Border Shut Tight: Migrants Turn Back as Trump’s Immigration Crackdown Takes Hold

[Tug]

4 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

Team Biden insisted that he couldn't do it without an act of Congress.  Surely, you're not saying he was lying?

Legally Biden is correct but then again Biden isn’t an enemy to the constitution nor a scofflaw or a dictator but you know that ……

[thesetat]

5 minutes ago, Tug said:

He’s grabbing people off the streets and shipping them to a foreign supermax without trial or due process that’s unacceptable unamerican unchristian unhinged evil and unlawful period all stop 🛑 if after due process and proved then simple deportation or if a crime has been committed then to the appropriate authority to be prosecuted.we are not fascist in the United States that’s why there’s pushback no more no less.are you fascist?do you condone grabbing people off the street and shipping them to a foreign supermax?

You twist this story to suit your needs to complain only.... this. story is not about getting the illegal criminals out of the USA. this is about stopping them from entering. You really need to seek help in your thought process regarding Trump and what is happening. You twist everything into bad that he does. Even when it is good

[jesimps]

38 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Also the policy of very other Republican administration in memory. These were people applying for LEGAL refugee status, not illegal immigrants. It sounds like they are accomplishing something but what it actually is, is a humanitarian crisis.

The correct way is to apply for a visa legally whilst in your home country. Even those claiming refugee status apply at the border, not wander across willy nilly making it almost impossible to send you back without the interference of Democrat-appointed activist judges. A secure border is the right course of action and was part of Trumps manifesto which the majority of the people in the US voted for. Refreshing for a politician to deliver on his pre-election promises.

[cjinchiangrai]

2 minutes ago, jesimps said:

The correct way is to apply for a visa legally whilst in your home country. Even those claiming refugee status apply at the border, not wander across willy nilly making it almost impossible to send you back without the interference of Democrat-appointed activist judges. A secure border is the right course of action and was part of Trumps manifesto which the majority of the people in the US voted for. Refreshing for a politician to deliver on his pre-election promises.

Unless you are applying as a refugee, where you have escaped your home country. 

 

A majority of those that had their vote recorded, not a majority of the population.

[dinsdale]

1 hour ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Also the policy of very other Republican administration in memory. These were people applying for LEGAL refugee status, not illegal immigrants. It sounds like they are accomplishing something but what it actually is, is a humanitarian crisis.

You are kidding surely. The borders have been closed to stop illegal immigration.  This has happened. There is a saying "credit where credit is due" but sadly those like you will never come to terms with this. I have said before that Trump could end all wars, hunger and all disease and people like you would still try and come out with "Trump Bad".

[KhunLA]

Shutting the border ... too easy ❤️

 

Have to disagree with the 'criminal in waiting' ... " “There’s no more hope for entering legally as long as Donald Trump is there, and anyone telling you otherwise is lying,” he added."

 

That is and was never a legal way to enter the USA.  Just an accepted 'catch & release' program, under Obama & Biden, that if not a registered criminal, if even having ID to check, then you simply got a court date at Imm court, for your case review, but released to do whatever.   

 

Go to a sanctuary state, CA & NY, register Dem and 'Live the Dream' 

 

You cross the border without registering first, you violated imm law, and you are a criminal, an illegal alien.

 

[metisdead]

Posts using derogatory and toxic nicknames or intentional misspelling of people’s names will be removed. If you don’t want your post to be removed, spell people’s names correctly, this applies to both sides of the political debate.

[biggles45]

'A majority of those that had their vote recorded, not a majority of the population."

 

Yes, but if people who oppose something don't care enough to go & vote against it, that's their fault, not the winning candidate. He got a majority from the people who cared, that's what counted! 

[thesetat]

2 hours ago, jesimps said:

What for illegally invading the US? Because that's what it is, an invasion without the use of arms. Why should it require an act of congress to repel an invading army?? Law-abiding people, when they want to enter a country apply for a visa whilst in their home country, only criminals and those with nothing to offer crash the border. This instantly makes them a lawbreaker, if they weren't before. Act of congress my rear end.

