13 hours ago, Alan Zweibel said:

Because of the facts are against you, you try to make it personal instead. Sad.

Personal ? wtf are you talking about ?
The one flinging insults is you, twice now. 

Though this is standard procedure for you in particular when you have nothing but your feelings, that nobody cares about.

 

1 hour ago, Slowhand225 said:

Personal ? wtf are you talking about ?
The one flinging insults is you, twice now. 

Though this is standard procedure for you in particular when you have nothing but your feelings, that nobody cares about.

 

"Because people like you have an agenda and to make it palatable you claim its affordable. You never figure the true cost both pre/post life.
You know that though "

Not personal, huh? So if I were to say that people like you have an agenda, that wouldn't be personal? Stick to the issues.

8 hours ago, Alan Zweibel said:

"Because people like you have an agenda and to make it palatable you claim its affordable. You never figure the true cost both pre/post life.
You know that though "

Not personal, huh? So if I were to say that people like you have an agenda, that wouldn't be personal? Stick to the issues.

No it wouldn't, I'm entertained that you think thats an attack. Its just so stupid its funny

52 minutes ago, Slowhand225 said:

No it wouldn't, I'm entertained that you think thats an attack. Its just so stupid its funny

Well it is kind of stupid. The issue isn't whether your comment was an insult, a compliment or a rigorously impartial observation. This isn't a thread about me. I am not the issue. Frankly, I think the moderators are making a big mistake by not making a whole forum about me. I am that fascinating a person. But until that time, stick to the issues.

On 12/4/2025 at 11:13 PM, darbie-foos said:

worse than bidens record inflation after printing trillions of dollars mister plagiarizer.

During the Biden administration, the rest of the world was also dealing with a significant surge in inflation, as it was a widespread global phenomenon driven primarily by the COVID-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine. 

 

In general, the U.S. fared relatively well compared to some other advanced economies, avoiding the sluggish growth experienced by many others, but the core issue of high inflation was a shared global challenge. 

1 minute ago, Alan Zweibel said:

Fact Check: Taylor Sheridan’s ‘Landman’ Is a Hit, But Its Writing Misleads

However, as Newsweek discovered, most of what Norris said in the viral scene was either false or deeply misleading. Newsweek has contacted media representatives for Taylor Sheridan and Paramount for comment via email...

Research on this topic has repeatedly found that wind energy recoups the carbon footprint it creates within a matter of months, not years—certainly well within its lifetime....

https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-taylor-sheridan-landman-hit-writing-misleads-1995622

 

Yes all wind farms are successful.

51 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Cheap but nobody wants to buy them.

Nobody in the entire world? In the USA? In Nigeria? 

 

Who is this nobody?

3 minutes ago, blaze master said:

 

Yes all wind farms are successful.

What relevance does your comment bear on the diatribe spewed by the character played by Billy Bob Thornton? Why would anyone with any sense of what constitute reasonable evidence offer a spiel played by a fictional character? What's more, this character works for the oil companies, so why would you expect his spiel to be truthful? 

3 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

What relevance does your comment bear on the diatribe spewed by the character played by Billy Bob Thornton? Why would anyone with any sense of what constitute reasonable evidence offer a spiel played by a fictional character? What's more, this character works for the oil companies, so why would you expect his spiel to be truthful? 

 

I'm sorry you can't figure it out. He even gives the answer to your gotcha questions. So come back when you got something cause right now......

 

You got nothing. 

3 minutes ago, blaze master said:

 

I'm sorry you can't figure it out. He even gives the answer to your gotcha questions. So come back when you got something cause right now......

 

You got nothing. 

Really, this fictional character cites research or offers links to an article that in turn links to research to back up what he claims? The gullibility of rightwingers never ceases to amaze me.

1 minute ago, Alan Zweibel said:

Really, this fictional character cites research or offers links to an article that in turn links to research to back up what he claims? The gullibility of rightwingers never ceases to amaze me.

 

Links hahaha oh man. Whay right wingers are you talking about ? Certainly not me. I voted liberal in the last election I was able to vote in. 

 

But do keep missing the point that was being made ph.

 

 

Unlike Europe who is basically destroying the auto industry. On the other hand Germany who has suffered the most, got what deserved in applausing the sanctions against Russian oil and in playing the absurd cards of going all-green for basic energy use. Same also for France playing on both sides - oil and environmental concerns (mainly in putting new and absurd environmental taxes on air travel or oil). The big industries of yesterday are now suffering in Europe and they looked for it. So well done Trump at the end of the day, even if I do not really like the style of the gentleman. 

4 minutes ago, blaze master said:

 

Links hahaha oh man. Whay right wingers are you talking about ? Certainly not me. I voted liberal in the last election I was able to vote in. 

 

But do keep missing the point that was being made ph.

 

 

I can only judge your political views by your take on events. Not by your alleged voting history.

 

What don't you understand about the fact that you are citing fiction to back up your arguments? Fiction.  If what this character is saying happens to be factual, it should be easy enough to find a nonfictional source or sources to back up what he claims. Good luck with that.

1 minute ago, Alan Zweibel said:

I can only judge your political views by your take on events. Not by your alleged voting history.

 

What don't you understand about the fact that you are citing fiction to back up your arguments? Fiction.  If what this character is saying happens to be factual, it should be easy enough to find a nonfictional source or sources to back up what he claims. Good luck with that.

 

What alleged voting ? I just stated how I voted. I know you may have a difficult time with that but again not my problem. Either that or you are calling me a liar. 

 

Why dont you understand that you're missing the bigger picture. 

 

I'd say good luck but....

5 minutes ago, blaze master said:

 

What alleged voting ? I just stated how I voted. I know you may have a difficult time with that but again not my problem. Either that or you are calling me a liar. 

 

Why dont you understand that you're missing the bigger picture. 

 

I'd say good luck but....

I can only judge evidence that can be independently verified. I'm not so besotted with myself that I would expect someone else to take the word of any anonymous party, including me,  as valid evidence. 

 

What is the bigger picture that I'm missing? My TV screen isn't wide enough?

Posts with content from unapproved social media sources and the replies have been removed:

 

General approach and policy.

We maintain a strict policy of accepting links or content only from mainstream and recognized media sources to ensure that information posted by members is both verifiable and trustworthy. We strive to remain impartial, prioritizing content that meets these standards and removing content that, in our opinion, does not.

 

Consequently, we do not accept content from social media platforms unless it originates from a credible, professional, and qualified source. This approach is essential for upholding the integrity and credibility of the information shared within our community."