3 minutes ago, annotator said:

Well, most of us in MAGA don't seem to be showing any interest now.  Why is that? Why are you defending the Trump administration now when it's clear that the coverup continues? Do you see that it's been revealed that there's a 62 second gap in the videotape?

Adjusting their internal head programming takes a little while.

 

They’ll show up as soon as they’ve received their download of the latest firmware 25.07.320epst (Talking points, deflections and whataboutary).

 

 

3 minutes ago, JAG said:

Fat chance of that, given that the absence of a "client list" gets Trump off a rather nasty hook!

It might.

 

Assuming there’s only one copy.

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

It might.

 

Assuming there’s only one copy.

If Bondi has declared that there is no list then anything else will be dismissed as "fake news"; stand by for some pretty vigorous suppression of any media which dares to challenge that!

10 minutes ago, annotator said:

Well, most of us in MAGA don't seem to be showing any interest now.

 

Alex Jones is still interested.

 

Imagine Joe Rogan and Aaron Rodgers will quietly take "Epstein" off their conspiracy list.

 

 

Just now, JAG said:

If Bondi has declared that there is no list then anything else will be dismissed as "fake news"; stand by for some pretty vigorous suppression of any media which dares to challenge that!

You think so? Then why is Fox News mounting such a strong challenge to that narrative?

7 minutes ago, annotator said:

You think so? Then why is Fox News mounting such a strong challenge to that narrative?

 

Chaos.  It gets so confusing people commence to ignore it.  Works great!

 

 

Mind you, the whole business might not go away that easily!

 

There was an interesting photograph of Trump and Epstein "with company" riding in the back of a limo predominantly displayed at one of the "No Kings" demonstrations the other day.

 

It is rather swirling about "out there"!

15 hours ago, John Drake said:

 

Then why was Epstein in jail, if there were no apparent victims to cite?

Why is Maxwell in jail now, how can you be tried and sentenced to 20yrs for recruting girls if they didnt goto anyone

Hmmm, the previous administration just ignored the issue. The current administration is sweeping it away with a "nothing to see here" presser after promising to uncover the deep state corruption in this matter.

 

Seems like the guilty but powerful can control the narrative no matter which party is leading the govt.

 

If you voted for Trump to expose the deep state corruption it seems like that was a wasted vote. His admin is going way further to protect the list and/or any other fallout than the previous admin.

2 minutes ago, JAG said:

Mind you, the whole business might not go away that easily!

 

There was an interesting photograph of Trump and Epstein "with company" riding in the back of a limo predominantly displayed at one of the "No Kings" demonstrations the other day.

 

It is rather swirling about "out there"!

Time to let go of the Trump involvement, widely published that he banned Epstein from his buildings. The Dems and media have thrown Litterally everything at Trump over the years, if there was any ties they'd have been front page headlines by now.

Well!

 

I find this all very confusing.

 

I have my suspicions someone is lying.

 if there isnt any clients or list then how could he & Maxwell be done for supplying the girls.

 

Appoint a new impartial investigator🤔

Has anyone bothered to talk to Ghislaine Maxwell? She's in prison and could get some time off if she cooperates with the police. On the other hand, some visits from a journalist to elicit the truth could help expose the dirty men that took advantage of her service. 

Would she be found dead in her cell later? Not if she recorded and signed an affidavit first.

8 minutes ago, Purdey said:

Has anyone bothered to talk to Ghislaine Maxwell? She's in prison and could get some time off if she cooperates with the police. On the other hand, some visits from a journalist to elicit the truth could help expose the dirty men that took advantage of her service. 

Would she be found dead in her cell later? Not if she recorded and signed an affidavit first.

Visit from a journalist... who do you suggest do that?  guaranteed the bosses . of the MSM outlets are all rubbing shoulders with politicians and elites who would also potentially be on the non existent list.

34 minutes ago, annotator said:

That's what the libtards have been saying about the 2020 elections. You really want to go with this?

Go with what, that trump is not involved with Epstein?.... yeah, i will go with that.

 

2 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Go with what, that trump is not involved with Epstein?.... yeah, i will go with that.

 

Perhaps you could show us your confirmation of that.........🤔

Sadly, I'm in agreement with this guy:

 

However, former CIA officer John Kiriakou appeared on Fox News on Monday evening and told Jesse Watters that the Epstein files were likely destroyed before Kash Patel and Bongino got to the FBI.

 

“I’m not blaming the FBI director Kash Patel or the Deputy Director Dan Bongino,” John Kirakou said.

 

“I think that that layer beneath them, that’s part of what we like to call the Deep State, has taken this bull by the horns, and they’ve probably destroyed information,” he said.

 

I've always thought it was a 50:50 shot that the public will ever know the truth about JFK, RFK, MLK, Epstein, et.al.  You can't find data and evidence that was long ago destroyed or altered, no matter who's currently in those positions.

 

41 minutes ago, sammieuk1 said:

Appoint a new impartial investigator🤔

is that carol vorderman?

18 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Go with what, that trump is not involved with Epstein?.... yeah, i will go with that.

