3 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Impeding federal officers from carrying out their duties is not protesting. Driving into a federal agent is not protesting. Shooting at ICE agents is not protesting.

Twist, twist, twist.............

Just now, dinsdale said:

Give it a rest. Just more puerile nonsense. One could almost say you are trolling with such silly comments like "you have told us the agent was right to execute the lady" which of course you can't directly quote me as saying. Just like you cant directly quote me as saying she deliberately drove into him. Pitiful.

Twist, twist, twist, but you say that the agent was OK to execute her for driving away after a smiley chat.....😬

Yeh, you're a fun guy, eh............😬

3 hours ago, blaxon said:

The girlfriend, barking out commands during their encounter and obstruction of ICE performing lawful congress enacted laws may face prosecution!

If evidence supports that she encouraged, planned, or participated in the interference with the ICE arrest—such as urging Renee to confront the agents while filming with intent to escalate for publicity—the following federal offenses could apply, given ICE's involvement:

• Conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 371): This covers agreements to commit a crime against the U.S., like obstructing a federal operation. If they conspired to interfere with the arrest or provoke a reaction, this could stick, with penalties up to 5 years in prison.

• Obstruction of Justice (18 U.S.C. § 1505): Interfering with federal law enforcement duties, such as an immigration enforcement action. Her role in filming and allegedly directing Renee to the scene could be seen as aiding the obstruction, carrying up to 5 years.

• Aiding and Abetting Assault on a Federal Officer (18 U.S.C. § 111 and § 2): If Renee's acceleration of the SUV toward the agent is deemed assault with a deadly weapon (the vehicle), and Rebecca encouraged or facilitated it, she could be liable as an accomplice. This is a felony with up to 20 years if serious injury occurred (the agent was reportedly dragged and injured).

Other Possibilities: In Minnesota (state level), charges like reckless endangerment or conspiracy to commit endangerment could arise if local prosecutors get involved, especially since her statements like "I made her come down here, it's my fault" suggest involvement. Past allegations of domestic abuse (e.g., cigarette burns on children) aren't directly related but could influence bail or sentencing if charged here.

That dem state is completely off the charts. There is no semblance of fairness.

One hour after the shooting the politicians already predetermined the investigation,Murder.

Just now, riclag said:

That dem state is completely off the charts. There is no semblance of fairness.

One hour after the shooting the politicians already predetermined the investigation,Murder.

It was murder.........🤫

1 hour ago, dinsdale said:

I never said that. This happened very quickly. A matter of seconds. He shot to stop though and there's little doubt about that. It's unbelievable that a woman in her 30's could be so stupid as to drive at and into an armed law enforcement officer especially after harassing them throughout the day and clearly must know tensions are high, tensions which paradoxically are high driven in part by activists like herself and her activist wife.

And absolutely nothing to do with the ICE guy's testosterone.

I see.

1 minute ago, NanLaew said:

And absolutely nothing to do with the ICE guy's testosterone.

I see.

Maybe. Who knows. Thing is the woman hit an officer who had a gun with her car. He shot her. Don't know about you but hitting someone that has a gun with my car wouldn't be something I'd do unless it was to save my family. Police. Gun. Get out of the car. I'd get out of the car. What would you do? Flatten it and drive off hitting the ARMED police with your car along the way?

18 minutes ago, riclag said:

That dem state is completely off the charts. There is no semblance of fairness.

One hour after the shooting the politicians already predetermined the investigation,Murder.

Trump and Noem immediatly declaring that it was justified self defence was absolutely not prejedicial to any investigation then?

Woof woof, you are barking!

1 hour ago, dinsdale said:

I never said that. This happened very quickly. A matter of seconds. He shot to stop though and there's little doubt about that. It's unbelievable that a woman in her 30's could be so stupid as to drive at and into an armed law enforcement officer especially after harassing them throughout the day and clearly must know tensions are high, tensions which paradoxically are high driven in part by activists like herself and her activist wife.

Split second justice incentivizes federal LE immunity. They should train the Marxist ICEWatch observers in this,especially when using a vehicle to ram LE.,over 100 cases of vehicle's being used to ram Fed LE.

Google ai overview:

"The phrase "split-second justice incentivizes federal le immunity cases" reflects a common criticism that the qualified immunity doctrine, particularly as applied to police use-of-force cases, creates incentives that favor law enforcement officers and make it difficult for civil rights plaintiffs to win lawsuits". 

Google ai overview:

Between January 21, 2025, and January 7, 2026, there were 66 vehicular attacks against ICE officers, compared to just two during the same period in 2024 (a 3,200% increase).

