After reading the news about the three Indian men who called the police because the girl they'd chosen had small breasts, I thought it was a stupid reason. But today, things went even "worse" for me: a non-Asian girl walked past me at least 10 times (I don't know why she kept walking back and forth), and given the way she was dressed, I couldn't help but stare at her. No sexist jokes, no whistles of approval, just constant stares. After a while, she approached me with the police, saying I kept staring at her like a maniac. Not even the police knew what to say.

You didnt even take any pics? Hard for me to care otherwise

12 minutes ago, Fabio1980 said:

After reading the news about the three Indian men who called the police because the girl they'd chosen had small breasts, I thought it was a stupid reason. But today, things went even "worse" for me: a non-Asian girl walked past me at least 10 times (I don't know why she kept walking back and forth), and given the way she was dressed, I couldn't help but stare at her. No sexist jokes, no whistles of approval, just constant stares. After a while, she approached me with the police, saying I kept staring at her like a maniac. Not even the police knew what to say.

 

How big were her....no...let's not go there.

25 minutes ago, Fabio1980 said:

But today, things went even "worse" for me: a non-Asian girl walked past me at least 10 times (I don't know why she kept walking back and forth), and given the way she was dressed, I couldn't help but stare at her.

You just figured out why I live in Siem Reap: French backpacker chicks!

 

At my age, if I get one or two a year, that makes my home a Paradise!

Question - why was the OP staring at her? What was she dressed like?

 

Pro tip: Wear sunglasses, then you can stare all you want.

 

Some girls here are well worth a stare, but I try to keep it discreet.

 

 

29 minutes ago, Fabio1980 said:

After reading the news about the three Indian men who called the police because the girl they'd chosen had small breasts, I thought it was a stupid reason. But today, things went even "worse" for me: a non-Asian girl walked past me at least 10 times (I don't know why she kept walking back and forth), and given the way she was dressed, I couldn't help but stare at her. No sexist jokes, no whistles of approval, just constant stares. After a while, she approached me with the police, saying I kept staring at her like a maniac. Not even the police knew what to say.

 

Lucky you don't live in England, men are arrested there for staring at women.

 

https://www.itv.com/news/london/2022-03-14/man-who-kept-staring-at-woman-on-a-berkshire-train-is-jailed

2 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Lucky you don't live in England, men are arrested there for staring at women.

 

https://www.itv.com/news/london/2022-03-14/man-who-kept-staring-at-woman-on-a-berkshire-train-is-jailed

 

You really shouldn't post dross in this manner....you just come across as a Trump supporter.

 

Dominik Bullock of Thatcham, was not jailed solely for staring—the case escalated when his behaviour became confrontational and obstructive. According to police: he sat next to the victim on a Berkshire-bound train from Reading and stared so intently that she repeatedly asked him to stop and to move as he was blocking her exit. He refused both requests, even spreading his legs and telling her she’d have to “climb over him.” When other passengers intervened and she called the police, he still wouldn’t move. Eventually, the train manager had to remove him. Bullock was subsequently identified via CCTV and arrested.

 

I doubt you have kids, but try to imagine it was your daughter or ex Filipino he was hassling.

14 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Pro tip: Wear sunglasses, then you can stare all you want.

First intelligent thing you have ever said.

 

White linen pants was the thing last high season. Mandatory for temples. Wonderfully diaphanous at sunrise.

22 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

You just figured out why I live in Siem Reap: French backpacker chicks!

 

At my age, if I get one or two a year, that makes my home a Paradise!

But you don't so what exactly does that make your home?

2 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

 

How would a 2 week member have that info?

It behooves you to do a little research on the topic youre posting about. People dont forget

17 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

You really shouldn't post dross in this manner....you just come across as a Trump supporter.

 

Dominik Bullock of Thatcham, was not jailed solely for staring—the case escalated when his behaviour became confrontational and obstructive. According to police: he sat next to the victim on a Berkshire-bound train from Reading and stared so intently that she repeatedly asked him to stop and to move as he was blocking her exit. He refused both requests, even spreading his legs and telling her she’d have to “climb over him.” When other passengers intervened and she called the police, he still wouldn’t move. Eventually, the train manager had to remove him. Bullock was subsequently identified via CCTV and arrested.

 

I doubt you have kids, but try to imagine it was your daughter or ex Filipino he was hassling.

 

He stared at the girl which got her all riled up. So they got into an argument. He sat next to the exit and extended his legs and refused to move for her. He didn't touch her and didn't verbally abuse her. She then called police and pressed charges against him.

 

It was the staring that precipitated the prosecution. Indeed in the UK it is now clearly established that men can be prosecuted for staring at women:

 

"Det Supt Sarah White, who leads BTP’s sexual offences team, dismissed the criticism and warned that her force is receiving daily reports of individuals committing sexual offences, including staring, across the country."

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/04/16/staring-tube-could-prosecuted-says-top-detective/

 

I do have kids, two daugthers in fact and I still find it distasteful that men get prosecuted for looking at a woman.

11 hours ago, Fabio1980 said:

fter a while, she approached me with the police, saying I kept staring at her like a maniac. Not even the police knew what to say.

 

haha, you are officially a pervert.

welcome to the club. 

 

 

Have no interest in the op, just wondering why anyone does?

2 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

He stared at the girl which got her all riled up. So they got into an argument. He sat next to the exit and extended his legs and refused to move for her. He didn't touch her and didn't verbally abuse her. She then called police and pressed charges against him.

 

It was the staring that precipitated the prosecution. Indeed in the UK it is now clearly established that men can be prosecuted for staring at women:

 

"Det Supt Sarah White, who leads BTP’s sexual offences team, dismissed the criticism and warned that her force is receiving daily reports of individuals committing sexual offences, including staring, across the country."

