If the shooter isn't found it's a state actor - 100% who can just "dissapear". That's impossible for Joe Public these days. 100% sure. Then you have to ask which state would best profit from his death and who have the resources and wile to get away with it. Russia with it's keystone cop like spies ain't it. 

Just now, Mike_Hunt said:

The odds are 8-1 that it’s a leftie. 

8.3 - 1 keep up at the back. 

 

 

9 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

You don't say! The criminals can do what they want in the UK?? I feel sorry for my Brit friends. And it took a fervent Trump supporter to enlighten me!

That's why I love to engage with the MAGA movement - always full of astounding facts!

When you bring a fact the table, let us know. 

1 hour ago, Mike_Hunt said:

OMG…lefties calling someone racist.  That never happens.  

 

You need to stop getting your info from people with an addenda and do some original research. 

Addenda are supplements to be added, such as to a legal document.

 

Agenda is a list of things to be discussed, or done.

 

Will you please stop torturing the English language.

8 minutes ago, angryguy said:

In your country not even police have guns so criminals can just do whatever the hell they want in the looney left UK

 The United States has significantly more gun violence and gun deaths than the United Kingdom, with the US gun homicide rate being far higher than the UK's.

 For example, in 2021, the U.S. had a gun violence death rate of 4.31 per 100,000 people, while the UK's rate was only 0.013 per 100,000. 

 

number of shootings in US compared to UK - Google Search

 

Far safer in the looney left UK, Mr Angry.  Never seen a gun outside a rifle range.

Move to the UK, people are far less angry.

 

 

Just now, Mike_Hunt said:

The first one is spot on.  

Those are women that actually pass for bright on the left. In the land of the blind and whatnot. 

2 hours ago, Mike_Hunt said:

In general the right believes in GOD.   The does left does not.   Thus, the left has replaced religion with politics

Please back up that B.S. statement by including a breakdown by religions,  countries etc!

Just now, bannork said:

 The United States has significantly more gun violence and gun deaths than the United Kingdom, with the US gun homicide rate being far higher than the UK's.

 For example, in 2021, the U.S. had a gun violence death rate of 4.31 per 100,000 people, while the UK's rate was only 0.013 per 100,000. 

 

number of shootings in US compared to UK - Google Search

 

Far safer in the looney left UK, Mr Angry.  Never seen a gun outside a rifle range.

Move to the UK, people are far less angry.

 

 

Tell that to the girls being raped. 

1 minute ago, Mike_Hunt said:

The first one is spot on.  

He was a proponent of the Great Replacment Theory.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Replacement_conspiracy_theory

What is the “Great Replacement” theory

The Great Replacement (or “replacement theory”) is a conspiracy idea popular among white nationalist and far-right groups. (Wikipedia)

At its core, it holds that there is a deliberate attempt (often blamed on “elites,” political parties, immigrants, or, in some versions, Jews) to replace the white population in Western countries with non-white people via immigration, demographic changes, etc. (Wikipedia)

---

What Charlie Kirk has said / done

From multiple sources, it appears that Charlie Kirk does endorse, or at least frequently invoke, elements of the Great Replacement theory. Some of the key points:

• He has explicitly posted, “The 'Great Replacement' is not a theory, it's a reality.” (Wikipedia)

• He has referred to demographic change as a threat, saying things like: “They’re trying to replace us demographically. They’re trying to make the country less white.” (Media Matters)

• On his show and in speeches, he has warned that immigrants or nonwhite people are changing the cultural or “racial” makeup of the country in ways that he sees as negative. (Media Matters)

• He has claimed that the Democrats support this “replacement” for political power. (Media Matters)

So yes: by multiple statements, Charlie Kirk appears to believe or at least argue in terms consistent with the Great Replacement theory.

---

Is that antisemitic?

Whether or not someone’s belief or statement is antisemitic depends on how they treat Jews — whether they invoke antisemitic tropes (e.g. blaming Jews for conspiracies, implying Jewish control, etc.), or place Jews in conspiratorial roles, or use classic antisemitic ideas.

