30 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

Karma is now a legal doctrine of the Trump administration. Don't tell the Christian right.

If Comey has leaked classified information, or if Comey has authorized/directed someone else to leak classifyied information, should he be prosecuted?

1 hour ago, Alan Zweibel said:

Deflecting much?

You mean a response to your point, wherein you claim bias on the part of some folks, that shows bias on the part of other folks, is a deflection? 

 

Got it. Only your view is ever correct. Grassleys folks are facist, yours defend Democracy.

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

If Comey has leaked classified information, or if Comey has authorized/directed someone else to leak classifyied information, should he be prosecuted?

Yeah, about that....

 

 

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

If Comey has leaked classified information, or if Comey has authorized/directed someone else to leak classifyied information, should he be prosecuted?

"Dont ask questions, prole".

1 hour ago, BLMFem said:

Yeah, about that....

 

 

So MAGAs are lying again? Oh noooo! 🤣

 

From the 2018 IG report:

“McCabe told the OIG that he informed Comey that he had authorized the disclosure and that Comey did not react negatively.”

 

https://web.archive.org/web/20210415142831/https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download

 

Guess what? The Trump administration deleted the report and it's only available on the wayback machine! 😆

Interesting......
 

 

8 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

Interesting......
 

 

But not interesting enough for you to actually watch it, and to provide a synopsis of it though, huh?

39 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

Interesting......
 

 

In particular from around 34:00! 😆

1 hour ago, BLMFem said:

Yeah, about that....

 

 

MAGAs are eagerly waiting for new instructions! 🤣

40 minutes ago, candide said:

In particular from around 34:00! 😆

Yes I agree good point.

McCabe's on CNN State of Union now with Jake Tapper.

Attention:   Senator Lynsey Graham  ties in simplistically  all the  characters in the Bombshell  Crossfire Hurricane & Comey crisis   . "Criminallity everywhere".Conspiracy & holding exculpatory evidence  mentioned .

 

 

McCabe hasn't been contacted in Comey's probe, and here's the reason! 🤣

 

“All I can say to that, Jake, is I’m not aware of Jim Comey ever authorizing some other person to leak information. That’s not something I experienced personally. It’s not something I saw in all the time I spent working around Jim Comey,” McCabe said, when asked whether he thinks Comey was being honest when he said he never authorized a leak.

“So I can’t sit here and characterize his testimony — which I think is far from clear enough to be the basis of a false statement or perjury prosecution — but nevertheless, all I can say is what my own experience revealed, and that is, I didn’t ever see 

 

McCabe says he hasn’t been contacted by FBI in Comey probe

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5525686-comey-mccabe-fbi-probe/

On 9/26/2025 at 5:38 PM, jerrymahoney said:

Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure -- Rule 21. Transfer for Trial

 

(d) Time to File a Motion to Transfer. A motion to transfer may be made at or before arraignment or at any other time the court or these rules prescribe.

Venue: A Legal Analysis of Where a Federal Crime May Be Tried

 

Reed, 773 F.2d at 481 ("[A] review of relevant authorities demonstrates that there is no single defined policy or mechanical test to determine constitutional venue. Rather, the test is best described as a substantial contacts rule that takes into account a number of factors—the site of the defendant's acts, the elements and nature of the crime, (and) the locus of the effect of the criminal conduct ...

https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/RL33223#fn63

On 9/28/2025 at 3:12 PM, Yagoda said:

What? Are you saying that a prosecutor cannot offer Brady material in a grand jury?

Are their situations where a prosecutor must offer Brady material? Do you even know what Brady material is?

You still haven't explained why you think Brady Material is relevant to this case. It seems to indicate that if anyone doesn't understand Brady material, what it is, and what it isn't, it's you.

Scott Jennings repeats a Comey response on a Cnn Broadcast ,

 

"I'll just say what Jim Comey said when Donald Trump was indicted. It's a good day for the rule of law because we have a system, and the system is in place and the system is working as it was designed with average, ordinary Americans making decisions about how our laws will be enforced". 

https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/se/date/2025-09-27/segment/01

 

43 minutes ago, riclag said:

Scott Jennings repeats a Comey response on a Cnn Broadcast ,

 

"I'll just say what Jim Comey said when Donald Trump was indicted. It's a good day for the rule of law because we have a system, and the system is in place and the system is working as it was designed with average, ordinary Americans making decisions about how our laws will be enforced". 

https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/se/date/2025-09-27/segment/01

 

The system was designed to have a President coerce a prosecution?

11 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

The system was designed to have a President coerce a prosecution?

If Comey leaked or had subordinates leak classified information should he be prosecuted?  

 

No one on the left gave a whit that Biden (and everyone in the legacy media) was hounding Garland to go after Trump. Biden's fingerprints were all over the Trump prosecutions. 

 

Neither did anyone on the left care the slightest that James and Bragg both ran for office promising to prosecute Trump. 

 

The left does not care that the DOJ is weaponized, they only care that they are no longer in charge of the weaponization. 

 

Hypocrite, they name is lefty, 

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

If Comey leaked or had subordinates leak classified information should he be prosecuted?  

 

No one on the left gave a whit that Biden (and everyone in the legacy media) was hounding Garland to go after Trump. Biden's fingerprints were all over the Trump prosecutions. 

 

Neither did anyone on the left care the slightest that James and Bragg both ran for office promising to prosecute Trump. 

