Fox News Contributor Savages Tulsi Gabbard in Scathing Op-Ed

[BLMFem]

Everyone knew this already but for the cult it needs to be spelled out.

 

Fox News Contributor Savages Tulsi Gabbard in Scathing Op-Ed

https://www.yahoo.com/news/fox-news-contributor-savages-tulsi-214903611.html

 

"A Fox News contributor ripped Tulsi Gabbard’s “misleading” attack on members of the Obama administration over its investigation into the 2016 Trump campaign’s ties to Russia.

National Review contributing editor Andrew McCarthy took issue Monday with the Director of National Intelligence’s claim that Obama’s team engaged in a “treasonous conspiracy” after the 2016 election to fabricate claims of Russian election meddling in order to damage Trump’s presidency.

McCarthy began by commenting that there’s “good reason to wonder” whether Gabbard speaks with other intelligence officials in the Trump administration, or even reads CIA reports, because when it comes to that agency’s findings on Russian interference, “no new light is shed on this episode by Gabbard’s email disclosures.”"

[impulse]

But she's not wrong...

 

[spidermike007]

There were at least a dozen good reasons why Russias interfered with the election, and wanted Trump elected. He has proven their good judgment over and over and over. 

[Purdey]

I heard they discovered that Obama was behind the shooting of John F. Kennedy, but they are covering it up. 

😱

[Will B Good]

 

 

 

Warhol was correct.....that was her 15 minutes.

[Will B Good]

Just now, Purdey said:

I heard they discovered that Obama was behind the shooting of John F. Kennedy, but they are covering it up. 

😱

 

Bloody knew it

[pedro01]

17 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

Everyone knew this already but for the cult it needs to be spelled out.

 

Fox News Contributor Savages Tulsi Gabbard in Scathing Op-Ed

https://www.yahoo.com/news/fox-news-contributor-savages-tulsi-214903611.html

 

"A Fox News contributor ripped Tulsi Gabbard’s “misleading” attack on members of the Obama administration over its investigation into the 2016 Trump campaign’s ties to Russia.

National Review contributing editor Andrew McCarthy took issue Monday with the Director of National Intelligence’s claim that Obama’s team engaged in a “treasonous conspiracy” after the 2016 election to fabricate claims of Russian election meddling in order to damage Trump’s presidency.

McCarthy began by commenting that there’s “good reason to wonder” whether Gabbard speaks with other intelligence officials in the Trump administration, or even reads CIA reports, because when it comes to that agency’s findings on Russian interference, “no new light is shed on this episode by Gabbard’s email disclosures.”"

 

 

Aaaaah - this is the noise of liberalism literally dying in the soul of a brainwashed leftist.

 

@BLMFem - you are almost there - the right will be there with open arms at your awakening.

[oxo1947]

24 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

 

"A Fox News contributor

 

Wow your quoting Fox news ---after telling everyone --for ever--how its all lies and propaganda,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,   

[gargamon]

7 minutes ago, pedro01 said:

 

 

Aaaaah - this is the noise of liberalism literally dying in the soul of a brainwashed leftist.

 

@BLMFem - you are almost there - the right will be there with open arms at your awakening.

 

[candide]

31 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

Everyone knew this already but for the cult it needs to be spelled out.

 

Fox News Contributor Savages Tulsi Gabbard in Scathing Op-Ed

https://www.yahoo.com/news/fox-news-contributor-savages-tulsi-214903611.html

 

"A Fox News contributor ripped Tulsi Gabbard’s “misleading” attack on members of the Obama administration over its investigation into the 2016 Trump campaign’s ties to Russia.

National Review contributing editor Andrew McCarthy took issue Monday with the Director of National Intelligence’s claim that Obama’s team engaged in a “treasonous conspiracy” after the 2016 election to fabricate claims of Russian election meddling in order to damage Trump’s presidency.

McCarthy began by commenting that there’s “good reason to wonder” whether Gabbard speaks with other intelligence officials in the Trump administration, or even reads CIA reports, because when it comes to that agency’s findings on Russian interference, “no new light is shed on this episode by Gabbard’s email disclosures.”"

This has been known for a long time, since the Mueller investigation and also the GOP-led Senate investigation...

 

Quote: "The recommendations were part of an 85-page report that outlined Russia's large-scale effort to interfere in the 2016 presidential election.