Here’s what the evidence suggests regarding Kirk:

• He has accused some Jewish donors and Jewish organizations of financing “anti-white causes,” critical race theory, or “left-wing” anti-white ideas. In some statements he qualifies that not all Jews are involved and some may not be aware of what is being financed. (JFeed)

• Critics see those statements as drawing on classic antisemitic tropes: e.g. Jews as secretly controlling culture, politics, or manipulating society. (JFeed)

• On the other hand, Kirk has also publicly condemned antisemitism. For example, he has called antisemitism “a lie from the pit of Hell.” (JFeed)

So, while Kirk may not always overtly say things as extreme as those found in white supremacist or neo-Nazi ideologies, there is evidence that some of his rhetoric overlaps with antisemitic ideas.

---

Conclusion

Putting it all together:

• Yes, Charlie Kirk appears to believe in or promote the Great Replacement theory (or at least many of its central ideas).

• Yes, parts of what he says about Jews (donors, institutions) resemble antisemitic tropes/conspiracy thinking.

• Whether all these statements are antisemitic depends on intent, phrasing, and context. But there is enough overlap that many critics reasonably say some of his rhetoric is antisemitic.

 

 

4 hours ago, sharot724 said:

holy molly

I read The word on the streets is Donald J Trump had this done so all eyes will be off him and focus more on this killing and say the radical left is the cause.. knowing it will cause even more violence so he is safe out of the picture.. everyone with common sense can see this.

Would you be shocked/surprised if it were found out to be true?

2 minutes ago, DezLez said:

Please back up that B.S. statement by including a breakdown by religions,  countries etc!

I posted data from Pew Research on a later post.  This is a USA thread, I only posted USA data. 

 

The data supports what I said.  

 

Now you can admit that I’m correct.  

 

I’ll be waiting. 

1 minute ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

He was a proponent of the Great Replacment Theory.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Replacement_conspiracy_theory

What is the “Great Replacement” theory

The Great Replacement (or “replacement theory”) is a conspiracy idea popular among white nationalist and far-right groups. (Wikipedia)

At its core, it holds that there is a deliberate attempt (often blamed on “elites,” political parties, immigrants, or, in some versions, Jews) to replace the white population in Western countries with non-white people via immigration, demographic changes, etc. (Wikipedia)

---

What Charlie Kirk has said / done

From multiple sources, it appears that Charlie Kirk does endorse, or at least frequently invoke, elements of the Great Replacement theory. Some of the key points:

• He has explicitly posted, “The 'Great Replacement' is not a theory, it's a reality.” (Wikipedia)

• He has referred to demographic change as a threat, saying things like: “They’re trying to replace us demographically. They’re trying to make the country less white.” (Media Matters)

• On his show and in speeches, he has warned that immigrants or nonwhite people are changing the cultural or “racial” makeup of the country in ways that he sees as negative. (Media Matters)

• He has claimed that the Democrats support this “replacement” for political power. (Media Matters)

So yes: by multiple statements, Charlie Kirk appears to believe or at least argue in terms consistent with the Great Replacement theory.

---

Is that antisemitic?

Whether or not someone’s belief or statement is antisemitic depends on how they treat Jews — whether they invoke antisemitic tropes (e.g. blaming Jews for conspiracies, implying Jewish control, etc.), or place Jews in conspiratorial roles, or use classic antisemitic ideas.

Here’s what the evidence suggests regarding Kirk:

• He has accused some Jewish donors and Jewish organizations of financing “anti-white causes,” critical race theory, or “left-wing” anti-white ideas. In some statements he qualifies that not all Jews are involved and some may not be aware of what is being financed. (JFeed)

• Critics see those statements as drawing on classic antisemitic tropes: e.g. Jews as secretly controlling culture, politics, or manipulating society. (JFeed)

• On the other hand, Kirk has also publicly condemned antisemitism. For example, he has called antisemitism “a lie from the pit of Hell.” (JFeed)

So, while Kirk may not always overtly say things as extreme as those found in white supremacist or neo-Nazi ideologies, there is evidence that some of his rhetoric overlaps with antisemitic ideas.

---

Conclusion

Putting it all together:

• Yes, Charlie Kirk appears to believe in or promote the Great Replacement theory (or at least many of its central ideas).

