Why is Every Newborn Forced to Get A Hepatitis B Vaccine?

Today at the 4-5 December ACIP meeting, we have a once in a lifetime chance to end this disastrous policy

Source: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-is-every-newborn-forced-to-get-369

= = = 

Story at a Glance:

• The hepatitis B vaccine has been marred by controversy since its inception, particularly since it is now given to every newborn child despite less than one in a million children benefitting from this policy.

• Remarkably, much of that controversy (e.g., Congressional hearings, mainstream news programs, and HIV vaccine contamination concerns) has been largely forgotten.

• The hepatitis B vaccine has long been associated with autoimmune disorders, particularly demyelinating ones. While the medical community has insisted for over 50 years that this link remains unproven and requires “further research”, evidence demonstrates this process indeed occurs.

• While the hepatitis B vaccine has reduced acute cases in high-risk demographics (e.g., intravenous drug users), there is no evidence it has done the same in newborns (as applicable circumstances are incredibly rare) or reduced chronic hepatitis cases.

• TODAY, on Thursday 4 December, the blanket policy to give it to every newborn will at last be re-evaluated.

 

> The article is an abridged version of a longer article which details the atrocious history of the hepatitis B vaccine (and can be read here > https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-is-every-newborn-forced-to-get).

Additionally a companion article on the pros and cons of each individual childhood vaccines can be read here > https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/determining-the-risks-and-benefits.

Finally, an article providing the extensive evidence vaccines cause a wide range of subtle and severe complications (e.g., making many chronic illnesses 3-10X more likely) can be read here > https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-much-damage-has-mass-vaccination

Well, it's a start.

 

"Hey, white-coat, leave those kids alone."

Why is Every Newborn Forced to Get A Hepatitis B Vaccine?

 

Because they are born in the US. 

Why?

 

Read this.

 

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.11.24.25340907v1

 

Conclusion:

 

Even brief delays in HepB vaccine initiation substantially increase HBV infections, adverse health outcomes, and health system costs. Our results quantify and demonstrate the importance of the universal HepB birth dose in preventing perinatal and early childhood HBV transmission in the United States.

 

 

5 minutes ago, Bacon1 said:

Why?

 

Read this.

 

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.11.24.25340907v1

 

Conclusion:

 

Even brief delays in HepB vaccine initiation substantially increase HBV infections, adverse health outcomes, and health system costs. Our results quantify and demonstrate the importance of the universal HepB birth dose in preventing perinatal and early childhood HBV transmission in the United States.

 

 

Absolute rubbish.

 

It's that elusive virus again.

19 minutes ago, Bacon1 said:

Why?

 

Read this.

 

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.11.24.25340907v1

 

Conclusion:

 

Even brief delays in HepB vaccine initiation substantially increase HBV infections, adverse health outcomes, and health system costs. Our results quantify and demonstrate the importance of the universal HepB birth dose in preventing perinatal and early childhood HBV transmission in the United States.

 

 

> The study you posted clearly disagrees with the statement made by A Midwestern Doctor that the hepatitis B vaccine is given to EVERY newborn child despite less than one in a million children benefitting from this policy.

 

Imo the deep-dive article by A Midwestern Doctor < https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-is-every-newborn-forced-to-get > is far more convincing than the results based on the simulation MODEL constructed by the authors of your study > Methods We constructed a Markov model to simulate lifetime health outcomes and costs...

 

 

The reason for the HepB regimen for newborns in the US is being changed is..............Under Kennedy, the Advisory Committee on Immunisation Practices (ACIP) is now composed largely of figures criticised by the scientific community for lack of expertise or their promotion of vaccine-sceptic theories.

On 12/4/2025 at 11:26 AM, Stiddle Mump said:

Absolute rubbish.

 

It's that elusive virus again.

But you are in denial, you think you are not carrying a VIRUS, and you are, and a risk to children.....

 

Talk about hypocrite......🤨

On 12/4/2025 at 11:07 AM, Red Phoenix said:

Why is Every Newborn Forced to Get A Hepatitis B Vaccine?

Today at the 4-5 December ACIP meeting, we have a once in a lifetime chance to end this disastrous policy

Source: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-is-every-newborn-forced-to-get-369

= = = 

Story at a Glance:

• The hepatitis B vaccine has been marred by controversy since its inception, particularly since it is now given to every newborn child despite less than one in a million children benefitting from this policy.

• Remarkably, much of that controversy (e.g., Congressional hearings, mainstream news programs, and HIV vaccine contamination concerns) has been largely forgotten.