Including Customs and Border Protection (CBP), there were nearly 100 vehicular attacks against federal law enforcement in a specific period in 2025, more than double the amount from the previous year. 

15 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

Hey, I forgot to thank you for the thread and your opinions of the radical ICEwarriors who refused to obey LE commands 4x while looking for a confrontation with LE.

3 hours ago, NanLaew said:

PS. For anyone thinking about selling me that "she weaponised her car" guff, Noem couldn't convince me, so don't waste your time.

Noem couldn't convince anyone on the point of getting a face lift.

3 hours ago, dinsdale said:

What's your point? This video shows her obstructing ICE, refusing legal orders to exit the vehicle and running into the ICE agent. As for the audio from the now dead driver it's of no legal consequence. What might be of legal consequence is her activist wife telling her to flee the scene.

To me this kind of reaction implies learning difficulties.

1 minute ago, Palatus said:

To me this kind of reaction implies learning difficulties.

Indeed.......😏

2 hours ago, Yagoda said:

And?

Fake facts LOL

Spinning so fast you are dizzy

Don't your parents limit your time on the internet? Get them on this thread so we can have a word with them please.

When an organization advertises for men who like video games, who are gun rights supporters, military enthusiasts (armchair), who have attended UFC fights and listen to "patriotic podcasts", this is the dross you get.

8 minutes ago, Hamus Yaigh said:

Don't your parents limit your time on the internet? Get them on this thread so we can have a word with them please.

Gee. What a riposte.

It turns out the killer is hard-core MAGA. What an utter surprise!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15449879/federal-agents-guns-swarm-jonathan-ross-home-hiding-minneapolis.html

"Neighbors told the Daily Mail that Ross was a hardcore MAGA supporter. Another neighbor told the Daily Mail that until recently Ross had been flying pro-Trump flags and a 'Don't Tread On Me' Gadsden Flag that is an emblem of the Make America Great Again movement. There's now no sign of Ross, his wife, or the flags."

in support of ICE.

8 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

That is very possible. She was obviously trying to irritate or anger the ICE agent as she was filming, trying to provoke a reaction that would look good on social media.

Also, her shouting "drive baby drive!" to her wife was hideously stupid.

Not really this is America not Russia or N Korea perhaps Iran would be a good example…..here ya don’t expect a soccer mom to be shot for not stopping for a armed masked trump thug.law enforcement are sworn to protect and serve not shoot people who disobey their orders.you would also hope they would be smart enough not to place themselves in the danger zone during a confrontation…..nore would you expect them to be so foolish in their hunger to kill to endanger their fellow thugs as witnessed by the fires shot through the windshield…..this tragedy in my view was unnecessary tragic and a result of incompetence and blood lust.Its especially galling to watch this administration lie……expected yes but galling just the same…..take note America let’s not tolerate it.

11 minutes ago, Tug said:

Not really this is America not Russia or N Korea perhaps Iran would be a good example…..here ya don’t expect a soccer mom to be shot for not stopping for a armed masked trump thug.law enforcement are sworn to protect and serve not shoot people who disobey their orders.you would also hope they would be smart enough not to place themselves in the danger zone during a confrontation…..nore would you expect them to be so foolish in their hunger to kill to endanger their fellow thugs as witnessed by the fires shot through the windshield…..this tragedy in my view was unnecessary tragic and a result of incompetence and blood lust.Its especially galling to watch this administration lie……expected yes but galling just the same…..take note America let’s not tolerate it.

Also take note. You lied and said her husband watched as the officer splattered her brains all over him.

Remember that lie ?

You're so misinformed and misguided its actually incredible to watch.

3 minutes ago, blaze master said:

Also take note. You lied and said her husband watched as the officer splattered her brains all over him.

Remember that lie ?

You're so misinformed and misguided its actually incredible to watch.

Oh, what a horrible mistake to say husband instead of wife!🤣

Listen very carefully: As a MAGA supporter you can not, I repeat CAN NOT, fault anyone for getting things factually wrong, or even lying, as the vile creature you support does nothing but lie, every day, all day.

Okay?

Just now, BLMFem said:

Oh, what a horrible mistake to say husband instead of wife!🤣

Listen very carefully: As a MAGA supporter you can not, I repeat CAN NOT, fault anyone for getting things factually wrong, or even lying, as the vile creature you support does nothing but lie, every day, all day.

Okay?

I see you are having trouble understanding. Come back when you're ready for basic concepts.

Bye.

1 minute ago, BLMFem said:

Oh, what a horrible mistake to say husband instead of wife!🤣

Listen very carefully: As a MAGA supporter you can not, I repeat CAN NOT, fault anyone for getting things factually wrong, or even lying, as the vile creature you support does nothing but lie, every day, all day.

