10 hours ago, nick supreme said:

The United States should embrace open borders for those seeking entry, as this aligns with our values of inclusivity and opportunity. Disagreeing with unrestricted immigration reflects a mindset that can be seen as discriminatory and exclusionary. Embracing diversity strengthens our nation and enriches our society.

oh my god are you serious?  if so you should be locked up ,

On 12/6/2025 at 5:58 AM, Yagoda said:

Every in  the USA who is not legally here should be removed immediately like they do in Thailand

 

You mean like this?

 

https://www.khaosodenglish.com/featured/2025/10/06/thailand-to-legalize-700000-undocumented-workers-from-4-nations/

4 minutes ago, rumak said:

 

I used to think 007  knew better than to go completely off the wall with trump hatred. 

 

The US is so screwed up from 20 plus years of completely insane and unfair bought and paid for by people who are corrupt and self- serving .

 

that is reality.   even the "middle class"  can hardly survive ( inflation and health care and property tax bankrupting millions... and retirees really suffering .  There has been only corrupt govt which includes BOTH parties.

 

It will take an immense effort to turn things around.   Give trump a chance..... it is a LONG and DIFFICULT  task the weed out all the filth from the last 20 to 39 years.  

 

There is a reason why historically both unemployment and inflation have been higher under Republican administrations than under Democratic administrations. If you don't believe it look it up. 

 

We have the filth weeding out the filth, that's a good one. 

3 minutes ago, mikeymike100 said:

Absolute nonsense.

Labeling Trump and Miller "white supremacists" is lazy hyperbole, not evidence.

Trump's policies targeted illegal immigration and security threats, not race—echoed by diverse supporters.

Miller, a Jewish American, pushed merit-based reforms, hardly fitting the anti-Semitic white supremacist mold. Real racism needs facts, not partisan smears.

 

keep up the fight, mikeymike .   I'm outahere (just another topic for the lefties to spout nonsense and post links to articles full of ad hominem crap. ) 

 

 i needed to get my thumbs down emoji count up...... hence my short visit here 😅

6 minutes ago, mikeymike100 said:

Absolute nonsense.

Labeling Trump and Miller "white supremacists" is lazy hyperbole, not evidence.

Trump's policies targeted illegal immigration and security threats, not race—echoed by diverse supporters.

Miller, a Jewish American, pushed merit-based reforms, hardly fitting the anti-Semitic white supremacist mold. Real racism needs facts, not partisan smears.

Jews can be racists too, and Miller is certainly proof of that. I'm not saying that he's racist against other white nations but rather against people of color, same applies to Trump. 

1 minute ago, spidermike007 said:

There is a reason why historically both unemployment and inflation have been higher under Republican administrations than under Democratic administrations. If you don't believe it look it up. 

 

We have the filth weeding out the filth, that's a good one. 

 

wrong

Just now, rumak said:

 

wrong

I assumed you wouldn't bother to look it up, after all truth can sometimes get in the way of dogmatic rhetoric. 

9 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Except:

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/26/immigrants-criminal-record-ice-detention

 

The Guardian’s headline is technically correct (“no criminal record”), but it is deliberately misleading if it leaves you thinking these are lawful residents or authorized workers. They are not. They are all removable non-citizens being held for deportation proceedings. Legal immigrants do not get put in ICE detention centers.

8 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

Jews can be racists too, and Miller is certainly proof of that. I'm not saying that he's racist against other white nations but rather against people of color, same applies to Trump. 

 

 

Stephen Miller is a Jew whose family fled pogroms.

He pushes merit-based immigration that judges people by skills and lawfulness, not skin color.

No credible evidence shows him hating “people of color.”

Trump’s “<deleted>hole countries” remark slammed failed governance, not race.

His administration delivered record-low Black and Hispanic unemployment, boosted aid to Africa, and repeatedly praised legal immigrants of every background.Enforcing borders isn’t racism.

Calling it racism when the enforcers are Jewish or pro-Israel just exposes the accusation as a cheap smear.