 

The left does not care that the DOJ is weaponized, they only care that they are no longer in charge of the weaponization. 

 

Hypocrite, they name is lefty, 

Typical MAGA propaganda rhetoric:

1. Make up a fake claim of DOJ weaponization by Biden

2. Justify the real Trump's DOJ weaponization by the first fake premise! 

10 hours ago, riclag said:

Attention:   Senator Lynsey Graham  ties in simplistically  all the  characters in the Bombshell  Crossfire Hurricane & Comey crisis   . "Criminallity everywhere".Conspiracy & holding exculpatory evidence  mentioned .

 

 

 

 "Expect more charges as Comey faces Congress and obstruction".

Maria is on a roll! Devin Nunez  former Congressional oversight committee person who help uncover the Russia Russia hoax  says Comey would be real lucky if there not  Grand Conspiracy charges brought on him . He even mentions  two  dozen more characters in the same conspiracy bucket .

 

6 hours ago, Alan Zweibel said:

You still haven't explained why you think Brady Material is relevant to this case. It seems to indicate that if anyone doesn't understand Brady material, what it is, and what it isn't, it's 

You don't know if Brady material was presented to the grand jury? You still haven't told us your understanding of what Brady material is. Your ignorance is clear

On 9/28/2025 at 4:18 PM, Yagoda said:

You mean a response to your point, wherein you claim bias on the part of some folks, that shows bias on the part of other folks, is a deflection? 

 

Got it. Only your view is ever correct. Grassleys folks are facist, yours defend Democracy.

Because the top is about the DOJ targeting Comey. Not about alleged misconduct by Democrats.

6 hours ago, Yagoda said:

You don't know if Brady material was presented to the grand jury? You still haven't told us your understanding of what Brady material is. Your ignorance is clear

You're the party who raised the issue of Brady material. Not me. Clearly it's incumbent upon you to explain why it's relevant here. But it's clear you've got no good explanation for it. That you don't understand what Brady material is.

1 hour ago, Alan Zweibel said:

Because the top is about the DOJ targeting Comey. Not about alleged misconduct by Democrats.

Got it. The only appropriate time to raise misconduct by both parties is when your side raises

 

59 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

You're the party who raised the issue of Brady material. Not me. Clearly it's incumbent upon you to explain why it's relevant here. But it's clear you've got no good explanation for it. That you don't understand what Brady material 

All right little fellow let me help you out here. among other things, Brady material is that relevant information that is favorable to the defendant. It must be turned over by the government to the defense. Was Brady material or information presented to this grand jury?

Justice Manual
Title 9: Criminal
9-11.000 - Grand Jury

 

https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-9-11000-grand-jury#9-11.233

 

31 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

Justice Manual
Title 9: Criminal
9-11.000 - Grand Jury

 

https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-9-11000-grand-jury#9-11.233

 

Was there exculpatory evidence presented here?

47 kept two inspector generals while firing many others ,of the two he kept one was DOJ Inspector Horowitz,

 The most important despite being limited in scope was  Horowitz  investigations that  involved.

DOJ and FBI conduct.

FISA abuse in the Trump/Russia investigation.

FBI's handling of the Hillary Clinton email probe.

 

Tie in the new findings by the head DNI Gabbard ,Grassley reports & the Durham Annex ,it sure looks like a fun time for those seeking accountability from the original sinners of weaponized Government agencies. Horowitz I believe will be a key figure in making sense of 

those who had their hands in the scheme to take down Trump & others. 

 

 

 

 

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

Was there exculpatory evidence presented here?

Lindsey Halligan
United States Attorney

 

Her email and telephone number at https://www.justice.gov/usao-edva  

 

Ask her.

5 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

Lindsey Halligan
United States Attorney

 

Her email and telephone number at https://www.justice.gov/usao-edva  

 

Ask her.

Bingo. Thanks. Glad to see someone else here isnt clueless

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

Was there exculpatory evidence presented here?

 

 

8 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Bingo. Thanks. Glad to see someone else here isnt clueless

 

Whether or not exculpatory evidence was presented, has nothing to do with the Brady Rule or Brady material. The Brady Rule only applies to criminal trials/. In order to try Comey, first he had to be indicted. So, in the the unlikely event that prosecutors managed to convict Comey and it turns out that the withheld exculpatory evidence from the defense that was significant enough to invalidate the verdict, that would be grounds for the Brady Rule to be apply. As you may not be aware, there is no defense in a grand jury proceeding. 

 

It must be that "someone else" you're referring to is me. Clearly, you haven't got a clue. How very, very unBrady of you.

Brady rule

The Brady rule, named after Brady v. Maryland, requires prosecutors to disclose material, exculpatory information in the government's possession to the defense. Brady material, or the evidence the prosecutor is required to disclose under this rule, includes any information favorable to the accused which may reduce a defendant's potential sentence, go against the credibility of an unfavorable witness, or otherwise allow a jury to infer against the defendant’s guilt. 

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brady_rule?utm_source=chatgpt.com

 

 

 

14 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

Whether or not exculpatory evidence was presented, has nothing to do with the Brady Rule or Brady material. The Brady Rule only applies to criminal trials/.

So Socialist: Confronted with the actual provision in the US Attys manual, you continue to lie.

 

Admit it: You have no idea WHAT evidence was presented to the Grand Jury. You have no idea whether the Govt provided Brady material to the Grand Jury. You just talk through your butt.

 

I wonder which banned anti Trumper troll you were previously