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/04/16/staring-tube-could-prosecuted-says-top-detective/

 

I do have kids, two daugthers in fact and I still find it distasteful that men get prosecuted for looking at a woman.

 

 

I still find it distasteful that men get prosecuted for looking at a woman.

 

........the case escalated when his behaviour became confrontational and obstructive. According to police: he sat next to the victim on a Berkshire-bound train from Reading and stared so intently that she repeatedly asked him to stop and to move as he was blocking her exit. He refused both requests, even spreading his legs and telling her she’d have to “climb over him.”.....

 

What is wrong with you?

 

 

57 minutes ago, Fabio1980 said:

After reading the news about the three Indian men who called the police because the girl they'd chosen had small breasts, I thought it was a stupid reason. But today, things went even "worse" for me: a non-Asian girl walked past me at least 10 times (I don't know why she kept walking back and forth), and given the way she was dressed, I couldn't help but stare at her. No sexist jokes, no whistles of approval, just constant stares. After a while, she approached me with the police, saying I kept staring at her like a maniac. Not even the police knew what to say.

I think you should hire Lewie as a ghost writer. You've got a good story line.

7 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

He stared at the girl which got her all riled up. So they got into an argument. He sat next to the exit and extended his legs and refused to move for her. He didn't touch her and didn't verbally abuse her. She then called police and pressed charges against him.

 

It was the staring that precipitated the prosecution. Indeed in the UK it is now clearly established that men can be prosecuted for staring at women:

 

"Det Supt Sarah White, who leads BTP’s sexual offences team, dismissed the criticism and warned that her force is receiving daily reports of individuals committing sexual offences, including staring, across the country."

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/04/16/staring-tube-could-prosecuted-says-top-detective/

 

I do have kids, two daugthers in fact and I still find it distasteful that men get prosecuted for looking at a woman.

I have two daughters too and id prefer they be protected by these laws than not

1 minute ago, Will B Good said:

..the case escalated when his behaviour became confrontational and obstructive. According to police: he sat next to the victim on a Berkshire-bound train from Reading and stared so intently that she repeatedly asked him to stop and to move as he was blocking her exit. He refused both requests, even spreading his legs and telling her she’d have to “climb over him.”.....

 

What is wrong with you?

 

He obviously got angry because of how the girl responded and telling him not to stare at her. So he extended his legs and and refused to move when she told him to. He was not prosecuted for that, he was prosecuted for staring.

 

British transport has launched a campaign to warn men they will be prosecuted if they stare at women.

 

In the UK, a woman can now go to police and accuse  a man of staring at her and they will arrest him and he'lll be prosecuted. For looking at a woman.

 

This is not an isolated case.

1 minute ago, angryguy said:

hey be protected by these laws than not

 

Protected from what? Looks?

 

Too snowflake for me.

4 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

I still find it distasteful that men get prosecuted for looking at a woman.

 

........the case escalated when his behaviour became confrontational and obstructive. According to police: he sat next to the victim on a Berkshire-bound train from Reading and stared so intently that she repeatedly asked him to stop and to move as he was blocking her exit. He refused both requests, even spreading his legs and telling her she’d have to “climb over him.”.....

 

What is wrong with you?

 

 

IMO the poster you are responding to went formerly by the nom-de-plume of Logosone. I am pretty sure he was banned.

‘Staring’ (Sadiq Khan’s bright red public safety warning reads – with ominous eyeballs popping out of the ‘a’ and the ‘g’) that may be construed as ‘intense’ and of ‘sexual nature’ is now ‘sexual harassment’ and ‘not tolerated’. Should anyone ‘see it or experience it’ they are to text the British Transport Police or dial an 0800 sexual harassment hotline if they want to remain anonymous.

 

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/is-it-really-a-crime-to-stare/

1 minute ago, Cameroni said:

 

Protected from what? Looks?

 

Too snowflake for me.

Protected in general from young men and the unhinged things they do. Only backwards countries havent implemented rights for women

Just now, angryguy said:

Protected in general from young men and the unhinged things they do. Only backwards countries havent implemented rights for women

 

He didn't do any "unhinged things". He just looked at her.

 

You want men to be prosecuted for looking at someone?

2 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

He didn't do any "unhinged things". He just looked at her.

 

You want men to be prosecuted for looking at someone?

IMHO, staring in that manner at a lone female is the act of an 'unhinged' person.....  If he tried that in the USA with a man, then he might end up eating lead...

Just now, simon43 said:

IMHO, staring in that manner at a lone female is the act of an 'unhinged' person.....

 

Emily Hill from the Spectator disagrees with you.

 

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/is-it-really-a-crime-to-stare/

37 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

You just figured out why I live in Siem Reap: French backpacker chicks!

 

At my age, if I get one or two a year, that makes my home a Paradise!

 

 

4 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

He didn't do any "unhinged things". He just looked at her.

 

You want men to be prosecuted for looking at someone?

If i didnt have daughters then id probably agree. The womens rights laws are essential for me

3 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Emily Hill from the Spectator disagrees with you.

 

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/is-it-really-a-crime-to-stare/

Too many unhinged people on the streets nowadays.  The UK was a much safer place to live when mental asylums were in vogue...

21 minutes ago, novacova said:

Have no interest in the op, just wondering why anyone does?

Ah, so that's why you're not posting. Got it!

27 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

But you don't so what exactly does that make your home?

Lol, the US is not a hotbed of euro hotties. But it doesn't rain every day so that's a benefit.

41 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

First intelligent thing you have ever said.

 

White linen pants was the thing last high season. Mandatory for temples. Wonderfully diaphanous at sunrise.

So old shocker walks around looking at girls bodies at Siem Reap. Not unexpected. Charming. Now I know why he's your hero.