Elderly Woman Suffers Brain Clot After First Shot, Heart Clot After Second

Nothing says “safe and effective” like a brain clot and a stroke.

 

An 83-year-old woman in Japan trusted the science, and paid the price TWICE.

After her first Pfizer shot, she barely survived a massive brain clot that required emergency surgery. Three weeks later, following her second dose, she suffered another stroke, this time caused by a heart clot that left her permanently disabled.

But don’t worry, officials still insist it’s “safe and effective.”

Source > You can read the full story here: https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/vaccine-horror-in-japan-elderly-woman

Safe and Effective?

Pfizer and the health authorities insisted their product was safe. They mocked and censored those who raised concerns. Yet here we are: a woman stable on blood-thinners for over a decade suddenly suffers two life-threatening strokes within weeks of vaccination.

The truth is becoming impossible to ignore. Each new case like this adds to the mountain of evidence that the public was sold a dangerous product under false pretenses — and manipulated into taking it, even when their own bodies were sending out warning signs.

Because in the end, the most dangerous side effect of the Pfizer shot wasn’t just the clot. It was the blind trust created by propaganda.

5 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

Elderly Woman Suffers Brain Clot After First Shot, Heart Clot After Second

Nothing says “safe and effective” like a brain clot and a stroke.

 

An 83-year-old woman in Japan trusted the science, and paid the price TWICE.

After her first Pfizer shot, she barely survived a massive brain clot that required emergency surgery. Three weeks later, following her second dose, she suffered another stroke, this time caused by a heart clot that left her permanently disabled.

But don’t worry, officials still insist it’s “safe and effective.”

Source > You can read the full story here: https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/vaccine-horror-in-japan-elderly-woman

Safe and Effective?

Pfizer and the health authorities insisted their product was safe. They mocked and censored those who raised concerns. Yet here we are: a woman stable on blood-thinners for over a decade suddenly suffers two life-threatening strokes within weeks of vaccination.

The truth is becoming impossible to ignore. Each new case like this adds to the mountain of evidence that the public was sold a dangerous product under false pretenses — and manipulated into taking it, even when their own bodies were sending out warning signs.

Because in the end, the most dangerous side effect of the Pfizer shot wasn’t just the clot. It was the blind trust created by propaganda.

Indeed!

 

Thanks Red for moving the truth out there; to here on AN.

 

I'm off to the farm right now, and will give an in-depth reply later.

 

"https://lionessofjudah.substack.com"

 

 

Thanks for quoting such an unbiased reputable news outlet.

Is this some sub forum for idiots? Using charged words and phrases like "VACCINE HORROR," "paid the price TWICE," "crippling heart-related stroke," and "psychological operation in history." This is a common tactic of scaremongering idiots by idiots and bypassed critical examination of the facts to appeal directly to emotions like fear and anger.

83 year old woman suffers blood clots is hardly a news story.  Happens all the time.  Associating it with vaccination is simply disingenuous.

I simply do not agree with the stated assertion, that certain groups are more at risk from covid and therefore would be better off taking the shots.

 

Who are these venerable souls? Well, although it has varied during the covid era, it is generally stated to be those with underlying condition, and the elderly. Depending upon who is speaking, the elderly can be any age between 60 and 100.

 

This is where I fundamentally disagree with people in the said groups having the jab.

 

Firstly, one has to ask what is the vax actually for. Put the 'safe' and 'effective' narrative aside. The claim was/is that those - in the vulnerable groups - are more at risk if they caught covid or one of the variants. I say that is nonsense. The risks to the old, infirm and already sick, are no more than any other year; when covid was not around. However, the risk to health from taking the jab, can be** devastating. Putting an alien substance into one's body is hazardous at the best pf times, but for the vulnerable it could be life-changing - as in the case of the elderly woman - or death.

 

Secondly; there is no evidence that a virus - any virus - has been found. Anywhere at any time. So then, the awake person would ask, what good can the vaccine possibly do? Well! It's pretty obvious that it does immeasurable harm, but how much world-wide we are not likely to find out. In my view; none.

 

** Don't know what one is getting. There are 'hot' ones, that have all the goodies in them. And there are those that are seemingly inert; although not to say they are safe.

The best guide I know of is:

 

https://www.howbadismybatch.com

 

Although getting the batch number might pose a problem or two.

 

 

HELLO!!!

 

There are on average over 37,000 instances of strokes EVERY DAY!!!!

 

The fact an 83 year old has a vaccination on the day they also have a stroke is not mind blowing.

 

Having suffered a stroke, it is not unusual to suffer another.

 

13.5 billion injections........to date.......and a woman in Japan has a stroke.

2 hours ago, Peter Crow said:

"https://lionessofjudah.substack.com"

 

 

Thanks for quoting such an unbiased reputable news outlet.

Bit unfair that Sir.

 

I've read members on here quoting the worst of the misinfo wallers; The BBC, CNN and the CDC for starters.

