Another woke Judge’s Decision Sparks Outrage in Tesla Firebomb Case

[Chomper Higgot]

1 hour ago, BangkokReady said:

 

So, how do you work it out? Apart from being White, this person seems to be totally in your team.

 

Is it like a game of Top Trumps?  (No, not that Trump.)

‘My team’?

 

Again, you are letting your imagination get the better of you.

[Scott Tracy]

6 hours ago, mikeymike100 said:

The judges are supposed to be non political and impartial, obviously this proves otherwise!

Oh the irony. Most of them are political appointees or elected officials. 

[Scott Tracy]

11 hours ago, Social Media said:

It’s only by a miracle no one was maimed or killed; this is no different from throwing molotovs through the window of a mosque or synagogue,” one observer noted

Good grief. A car showroom being equated to a place of worship now...? I notice that 'church' is not mentioned....

[chondan]

5 hours ago, impulse said:

 

Not much different than 150x as likely to get prison time for assaulting a cop on Jan6 than during the summer of love and peaceful town burnings.  Just another data point.

 

I'm not going to go through the numbers again (boring), but this tells a pretty good story:

 

BLM:

 

Over 16,000 arrests and only 70 of them got prison time. That's one per 29 injured cops.

 

Jan6:

 

Thats 7 per each injured cop.

 

I was in MPLS during that time.  Had to grocery shop 50 miles from home.

[chondan]

Should have spent a year or two or more in a psych jail cell.  Could have affirmed there.

[mikeymike100]

17 hours ago, Scott Tracy said:

Oh the irony. Most of them are political appointees or elected officials. 

Well there is the problem??

[jerrymahoney]

Maybe soon there will be a story that someone arrested for torching Tesla's at a dealership lot was actually paid by the Tesla dealership owner to torch the cars as they have become unsalable lemons and this way the dealer can at least recoup by collecting on the insurance.

[frank83628]

18 hours ago, WDSmart said:

As most of you probably already know, any defendant, regardless of the crime they are charged with, is presumed innocent. So, unless they are considered a flight risk or a further risk to the community, they should at least be given bail or, like in this case, a supervised home release, or even a completely unsupervised release.

Not true, it depends on the offence and persons criminal history.

Violent offeces are less likely to get bail, 1St time offenders are more likely to get bail.

If someone had dIED I would probably be different.

The fact that they are trans means they are mentally unstable and perhaps a psyc ward and meds would be better than prison

[WDSmart]

1 hour ago, frank83628 said:

20 hours ago, WDSmart said:

As most of you probably already know, any defendant, regardless of the crime they are charged with, is presumed innocent. So, unless they are considered a flight risk or a further risk to the community, they should at least be given bail or, like in this case, a supervised home release, or even a completely unsupervised release.

Not true, it depends on the offence and persons criminal history.

Violent offeces are less likely to get bail, 1St time offenders are more likely to get bail.

Yes, what you say in this part of your response is true, but all that is taken into consideration to determine if, as I've said above, "they are considered a flight risk or a further risk to the community". 

[Chomper Higgot]

1 hour ago, frank83628 said:

Not true, it depends on the offence and persons criminal history.

Violent offeces are less likely to get bail, 1St time offenders are more likely to get bail.

If someone had dIED I would probably be different.

The fact that they are trans means they are mentally unstable and perhaps a psyc ward and meds would be better than prison

“The fact that they are trans means they are mentally unstable and perhaps a psyc ward and meds would be better than prison”

 

Is that your considered professional medical opinion or are you simply talking garbage?

[frank83628]

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

“The fact that they are trans means they are mentally unstable and perhaps a psyc ward and meds would be better than prison”

 

Is that your considered professional medical opinion or are you simply talking garbage?

50/50

[StandardIssue]

On 5/2/2025 at 7:18 PM, RuamRudy said:

 

It proves nothing of the sort. It merely shows that your innate tribalism is causing you to challenge anything that goes against your own biases and label it as partial. 

Exactly. Woke judges? Even the post reeks of bias. Just trash and a waste of time. It proves nothing.

[ThreeCardMonte]

On 5/3/2025 at 8:57 AM, mikeymike100 said:

The judges are supposed to be non political and impartial, obviously this proves otherwise!

Same same with illegal alien (terrorist) removal cases.

[ThreeCardMonte]

On 5/3/2025 at 9:01 AM, Chomper Higgot said:

Why is this a surprise?

 

White defendants are far less likely to be remanded in custody than defendants from any other ethnic background.

 

https://www.prisonpolicy.org/blog/2019/10/09/pretrial_race/

Your white guilt is remarkable!

 

Where was your indoctrination?

[ThreeCardMonte]

It’s all part of LAWFARE 2.0.  1.0 didn’t go in their favor so the left needs a new tactic.