1 minute ago, mikeymike100 said:

 

 

Stephen Miller is a Jew whose family fled pogroms.

He pushes merit-based immigration that judges people by skills and lawfulness, not skin color.

No credible evidence shows him hating “people of color.”

Trump’s “<deleted>hole countries” remark slammed failed governance, not race.

His administration delivered record-low Black and Hispanic unemployment, boosted aid to Africa, and repeatedly praised legal immigrants of every background.Enforcing borders isn’t racism.

Calling it racism when the enforcers are Jewish or pro-Israel just exposes the accusation as a cheap smear.

False. Stephen Miller is credited with shaping the racist and draconian immigration policies of President Trump, which include the zero-tolerance policy, also known as family separation, the Muslim ban and ending the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. Miller has also “purged” government agencies of civil servants who are not entirely loyal to his extremist agenda, according to a report in Vanity Fair.

 

Through the conscious use of fearmongering and xenophobia, Miller implements policies which demonize immigrants, regardless of their immigration status, in an apparent effort to halt all forms of immigration to the United States.

 

Miller started working with far-right hate groups while studying at Duke University. He worked with the David Horowitz Freedom Center, an anti-Muslim hate group, organizing events such as an “Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week” on Duke’s campus. He also served as the first national coordinator of the Center’s “Terrorism Awareness Project.” To Miller, the project existed to “make our fellow students aware of the Islamic jihad and the terrorist threat, and to mobilize support for the defense of America and the civilization of the West.”

 

https://share.google/Dk3zEidVB0EDuQgkj

 

 

So many posts here have "racisme" in it, as if it were negative.

Racisme is survival.

If you see someone of a certain race in an alley , you better turn back.

Chances of getting robbed/raped or murdered are higher.

 

Trump is very much right on immigration.

I wish we could have leaders like him in europe.

 

Embracing diversity strengthens our nation and enriches our society.

= NWO BS

 

43 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

10 hours ago, nick supreme said:

The United States should embrace open borders for those seeking entry, as this aligns with our values of inclusivity and opportunity. Disagreeing with unrestricted immigration reflects a mindset that can be seen as discriminatory and exclusionary. Embracing diversity strengthens our nation and enriches our society.

oh my god are you serious?  if so you should be locked up

 

hahahaha   Can you believe how warped the "thinking"  is of some of these guys who frequent these political hate trump sites ?    

 

I guess ole nick is walking around thailand without any visa or permission to be here .  right nick ?     and 007 as well .    no visa for mike 007 either ... must be !   I mean,  surely he wouldn't agree to any of that kind of "fascist"  requirement .

 

what you say.....007 ?

14 minutes ago, FlorC said:

So many posts here have "racisme" in it, as if it were negative.

Racisme is survival.

If you see someone of a certain race in an alley , you better turn back.

Chances of getting robbed/raped or murdered are higher.

 

Trump is very much right on immigration.

I wish we could have leaders like him in europe.

 

Embracing diversity strengthens our nation and enriches our society.

= NWO BS

 

 

great post FlorC .    The only dark alley these diversity warriors ever encountered is when the electric went down on their bowling night in Santa Barbara .

57 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Except:

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/26/immigrants-criminal-record-ice-detention

Except:
They're being cute with the english language and being dishonest.

If you think being here is not illegal then yes, you're going to say the largest group has no criminal record (they wouldn't if they've not been convicted)

If you believe they broke the law when they crossed the border without a visa, then you're story is BS. They are criminals. Notice, no record yet, because they've not been convicted of that crime yet.

10 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Such a stunning level of ignorance.

 

right from the leftie playbook ............ accuse others of what they are guilty of ...🥰

 

btw:  we are all still waiting to hear from you on how you manage to stay so long in Thailand without a legal visa ?    

There are millions of others who would love to know just how you do that 

Let Ai and robotics get popular. 

 

No more need of migrants to do the dirty jobs and with ai robots doing the dirty jobs, no more need for politicians to  close one's eyes in letting the illegals in,  as currently the migrants enable to  run most of the economies in western nations. They are just usually hidden behind the public eye, in most western restaurants, hotels, services and much more...

