7 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Yes as soon as I saw this I knew the lefties would cling onto this as some kind of moral victory. 

 

Look, if a PitBull ran into a child's playground and mauled 5 children to death before another Pitbull ran in and attacked the first PitBull and killed it, would your conclusion be "PitBulls are not the problem here, what we really need in this park is more PitBulls"?

 

The guy you refer to was very brave and I salute him, but he was one of many people who bravely helped stop this attack. An attack that would not have happened in the first place without the 2 Muslim terrorists executing Jews on a day out to the beach.

 

Stop being an apologist for this murderous event. It deserves to be condemned, not excused. There is a pattern here and you should stop pretending you cannot see it. 

This is a new low for you. Comparing Muslims lo Pitbulls.

You and your lefty nonsense.

I vote Reform and use to vote Conservative. I would have voted for Trump.

I'm against as ll illegal immigration and think they should turn all boats away, so enough of your polarised nonsense 

25 minutes ago, transam said:

Does the Muslim hierarchy condemn these attacks, do they tell these terrorists not to do it as it is wrong...?  🤫

What hierarchy? 

OMG, it's a beautiful day and I'm taking the bait from a guy under a bridge.

10 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

You are missing my point. Apparently this father and son perpetrators have been radicalised. The high percentage of targeted crimes towards Muslims in Australia played a role in this complex path to being radicalised. Muslims often feel victimised and targeted due widespread experiences of Islamophobia, discrimination and hate crimes which you classified as small crimes. Don’t discount these disproportionately small crimes as they can fester into hideous big crimes. Majority of Muslims are peace loving people. 

Look, an Islamofascist terror attack.  And the worst part is, how do we deal with the blowback ot the muslim community?

 

Thanks, Norm McDonald

Notice how quick the BBC news was to name the hero who tackled the gunman, and yet they still haven't named the gunmen.  Even the news reports from Muslim countries have named the father and son murderers, but the BBC dare not speak their names.

1 hour ago, Eric Loh said:

While I condemned the perpetrators of this senseless killings of innocent people, your information must be put in proper perspective. According to NSW Police data, Muslim is commonly targetted in Australia. A 2019 study of victim demograhy found that of all religiously motivated crimes, 73% targeted Muslim, followed by 14% targeting Jewish and 9% targeting Christains.

So, the Jewish / muslim ratio is 19%. Yet the 2021 census has the actual jewish / muslim ratio at 12.5% (0.4% / 3.2%). Seems the jews are more commonly targetted than muslims. Thanks for your figures.

1 hour ago, JimCM said:

You are so confused, you probably blamed the Pope when the IRA blew up Norman Tebbbit and co.

Did the Pope, or any of the Catholic church, call for an attack?  You are trying, and failing badly, to defend the indefensible, but you've dug your hole and you will keep digging despite the overwhelming evidence that the world has a major problem with a particular religion.

1 hour ago, Nick Carter icp said:

You are saying that Benjamin Netanyahu, leader of Israel "loves" all terror attacks ?

Not at all. Only those that serve his political ambitions, like Oct 7 and the resulting decimation of Gaza.

Long thread, perhaps someone has said it already. What percentage of people on Bondi were Jewish? Among the victims, how many were Jewish?

 

Obviously the gunmen were targeting Jews but there was likely a lot of collateral damage.

7 minutes ago, unblocktheplanet said:

Long thread, perhaps someone has said it already. What percentage of people on Bondi were Jewish? Among the victims, how many were Jewish?

 

Obviously the gunmen were targeting Jews but there was likely a lot of collateral damage.

 

   Maybe an idea for you to read the media reports ?

You can find the info there 

12 minutes ago, Kinnock said:

Did the Pope, or any of the Catholic church, call for an attack?  You are trying, and failing badly, to defend the indefensible, but you've dug your hole and you will keep digging despite the overwhelming evidence that the world has a major problem with a particular religion.

Oh, of course - let’s ignore 20 years of foreign invasions, the destruction of Iraq under blatantly false pretences, and the resulting refugee crisis. Clearly, millions of people fleeing war and instability in the Middle East has nothing to do with Western governments dropping bombs and destabilising the region. It must all be… their religion. Thanks for the history lesson, Captain Obvious.

Just for consideration the murdering Pakistani father and son combo went back to the s**thole in October and met with some top army man is being reported,

 

also consider the UK for example has lost 55,000 failed asylum seekers and has had 40,000 undocumented illegal arrivals just in the last year alone ... what will go wrong🤔

9 minutes ago, simon43 said:

Apologies if this comment has already been made.

 

The gunman who was shot dead had a firearms licence and had no less than 6 firearms.

 

Why are Muslims allowed to own firearms in Australia?  (or the UK or the USA etc).

 

It's like giving the key of the henhouse to a fox....

More vile islamophobic posts.

Firearms licences are issued to individuals, not religions. Saying “Why are Muslims allowed to own firearms?” is no different from asking why Christians, Jews, or white men are allowed to own them. It assumes guilt based solely on identity.

Millions of Muslims live peacefully under the law. Treating them as a collective security threat because of one person’s crime is prejudice, not public safety. If a licensed gun owner commits violence, the issue is the person or the licensing process, not their faith.

