GammaGlobulin Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Dear Folks, There are four choices, at least…. 1. I’m NOT OK, and You are OK 2. I’m Not OK, and You are NOT OK 3. I’m OK, Your are obviously NOT OK 4. I’m OK, and nobody, including me, is OK This is the true essence of the Pop-Psychology idiocy of the 1960s, of course…. Do you recall this book: What about this one: 1. I am dysfunctional, and…YOU, too, are dysfunctional. Also, most primates, including baboons are dysfunctional, but few baboons have ever read this book.....although.... 15 million copies have been sold, to date. So then, if the lesser primates have not been reading this book.... Who has? You? What did this book do for you and how did it improve your life, and the lives of your loved ones? If you wish to truly appreciate the importance of the Social Sciences, then you will need to re-read this book by Harris, if you have forgotten it... I guess. And, by the way, do you think that Harris will be running for Prez, and will Harris be our next big winner in the year 2028? Our world is so crazy that even the best Pop-Psychology books cannot help our humanity. Someday, only the baboons will rule this Planet of the Apes, presumably. Or, some AI from Meta....most likely. What do you think? Is it now time for us all to get back to the Natural Sciences….? Or, not? Best regards, Gamma Note: This is a great Topic for any Saturday morning in the month of August. Note2: All pertinent and lucid thoughts are welcome here….Have a go…. 1
Popular Post save the frogs Posted 3 hours ago Popular Post Posted 3 hours ago 11 hours ago, GammaGlobulin said: 1. I am dysfunctional, and…YOU, too, are dysfunctional. Exactly. How about this? "You are Not Ok. Stop deluding yourself." 1 1 1
GammaGlobulin Posted 3 hours ago Author Posted 3 hours ago 4 minutes ago, save the frogs said: Exactly. How about this? "You are Not Ok. Stop deluding yourself." How about this? Give me a thumbs down. But....ONLY IF.... I might be not OK.... Or, not up to snuff. 3
jerrymahoney Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 40 minutes ago, GammaGlobulin said: This is the true essence of the Pop-Psychology idiocy of the 1960s So was this (OCT 72):
daveAustin Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago This topic is way over my comprehension level since I am not a genius. 1 1
GammaGlobulin Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago Just now, jerrymahoney said: So was this (OCT 72): So is thIs: Or, it was.... Now, I am 667. But, you are correct.... MAD was great, back in the day. Now, we will all die, as I said, due to MAD..... Bombs away.....!!!!
GammaGlobulin Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago 1 minute ago, daveAustin said: This topic is way over my comprehension level since I am not a genius. And, most importantly, you are not mad.... As a hatter.
daveAustin Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 2 minutes ago, GammaGlobulin said: And, most importantly, you are not mad.... As a hatter. Don’t know about that either
nick supreme Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 11 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said: So was this (OCT 72): I just cooked some fresh corn. 1
DezLez Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 13 minutes ago, daveAustin said: This topic is way over my comprehension level since I am not a genius. Neither is the OP but he deludes himself! 1
Harrisfan Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, GammaGlobulin said: Dear Folks, There are four choices, at least…. 1. I’m NOT OK, and You are OK 2. I’m Not OK, and You are NOT OK 3. I’m OK, Your are obviously NOT OK 4. I’m OK, and nobody, including me, is OK This is the true essence of the Pop-Psychology idiocy of the 1960s, of course…. Do you recall this book: What about this one: 1. I am dysfunctional, and…YOU, too, are dysfunctional. Also, most primates, including baboons are dysfunctional, but few baboons have ever read this book.....although.... 15 million copies have been sold, to date. So then, if the lesser primates have not been reading this book.... Who has? You? What did this book do for you and how did it improve your life, and the lives of your loved ones? If you wish to truly appreciate the importance of the Social Sciences, then you will need to re-read this book by Harris, if you have forgotten it... I guess. And, by the way, do you think that Harris will be running for Prez, and will Harris be our next big winner in the year 2028? Our world is so crazy that even the best Pop-Psychology books cannot help our humanity. Someday, only the baboons will rule this Planet of the Apes, presumably. Or, some AI from Meta....most likely. What do you think? Is it now time for us all to get back to the Natural Sciences….? Or, not? Best regards, Gamma Note: This is a great Topic for any Saturday morning in the month of August. Note2: All pertinent and lucid thoughts are welcome here….Have a go…. You're ok. The thumbs down weirdos are not ok. 2 1
GammaGlobulin Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago 54 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said: How about this.....? Driving Ms. Daisy? Who is the ADULT in the car?