Still waiting ........... hmmmm  must be on a crisis call to his handlers :

 

"what's happening ??   they're not falling for the same old "fascist, racist , misogonist " name calling anymore . "   

 

"what's that ?   just wait ,  we got some new "stratagists"  coming in .  Soros says they're

the best ! "

1 hour ago, spidermike007 said:

False. Stephen Miller is credited with shaping the racist and draconian immigration policies of President Trump, which include the zero-tolerance policy, also known as family separation, the Muslim ban and ending the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. Miller has also “purged” government agencies of civil servants who are not entirely loyal to his extremist agenda, according to a report in Vanity Fair.

 

Through the conscious use of fearmongering and xenophobia, Miller implements policies which demonize immigrants, regardless of their immigration status, in an apparent effort to halt all forms of immigration to the United States.

 

Miller started working with far-right hate groups while studying at Duke University. He worked with the David Horowitz Freedom Center, an anti-Muslim hate group, organizing events such as an “Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week” on Duke’s campus. He also served as the first national coordinator of the Center’s “Terrorism Awareness Project.” To Miller, the project existed to “make our fellow students aware of the Islamic jihad and the terrorist threat, and to mobilize support for the defense of America and the civilization of the West.”

 

https://share.google/Dk3zEidVB0EDuQgkj

 

 

 

False.

Stephen Miller,crafted Trump's immigration agenda to enforce federal law, curb illegal entries, and prioritize American workers—hard-line, yes, but not "racist draconian" bigotry.

Zero-tolerance? It stemmed from a 2017 court ruling mandating prosecution for illegal entry (a misdemeanor under 8 USC §1325), separating ~2,500 families temporarily until Trump's EO ended it amid outcry; Biden's admin later separated 1,000+ in 2021 for the same reason.

Muslim ban?

A targeted travel pause from high-terror-risk nations (e.g., Iran, Libya), upheld 5-4 by SCOTUS in 2018 as lawful national security under INA §212(f)—not anti-Muslim, as it exempted 40+ majority-Muslim countries and echoed Obama-era restrictions. DACA?

Trump offered multiple bipartisan deals (e.g., 2018 with $25B wall funding) to codify it for Dreamers while securing borders; courts blocked his wind-down, not "ending" it outright.

Purging agencies? Vanity Fair's 2019 piece alleges Miller ousted "soft" DHS officials like Nielsen for slow enforcement, but that's policy alignment, not "extremism"—Trump's right to staff loyalists, just as Biden purged ICE leadership in 2021.

No evidence of enjoying separations; that's anonymous spin from critics.Fearmongering?

Miller highlighted real stats: Illegal crossings hit 2M+ annually pre-2025, straining resources and enabling cartel trafficking (DOJ data).

His Duke ties to Horowitz's Terrorism Awareness Project? A post-9/11 student push against jihadist threats via awareness weeks and films—not "hate groups," but counter-radicalism, condemned by left media as "Islamophobic" for naming the enemy.

The Google share? A SPLC-curated hit piece recycling leaked 2015-16 emails (to Breitbart editors) pushing tough rhetoric and books like Camp of the Saints as satire on unchecked migration—not "white nationalist" blueprints. Miller's vision: Legal, merit-based immigration boosting diversity (e.g., H-1B expansions, record minority job growth under Trump). Demonizing? No—defending sovereignty against chaos that hurts low-wage Americans, including immigrants.

Smearing him as a supremacist ignores his heritage and facts; it's the accusers who peddle xenophobic hysteria against border hawks.

8 hours ago, Roadsternut said:

 

There is a lot. 

 

Starting with people outside then cabinet, but funded by the President, and largely responsible for getting him elected.

 

Laura Loomer, one of the founding members of the Veritas Foundation, which was funded by the Donald J Trump Foundation, and which played a big role in his election both times.. She describes her self as a White Nationalist, and is unapologetic for that. Some people might say White Nationalists are not racists. That's not the view I take. I don't know if you agree with that position. While she is outside of government, she has claimed credit for key decisions, such as sacking national security advisors. Now racists are allowed a sense of humour. Her sense of humour (we hope it was a joke) meant that when the Florida Immigration Centre (camp) was opened she joked:

 

 

If you found yourself chuckling at that, give your head a wobble. 