• The hepatitis B vaccine has long been associated with autoimmune disorders, particularly demyelinating ones. While the medical community has insisted for over 50 years that this link remains unproven and requires “further research”, evidence demonstrates this process indeed occurs.

• While the hepatitis B vaccine has reduced acute cases in high-risk demographics (e.g., intravenous drug users), there is no evidence it has done the same in newborns (as applicable circumstances are incredibly rare) or reduced chronic hepatitis cases.

• TODAY, on Thursday 4 December, the blanket policy to give it to every newborn will at last be re-evaluated.

 

> The article is an abridged version of a longer article which details the atrocious history of the hepatitis B vaccine (and can be read here > https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-is-every-newborn-forced-to-get).

Additionally a companion article on the pros and cons of each individual childhood vaccines can be read here > https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/determining-the-risks-and-benefits.

Finally, an article providing the extensive evidence vaccines cause a wide range of subtle and severe complications (e.g., making many chronic illnesses 3-10X more likely) can be read here > https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-much-damage-has-mass-vaccination

You are not qualified in anything to question it, well are you............?  🤔

 

Did your parents have you immunised against the threats of the era after your birth.......?..🤫

> The answer to the title-question of this thread is now NOT ANY MORE!

So progress and US parents will now decide - in consultation with their physician - whether they want to jab their new-born with that vax.  Also it is now recommended NOT to do it anymore within 24 hours of birth, but wait at least 2 months before taking the decision.  

 

 

More info in the article which makes it clear that this +30 year practice of jabbing new-borns was never necessary and dangerous (reason why it was NOT practiced in other Western countries).  So this wagon from Big Pharma's  vax gravy train has finally been side-lined. 

> https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/cdc-vaccine-panel-vote-end-universal-hep-b-vaccine-newborns/

1 hour ago, transam said:

You are not qualified in anything to question it, well are you............?  🤔

 

Did your parents have you immunised against the threats of the era after your birth.......?..🤫

Don't think many babies in the west come in contact with Hep B carriers.

If their mom is clear, the babies should be good to go.

 

"The hepatitis B virus spreads through contact with blood, semen or other body fluids from an infected person. Your risk of HBV infection rises if you: Have sex without a condom with multiple sex partners or with someone who's infected with HBV . Share needles during the use of drugs injected into a vein"

4 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Don't think many babies in the west come in contact with Hep B carriers.

If their mom is clear, the babies should be good to go.

 

"The hepatitis B virus spreads through contact with blood, semen or other body fluids from an infected person. Your risk of HBV infection rises if you: Have sex without a condom with multiple sex partners or with someone who's infected with HBV . Share needles during the use of drugs injected into a vein"

Nice thumbs down .......

Someone on this forum appears to think babies are having unprotected sex with multiple partners, obviously a danger if you have transmen in your home.

3 hours ago, transam said:

But you are in denial, you think you are not carrying a VIRUS, and you are, and a risk to children.....

 

Talk about hypocrite......🤨

What are you on about Trans Sir?

18 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

What are you on about Trans Sir?

You are carrying the virus Herpes Simplex, you told us so, so you can pass it on to anyone, including children to keep for life, yet you deny there are viruses, which is absolutely crazy, of which you are too.................🤪..........😒

2 hours ago, transam said:

You are carrying the virus Herpes Simplex, you told us so, so you can pass it on to anyone, including children to keep for life, yet you deny there are viruses, which is absolutely crazy, of which you are too.................🤪..........😒

Still don't know what you are talking about. 

 

And I suspect you don't either.

15 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Still don't know what you are talking about. 

 

And I suspect you don't either.

Nice dodge, but no cigar, you know exactly what I mean, though you don't know what viruses are, could be that grass you've been eating, could be a mad cow disease field......😬

It makes Big Pharma big money baby!

On 12/6/2025 at 4:14 PM, transam said:

You are carrying the virus Herpes Simplex, you told us so, so you can pass it on to anyone, including children to keep for life, yet you deny there are viruses, which is absolutely crazy, of which you are too.................🤪..........😒

He can't even pronounce Middle Stomp 

On 12/6/2025 at 12:35 AM, BritManToo said:

Don't think many babies in the west come in contact with Hep B carriers.

If their mom is clear, the babies should be good to go.

 

"The hepatitis B virus spreads through contact with blood, semen or other body fluids from an infected person. Your risk of HBV infection rises if you: Have sex without a condom with multiple sex partners or with someone who's infected with HBV . Share needles during the use of drugs injected into a vein"

 

You have assumed there is no contact with carriers. On the contrary there is. If that wasn't the case, there would not be ongoing infections in the world, even in the USA.  People refuse vaccinations and people travel. They infect other people.