Senate report details foreign meddling in 2016 election, urges Trump to take preventative measures for 2020

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bipartisan-senate-report-foreign-meddling-2016-trump-2020-election

[connda]

30 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

Everyone knew this already but for the cult it needs to be spelled out.

 

Fox News Contributor Savages Tulsi Gabbard in Scathing Op-Ed

https://www.yahoo.com/news/fox-news-contributor-savages-tulsi-214903611.html

 

"A Fox News contributor ripped Tulsi Gabbard’s “misleading” attack on members of the Obama administration over its investigation into the 2016 Trump campaign’s ties to Russia.

National Review contributing editor Andrew McCarthy took issue Monday with the Director of National Intelligence’s claim that Obama’s team engaged in a “treasonous conspiracy” after the 2016 election to fabricate claims of Russian election meddling in order to damage Trump’s presidency.

McCarthy began by commenting that there’s “good reason to wonder” whether Gabbard speaks with other intelligence officials in the Trump administration, or even reads CIA reports, because when it comes to that agency’s findings on Russian interference, “no new light is shed on this episode by Gabbard’s email disclosures.”"

I'm sure Putin instructed Gabbard to conduct a "misleading" attack on members of Obama administration.  Obviously it's a Russian psy-op, of course. 

[connda]

Oh well, like the Epstein List, after a few days we'll hear, "No no no, there was no conspiracy, just a misunderstanding!" 

Trump: "I didn't say that Obama had anything to do with a Russia Hoax.  That was Gabbard."
Gabbard:  "There is no list, I mean, there are no conspirators, my junior analysts made a mistake and we're going to fire them all."

[frank83628]

36 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

Everyone knew this already but for the cult it needs to be spelled out.

 

Fox News Contributor Savages Tulsi Gabbard in Scathing Op-Ed

https://www.yahoo.com/news/fox-news-contributor-savages-tulsi-214903611.html

 

"A Fox News contributor ripped Tulsi Gabbard’s “misleading” attack on members of the Obama administration over its investigation into the 2016 Trump campaign’s ties to Russia.

National Review contributing editor Andrew McCarthy took issue Monday with the Director of National Intelligence’s claim that Obama’s team engaged in a “treasonous conspiracy” after the 2016 election to fabricate claims of Russian election meddling in order to damage Trump’s presidency.

McCarthy began by commenting that there’s “good reason to wonder” whether Gabbard speaks with other intelligence officials in the Trump administration, or even reads CIA reports, because when it comes to that agency’s findings on Russian interference, “no new light is shed on this episode by Gabbard’s email disclosures.”"

And again, 2nd troll thread using previously ridiculed outlet.

Fox is a joke apparently. Never to be trusted...  but oh wait, when 1 person says something against Treumps team all of a sudden they are Dan o's go-to

[frank83628]

21 minutes ago, connda said:

I'm sure Putin instructed Gabbard to conduct a "misleading" attack on members of Obama administration.  Obviously it's a Russian psy-op, of course. 

Isnt everything. Russia got blamed for a cyber attack on marks & Spencer. A UK retail chain.... selling clothes

[Will B Good]

20 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Isnt everything. Russia got blamed for a cyber attack on marks & Spencer. A UK retail chain.... selling clothes

 

 

....attacking a sovereign nation......

[frank83628]

2 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

....attacking a sovereign nation......

defending their borders and interests. A war provoked by western interference in the area

[Will B Good]

1 minute ago, frank83628 said:

defending their borders and interests. A war provoked by western interference in the area

 

Nations join NATO, they are not attacked and subsumed by NATO.

 

Only the likes of Hitler and Putin suddenly decide...... oh look....here's the new border.....funny.....all this is ours now.

[frank83628]

4 hours ago, Will B Good said:

 

Nations join NATO, they are not attacked and subsumed by NATO.

 

Only the likes of Hitler and Putin suddenly decide...... oh look....here's the new border.....funny.....all this is ours now.

Will. You are old and wise enough to know that NATO is basically the USA in Europe. Dont play dumb because you dislike Trump.

[Will B Good]

12 hours ago, frank83628 said:

Will. You are old and wise enough to know that NATO is basically the USA in Europe. Dont play dumb because you dislike Trump.