 

65 million. 65 million is either the number of hispanics (including US born) in the US. 65 million is also about the number of foreign born American citizens combined with the estimated number of illegal immigrants. You decide which group she was referring to. Most think she was referring to anyone of Hispanic ancestry.

 

She is referring to the threat of alligators finishing off anyone escaping from the camp, but then she said "if we get started now". What, feeding  people to alligators. And this is a joke? Essentially a Final Solution for Hispanics. And she's a Jewess.

 

But maybe you will discount her, because although she is a racist influencing decision makers in government, she's not in government.

 

Stephen Miller; examine his speeches and support for the Great Replacement Theory (the idea that reproduction by brown people will cause white people to go extinct. Racist fruitloop stuff. But fully expecting someone on this forum to explain its not racist, and thaht they believe in it). He writes polcy.

 

One of the policy pieces he has developed is the National Security Strategy. This is a document dripping with racism. 

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2025-National-Security-Strategy.pdf

 

It equates civilisation with race. I am British. I have always identified as British. Like most British people , I am about 60% Anglo Saxon and 40% Irish Celtic.

 

But the Pritani people are reduced to a rump, mostly in Wales, after successive invasions. First the Romans, who changed the British into Romano-British. The Romans didn't mix much, because there is no Roman DNA left in the population. The Immigrants  changed the British, but the British changed the immigrants, because many of these Romans started worshiping British gods. Later on, one of them would push very hard for everyone to worship the god of a bloke from the modern day Palestine.

 

Then the Romans <deleted> off, as a result of continued sackings of Rome by Huns and Vandals.

 

A period of disintegration followed, the dark ages, with raids by Vikings, who plundered a bit, raped a bit, let their mark on the culture.

 

Then the Anglo-Saxons; genetically indistinguishable from the Vikings, disappointing anyone who thinks they are descendants of Erik the Red, the rapey Viking. Town names changes. Anything with a "ton" is an Anglo Saxon immigrant town. We had the West Saxon of Wessex, the East Saxons of Essex, the North Folk (Volk) of Norfolk, and the South Folk of Suffolk. A foreign immigrant culture, not Western (Western being Greco-Romano), was predominating.

 

Then the Normans came; Frenchmen of Norse origin. So French names appeared. Over the following centuries, Empire followed. Europeans started eating potatoes from South America, smoking tobacco from Mexico. Trade with China lead a nation of coffee drinkers to become tea drinkers, leading to a new country, the United States, arising as a result of Chinese influence of so called Western Civilisation (Boston tea Party would have been the Boston Coffee Party if not for heroin-addled Chinese). When Robert Clive went to India, the British became curry eaters. When  Portugeuse Jews fled the Inquisition, we started eating and loving their fish and chips. When Russian Jews  arrived in the 19th century, we found their pickled cucumbers went rather well with the fish (leading to a jar of Wallies on the counter of any proper fish and chip shop). When African slaves were sent to work the plantations of Jamaica, they were told the Mother Country was Britain. Little wonder their descendants considered themselves British.

 

And you can repeat the story in every European country. Its a complete fiction, dreamt of by thickos, to suggest there is a single "European civilisation" . There is no such thing as Western Identity. I have <deleted> all to do with a Greek, and vice versa. There is a British identity, a Greek identity, a French identity and so forth. the British identity is expressed through descendants of rapey invading immigrants calling theselves British. Identity constantly evolves and changes.

 

Its a racist selfish document. If you think its not racist, then, ergo, you are a racist. Racists very rarely call themselves as racist, They come up with some mealymouthed term instead, like White Nationalist. There are plenty of racists on this forum. Not sure why. Perhaps because its full of pathetic individuals running away from failed marriages and broken families into the arms of a pox-ridden prostitute.