 

Approx. 250-300 million people have chronic hepatitis. It results in 1 million+ dying of preventable cirrhosis of the liver and/or liver cancer every year. The most likely transmission route is between mother and child and between children. As per the WHO summary; In highly endemic areas, hepatitis B is most commonly spread from mother to child at birth (perinatal transmission) or through horizontal transmission, especially from an infected child to an uninfected child during the first 5 years of life. The development of chronic infection is very common in infants infected from their mothers or before the age of 5 years.

This is why children are immunized.

 

Hepatitis is an incurable, chronic illness. The best that can be hoped for is remission. 50% of infected people must take treatment for the rest of their life. The political interference by Kennedy and his collection of unqualified nitwits will result in the unnecessary illness and deaths of an estimated 1400 children going forward. Hundreds will die from a preventable illness and taxpayers will be burdened with the additional medical costs for those who use state hospitals and medicaid.  Hopefully, the idiotic decision by Kennedy and his cult will be reversed in 2 years when the Republicans are thrown out of office.

5 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

You have assumed there is no contact with carriers.

I assume most parents of newborns don't pass their babies around to share bodily fluids with other people.

3 hours ago, BritManToo said:

I assume most parents of newborns don't pass their babies around to share bodily fluids with other people.

You do not understand the transmission of the disease in young children. Primary infection source is the mother. Many people are unaware that they are infected until it is too late. Children in daycares and elementary schools leak and drip bodily fluids. It can be vomit, diarrhea, spittle from sneezing or coughing, and wounds that bleed or ooze plasma. If children were not vectors of disease, there would be no foot and mouth epidemics, flu epidemics, respiratory infections, meningitis, in schools and certainly no head lice.

16 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

You do not understand the transmission of the disease in young children. Primary infection source is the mother. Many people are unaware that they are infected until it is too late. Children in daycares and elementary schools leak and drip bodily fluids. It can be vomit, diarrhea, spittle from sneezing or coughing, and wounds that bleed or ooze plasma. If children were not vectors of disease, there would be no foot and mouth epidemics, flu epidemics, respiratory infections, meningitis, in schools and certainly no head lice.

Before quite recently, the idea of transmission of disease, or contagion, was unknown. It has been gathering pace since the early 1900s.

 

Can't find any records that show infectious diseases even exist. In fact the opposite. In the 1920s many studies were done. None showed that an ill person could infect a well person, with the complaint that was making the ill person sick.

 

Children are no more vectors of disease than the ill subjects in the above paragraph. 

49 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

You do not understand the transmission of the disease in young children. Primary infection source is the mother. Many people are unaware that they are infected until it is too late. Children in daycares and elementary schools leak and drip bodily fluids. It can be vomit, diarrhea, spittle from sneezing or coughing, and wounds that bleed or ooze plasma. If children were not vectors of disease, there would be no foot and mouth epidemics, flu epidemics, respiratory infections, meningitis, in schools and certainly no head lice.

Presumably you will be surprised the kids don't all have syphilis and gonorrhea?

53 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Presumably you will be surprised the kids don't all have syphilis and gonorrhea?

 

A child should not have an STI, although they can be exposed to them in their home environments. The reality is that children are in an environment where transmission of infectious disease is facilitated. Elementary school kids are very tactile, constantly putting things in their mouths and in a perpetual state of oozing or leaking bodily fluids. They touch, hug and grapple other and easily sneeze and cough on one another. It's what kids do.

59 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Presumably you will be surprised the kids don't all have syphilis and gonorrhea?

Who-da-guessed.................🙄

17 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

 

A child should not have an STI, although they can be exposed to them in their home environments. The reality is that children are in an environment where transmission of infectious disease is facilitated. Elementary school kids are very tactile, constantly putting things in their mouths and in a perpetual state of oozing or leaking bodily fluids. They touch, hug and grapple other and easily sneeze and cough on one another. It's what kids do.

This is utter nonsense.

 

You really don't know what you are talking about.

9 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

This is utter nonsense.

 

You really don't know what you are talking about.

Hey, that's your department..............😬

 

26 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

The 'logic' of Science™…

 

 

 

 

Ahh yes, your source of knowledge is a serial  liar. The woman who was caught making false claims about Covid vaccines and also the hepatitis B  vaccine. It does not matter to you that her claims have been disproven and that she has been shown to be a dishonest con. 

6 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

 

 

 

Ahh yes, your source of knowledge is a serial  liar. The woman who was caught making false claims about Covid vaccines and also the hepatitis B  vaccine. It does not matter to you that her claims have been disproven and that she has been shown to be a dishonest con. 