Is there a vaccine for vaccines on the brain?

@Red Phoenix,

 

Does your family know where you are?

Just now, BLMFem said:

@Red Phoenix,

 

Does your family know where you are?

 

They know where he is.......🤭

1 minute ago, Will B Good said:

 

They know where he is.......🤭

...but not the other way around, and they like to keep it that way? I was just thinking that they might wanna do an intervention but I get your point.😁

Hurrah, it looks like an article by the medical neanderthalers 🥳👍😂🤣.

This article comes by "Yellow Press" without any scientific background.

Just for the bin💩

Next

20 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Bit unfair that Sir.

 

I've read members on here quoting the worst of the misinfo wallers; The BBC, CNN and the CDC for starters.

From where should we be getting our news then please?

Just now, KannikaP said:

From where should we be getting our news then please?

 

 

Come on you know the answer......JFKJr, Fox, YouTube, Tik Tok, a guy I met in a bar.

8 minutes ago, KannikaP said:

From where should we be getting our news then please?

If you want health, especially covid news; read my posts.

 

I only tell the truth. I've got my reputation to protect.

41 minutes ago, proton said:

Is there a vaccine for vaccines on the brain?

There are a few manufacturers:  Colt, Smith&Wesson, Beretta ... one self-administered shot and problem is gone.

12 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

If you want health, especially covid news; read my posts.

 

I only tell the truth. I've got my reputation to protect.

You're joking only, aren't you? You might apply for a comedy prize as anybody of your conspiracy group 🥳🤗🎉💩

Any vaccine can have side effect so why is this one such a show stopper?

47 minutes ago, proton said:

Is there a vaccine for vaccines on the brain?

Do you need one?

8 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

You're joking only, aren't you? You might apply for a comedy prize as anybody of your conspiracy group 🥳🤗🎉💩

Not joking Sir.

 

You believe in the vaxx to nullify the virus. I don't.

 

I've plenty of evidence to prove my assertions.

5 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Not joking Sir.

 

You believe in the vaxx to nullify the virus. I don't.

 

I've plenty of evidence to prove my assertions.

No, you don't have evidence as long you believe questionable sources which are well known for the doctored "evidence". 

1 hour ago, KannikaP said:

From where should we be getting our news then please?

 

1 hour ago, Stiddle Mump said:

If you want health, especially covid news; read my posts.

 

I only tell the truth. I've got my reputation to protect.

That's only if you don't mind 19th century theories that were discarded many decades ago when too many exceptions and counterexamples were found.

 

As in food items, theories often have a shelf life and Stiddle's favorites expired before he was born.

What the Data Shows:

 

•  A massive study of 46 million adults in England found that the incidence of strokes was lower after vaccination than before or without vaccination.

 

•  Specifically the risk of arterial thrombotic events (which includes ischemic strokes) was up to 10% lower in the 13–24 weeks after the first dose, and even lower after second doses:

 

  ⁠◦  27% lower after AstraZeneca

  ⁠◦  20% lower after Pfizer/BioNTech

 

 

As opposed to Red Phoenix's sample of one, albeit very unfortunate, Japanese lady. 

Predictably, more nonsense and worthless posting junk from bogus sources:

 

Re the direct source quoted/linked in the OP:

 

 

And re the original source where the Lioness pulled its worthless report from:

 

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/news-punch/

 

Let's repeat the concluding sentence of the above review:

 

"This website has zero credibility due to the routine publishing of fake news."

 

There's a reason this is the "Off the Beaten Track" subforum.

 

1 hour ago, Stiddle Mump said:

If you want health, especially covid news; read my posts.

Shouldn't you out spreading muck on your fields if you are a farmer, instead of spreading it here?

41 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

I've plenty of evidence to prove my assertions.

The evidence you've presented most vividly illustrates a malfunctioning prefrontal cortex... do you perchance have a large dent in your forehead?

12 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

Predictably, more nonsense and worthless posting junk from bogus sources:

 

Re the direct source quoted/linked in the OP:

 

 

And re the original source where the Lioness pulled its worthless report from:

 

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/news-punch/

 

Let's repeat the concluding sentence of the above review:

 

"This website has zero credibility due to the routine publishing of fake news."

 

There's a reason this is the "Off the Beaten Track" subforum.

 

 

 

Anyone really expect to get credible COVID information from a place like this in the OP:

 

 

2 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Secondly; there is no evidence that a virus - any virus - has been found. Anywhere at any time.

 

That is one of the most spectacularly ignorant statements I've read in a long time.  It must take a lot of effort to be that scientifically illiterate.

38 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

No, you don't have evidence as long you believe questionable sources which are well known for the doctored "evidence". 

So evidence from the US Navy, Nobel Prize winners and esteemed scientists qre not to be taken notice of?

 

The evidence is out there Sir. Just open your mind and do some thinking. Research too.