 

Charlie Chaplin's utopian and ab libbed view of the world. Still relevant after 85 years. Look out for the Double Cross Party.

 

https://youtu.be/w8HdOHrc3OQ?si=wJPc5GI5PGVXONWT

 

 

Your tirade is a fever dream of guilt-by-association smears and historical fanfic, conflating one unhinged influencer's jokes with Trump's entire agenda.

Let's dismantle it point by point, with reality.

Laura Loomer? She's a loudmouth provocateur, not a policymaker—Trump distanced her from his campaign in 2024 after her antics, calling her "unacceptable."

Her June 30, 2025 X post about "Alligator Alcatraz" (the Everglades detention center) was crude dark humor targeting undocumented criminals (not "65 million Hispanics"—that's your distortion; actual undocumented estimate is ~11M, per Pew).

The facility houses convicted felons like Tren de Aragua gang members, not families. Equating alligator quips to a "Final Solution" is hysterical libel, especially since Loomer (a Jewish woman) fights antisemitism.

Trump toured it praising security, not endorsing genocide. Discount her? Absolutely—she's irrelevant to cabinet decisions, unlike Biden's own inflammatory border rhetoric.Stephen Miller? Baseless. No public speeches or policies from Miller endorse "Great Replacement" as racial extinction— that's a white supremacist fever dream from Renaud Camus.

Leaked 2015 emails show him recommending Camp of the Saints as a satirical warning on unchecked migration (a novel, not a blueprint), and citing crime stats to justify enforcement.

His "policies" (zero-tolerance, travel pauses) enforced existing law: Family separations ended via Trump's 2018 EO after court mandates; the "Muslim ban" was SCOTUS-upheld national security from terror hotspots (exempting 40+ Muslim nations); DACA offers were bipartisan deals blocked by Dems. Miller, son of pogrom refugees, pushes merit-based immigration—expanding H-1Bs, boosting minority jobs (record-low Black unemployment pre-COVID).

Calling enforcement "racist fruitloop stuff" ignores how it protects low-wage Americans, including immigrants.The 2025 National Security Strategy? Laughable fiction.

The actual document (released Dec 4, 2025) is a sober "America First" blueprint: It slams mass uncontrolled migration as a security threat straining resources and enabling crime—echoing DHS data on 2M+ annual crossings fueling cartels. "Civilization" means cultural confidence and merit (e.g., "competence as a civilizational advantage"), not race—zero slurs, hierarchies, or "equating with race."

It urges Europe to "remain European" via self-confidence and birthrates, critiquing EU censorship and low GDP share, not "erasure" by brown hordes.

Your British history lecture? Spot-on that identities evolve through integration—but that's the point: The NSS champions legal assimilation, not open borders chaos.

No "racist selfish document"; it's realist sovereignty, like every nation's strategy.

Your ad hominem forum jabs ("pathetic individuals," Chaplin vid) scream projection—debate ideas, not mock failures. Enforcing borders isn't racism; it's common sense shared by diverse leaders (e.g., Israel's Netanyahu, India's Modi). If you think sovereignty = supremacy, that's the real thicko fantasy.

Trump's team delivers security for all Americans, legal immigrants included. 

26 minutes ago, mikeymike100 said:

 

Your tirade is a fever dream of guilt-by-association smears and historical fanfic, conflating one unhinged influencer's jokes with Trump's entire agenda.

Let's dismantle it point by point, with reality.

Laura Loomer? She's a loudmouth provocateur, not a policymaker—Trump distanced her from his campaign in 2024 after her antics, calling her "unacceptable."

Her June 30, 2025 X post about "Alligator Alcatraz" (the Everglades detention center) was crude dark humor targeting undocumented criminals (not "65 million Hispanics"—that's your distortion; actual undocumented estimate is ~11M, per Pew).

The facility houses convicted felons like Tren de Aragua gang members, not families. Equating alligator quips to a "Final Solution" is hysterical libel, especially since Loomer (a Jewish woman) fights antisemitism.