 

Immaterial.....countries join NATO

[frank83628]

1 hour ago, Will B Good said:

 

Immaterial.....countries join NATO

They are coerced into joining by NATO lobbyists and flase threats of the being attacked by " -----" (insert dictator of choice)

And basically have to give US weapons manufacturers X % of their GDP, which it tax payer money. That tax payers want no part of

[Will B Good]

Just now, frank83628 said:

They are coerced into joining by NATO lobbyists and flase threats of the being attacked by " -----" (insert dictator of choice)

And basically have to give US weapons manufacturers X % of their GDP, which it tax payer money. That tax payers want no part of

Fascinating......

 

threats of the being attacked by " -----" (insert dictator of choice).....

 

So which dictators threatened to attack each of these countries?

 

 

 

[frank83628]

1 minute ago, Will B Good said:

Fascinating......

 

threats of the being attacked by " -----" (insert dictator of choice).....

 

So which dictators threatened to attack each of these countries?

 

 

 

Exactly whos borders are most of these countries close too.

Former USSR = currently USA

 

[Will B Good]

Just now, frank83628 said:

Exactly whos borders are most of these countries close too.

Former USSR = currently USA

 

 

So, again.....

 

.............which dictators threatened to attack each of these countries?

 

 

[HappyExpat57]

20 hours ago, Purdey said:

I heard they discovered that Obama was behind the shooting of John F. Kennedy, but they are covering it up. 

😱

He was also responsible for the sinking of the Titanic. THAT was difficult to cover up but they managed it.

[KhaoHom]

20 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

There were at least a dozen good reasons why Russias interfered with the election, and wanted Trump elected. He has proven their good judgment over and over and over. 

 

Oh Fk sake.

 

You have proof on that? Maybe Spidey senses failing?

 

You've absolutely, totally, and thoroughly lost the plot here now taking to just outright lying

 

There is concrete proof. Irrefutable proof that has been presented to the public by Tulsi Gabbard that former president Obama conspired with a number of parties in the intelligence community  in which the emails clearly show conspire against the incoming Trump administration

 

This is just an outright lie what you have written. It's not even an opinion. You stated something as it's a truth or a fact and it's nothing close.

 

This is basically a different form of trolling and most certainly placing disinformation in the public domain

 

And say you should be ashamed, but your lot has no shame

 

You should be given a one week time out.

 

SERIOUSLY...

[Will B Good]

3 minutes ago, KhaoHom said:

 

Oh Fk sake.

 

You have proof on that? Maybe Spidey senses failing?

 

You've absolutely, totally, and thoroughly lost the plot here now taking to just outright lying

 

There is concrete proof. Irrefutable proof that has been presented to the public by Tulsi Gabbard that former president Obama conspired with a number of parties in the intelligence community  in which the emails clearly show conspire against the incoming Trump administration

 

This is just an outright lie what you have written. It's not even an opinion. You stated something as it's a truth or a fact and it's nothing close.

 

This is basically a different form of trolling and most certainly placing disinformation in the public domain

 

And say you should be ashamed, but your lot has no shame

 

You should be given a one week time out.

 

SERIOUSLY...

 

 

U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee Report (2020)

 

Bipartisan findings confirmed:

 

Russia interfered extensively and in favor of Trump.

Some Trump associates had questionable ties to Russian figures.

 

What more do you want?

 

 

[Will B Good]

4 minutes ago, KhaoHom said:

There is concrete proof. Irrefutable proof that has been presented to the public by Tulsi Gabbard that former president Obama conspired with a number of parties in the intelligence community  in which the emails clearly show conspire against the incoming Trump administration

 

Utter tripe.....even if true....still no crime committed, not treasonable, and not a coup......just an administration reacting to intelligence (false or otherwise) that it receives.

[Patong2021]

20 hours ago, impulse said:

But she's not wrong...

 

 Why? She  has not provided anything credible. Russia was caught trying to  interfere in the US election. It was proven and  cannot be denied.

[frank83628]

27 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

So, again.....

 

.............which dictators threatened to attack each of these countries?

 

 

I did say any did, the lobbyists pushed NATO under the threat of attack.

 

Anyway. Off topic

[HappyExpat57]

11 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

 Why? She  has not provided anything credible. Russia was caught trying to  interfere in the US election. It was proven and  cannot be denied.

Oh, they will deny in spite of black and white evidence. I gave up wasting time trying to explain the obvious to the close-minded. They don't care about the truth, they just want to think they "owned the libs" even though it's having more negative effects on the MAGA crowd overall. History will not treat them kindly.