Okay?

Actually, having seen photos of Mrs Good (2), it IS an understandable mistake. However, placing her in the car at the time of the shooting is less easily explained. She was clearly outside and had been for some time.

Just now, Hanaguma said:

Actually, having seen photos of Mrs Good (2), it IS an understandable mistake. However, placing her in the car at the time of the shooting is less easily explained. She was clearly outside and had been for some time.

Remember this is coming from the no one hit the officer with their car squad.

Have you seen the footage from a house across the street. Clearly showing he was hit.

Ya I have too.

Then mix in the good old you disagree with me therefore you are maga years old trope.

Yawn burger with cheese please.

14 minutes ago, blaze master said:

Remember this is coming from the no one hit the officer with their car squad.

Have you seen the footage from a house across the street. Clearly showing he was hit.

Ya I have too.

Then mix in the good old you disagree with me therefore you are maga years old trope.

Yawn burger with cheese please.

Oh, you have seen a video "clearly" showing he was hit. Mind sharing? And also, even if it were true, as she drove past him - past him, not over him - was it then appropriate for him to shoot her dead?

1 minute ago, BLMFem said:

Oh, you have seen a video "clearly" showing he was hit. Mind sharing? And also, even if it were true, as she drove past him - past him, not over him - was it then appropriate for him to shoot her dead?

Think I saw her hit him in the new video. But that is honestly irrelevant. The legal standard does not require the car to actually hit him. The standard is "did he at that time have a good faith fear for his life and/or safety".

Also, does the driver not bear some responsibility? Ignoring and disobeying 4 consecutive legal orders to exit the vehicle must have SOME meaning...

47 minutes ago, Tug said:

Not really this is America not Russia or N Korea perhaps Iran would be a good example…..here ya don’t expect a soccer mom to be shot for not stopping for a armed masked trump thug.law enforcement are sworn to protect and serve not shoot people who disobey their orders.you would also hope they would be smart enough not to place themselves in the danger zone during a confrontation…..nore would you expect them to be so foolish in their hunger to kill to endanger their fellow thugs as witnessed by the fires shot through the windshield…..this tragedy in my view was unnecessary tragic and a result of incompetence and blood lust.Its especially galling to watch this administration lie……expected yes but galling just the same…..take note America let’s not tolerate it.

She was not a soccer mom. The use of the term is intended to create a soft image of the deceased, to downplay her political activism.

17 hours ago, Autocan said:

It doesn't matter if she was a convicted axe-murderer. This wasn't why she was shot dead. Plenty of footage shows that, yes, she disobeyed LEO command to stop and was turning the car onto the road in a manner not threatening the safety of the LEO who stepped in front of the car and shot her through the front window.

Lethal force wasn't justified in any way. Heck, they had her plate number and could have apprehended her in hours. But, no, they decided to execute her.

Think how scary this is. Say you are in the US and being in the wrong place at the wrong time are caught up in an ICE dragnet. You protest that you are a law-abiding citizen minding his own business. But the ICE agent you are talking to for some reason or who is just having a bad day takes offense to the tone of your voice, doesn't like your face and shoots you through the head for allegedly threatening violence. And, then, FBI and DOJ back him up and local LE is barred from investigating your death, while MAGA media paints you as violent criminal who deserved what he got. North Korea, man!

The woman and her wife had spent the day impeding ICE officers and if you have seen the latest available videos from different viewpoints, including the ICE officers bodycam footage, you will probably form a different opinion. Her wife was blaming herself in the immediate aftermath after telling her to drive a couple of seconds before she was shot through the windscreen. The ICE officer was directly in front of her and she smiled before flooring the accelerator.

9 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

Oh, you have seen a video "clearly" showing he was hit. Mind sharing? And also, even if it were true, as she drove past him - past him, not over him - was it then appropriate for him to shoot her dead?

Have you seen this angle?

9 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

Oh, you have seen a video "clearly" showing he was hit. Mind sharing? And also, even if it were true, as she drove past him - past him, not over him - was it then appropriate for him to shoot her dead?

Watch the body cam footage that the mainstream won't show

6 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Think I saw her hit him in the new video. But that is honestly irrelevant. The legal standard does not require the car to actually hit him. The standard is "did he at that time have a good faith fear for his life and/or safety".

Also, does the driver not bear some responsibility? Ignoring and disobeying 4 consecutive legal orders to exit the vehicle must have SOME meaning...

I have read that they did not have authority to order her out of the vehicle as they did not suspect her to be an illegal immigrant.

Grok (AI):