today’s cars offer you heating and cooling and entertainment from the internet and satellites. They will navigate for you and even drive for you — and they’re much safer. When we can combine more complex knowledge and complex parts to solve complex problems, our quality of life soars.

 

But here’s the catch. You cannot make complex stuff alone anymore. It’s too complex. And if you are not part of these ecosystems, your country will not thrive.”

 

 

 

FB_IMG_1741712766944.jpg

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Posted
2 hours ago, James105 said:

 

Did you need hard evidence that tax money wasn't being wasted?  Are you so naive to base it on trust?  Do you have hard evidence that (already) kids are dying purely due to cuts Musk has made in the last month?  I want some hard evidence provide me some links please.  

The cuts have been fast and sweeping. “We spent the weekend feeding USAID into the wood chipper,” Musk posted on February 3 on X (formerly Twitter), the social media site he owns.

 

The effects of these actions immediately ricocheted around the world, and they will continue to be felt for years to come. They will especially threaten young children and women, for whom USAID funding has been providing lifesaving basic medical services that have ranged from vaccines to treatments for diarrheal diseases to maternal health care. Studies show this funding has helped save the lives of nearly three million children under age five and at least one million women of reproductive age in recent decades, experts say.

 

Dismantling USAID endangers all of these gains. “This is like trying to pause an airplane in midflight and then subsequently firing the crew,” says Atul Gawande, former head of global health at USAID.

 

USAID has provided health funding and staff support to numerous countries worldwide. But measuring the effects of that aid—or the sudden lack of it—is a challenge. To do so, William Weiss, a professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health who served as an advisor in the global health bureau at USAID until his agreement was recently suspended, and his colleagues created a model to quantify the effect of USAID funding from 2000 to 2016 on under-five childhood mortality for low- and middle-income countries. The study was published in January 2022 in Population Health Metrics.

 

In a related preprint study posted online last August, Weiss, Gawande and their colleagues modeled the effects of USAID funding on mortality among women of reproductive age between 2005 and 2019. That study, which has been accepted for publication in the Journal of Global Health, found that for the years 2009 through 2019, countries that received a sustained high level of USAID funding saw a mortality rate reduction of 0.8 death per 1,000 women of reproductive age. This translates to about one million to 1.3 million deaths prevented, or four extra years of life expectancy, says Gawande, who is a surgeon at Brigham and Women's Hospital, as well as a writer and public health researcher.

 

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/usaid-funding-saved-millions-of-childrens-lives-recent-cuts-put-it-in/

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
4 hours ago, fredwiggy said:

I agree but he has people behind him that give him advice, and are more knowledgeable on things.

People such as Musk for example?

 

After all, Trump only chooses the best of the best people to work for him. The fact that you won't get a job if you disagree with him, or even if you have a job and disagree with him, you will be fired and your department possibly closed down.

 

The problem with hiring yes men to surround yourself with, is always a bad plan, They will always tell you want to hear, which is not necessarily the truth or reality.

  • Confused 1
Posted
1 minute ago, billd766 said:

People such as Musk for example?

 

After all, Trump only chooses the best of the best people to work for him. The fact that you won't get a job if you disagree with him, or even if you have a job and disagree with him, you will be fired and your department possibly closed down.

 

The problem with hiring yes men to surround yourself with, is always a bad plan, They will always tell you want to hear, which is not necessarily the truth or reality.

People such as Congress. Time will tell if what he's doing will help or backfire. Some of the things will definitely hurt relations with other countries.

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, James105 said:

 

Did you need hard evidence that tax money wasn't being wasted?  Are you so naive to base it on trust?  Do you have hard evidence that (already) kids are dying purely due to cuts Musk has made in the last month?  I want some hard evidence provide me some links please.  

Trust, like respect in a person, is something that is earned and NOT freely given.

 

The poster made a simple and easy to fill request.

 

If you cannot provide an answer, Why bother to post?

  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

The cuts have been fast and sweeping. “We spent the weekend feeding USAID into the wood chipper,” Musk posted on February 3 on X (formerly Twitter), the social media site he owns.

 

The effects of these actions immediately ricocheted around the world, and they will continue to be felt for years to come. They will especially threaten young children and women, for whom USAID funding has been providing lifesaving basic medical services that have ranged from vaccines to treatments for diarrheal diseases to maternal health care. Studies show this funding has helped save the lives of nearly three million children under age five and at least one million women of reproductive age in recent decades, experts say.

 

Dismantling USAID endangers all of these gains. “This is like trying to pause an airplane in midflight and then subsequently firing the crew,” says Atul Gawande, former head of global health at USAID.

 

USAID has provided health funding and staff support to numerous countries worldwide. But measuring the effects of that aid—or the sudden lack of it—is a challenge. To do so, William Weiss, a professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health who served as an advisor in the global health bureau at USAID until his agreement was recently suspended, and his colleagues created a model to quantify the effect of USAID funding from 2000 to 2016 on under-five childhood mortality for low- and middle-income countries. The study was published in January 2022 in Population Health Metrics.

 

In a related preprint study posted online last August, Weiss, Gawande and their colleagues modeled the effects of USAID funding on mortality among women of reproductive age between 2005 and 2019. That study, which has been accepted for publication in the Journal of Global Health, found that for the years 2009 through 2019, countries that received a sustained high level of USAID funding saw a mortality rate reduction of 0.8 death per 1,000 women of reproductive age. This translates to about one million to 1.3 million deaths prevented, or four extra years of life expectancy, says Gawande, who is a surgeon at Brigham and Women's Hospital, as well as a writer and public health researcher.

 

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/usaid-funding-saved-millions-of-childrens-lives-recent-cuts-put-it-in/

And all you liberals could easily donate 10% of your income to charities to make up for Trumps cuts, but then you wouldn't be giving other people's money away!

  • Confused 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

And all you liberals could easily donate 10% of your income to charities to make up for Trumps cuts, but then you wouldn't be giving other people's money away!


So cutting food programs to feed poor kids in America, cutting the funding of cancer research, cutting veteran services, cutting social security services, cutting Medicaid etc 

 

To give tax cuts to the hyper wealthy.

 

You’re good with that?

  • Confused 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:


So cutting food programs to feed poor kids in America, cutting the funding of cancer research, cutting veteran services, cutting social security services, cutting Medicaid etc 

 

To give tax cuts to the hyper wealthy.

 

You’re good with that?

Veterans ...... Wouldn't liberals generally refer to them as baby killers?

Now they're your best friend?

 

Cancer research........ More free money for big pharma.

Don't forget vaccine research,that works so well with COVID.

 

Feeding your own countries poor (kids or not) I can agree with.

Feeding other countries poor, not so much.

  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




  • Topics

  • Popular Contributors

  • Latest posts...

    1. 81

      Russell Brand criminally charged with rape...

    2. 0

      Trade Turmoil Deepens as U.S. and China Lock Horns Over Tariffs

    3. 235

      Thailand Digital Arrival Card (TDAC) system is online (but not announced as starting yet)

    4. 24

      Thailand in Talks with US Over New Tariffs

    5. 13

      Katy Perry Promises to Bring Glam to Space in All-Female Blue Origin Mission

    6. 3

      Americans in Pattaya and impact from Tariffs?

  • Popular in The Pub

×
×
  • Create New...