GammaGlobulin Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago 28 minutes ago, Harrisfan said: You're ok. The thumbs down weirdos are not ok. I never was OK. 1
short-Timer Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 5. You are not OK, but you think you’re OK, and that, my friend, is definitely not OK, because everyone else is right as rain, perfectly OK, but you keep telling yourself they’re not OK, which is really not OK at all, so you’re stuck thinking you’re OK when you really are not OK, not OK, OK, and here’s the kicker, you insist you’re the only one who’s OK, everyone else, in your mind, is some kind of not OK, so you keep repeating that story over and over like a broken record of OK and not OK, and the more you try to prove you’re OK, the less OK you actually seem to be because real OK doesn’t need to shout it out loud, real OK just is OK, meanwhile the rest of us, happily not OK or perfectly OK, just keep rolling along while you’re stuck in a loop of OK and not OK, so you see your OK is a special kind of not OK which is actually not OK but hey maybe you think that’s OK too, confused? Perfectly OK, because that’s just the way the world spins around your OK and not OK dance, not OK, OK.
GammaGlobulin Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago Just now, short-Timer said: 5. You are not OK, but you think you’re OK, and that, my friend, is definitely not OK, because everyone else is right as rain, perfectly OK, but you keep telling yourself they’re not OK, which is really not OK at all, so you’re stuck thinking you’re OK when you really are not OK, not OK, OK, and here’s the kicker, you insist you’re the only one who’s OK, everyone else, in your mind, is some kind of not OK, so you keep repeating that story over and over like a broken record of OK and not OK, and the more you try to prove you’re OK, the less OK you actually seem to be because real OK doesn’t need to shout it out loud, real OK just is OK, meanwhile the rest of us, happily not OK or perfectly OK, just keep rolling along while you’re stuck in a loop of OK and not OK, so you see your OK is a special kind of not OK which is actually not OK but hey maybe you think that’s OK too, confused? Perfectly OK, because that’s just the way the world spins around your OK and not OK dance, not OK, OK. The entire DYNAMIC of the Book, in question, is .... P. A. C..... Parent Adult Child Please read the book, and you will see what I mean. Are we adults here? Are we children? And, who are the Parents? This is what you call POP-PSYCH SCHEMATIC.....101 Just all boils down to something like .... Transcendental Meditation, but from a Psychoanalyst.... Which is NOT science, as we all know. So, do you recall this book when it first came out in hardback? What a joke....!!! Or, do you disagree??? 1
save the frogs Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 11 hours ago, GammaGlobulin said: Transcendental Meditation, but from a Psychoanalyst.... Which is NOT science, as we all know. No, Freud was onto something ... cannot be completely dismissed.
newbee2022 Posted 16 minutes ago Posted 16 minutes ago 2 hours ago, GammaGlobulin said: Dear Folks, There are four choices, at least…. 1. I’m NOT OK, and You are OK 2. I’m Not OK, and You are NOT OK 3. I’m OK, Your are obviously NOT OK 4. I’m OK, and nobody, including me, is OK This is the true essence of the Pop-Psychology idiocy of the 1960s, of course…. Do you recall this book: What about this one: 1. I am dysfunctional, and…YOU, too, are dysfunctional. Also, most primates, including baboons are dysfunctional, but few baboons have ever read this book.....although.... 15 million copies have been sold, to date. So then, if the lesser primates have not been reading this book.... Who has? You? What did this book do for you and how did it improve your life, and the lives of your loved ones? If you wish to truly appreciate the importance of the Social Sciences, then you will need to re-read this book by Harris, if you have forgotten it... I guess. And, by the way, do you think that Harris will be running for Prez, and will Harris be our next big winner in the year 2028? Our world is so crazy that even the best Pop-Psychology books cannot help our humanity. Someday, only the baboons will rule this Planet of the Apes, presumably. Or, some AI from Meta....most likely. What do you think? Is it now time for us all to get back to the Natural Sciences….? Or, not? Best regards, Gamma Note: This is a great Topic for any Saturday morning in the month of August. Note2: All pertinent and lucid thoughts are welcome here….Have a go…. And in 3 sentences.....what you want to tell us??? I don't have a clue yet. Sorry
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now