Comparing Muslims to “a fox in the henhouse” is dehumanising and exactly the kind of thinking that fuels hate rather than preventing violence.

Judge actions. Not religion.

4 minutes ago, sammieuk1 said:

Just for consideration the murdering Pakistani father and son combo went back to the s**thole in October and met with some top army man is being reported,

 

also consider the UK for example has lost 55,000 failed asylum seekers and has had 40,000 undocumented illegal arrivals just in the last year alone ... what will go wrong🤔

Get Farage in, he should deport every single one of them.

8 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

Because lefties allow it

Oh, Suze....😄

3 minutes ago, JimCM said:

Get Farage in, he should deport every single one of them.

 

Only if Putin pays him.

31 minutes ago, sammieuk1 said:

Just for consideration the murdering Pakistani father and son combo went back to the s**thole in October and met with some top army man is being reported,

 

also consider the UK for example has lost 55,000 failed asylum seekers and has had 40,000 undocumented illegal arrivals just in the last year alone ... what will go wrong🤔

BREAKING : Big revelation in the case of Bondi Beach, Sydney Terrorist Attack : Both terrorists Sajid Akram & Naveed Akram both had visited their home country Pakistan in October 2025 and met with 3 top Pakistan Army & ISI officials including Pak Army Chief Asim Munir.

 

Netanyahu you have another mission fulfill with gusto 

31 minutes ago, JimCM said:

More vile islamophobic posts.

Firearms licences are issued to individuals, not religions. Saying “Why are Muslims allowed to own firearms?” is no different from asking why Christians, Jews, or white men are allowed to own them. It assumes guilt based solely on identity.

Millions of Muslims live peacefully under the law. Treating them as a collective security threat because of one person’s crime is prejudice, not public safety. If a licensed gun owner commits violence, the issue is the person or the licensing process, not their faith.

Comparing Muslims to “a fox in the henhouse” is dehumanising and exactly the kind of thinking that fuels hate rather than preventing violence.

Judge actions. Not religion.

You will be telling us Islam is the religion of peace next not a death cult.

1 hour ago, georgegeorgia said:

Oh why do they need to ?

 

Did you tell every transexual not to do something?

 

What a strange comment, are transexual by any chance...

1 hour ago, JimCM said:

What hierarchy? 

OMG, it's a beautiful day and I'm taking the bait from a guy under a bridge.

More like you are cornered.........🤫

It shouldn’t be possible for any religion to be interpreted in an extremist way.

 

Holy books and teachings that can be interpreted this way should be edited by their religious bodies in such a way that extremist interpretation is impossible.

 

 

Offensive posts removed 

 

@EastBayRay

 

@simon43

Gentlemen, I understand that this news is deeply shocking and highly emotional. However, please take care to ensure that your responses remain respectful and do not contain any racist or hateful remarks. 

 

Thankyou for your cooperation.

17 minutes ago, JBChiangRai said:

It shouldn’t be possible for any religion to be interpreted in an extremist way.

 

Holy books and teachings that can be interpreted this way should be edited by their religious bodies in such a way that extremist interpretation is impossible.

 

 

Religious books are written exactly how they want to be read, hence the bunch who want to go around killing folk of  different religion.

Look at how J.W.'s 'read' stuff from the bible.......😳

4 hours ago, JimCM said:

Do you think the current Genocide in Gaza could have anything to do with the increase in violence against Jews around the world?

 

Holding Jews collectively responsible for the actions of the government of Israel is the rawest form of antisemitism, stretching back to the third and fourth centuries C.E. when all Jews, living and dead, were  blamed for the death  of Jesus Christ.

 

It would be equally insane to blame all Catholics for the actions of the Italian or Irish governments or all Buddhists for the actions of the Thai government.

3 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

    You are saying that Benjamin Netanyahu, leader of Israel "loves" all terror attacks ?

Pro Palestinians love terror attacks, because it gives then another opportunity to attack Israel .

   Threads about Islamic terror attacks quickly turn into Israel bashing threads 

 

I don’t think he loves all terror attacks. He likes the ones that have the potential to give his government opportunities to achieve their ultimate goals. 

Just now, AustinRacing said:

I don’t think he loves all terror attacks. He likes the ones that have the potential to give his government opportunities to achieve their ultimate goals. 

 

   What are his ultimate goals  ?

1 hour ago, sammieuk1 said:

Just for consideration the murdering Pakistani father and son combo went back to the s**thole in October and met with some top army man is being reported,

 

 

The son was on an ASIO watchlist for the past 6yrs.

Dad has a gun licence.

Off topic post removed

1 hour ago, JimCM said:

Treating them as a collective security threat because of one person’s crime is prejudice

 

No, it's common sense 

2 hours ago, Eric Loh said:

You are missing my point. Apparently this father and son perpetrators have been radicalised. The high percentage of targeted crimes towards Muslims in Australia played a role in this complex path to being radicalised. Muslims often feel victimised and targeted due widespread experiences of Islamophobia, discrimination and hate crimes which you classified as small crimes. Don’t discount these disproportionately small crimes as they can fester into hideous big crimes. Majority of Muslims are peace loving people. 

your just blaming other people for their disgraceful violence