2 hours ago, Photoguy21 said:

Seems you have a lot to learn. Usually trials are put in place, the results analysed and changes made according to the trial results. After all of that the results are submitted to the government body for approval to use.

Dodgy trial data signed off on by bureaucrats with said bureaucrats sometimes having direct links to big pharma. Example: Trial data said the spike proteins would stay at the injection site. Spike proteins as it turns out have been found in every organ of the body.  

1 minute ago, dinsdale said:

Dodgy trial data signed off on by bureaucrats with said bureaucrats sometimes having direct links to big pharma. Example: Trial data said the spike proteins would stay at the injection site. Spike proteins as it turns out have been found in every organ of the body.  

The CDC covered up data on the MMR vaxxes.

 

Hope Kennedy can get hold of the info. I've actually seen it. But it's not been released officially.

24 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

No such thing as an ',,,unvaccinated COVID patients,,,,.'

 

Hospitals were, for the most part, empty.

 

There was no ',,,world-wide health crisis?'

 

The WHO knew exactly what they were doing. Event 201.

Liar.

31 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Australia had one of the lowest death rates from COVID. 3.3 deaths per 100,000.

 

America had one of the highest death rates in the same period. 60.3 deaths per 100,000

 

That was the price of your freedumb.

Aha the old name calling approach, I've never insulted your stand on a personal level. You are entitled to your view, just don't involve me in your propaganda is all I request. But that's a problem for people with your mindset isn't it. You are not happy until you are also controlling others lives. Have you considered politics? Or maybe that was your background at some point in the past? Just a guess. 

3 hours ago, Will B Good said:

 

13.6 billion covid shots administered and everyone of them a death sentence?????

 

I'd give just about anything to go back and undo my 2nd Pfizer.  My health and quality of life took a nosedive the day after and still hasn't recovered.

 

So, the horse you rode in on, too.

3 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

I'd give just about anything to go back and undo my 2nd Pfizer.  My health and quality of life took a nosedive the day after and still hasn't recovered.

 

So, the horse you rode in on, too.

My respect to you sir. Takes a humble man to admit that. Many would prefer to swallow the brain washing and argue against what is increasingly becoming a crime against humanity.

5 minutes ago, Conno said:

Aha the old name calling approach, I've never insulted your stand on a personal level. You are entitled to your view, just don't involve me in your propaganda is all I request. But that's a problem for people with your mindset isn't it. You are not happy until you are also controlling others lives. Have you considered politics? Or maybe that was your background at some point in the past? Just a guess. 

Never been interested in politics or controlling others. That's an ad hominem attack right there, you hypocrite.

 

I am a retired scientist. I follow facts and data.

 

Noted you have nothing to contradict said facts.

 

 

3 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

I am a retired scientist. I follow facts and data.

 

You follow the facts and data from people whose livelihoods depend on funding from the very entities whose products they're supposed to be reporting on. 

 

MSM depends on Pharma advertising $$ and "scientists" depend on Pharma to fund their studies.

 

What could possibly go wrong?

 

 

8 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

This 70 minutes film offers an intimate look into the lives of vaccine trial volunteers.

These individuals came forward with hope and trust, only to encounter serious, lasting health complications. Now, navigating a system that offers little support, their stories shed light on a larger concern: post-vaccine injuries are often ignored, and voices are suppressed under intense censorship.

 

 

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRvhFpP5wOE

 

UK worst in G7 for MMR jab rates, as 30m children worldwide not fully immunised

More than 14m children globally have not had single routine jab as figures show less than 90% of those eligible in UK had first MMR last year

Anna Bawden Health and social affairs correspondent

Tue 15 Jul 2025 01.01 BST

Share

Millions of children worldwide are at growing risk of serious illness and death due to declining infant vaccination rates, experts have warned, while the UK ranks worst of major western economies for MMR immunisation.