 

What you call a "source of knowledge", I call an interesting take which certainly makes a lot of sense.

 

Who was she "disproven" by?

On 12/4/2025 at 11:56 AM, Red Phoenix said:

 

> The study you posted clearly disagrees with the statement made by A Midwestern Doctor that the hepatitis B vaccine is given to EVERY newborn child despite less than one in a million children benefitting from this policy.

 

Imo the deep-dive article by A Midwestern Doctor < https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-is-every-newborn-forced-to-get > is far more convincing than the results based on the simulation MODEL constructed by the authors of your study > Methods We constructed a Markov model to simulate lifetime health outcomes and costs...

 

 

Here's what ChatGPT has to say about this article:

 

Thanks — I pulled the Midwestern Doctor piece and checked the article’s main claims against high-quality sources. Below is a short, evidence-focused credibility assessment of that specific post (with the key sources I used).

Quick verdict

Most of the article’s sweeping claims are misleading or unsupported by higher-quality evidence. The author mixes real historical events (some accurate), case reports/VAERS numbers, and anecdote with selective citations and speculative causal claims. When the question is “does the evidence show the hep-B birth dose is broadly dangerous or causally linked to autoimmune/demyelinating diseases?” the best available systematic reviews and global safety committees say no — and public-health data show the universal program produced very large reductions in pediatric hepatitis B. PMC+2World Health Organization+2

Specific claims from the article and what the evidence shows

1. “Hepatitis B vaccine is ‘dangerous’ and causes many autoimmune / demyelinating diseases.”

   • What the article uses: VAERS counts, individual case reports, and older observational studies/testimonies.

   • What higher-quality evidence shows: multiple systematic reviews and expert panels have found no consistent association between hepatitis B vaccination and multiple sclerosis or other autoimmune conditions. Case reports and passive surveillance signals require rigorous study to establish causation; the balance of population-level evidence does not support a causal link. PMC+1

   • Bottom line: Claim is not supported by the best available evidence.

2. Heavy reliance on VAERS report counts as proof of causation (e.g., infant deaths, neurological injuries).

   • What to know: VAERS is a passive reporting system intended for signal detection. Reports alone cannot establish that a vaccine caused an event — they include coincidental and unverified reports and are subject to reporting bias. Proper causal assessment requires controlled studies and active surveillance. CDC+1

   • Bottom line: Using VAERS counts as proof is misleading.

3. Historical events (France suspended school vaccination in 1998; congressional hearings in the 1990s).

   • What the article says: it recounts real controversies and hearings.

   • What the record shows: France did temporarily suspend a school-based adolescent HBV program in 1998 amid public concern; WHO and other bodies investigated and ultimately rejected a causal association with MS. These historical controversies are real, but they do not by themselves prove ongoing causation. World Health Organization+1

   • Bottom line: History is factual but the article overweights these events to imply current proof of danger.

4. “No evidence the birth-dose reduced chronic hepatitis cases (so risks outweigh benefits).”

   • What the evidence shows: Universal infant hepatitis B vaccination (policy in the U.S. since 1991) is associated with dramatic declines in pediatric HBV infection and chronic disease; public-health analyses estimate hundreds of thousands of childhood infections and many deaths prevented. Multiple public health agencies and reviews conclude large net benefit. CDC+1

   • Bottom line: This claim is false / contradicted by public-health data.

5. Selective citation and tone (anecdotes, “suppressed history”, conspiratorial framing).

   • Problem: the article mixes plausible scientific questions with emotional anecdotes, then moves from unanswered uncertainties to strong causal conclusions. That pattern raises concern for cherry-picking and confirmation bias. High-credibility medical analysis gives more weight to systematic reviews, biological plausibility plus good epidemiology, and regulatory safety assessments. PMC

Short explanation of why the article is persuasive but unreliable

• It collects vivid anecdotes and old controversies (which draw attention) but treats passive reports and case series as equivalent to controlled studies.

• It often ignores systematic reviews, large cohort studies, and official reviews that directly address the raised safety questions.

• It frames legitimate historical episodes (e.g., the 1998 French pause) as definitive proof rather than examples of how precautionary responses can be amplified by media and activism — while the scientific committees that investigated found no causal link.

Key sources I used (most load-bearing)

• Systematic reviews / literature: Sestili et al. (systematic review on HBV vaccine and MS). PMC

• WHO Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety — rejected association between HBV vaccine and MS (2002/2003 review). World Health Organization

• CDC / ACIP evidence & impact statements showing large reductions in pediatric HBV and benefits of universal infant vaccination. CDC+1

• VAERS explanation and limitations (CDC). CDC