Trump toured it praising security, not endorsing genocide. Discount her? Absolutely—she's irrelevant to cabinet decisions, unlike Biden's own inflammatory border rhetoric.Stephen Miller? Baseless. No public speeches or policies from Miller endorse "Great Replacement" as racial extinction— that's a white supremacist fever dream from Renaud Camus.

Leaked 2015 emails show him recommending Camp of the Saints as a satirical warning on unchecked migration (a novel, not a blueprint), and citing crime stats to justify enforcement.

His "policies" (zero-tolerance, travel pauses) enforced existing law: Family separations ended via Trump's 2018 EO after court mandates; the "Muslim ban" was SCOTUS-upheld national security from terror hotspots (exempting 40+ Muslim nations); DACA offers were bipartisan deals blocked by Dems. Miller, son of pogrom refugees, pushes merit-based immigration—expanding H-1Bs, boosting minority jobs (record-low Black unemployment pre-COVID).

Calling enforcement "racist fruitloop stuff" ignores how it protects low-wage Americans, including immigrants.The 2025 National Security Strategy? Laughable fiction.

The actual document (released Dec 4, 2025) is a sober "America First" blueprint: It slams mass uncontrolled migration as a security threat straining resources and enabling crime—echoing DHS data on 2M+ annual crossings fueling cartels. "Civilization" means cultural confidence and merit (e.g., "competence as a civilizational advantage"), not race—zero slurs, hierarchies, or "equating with race."

It urges Europe to "remain European" via self-confidence and birthrates, critiquing EU censorship and low GDP share, not "erasure" by brown hordes.

Your British history lecture? Spot-on that identities evolve through integration—but that's the point: The NSS champions legal assimilation, not open borders chaos.

No "racist selfish document"; it's realist sovereignty, like every nation's strategy.

Your ad hominem forum jabs ("pathetic individuals," Chaplin vid) scream projection—debate ideas, not mock failures. Enforcing borders isn't racism; it's common sense shared by diverse leaders (e.g., Israel's Netanyahu, India's Modi). If you think sovereignty = supremacy, that's the real thicko fantasy.

Trump's team delivers security for all Americans, legal immigrants included. 

 

A new AN hero is born    Thank you mikeymike !   

 

The few remaining Trump tirade children left ( oops, seems like they have left already) ,

who think they have the intellect to make comments derived from their own brain cells, not hit pieces from paid for sources,   PLEASE  take each issue and try to rationally state YOUR point of view . 

Hopefully Mikeymike can get you to pause and try to understand another view .  But it will take a lot of effort by lefties who only want to scream the same nonsense.   post after post

2 hours ago, rumak said:

 

right from the leftie playbook ............ accuse others of what they are guilty of ...🥰

 

btw:  we are all still waiting to hear from you on how you manage to stay so long in Thailand without a legal visa ?    

There are millions of others who would love to know just how you do that 

Quite a bizarre and nasty presumption. Right out of the MAGA playbook. Vilify thy political foe. Pure Marxist ideology. 

1 hour ago, mikeymike100 said:

 

Your tirade is a fever dream of guilt-by-association smears and historical fanfic, conflating one unhinged influencer's jokes with Trump's entire agenda.

Let's dismantle it point by point, with reality.

Laura Loomer? She's a loudmouth provocateur, not a policymaker—Trump distanced her from his campaign in 2024 after her antics, calling her "unacceptable."

Her June 30, 2025 X post about "Alligator Alcatraz" (the Everglades detention center) was crude dark humor targeting undocumented criminals (not "65 million Hispanics"—that's your distortion; actual undocumented estimate is ~11M, per Pew).

The facility houses convicted felons like Tren de Aragua gang members, not families. Equating alligator quips to a "Final Solution" is hysterical libel, especially since Loomer (a Jewish woman) fights antisemitism.

Trump toured it praising security, not endorsing genocide. Discount her? Absolutely—she's irrelevant to cabinet decisions, unlike Biden's own inflammatory border rhetoric.Stephen Miller? Baseless. No public speeches or policies from Miller endorse "Great Replacement" as racial extinction— that's a white supremacist fever dream from Renaud Camus.

