https://odysee.com/@ConcernedforTruth:a/THE-SHOCKING-TRUTH-ABOUT-VACCINES:f0

 

A short vid that explains the testing of vaccines. What's it really all about?

 

Only 13% of presented papers go to publication. What ones might they be?

 

https://odysee.com/@TGHeretic:7/Exposing-The-Shocking-Ingredients-In-Vaccines-:2

I automatically stop reading anything that starts with “The Shocking Truth About………"

That is a flag that the article is all speculation, not truth/science.   Peace

6 minutes ago, Explorator en Actione said:

I automatically stop reading anything that starts with “The Shocking Truth About………"

That is a flag that the article is all speculation, not truth/science.   Peace

 

If it is shocking and it is the truth, then it is shocking truth.

That 13% figure tracks close to a 2014 BMJ study on vaccine trials: only about 12% got published within 12 months of wrapping up.c17ac5 Overall, 73% eventually make it out after 48 months, but delays are the norm.

Why so low early on? Publication bias hits hard journals and sponsors prioritize "exciting" positive results, while null or negative ones sit on shelves (or get buried). Add in resource crunches for researchers.

Who's screening? Sponsors (often pharma) decide what to submit first; then journal editors and peer reviewers gatekeep the rest.

Funding controlling it? Its a spot on opportunity,ndustry foots most bills, so they can slow-roll unflattering data to shape the story. Registries like ClinicalTrials.gov help force some transparency now, but it's not perfect.

12 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

https://odysee.com/@ConcernedforTruth:a/THE-SHOCKING-TRUTH-ABOUT-VACCINES:f0

 

A short vid that explains the testing of vaccines. What's it really all about?

 

Only 13% of presented papers go to publication. What ones might they be?

 

https://odysee.com/@TGHeretic:7/Exposing-The-Shocking-Ingredients-In-Vaccines-:2

 

No, science cannot be fully trusted.

 

There have been several studies in the past few years claiming long-term Keto diets are unhealthy.

 

So I got worried about health issues and re-introduced carbs and have gained a lot of weight.

So now I am going back on Keto. 

 

The studies are either deliberately flawed/biased for corporate interests or highly incompetent.

 

 

 

 

You can trust the science (done proerly and peer reviewed), not the scientists.

 

Look and Andrew Wakefield

5 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

You can trust the science (done proerly and peer reviewed), not the scientists.

 

Look and Andrew Wakefield

Dr Wakefield got a great reception in York on 18th October this year.

 

He cared about children's health unlike many.

My stance on medical science is founded on nature.

 

What surprises me Sir, is that after reading all my posts, you still don't get it.

Just now, Stiddle Mump said:

My stance on medical science is founded on nature.

 

What surprises me Sir, is that after reading all my posts, you still don't get it.

Your problem is that I do get it, Nature created, viruses, bacteria and cancer. You want everyone to give up and die.

8 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Your problem is that I do get it, Nature created, viruses, bacteria and cancer. You want everyone to give up and die.

Sir! That is bordering silly-billy talk. I thought you were better than that.

 

Can't find a virus in nature. Can supposedly see them after a cell has died. But not in my book.

 

Bacteria are nature's clean-up agents.

 

Let's talk cancer shall we? I'm up for it. Let's debate.

The problem is that science is now also becoming politicized and used for agenda and narrative control... everything from big pharma to NASA to archaeology to ultra processed foods and the climate change.

Whatever the truth is on most stuff, you can be pretty sure we are not being told it.

If you are a lefty, then watch your darling Michael Moore's "Planet of the Humans"... talk about awkward and inconvenient.

12 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Sir! That is bordering silly-billy talk. I thought you were better than that.

 

Can't find a virus in nature. Can supposedly see them after a cell has died. But not in my book.

 

Bacteria are nature's clean-up agents.

 

Let's talk cancer shall we? I'm up for it. Let's debate.

 

You are getting into abstract science which is over the head of most people to debate.

 

Is it because you are desperate to prove your intellectual superiority?

 

And "intellectual superiority" would assume that there is some validity to your statements, but I doubt there is. 

 

And anyway, you continually rehashing these points is silly. There are no Phds in Microbiology on this forum. 

 

Give it a rest, maybe? 

 

What was your other thread? Cancer is good? You sound desperate to formulate a narrative, ANY narrative, that goes against mainstream, no matter how absurd it sounds.

 

You're making a fool of yourself. 

 

 

26 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

What was your other thread? Cancer is good?

You sound desperate to formulate a narrative, ANY narrative, that goes against mainstream, no matter how absurd it sounds. 

Yes, you are correct. I did post a topic on cancer. I believe the modern cancer model is wrong.

 

I'm for a better understanding of nature. It has all the answers. Yet many look to white-coats for truth. And they get nothing but.

 

But back to cancer for a mo. What is the alternative to a tumor. Death!! Could be. Let's debate.

 

 

12 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

I believe the modern cancer model is wrong.

 

Here, this guy is criticizing how cancer is being treated. He is saying we are still using "medieval tools" to treat cancer. 

But not sure why he's optimistic about future treatments. Not sure what he means. 

 

 

1 hour ago, Stiddle Mump said:

 

But back to cancer for a mo. What is the alternative to a tumor. Death!! Could be. Let's debate.

 

 

???  Death is the alternative to a Tumour - so when many Tumours cause death - you are suggesting the alternative to death is death ???

 

 

This is why debating with you is such a waste - you only entertain the utterly preposterous and do so with this thin veil of self-claimed knowledge thats so flimsy a halfwit can see how foolish your comments are.

 

 

2 hours ago, save the frogs said:

 

No, science cannot be fully trusted.