• Yes, parts of what he says about Jews (donors, institutions) resemble antisemitic tropes/conspiracy thinking.

• Whether all these statements are antisemitic depends on intent, phrasing, and context. But there is enough overlap that many critics reasonably say some of his rhetoric is antisemitic.

 

 

The has nothing do with my the post.  Go away.  

3 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Tell that to the girls being raped. 

What has Rape crimes got to do with gun crime deaths?

3 minutes ago, Mike_Hunt said:

I posted data from Pew Research on a later post

How can I read your later post?

Please back up that B.S. statement by including a breakdown by religions,  countries etc in your next reply!

 

The mental health crisis of the left.

 

45 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Do you honestly believe there are not more religious people on the right than the left? The left openly mocks religion, except Islam of course. 

 

Now if you consider Marxism and or Wokeism religions, than sure. 

Can't deny there is flaws in both camps, but seems some you guys forget to flame 🔥 the outright rightwings lunatics, or should we take that for granted you guys do? 

 

I see moderate left want equal rights for everyone no matter religion or sexual orientation, and I think that's a good idea, but no free pass for anyone either way. 

 

Same goes for genders at work, equal rights, responsibilities and requirements then we are on a good path for everyone. 

 

Also there is only two genders, but the freedom to express whatever you want you feel or associates with. 

5 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Those are women that actually pass for bright on the left. In the land of the blind and whatnot. 

Have you read some from the writings from KBJ? 

 

 

“Courts must have the power to order everyone (including the executive) to follow the law — full stop.”

 

“The majority sees a power grab — but not by a presumably lawless executive choosing to act in a manner that flouts the plain text of the Constitution. Instead, to the majority, the power-hungry actors are … (wait for it) … the District Courts.

 

 

2 hours ago, Mike_Hunt said:

What do the people of Europe do other than watch? 

Watch what?

https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/dear-charlie-kirk-the-noise-got-to-you-too/

 

This isn’t about canceling critics of Israel. It’s about ensuring those critics don’t dominate the narrative without pushback. That trucker in your group practically quoted Jewish conspiracy tropes—and no one stopped to challenge him. That’s not balance. That’s abandonment.

Charlie, I’m not writing this to scold you.

I’m writing this because I believe in you. Because I know you know better. Because Dennis Prager is one of your mentors. Because I’ve seen you rally thousands of young people to moral strength and biblical truth.

I believe you still can. 

4 minutes ago, DezLez said:

How can I read your later post?

Please back up that B.S. statement by including a breakdown by religions,  countries etc in your next reply!

 

 

You are free to find and post this data.  I’m not your research assistant.  

An incredibly moving and heartfelt tribute by Ron De Santis:

 

 

2 hours ago, Cameroni said:

 

Because you know it was a leftist lunatic.

Because you know  think it was a leftist lunatic.

56 minutes ago, Mike_Hunt said:

I have no <deleted> idea.   I’m only going off the data. 

Reporter: What's your favorite Bible passage?
Twitler: I like all of them.

Just now, Mike_Hunt said:

 

You are free to find and post this data.  I’m not your research assistant.  

The AN rules that you must back your so called facts with verifiable links.

I will treat your post as B/S. until you PROVE it otherwise!

1 minute ago, Cameroni said:

An incredibly moving and heartfelt tribute by Ron De Santis:

 

 

Ron DeSanctimonious

1 minute ago, DezLez said:

Because you know  think it was a leftist lunatic.

 

Stop talking nonsense. It was a leftist.

 

Nothing else make sense. This was an intolerant leftist filled with hate who could not stomach an opposing point of view. An enemy of democracy.

 

May he get a swift death penalty.

🥱

4 hours ago, Dan O said:

You have no clue the affiliation the shooter has, but you'll blame anyone as long as they don't believe in your views. Your mentality on this is common among cultist. 

 

This is exactly what andi god / deranged leftie would say.

Just now, DezLez said:

The AN rules that you must back your so called facts with verifiable links.

I will treat your post as B/S. until you PROVE it otherwise!

I did post the data from Pew Research.   You are free to post data that counters my data.  

A member has been removed from the conversation for posting offensive content. More unpleasant posts were removed. Please be polite, if you want to participate here. Thank you.