I like the word you used. It seems not many are willing to follow that route. But when there are 100,000 of thousands of illegals trying to enter to live without registering... that is called an invasion.. and should allow any means to repel them.... Invasions definition 

Some common synonyms of invade are encroach, infringe, and trespass

[frank83628]

Well done Trump, you did exactly what you said you would and Biden said couldn't, and denied even was happening.

 

The UK needs a trump style border control. not the weak people running it now.

[cjinchiangrai]

3 hours ago, impulse said:

The legislation you're referring to would have allowed up to 5000 illegals a day before closing the border.  Thank God it didn't pass, or they'd be suing Trump for not allowing the 5000 a day.

Not illegals. 5000 asylum seekers, properly applying with INS.

[frank83628]

3 hours ago, thesetat said:

Leave it to a Trump hater or Dem to twist this into something bad. For years illegals have been crossing undetected into the US. Finally someone, albeit Trump, did something to stop it. And here you are making that into a bad thing. 

 

They hate everything he says or does regardless.

A Democratic senator flew to El Salvador using Tax payer money, fighting to bring back an ms13 gang member that Trump deported.

They attack Musk for trying weed out government wastage of tax payer money.

They have no moral compass whatsoever

[frank83628]

3 hours ago, Tug said:

He’s grabbing people off the streets and shipping them to a foreign supermax without trial or due process that’s unacceptable unamerican unchristian unhinged evil and unlawful period all stop 🛑 if after due process and proved then simple deportation or if a crime has been committed then to the appropriate authority to be prosecuted.we are not fascist in the United States that’s why there’s pushback no more no less.are you fascist?do you condone grabbing people off the street and shipping them to a foreign supermax?

He is not just grabbing random people off the streets, how utterly stupid do you have to be to believe that.

 

 

[thesetat]

25 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

He is not just grabbing random people off the streets, how utterly stupid do you have to be to believe that.

 

 

@Tug... There are over 10 million illegal immigrants in the US...With only 700 immigration judges in the whole country. It will take longer than our lifetime or our kids to put every illegal immigrant before a judge just to say he broke the law by entering illegally and should be deported immediately.... 

By the way, for decades, California, Texas, and other border cities have captured illegal immigrants on US soil prior to Trump and been deported immediately without seeing any judge. California immigration raided farms and factories many times and were shipped back to Mexico right away. On a bus to Mexico as fast as possible. No one screamed then about it. All this huffing and puffing is simply because Trump is doing it now. 

 

In the 1990s.. immigrants were fast tracked back to their country in huge numbers. Were you there at the border screaming how bad this was? I am most certain you were not. But yet, here you are with hatred for Trump. Here the Dems are with losing face and all almost majority in elections. Fighting for something that has been done many times throughout American history without protesters, riots, or politicians using as a means to demean Trumps actions. Your hate fuels you for this. Without any rational thought. 

 

• Focus on "Fast" Removal:

  During the 1990s, there was a push for faster removal of undocumented immigrants, leading to increased use of "expedited removal" procedures, which allowed for quick deportation without a formal hearing before an immigration judge.

[riclag]

7 hours ago, impulse said:

 

You mean that legislation that codified and normalized up to 5000 illegals a day before anyone was allowed to act?

 

Can you imagine the chaos by the Dem party that’s favored by 20 something %,if those 5,000 were forced to be vetted!

[WDSmart]

I'm not a constitutional lawyer, but I would think closing a border would have to be done by an act of Congress, not the President. I could believe the President could close a border temporarily in an emergency, but I think it would have to be an emergency like a military invasion or a health crisis. I hope this doesn't last very long, or the price of a lot of agricultural items, like fruits and vegetables, will skyrocket without the help of low-cost workers.

[riclag]

1 hour ago, frank83628 said:

They hate everything he says or does regardless.

A Democratic senator flew to El Salvador using Tax payer money, fighting to bring back an ms13 gang member that Trump deported.

They attack Musk for trying weed out government wastage of tax payer money.

They have no moral compass whatsoever

Actually its Democrat Senator and yes looking through history , they/ them use to stand up for the middle class & poor Americans !

But now ,not so much .Some Online platforms  have the senator with  many MS13  tatt memes 

on his face!