 

What I find even more amusing is a few short years ago Elon was the GOAT with the left.

 

Electric vehicles very good.  ICE very bad.

 

They’d turn on their own mother in a heartbeat.

 

[hotsun]

1 minute ago, ThreeCardMonte said:

It’s all part of LAWFARE 2.0.  1.0 didn’t go in their favor so the left needs a new tactic.

 

What I find even more amusing is a few short years ago Elon was the GOAT with the left.

 

Electric vehicles very good.  ICE very bad.

 

They’d turn on their own mother in a heartbeat.

 

They dont even care about their own beliefs, or about the planet. Just about their agenda

[ThreeCardMonte]

1 minute ago, hotsun said:

They dont even care about their own beliefs, or about the planet. Just about their agenda

The reason is because Elon stands by and supports Trump.  100 percent.

 

If Elon supported Harris there would be no Tesla vandalism.  I guarantee it.

 

LAWFARE 2.0

 

 

[mogandave]

2 hours ago, jerrymahoney said:

Maybe soon there will be a story that someone arrested for torching Tesla's at a dealership lot was actually paid by the Tesla dealership owner to torch the cars as they have become unsalable lemons and this way the dealer can at least recoup by collecting on the insurance.

I think Tesla owns Tesla dealerships. 

 

 

[ThreeCardMonte]

The leftists and their ideology is disgusting.

 

 

 

 

[jerrymahoney]

27 minutes ago, mogandave said:

I think Tesla owns Tesla dealerships. 

 

 

OK. Seems you are right. So I will back peddle and still say it's possible some torchings are deliberate by owner(s) for insurance.

[safarimike11]

On 5/3/2025 at 4:07 AM, Social Media said:

 

A controversial court decision in Massachusetts has ignited public debate after a judge allowed a suspect accused of firebombing a Tesla dealership to await trial under supervised home release. The move, made by Judge Jessica Hedges, has drawn criticism for what many see as excessive leniency in a case involving politically motivated property destruction.

 

The defendant, Owen McIntire, faces serious charges after allegedly setting fire to vehicles at a Tesla dealership, resulting in hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages. Authorities say the act was carried out in protest against the politics of Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla. While no injuries were reported, the incident has been described by critics as highly dangerous and ideologically driven.

 

“It’s only by a miracle no one was maimed or killed; this is no different from throwing molotovs through the window of a mosque or synagogue,” one observer noted, underscoring the perceived severity of McIntire’s actions. Yet, rather than being held in custody, McIntire was granted home release to ensure continued access to cross-gender hormone treatment, as well as medication for autism and ADHD.

 

This decision has been described by some as a stark example of judicial bias, with accusations that the court is prioritizing the defendant’s identity and personal circumstances over public safety. “Judge Jessica Hedges had more sympathy for the accused terrorist than the victims and potential victims,” one critic charged. “It’s impossible to imagine this or any other judge being this lenient on a right-wing terrorist.”

 

The backlash has also pointed to what some see as a broader pattern of perceived partiality within the judiciary. Citing previous incidents, critics referenced Hennepin County District Attorney Mary Moriarty’s decision not to pursue jail time for a Minnesota government employee who vandalized Teslas across Minneapolis, causing approximately $20,000 in damage. This, they argue, is part of a troubling trend in which individuals who commit politically charged acts against conservative targets receive more favorable treatment.

 

Critics have extended their scrutiny to judges beyond Massachusetts and Minnesota. Milwaukee’s Hannah Dugan was mentioned as another example, after she was accused of misusing her position to shield an undocumented immigrant and was later temporarily stripped of her authority by the state court system. Federal judges such as James Boasberg of the DC Circuit have also faced criticism for issuing broad injunctions against presidential policies, with detractors claiming such actions exceed proper judicial bounds.

 

As for Hedges, the criticism remains pointed. “Hedges is sending a signal: Go ahead, boys and girls. Throw your tantrums, set things on fire, and I’ll make sure all you get is a slap on the wrist,” one commenter remarked, reflecting the frustrations of those who see a double standard in how justice is being administered.

 

Calls are now growing louder for accountability and balance in the judicial system. “America would be a better place if that also happens to Hedges — and any other bench-sitter giving a thumbs-up to crimes as long as they’re anti-Trump,” another critic concluded, capturing the deep divide over how ideology and identity are influencing outcomes in American courts.

 

  Adapted by ASEAN Now from NYP  2025-05-03

 

 

It should be hung, drawn and quartered.

[riclag]

31 minutes ago, ThreeCardMonte said:

The leftists and their ideology is disgusting.

 

 

 

 

Don’t get me goin!

 

[worgeordie]

On 5/3/2025 at 8:57 AM, mikeymike100 said:

The judges are supposed to be non political and impartial, obviously this proves otherwise!