Figures released by the World Health Organization and Unicef show that more than 30 million children worldwide are not fully immunised against measles, mumps and rubella and 14.3 million children have not received a single routine infant vaccination.

While the figures show that measles coverage improved slightly last year, reaching 2 million more children than in 2023, vaccination rates have gone backwards in some middle- and high-income countries and stagnated in other regions, leaving children increasingly vulnerable to outbreaks of the disease.

Across 53 countries in Europe and central Asia, vaccination coverage dropped by an average of one percentage point on 2019 levels. In 2024, more than half of the countries in the region did not meet the 95% vaccination rate required to reach herd immunity for measles. Almost a third reported coverage below 90%.

Montenegro had the lowest coverage with just 23% children having their first MMR jab, while seven countries worldwide had rates below 50%.

The UK is the worst performer among G7 nations, the data shows. Only 89% of children received their first MMR jab in 2024, compared with 96% in Germany, 95% in France, Italy and Japan, and 92% in the US and Canada.

Reported measles cases worldwide continue to rise. WHO/Unicef estimates there were about 10m cases and more than 100,000 deaths from measles in 2023. The number of countries reporting large and disruptive outbreaks nearly doubled from 33 in 2022 to 60 in 2024. Cases in Europe doubled during 2024 and in the US they reached a three-year high.

UK worst in G7 for MMR jab rates, as 30m children worldwide not fully immunised

More than 14m children globally have not had single routine jab as figures show less than 90% of those eligible in UK had first MMR last year

Anna Bawden Health and social affairs correspondent

Tue 15 Jul 2025 01.01 BST

Share

Millions of children worldwide are at growing risk of serious illness and death due to declining infant vaccination rates, experts have warned, while the UK ranks worst of major western economies for MMR immunisation.

Figures released by the World Health Organization and Unicef show that more than 30 million children worldwide are not fully immunised against measles, mumps and rubella and 14.3 million children have not received a single routine infant vaccination.

While the figures show that measles coverage improved slightly last year, reaching 2 million more children than in 2023, vaccination rates have gone backwards in some middle- and high-income countries and stagnated in other regions, leaving children increasingly vulnerable to outbreaks of the disease.

Across 53 countries in Europe and central Asia, vaccination coverage dropped by an average of one percentage point on 2019 levels. In 2024, more than half of the countries in the region did not meet the 95% vaccination rate required to reach herd immunity for measles. Almost a third reported coverage below 90%.

Montenegro had the lowest coverage with just 23% children having their first MMR jab, while seven countries worldwide had rates below 50%.

The UK is the worst performer among G7 nations, the data shows. Only 89% of children received their first MMR jab in 2024, compared with 96% in Germany, 95% in France, Italy and Japan, and 92% in the US and Canada.

Reported measles cases worldwide continue to rise. WHO/Unicef estimates there were about 10m cases and more than 100,000 deaths from measles in 2023. The number of countries reporting large and disruptive outbreaks nearly doubled from 33 in 2022 to 60 in 2024. Cases in Europe doubled during 2024 and in the US they reached a three-year high.

3 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

I am a retired scientist. I follow facts and data.

Whose "facts" and whose "data" is the question.

13 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Whose "facts" and whose "data" is the question.

100% - Those who profit the greatest from those 'facts' and 'data' that's who. This is the very reason I don't waste my time attempting to counter argue Lacessit's allegedly factual posts. 

 

Kind regards,

The Hypocrite. 

9 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

This 70 minutes film offers an intimate look into the lives of vaccine trial volunteers.

Imho, volunteering for vaccine trials is about the dumbest thing a person could do.  Morons.

13 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

You follow the facts and data from people whose livelihoods depend on funding from the very entities whose products they're supposed to be reporting on. 

 

MSM depends on Pharma advertising $$ and "scientists" depend on Pharma to fund their studies.

 

What could possibly go wrong?