Leaked 2015 emails show him recommending Camp of the Saints as a satirical warning on unchecked migration (a novel, not a blueprint), and citing crime stats to justify enforcement.

His "policies" (zero-tolerance, travel pauses) enforced existing law: Family separations ended via Trump's 2018 EO after court mandates; the "Muslim ban" was SCOTUS-upheld national security from terror hotspots (exempting 40+ Muslim nations); DACA offers were bipartisan deals blocked by Dems. Miller, son of pogrom refugees, pushes merit-based immigration—expanding H-1Bs, boosting minority jobs (record-low Black unemployment pre-COVID).

Calling enforcement "racist fruitloop stuff" ignores how it protects low-wage Americans, including immigrants.The 2025 National Security Strategy? Laughable fiction.

The actual document (released Dec 4, 2025) is a sober "America First" blueprint: It slams mass uncontrolled migration as a security threat straining resources and enabling crime—echoing DHS data on 2M+ annual crossings fueling cartels. "Civilization" means cultural confidence and merit (e.g., "competence as a civilizational advantage"), not race—zero slurs, hierarchies, or "equating with race."

It urges Europe to "remain European" via self-confidence and birthrates, critiquing EU censorship and low GDP share, not "erasure" by brown hordes.

Your British history lecture? Spot-on that identities evolve through integration—but that's the point: The NSS champions legal assimilation, not open borders chaos.

No "racist selfish document"; it's realist sovereignty, like every nation's strategy.

Your ad hominem forum jabs ("pathetic individuals," Chaplin vid) scream projection—debate ideas, not mock failures. Enforcing borders isn't racism; it's common sense shared by diverse leaders (e.g., Israel's Netanyahu, India's Modi). If you think sovereignty = supremacy, that's the real thicko fantasy.

Trump's team delivers security for all Americans, legal immigrants included. 

Saint Donald. Total revisionist history, a complete reformation of his entire career, and a total erasure of his past crimes, moral terpitude, and a total and complete willingness to overlook a lifetime of moral bankruptcy. 

 

I do have some friends that will come right out and say the man is a butthead, he's an idiot, and he's an absolute clown, but I like his policies. Those are the Republicans I admire.

 

With many people, once they got attached to a theory, it was hard to get them detached. They’d screen out unhelpful facts, invent favorable ones, and ignore contradictions in their own claims. Look at those Sandy Hook, multiple fraud convictions, and Jan. 6th truthers, babbling about false flags and crisis actors and all the rest. When people were motivated enough to believe something, they were going to believe it no matter what. There was no such thing as a bridge too far. 

 

One huge benefit of immigration reform under Trump is the basic closure of the Darien Gap. If you dont know, it is a jungle route through Central America into Mexico and eventually to the southern border of the US. Pre Trump, hundreds of thousands used the route, at great peril, to seek entry to the US. All were at the mercy of drug and human trafficking cartels, all had to pay the criminals a toll and fee to get close to the border. Untold thousands of women and girls were gang raped and kidnapped by the cartels as the "price" to use  the route.

 

Now, thanks to the US, it is closed.  The cartels have lost a huge source of revenue, and untold thousands of would-be migrants are not suffering robbery, assault, and worse at the hands of the smugglers.

1 hour ago, spidermike007 said:

Quite a bizarre and nasty presumption. Right out of the MAGA playbook. Vilify thy political foe. Pure Marxist ideology. 

 

ok..... are you in Thailand on a visa ?     Stop with all the fancy words like marxist ideology and Maga playbook.   Its all way beyond your capacity to debate the issues with someone like mikeymike.  that's why you avoid the real issues and resort to the thmbs down attacks   hahaha

 

Answer a simple question.  If you are in Thailand legally ,  how so ?   Since Biden let them  all in and gave them lots of goodies..... why can't we all do that here?    Surely you would advocate that

 

Next deflection ,bs of yours will be that 15 million or so people that crossed the border into US are there legally.....having obtained permission from Dept of Immigration.    And all did so under Rupublican policies. 