 

There have been several studies in the past few years claiming long-term Keto diets are unhealthy.

 

So I got worried about health issues and re-introduced carbs and have gained a lot of weight.

So now I am going back on Keto. 

 

The studies are either deliberately flawed/biased for corporate interests or highly incompetent.

 

 

 

 

I have found that doing the exact opposite of what they say is a pretty good compass. Meat is bad and should be drastically reduced, they claim? That means it's actually good for you and you should eat it every day.

12 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

 

I have found that doing the exact opposite of what they say is a pretty good compass. Meat is bad and should be drastically reduced, they claim? That means it's actually good for you and you should eat it every day.

 

Yes, they deliberately put out fake studies financed by god knows who.

But there are also a lot of studies showing meat is healthy.

So how can there be so many contradictory studies? Makes no sense. 

And this is for a lot of things, not just meat.

 

 

The best defense is maintaining the healthy immune system and a positive outlook. Pathogens exploit the weak. 

9 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

Yes, they deliberately put out fake studies financed by god knows who.

 

I recommend watching this (shout-out to @rumak who posted it a few weeks ago in another thread).

 

 

12 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

I recommend watching this (shout-out to @rumak who posted it a few weeks ago in another thread).

just watched it. 

thanks.

Bryan Johnson (a guy trying to push the boundaries of longevity research) went to meet a congressman to try to get them to change the system. I don't think he will get too far .. 

But there's more and more doctors with medical degrees (not kicked out of medicine) that are criticizing the system on Youtube, so who knows? It might change.

 

Metabolic Mind Youtube channel -- they are pushing for medical doctors to prescribe Keto diets for cancer and mental health issues. 

 

 

1 hour ago, richard_smith237 said:

 

???  Death is the alternative to a Tumour - so when many Tumours cause death - you are suggesting the alternative to death is death ???

 

 

This is why debating with you is such a waste - you only entertain the utterly preposterous and do so with this thin veil of self-claimed knowledge thats so flimsy a halfwit can see how foolish your comments are.

 

As usual Sir, you have something in a twist.

 

The body - yours and mine - is a wonderful piece of kit, that will do best it can to survive and reproduce. But, even in saying that, it will not allow the latter if the terrain is not as good as it should be. So, it has an inbuilt intelligence that we don't comprehend.

 

In my world, the body does things for a reason. It doesn't normally make mistakes. So when a tumor is formed, it is usually a last resort to protect the host; the person. Protect!? 

 

There are stages to tumor growth. The first is somewhat dependent upon the strength of the body. Is it capable of fighting off the toxin in real time? The second step is again dependent upon the host (us). It will bring out its array of cures; symptoms. These include; coughs, sneezes, sweating, fevers. We all know what they are. And what often happens? Off to the doc to get medicine. The medicine is usually designed to work as a suppressor. The symptoms lessen; maybe go. We are cured? However the toxicity is pushed further into the tissues where is can stay for months even years. To be removed at a later stage? Or maybe not!

 

Next stage is to break down the toxins through other methods. Bacteria and macerozymes get to work. They create microscopic fungi (mold). This then 'eats' the toxic molecules. And after some time, hopefully, we are back to pre-toxin days. However. This is not always the case. And if more toxic entities arrive the body will coat the baddies, seal them in a pouch and store them away out of harm's reach; ABIC.

 

This step of creating a tumor is not the last step in the cancer story however. The body will - if given the tools and support - still attempt to repair. No tools & no support, or/and the toxins keep coming then a bigger tumor or more of them.

 

So! As I say, getting a tumor is almost the last resort in the body's quest to protect us.

 

I say we must learn to read our bodies. Take control of our own health destiny and that of our loved ones. It is not by constantly taking drugs, that will ensure good health, but by giving it adequate nourishment in the first place, and understanding that symptoms are the cure. 

 

Kick off those boots Richard, and go for a long walk in the forest. You know you want to.

 

If you think differently Sir; let's debate.

 

 

3 hours ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Your problem is that I do get it, Nature created, viruses, bacteria and cancer. You want everyone to give up and die.

 

By the way, do you still think people who didn't receive the Covid jab should have their visas revoked and be deported?

Just now, rattlesnake said:

 

By the way, do you still think people who didn't receive the Covid jab should have their visas revoked and be deported?

I will leave that to the Thai Health department, but I would not object. Staying here is a privilege, follow the rules or leave.

1 minute ago, cjinchiangrai said:

I will leave that to the Thai Health department, but I would not object. Staying here is a privilege, follow the rules or leave.

 

What rules?

5 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

 

What rules?

Whatever rules they decide to implement. If I were the director of the Thai health department, I would require a full panel of vaccinations for expats, but up to them. Why should Thais be put at risk because expats are reading ignorant anti-vax nonsense on the internet?

3 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

I would require a full panel of vaccinations for expats

 

Including the Covid one, now in 2025?

40 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

 

Including the Covid one, now in 2025?

Of course. You wouldn't need to get it now if you already had a proper series before. Just like the EU requirements.

 

If you are scared of needles stay home. Why should Thailand risk it's citizens for you?

It's a good thing the Thai authorities are much more reasonable and sensible than you, and never even considered separating people from their families because they refused a medical intervention.

 

Who you were during Covid is who you are.

 

 

5 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

And you still have no respect for the health of others. Sad to be so shallow.

You think putting fear into people is respect Sir?

19 hours ago, Explorator en Actione said:

I automatically stop reading anything that starts with “The Shocking Truth About………"

That is a flag that the article is all speculation, not truth/science.   Peace

If you don't want to learn the truth, better not to visit Sir.