 

 

Smallpox has been eradicated. Polio no longer terrorizes parents. Most of the recurring diseases are the result of vaccine hesitancy, promoted endlessly on social media by anti-vaxxers.

 

You think a guy like Dr. John Campbell is on YouTube out of altruism? He's making money on the number of hits he gets from people who like being told what they want to hear.

 

Instead of asking what could go wrong, a better question is why people like you insist on throwing the baby out with the bath water.

7 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Smallpox has been eradicated. Polio no longer terrorizes parents. Most of the recurring diseases are the result of vaccine hesitancy, promoted endlessly on social media by anti-vaxxers.

 

You think a guy like Dr. John Campbell is on YouTube out of altruism? He's making money on the number of hits he gets from people who like being told what they want to hear.

 

Instead of asking what could go wrong, a better question is why people like you insist on throwing the baby out with the bath water.

This thread is about mRNA "vaccines" specifically the ones made for Covid-19 not attenuated vaccines which is what the smallpox and polio vaccines are. Surely being a scientist you should know this.

3 hours ago, Lacessit said:

With all the BS the OP posts, why am I not dead?

Perhaps you're well on your way and just don't know it...

Fyi.  My wife willingly goes to the local hospital and dutifully gets her vaccinations for flu/Covid.  She's been sick for the last 5 days.  Me?  Not even a sniffle.

So?  Go get your Safe & Effective Covid shots every six month.  

14 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

You think a guy like Dr. John Campbell is on YouTube out of altruism? He's making money on the number of hits he gets from people who like being told what they want to hear.

 

People want to hear what's going to keep us healthy.  Can you see the difference? 

 

Pharma could care less whether we're healthy or not.  In fact, their business model depends on us NOT being healthy.  We're (ideally) perpetual customers to them.

 

 Ans, as Dinsdale pointed out, this thread is about mRNA.  Not proven technology that's been around 100+ years. 

 

On an aside, I know more people with cancer since the mRNA rollout than any 20 year period before that.  And I've spoken to several (one just yesterday) whose oncologists have gotten onboard and explained to them the mechanism behind the mRNA's triggering cancer in patients who are predisposed but not necessarily going to get it.

 

1 hour ago, Lacessit said:

0,5 mL of a vaccine

You mean the 0.5 mL of mRNA that make you into a spiked protein manufacturing factory.  

 "it's only temporary!"
Ah-huh.  Sure! 

38 minutes ago, Magictoad said:

The number of countries reporting large and disruptive outbreaks nearly doubled from 33 in 2022 to 60 in 2024. Cases in Europe doubled during 2024 and in the US they reached a three-year high.

 

And I'm sure it will all be blamed on RFK, Jr and Trump, in spite of the fact that vaccine hesitance takes years to manifest itself.  OTOH, unvetted immigration has wiped out civilizations in just months, many times throughout history.

10 minutes ago, connda said:

Perhaps you're well on your way and just don't know it...

Fyi.  My wife willingly goes to the local hospital and dutifully gets her vaccinations for flu/Covid.  She's been sick for the last 5 days.  Me?  Not even a sniffle.

So?  Go get your Safe & Effective Covid shots every six month.  

Counter-argument. I got COVID after two vaccinations, 3 days of sore throat and runny nose, finish.

 

My Thai GF was unvaccinated, Thai social media. 23 years younger than me, sick as a dog for 12 days with classic lung congestion.

 

A statistical sample of one on either side proves nothing. Mass data does.

 

I may be on the way out, nobody can predict the future.

 

However, I am smarter than believing all the vaccinations in my life have harmed me. I would have been dead 20 years ago without one of them.

 

 

19 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

People want to hear what's going to keep us healthy.  Can you see the difference? 

 

Pharma could care less whether we're healthy or not.  In fact, their business model depends on us NOT being healthy.  We're (ideally) perpetual customers to them.

 

 As Dinsdale pointed out, this thread is about mRNA.  Not proven technology. 