Like the MAGA judges on the Supreme Court.....

 

regards Worgeordie

[riclag]

10 minutes ago, safarimike11 said:

It should be hung, drawn and quartered.

Not until they find  what Ngo anti American  group indoctrinated him

At Umass.

[ThreeCardMonte]

54 minutes ago, riclag said:

Not until they find  what Ngo anti American  group indoctrinated him

At Umass.

Most roads lead to George Soros or his son.

[ThreeCardMonte]

On 5/3/2025 at 4:07 AM, Social Media said:

 

A controversial court decision in Massachusetts has ignited public debate after a judge allowed a suspect accused of firebombing a Tesla dealership to await trial under supervised home release. The move, made by Judge Jessica Hedges, has drawn criticism for what many see as excessive leniency in a case involving politically motivated property destruction.

 

The defendant, Owen McIntire, faces serious charges after allegedly setting fire to vehicles at a Tesla dealership, resulting in hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages. Authorities say the act was carried out in protest against the politics of Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla. While no injuries were reported, the incident has been described by critics as highly dangerous and ideologically driven.

 

“It’s only by a miracle no one was maimed or killed; this is no different from throwing molotovs through the window of a mosque or synagogue,” one observer noted, underscoring the perceived severity of McIntire’s actions. Yet, rather than being held in custody, McIntire was granted home release to ensure continued access to cross-gender hormone treatment, as well as medication for autism and ADHD.

 

This decision has been described by some as a stark example of judicial bias, with accusations that the court is prioritizing the defendant’s identity and personal circumstances over public safety. “Judge Jessica Hedges had more sympathy for the accused terrorist than the victims and potential victims,” one critic charged. “It’s impossible to imagine this or any other judge being this lenient on a right-wing terrorist.”

 

The backlash has also pointed to what some see as a broader pattern of perceived partiality within the judiciary. Citing previous incidents, critics referenced Hennepin County District Attorney Mary Moriarty’s decision not to pursue jail time for a Minnesota government employee who vandalized Teslas across Minneapolis, causing approximately $20,000 in damage. This, they argue, is part of a troubling trend in which individuals who commit politically charged acts against conservative targets receive more favorable treatment.

 

Critics have extended their scrutiny to judges beyond Massachusetts and Minnesota. Milwaukee’s Hannah Dugan was mentioned as another example, after she was accused of misusing her position to shield an undocumented immigrant and was later temporarily stripped of her authority by the state court system. Federal judges such as James Boasberg of the DC Circuit have also faced criticism for issuing broad injunctions against presidential policies, with detractors claiming such actions exceed proper judicial bounds.

 

As for Hedges, the criticism remains pointed. “Hedges is sending a signal: Go ahead, boys and girls. Throw your tantrums, set things on fire, and I’ll make sure all you get is a slap on the wrist,” one commenter remarked, reflecting the frustrations of those who see a double standard in how justice is being administered.

 

Calls are now growing louder for accountability and balance in the judicial system. “America would be a better place if that also happens to Hedges — and any other bench-sitter giving a thumbs-up to crimes as long as they’re anti-Trump,” another critic concluded, capturing the deep divide over how ideology and identity are influencing outcomes in American courts.

 

  Adapted by ASEAN Now from NYP  2025-05-03

 

 

 He does have a purdy mouth.

[Photoguy21]

On 5/3/2025 at 10:15 AM, mikeymike100 said:

So you are saying 'woke judges' (Another woke Judge’s Decision Sparks Outrage in Tesla Firebomb Case) are in fact non political and impartial?.........

You are not impartial if you are "woke"

[frank83628]

2 hours ago, ThreeCardMonte said:

The leftists and their ideology is disgusting.

 

 

 

 

And they say maga is a cult

[mikeymike100]

1 hour ago, worgeordie said:

Like the MAGA judges on the Supreme Court.....

 

regards Worgeordie

There are no 'MAGA' judges on the Supreme court! Are there conservative judges...yes!

 

Justices are bound by legal precedent, constitutional interpretation, and reasoned argumentation, not political loyalty. For instance, Gorsuch authored the majority opinion in Bostock v. Clayton County (2020), extending Title VII protections to LGBTQ workers, a decision at odds with some MAGA-associated social conservative priorities.

Kavanaugh has shown moderation in cases like June Medical Services v. Russo (2020), where he joined Chief Justice Roberts in a narrower concurrence to strike down a Louisiana abortion law, suggesting a pragmatic approach over ideological purity.

Barrett, while consistently conservative, has not publicly endorsed MAGA rhetoric and emphasizes an originalist framework, which predates and exists independently of MAGA ideology.

 

[Yellowtail]

1 hour ago, worgeordie said:

Like the MAGA judges on the Supreme Court.....

 

regards Worgeordie

Which judges on the Supreme Court are MAGA?