 

3 hours ago, FlorC said:

So many posts here have "racisme" in it, as if it were negative.

Racisme is survival.

If you see someone of a certain race in an alley , you better turn back.

Chances of getting robbed/raped or murdered are higher.

 

Trump is very much right on immigration.

I wish we could have leaders like him in europe.

 

Embracing diversity strengthens our nation and enriches our society.

= NWO BS

 

  It goes even deeper than that people just generally do not trust strangers, and never have done, its a basic human instinct necessary for , as you correctly said, survival,         We only have to look at the warring tribes in africa to see it at its most basic fundamental level  I mean you would not be welcoming of neighbours who are liable to attack your village and steal the women.  

                 In the western world , using the UK for example , many remote village are still wary of strangers ( possibly for the same reason lol)  people from the north and south also have their differences  and don't even mention scousers

               We use our instincts to identify  all strangers we encounter either by appearance   or  their language and dialect and subconsciously we assess the the level of threat , if any , that they may pose  Like it or not it needs to be accepted that this is a deep rooted survival instinct hard wired into our brains   just like a fear of snakes  or the urge to procreate

                 There are some who think that forcing us to live in multicultural societies will erase this instinct and make us all live more happily together ,  it will not , it just keeps everybody in a constant state of  unease but whether they know it or not is a different matter,   Those who would be honest about how they feel are condemned as "racist"  which is a completely made up word  

There are  plenty  of examples of the negative effects of removing or at least reducing the influence of this basic human instinct which has been  erroneously vilified with a word (racism) invented for that sole  purpose

 

               Look at white laboratory rats   they have had their fear of predators slowly bred out of them over the years and as such it is impossible for them to survive in the wild   

Then there is our own misguided left-wingers and of course the idiotic  woke ,  at a touristy level easy prey for every african scammer on the mediterranean tourist trail,  and of  course crying like babies when they are treated in accordance with other "not so woke countries,"  their level pf perceived entitlement can be astonishing

                At street level we have idiots supporting terrorist organisations who would relish killing them simply for who or what they are   "gays for gaza"  being a perfect example

                An then at the top  we have our  government who for reasons of  diversity etc have decided that accepting , importing and  supporting thousands of unchecked illegal immigrants, who are, with very few exceptions predominately unskilled men of  military age  will in some way benefit us.   In fact they are so sure about it they make us pay for it in two ways,  firstly in tax , and secondly with the destruction of our traditional culture  plus its illegal to even consider voicing ones opinion if it differs from the narrative,,    Because they think its for our "own good" 

4 hours ago, rumak said:

what you say.....007 ?

I think he may have been radicalised, quite recently too, there is a definite change in the nature of his posts

On 12/6/2025 at 6:58 AM, Yagoda said:

Every in  the USA who is not legally here should be removed immediately like they do in Thailand

Totally agree.  if there's a labour shortage then get the relevant visa processes sorted.  Like what they do in Thailand and most other countries.

There are two types of immigration... the right type and the wrong type. The right type are skilled, educated, have something to offer, hardworkers, investors, pay tax, don't commit crime, don't remit money to the backside of nowhere, want to integrate and share in the opportunity of a better future etc. etc. No problem at all with this sort of immigration, rather like it is in most places regarding this section of migrants.

The wrong type however, well, we hear about them all the time, and basically they aren't or don't do any of the aforementioned traits that are desirable as positive additions to a society... just want to sponge, commit crime, and be a general scumbag.

There is nothing wrong with deporting miscreants and denying entry to the feckless, criminal, and pointless spongers that offer sweet FA... rather like most sane countries do, including Thailand.

Why is it that western liberal democracies somehow think they are superiour to everywhere else because they fling open their borders to all and sundry that will untimately bring their societies to their knees, and have their cultures destroyed by those bringing all their problems and failed attitudes with them because they refuse to integrate or contribute? History will look back on the early 21st century and judge it very harshly indeed... assuming knowledge of history or being a historian hasn't be made illegal at some point.

 

Opinion | Donald Trump’s Racism: The Definitive List, Updated - The New York Times