 

On an aside, I know more people with cancer since the mRNA rollout than any 20 year period before that.  And I've spoken to several (one just yesterday) whose oncologists have gotten onboard and explained to them the mechanism behind the mRNA's triggering cancer in patients who are predisposed but not necessarily going to get it.

 

Dr John Campbell and his ivermectin crusade is not going to keep you healthy. Quite the opposite.

1 hour ago, Lacessit said:

Please explain to me why unvaccinated COVID patients were 6-7 times more likely to need ICU admission than vaccinated patients.

 

ICU's are finite, some rural hospitals don't even have them. Every COVID patient was displacing non-Covid patients, such as accident victims.

 

You expect the authorities to sit on their hands during a world-wide health crisis?

 

It's obvious you did not know what you were doing.

Gullible . Com

5 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Dr John Campbell and his ivermectin crusade is not going to keep you healthy. Quite the opposite.

Bizarre how India fell out of the western news because their 2$ covid kits containing ivermectin drastically reduced covid cases

23 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Dr John Campbell and his ivermectin crusade is not going to keep you healthy. Quite the opposite.

 

And you know that because?

 

35 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Dr John Campbell and his ivermectin crusade is not going to keep you healthy. Quite the opposite.

Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were being used in Thailand and other countries. When given early in the onset of symptoms it was showing to be effective in reducing symptom severity. Big pharma could not allow this as these are cheap drugs and they wouldn't make billions on their experimental juice. Studies were done where ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine was given to patients who had already developed more severe symptoms and the drugs were found not to be efficacious in reducing symptoms. Basically it was given too late deliberately so as to manufacture the outcome big pharma wanted. These drugs were stopped being used because the CDC said they were not effective and the demonising of Ivermectin began, heavily pushed by MSM and totally believed by the sheeple. "It's a horse drug."

2 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

No such thing as an ',,,unvaccinated COVID patients,,,,.'

 

Hospitals were, for the most part, empty.

 

There was no ',,,world-wide health crisis?'

 

The WHO knew exactly what they were doing. Event 201.

I can only speak for my local hospital.  It was eerily empty from 2021 through 2022.  Went there a few times during this period and 300 seats empty in the main waiting room one time and a few people the other times.  Nobody knows anyone that died near me except a local drunk and she was dead almost before getting Covid. Weird times. 

 

It was a crisis for the extremely unhealthy.  There were also many that wanted to make it a crisis because their political parties demanded it with zero acceptance of alternative views.  The real problem was never the unvaccinated. The main issue  was, and will be again,  the pathetically unhealthy people throughout the world that is getting worse each year. 

 

 

2 hours ago, dinsdale said:

Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were being used in Thailand and other countries. When given early in the onset of symptoms it was showing to be effective in reducing symptom severity. Big pharma could not allow this as these are cheap drugs and they wouldn't make billions on their experimental juice. Studies were done where ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine was given to patients who had already developed more severe symptoms and the drugs were found not to be efficacious in reducing symptoms. Basically it was given too late deliberately so as to manufacture the outcome big pharma wanted. These drugs were stopped being used because the CDC said they were not effective and the demonising of Ivermectin began, heavily pushed by MSM and totally believed by the sheeple. "It's a horse drug."

It's a pity there's not an emoticon of a tin hat.

4 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

It's a pity there's not an emoticon of a tin hat.

A very mature and exceptionally intelligent response to my above post.. 

6 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

A very mature and exceptionally intelligent response to my above post.. 

Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine have been repeatedly debunked as a cure for COVID. Please post a peer-reviewed study in The Lancet, Journal of New England Medicine, Nature, or Science that says otherwise.

 

If you can't, p!ss off and stop wasting my time.

 

 

15 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Please post a peer-reviewed study in The Lancet, Journal of New England Medicine, Nature, or Science that says otherwise.

The journals that stated that the virus was zoonotic. I guess you're now going to tell us that it didn't come from a lab.