[Red Forever]

5 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

You sure about that? The majority cross the border at a place with no port of entry. An illegal act AFAIK.  They can apply for refugee status at an American consulate or embassy in Mexico.

 

In any case, Trump is doing what the public wants. Support for deporting ALL illegals is something like 56%. A clear answer from the people.

Hmm…. 56%. Hardly a ringing endorsement but still better than the 49+ % that the orange moron garnered in his “ landslide “ election victory.

[riclag]

4 hours ago, dinsdale said:

You are kidding surely. The borders have been closed to stop illegal immigration.  This has happened. There is a saying "credit where credit is due" but sadly those like you will never come to terms with this. I have said before that Trump could end all wars, hunger and all disease and people like you would still try and come out with "Trump Bad".

Have you ever considered that many on the international left don’t believe in border walls, or border restrictions !

Just one big Global society, were your

free to travel, live,work, vote , get health care , go to school all on the Government they choose to go to , dime

 

[Cryingdick]

12 hours ago, impulse said:

 

You mean that legislation that codified and normalized up to 5000 illegals a day before anyone was allowed to act?

 

For 5 days in a row per  rolling calendar week. lol I forget exactly what it was but it was simply retarded. 

[Magictoad]

So Trump said he was going to stop illegal immigration and he stopped illegal immigration.  WELL DONE THAT MAN. And he's just starting.....

Oh: what do the Democrats have to say or their media? LOL

[Magictoad]

5 hours ago, riclag said:

Have you ever considered that many on the international left don’t believe in border walls, or border restrictions !

Just one big Global society, were your

free to travel, live,work, vote , get health care , go to school all on the Government they choose to go to , dime

 

Unfortunately true. That's why we need Trump and his ilk.

[Magictoad]

8 hours ago, frank83628 said:

Well done Trump, you did exactly what you said you would and Biden said couldn't, and denied even was happening.

 

The UK needs a trump style border control. not the weak people running it now.

So true. We in the UK are being OVERRUN by people who hate our culture and history.

[Magictoad]

10 hours ago, Tug said:

Legally Biden is correct but then again Biden isn’t an enemy to the constitution nor a scofflaw or a dictator but you know that ……

Biden was/is a senile stumblebum. 

[NoDisplayName]

10 hours ago, Tug said:

He’s grabbing people off the streets and shipping them to a foreign supermax without trial or due process that’s unacceptable unamerican unchristian unhinged evil and unlawful period all stop 🛑

 

I thought we stopped extraordinarily kidnapping random individuals off the streets of Europe for rendition to assorted BLack sites for "enhanced interrogation."

 

Next, you'll tell me Trump is ordering the execution of American citizens by drone strike without trial.

 

'Cause he's a fassist.

[blaze master]

11 hours ago, thesetat said:

Leave it to a Trump hater or Dem to twist this into something bad. For years illegals have been crossing undetected into the US. Finally someone, albeit Trump, did something to stop it. And here you are making that into a bad thing. 

 

 

Quite a few posters here simply cannot put their deep rooted hate aside to see anything positive......all while telling everyone how so and so is dividing everything. 

 

Classic.

[NoDisplayName]

5 hours ago, WDSmart said:

I'm not a constitutional lawyer, but I would think closing a border would have to be done by an act of Congress, not the President. I could believe the President could close a border temporarily in an emergency, but I think it would have to be an emergency like a military invasion or a health crisis. I hope this doesn't last very long, or the price of a lot of agricultural items, like fruits and vegetables, will skyrocket without the help of low-cost workers.

 

secure ≠ close

[blaze master]

3 minutes ago, NoDisplayName said:

 

I thought we stopped extraordinarily kidnapping random individuals off the streets of Europe for rendition to assorted BLack sites for "enhanced interrogation."

 

Next, you'll tell me Trump is ordering the execution of American citizens by drone strike without trial.

 

'Cause he's a fassist.

 

Obama is the only 1 so far to kill an American citizen with a drone strike.

[NoDisplayName]

3 minutes ago, blaze master said:

 

Obama is the only 1 so far to kill an American citizen with a drone strike.

 

And he got a nobel peace prize!

[blaze master]

1 minute ago, NoDisplayName said:

 

And he got a nobel peace prize!

 

Obama is the drone king.