 

Because you're doing just what the libtards did about the 2020 election. I don't believe President Trump had anything to do with Epstein's criminal activities either. But why doesn't he want to get to the bottom of this?

6 minutes ago, transam said:

Perhaps you could show us your confirmation of that.........🤔

Yes i forgot about the low IQ ers like yourself... i will write it clearly for you.

 

IMO, trump is not involved with Epstein for these reasons

 

1, He banned him from his buildings many years ago, after he allegedly made  comments ragearding someones under age daughter.

2, he doesnt drink so is unlikely to being involved in any parties where both are prevalent.

3, the Democrats and MSM have attacked Trump in every way possible over the years in attempts to stop and jail him, if there was any links to Epstein, theyd have used then by now

(Those are my opinions, if you want to reply, please try and write something in relation to the above, not your usual 1 line, emoji filled rubbish)

16 minutes ago, impulse said:

Sadly, I'm in agreement with this guy:

 

However, former CIA officer John Kiriakou appeared on Fox News on Monday evening and told Jesse Watters that the Epstein files were likely destroyed before Kash Patel and Bongino got to the FBI.

 

“I’m not blaming the FBI director Kash Patel or the Deputy Director Dan Bongino,” John Kirakou said.

 

“I think that that layer beneath them, that’s part of what we like to call the Deep State, has taken this bull by the horns, and they’ve probably destroyed information,” he said.

 

I've always thought it was a 50:50 shot that the public will ever know the truth about JFK, RFK, MLK, Epstein, et.al.  You can't find data and evidence that was long ago destroyed or altered, no matter who's currently in those positions.

 

 

 

Presumably, the destruction of this evidence is quite a serious crime and warrants an investigation?

17 minutes ago, impulse said:

Sadly, I'm in agreement with this guy:

 

However, former CIA officer John Kiriakou appeared on Fox News on Monday evening and told Jesse Watters that the Epstein files were likely destroyed before Kash Patel and Bongino got to the FBI.

 

“I’m not blaming the FBI director Kash Patel or the Deputy Director Dan Bongino,” John Kirakou said.

 

“I think that that layer beneath them, that’s part of what we like to call the Deep State, has taken this bull by the horns, and they’ve probably destroyed information,” he said.

 

I've always thought it was a 50:50 shot that the public will ever know the truth about JFK, RFK, MLK, Epstein, et.al.  You can't find data and evidence that was long ago destroyed or altered, no matter who's currently in those positions.

 

More. B.S. The Justice Dept didn't say the list was destroyed. It said there was no list.

Just now, frank83628 said:

Yes i forgot about the low IQ ers like yourself... i will write it clearly for you.

 

IMO, trump is not involved with Epstein for these reasons

 

1, He banned him from his buildings many years ago, after he allegedly made  comments ragearding someones under age daughter.

2, he doesnt drink so is unlikely to being involved in any parties where both are prevalent.

3, the Democrats and MSM have attacked Trump in every way possible over the years in attempts to stop and jail him, if there was any links to Epstein, theyd have used then by now

(Those are my opinions, if you want to reply, please try and write something in relation to the above, not your usual 1 line, emoji filled rubbish)

Just show us your proof, I don't need the waffle............🙄

1 minute ago, annotator said:

More. B.S. The Justice Dept didn't say the list was destroyed. It said there was no list.

Contradicting Pam Bondi’s clear statement that the list was on her desk.

1 minute ago, frank83628 said:

Yes i forgot about the low IQ ers like yourself... i will write it clearly for you.

 

IMO, trump is not involved with Epstein for these reasons

 

1, He banned him from his buildings many years ago, after he allegedly made  comments ragearding someones under age daughter.

2, he doesnt drink so is unlikely to being involved in any parties where both are prevalent.

3, the Democrats and MSM have attacked Trump in every way possible over the years in attempts to stop and jail him, if there was any links to Epstein, theyd have used then by now

(Those are my opinions, if you want to reply, please try and write something in relation to the above, not your usual 1 line, emoji filled rubbish)

 

 

That being the case, and you may well be correct, I would push like hell, if i were Trump, to get all this out in the open (unless of course it gives him massive leverage over the guilty).

2 minutes ago, annotator said:

Because you're doing just what the libtards did about the 2020 election. I don't believe President Trump had anything to do with Epstein's criminal activities either. But why doesn't he want to get to the bottom of this?

I am certainly not doing anything that libtards do, so wind your head back in some.

i was responding to another members comment. At the time I had not added to the thread apart from that.

5 minutes ago, annotator said:

More. B.S. The Justice Dept didn't say the list was destroyed. It said there was no list.

 

After you destroy something, it doesn't exist.  That's kinda the objective...

 

3 minutes ago, transam said:

Just show us your proof, I don't need the waffle............🙄

Yeah, didnt think you could write anything of substance. Everyday i check to a comment or 2 of yours, but you never change regardless of the thread topics, back to ignore you go. 🤡

2 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

I am certainly not doing anything that libtards do, so wind your head back in some.

i was responding to another members comment. At the time I had not added to the thread apart from that.

"PROOF", please...............