5 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

Generally yes.

But you had already sucked the air from the room with your repetitious nonsense, so if there's only an empty windbag left, go for it.

But your repetitious nonsense is okay? You seem to want to name-call and whatnot and then seem to get butt-hurt and claim the moral high ground when someone does it to you. Don't sell wolf tickets and then start moaning when people buy them.

17 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

With this crowd, it always degenerates into insults when their hypocrisy is exposed.

Blah...blah...blah...

Just now, Yellowtail said:

But your repetitious nonsense is okay? You seem to want to name-call and whatnot and then seem to get butt-hurt and claim the moral high ground when someone does it to you. Don't sell wolf tickets and then start moaning when people buy them.

Blah...blah...blah...

1 hour ago, NanLaew said:

Generally yes.

But you had already sucked the air from the room with your repetitious nonsense, so if there's only an empty windbag left, go for it.

Repetitive nonsense would be classified better as supporting lying under oath. What other crimes are OK to fight Trump?

1 hour ago, NanLaew said:

Blah...blah...blah...

Blah...blah...blah...

Brilliant response brother, I think I'll change my position.

24 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Brilliant response brother, I think I'll change my position.

No need, just change hands.

6 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

No need, just change hands.

Oh, you're too quick for me!

Getting back on topic: Do you think people should be investigated and (if guilty) punished for lying to Congress under oath or not?

3 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Oh, you're too quick for me!

Getting back on topic: Do you think people should be investigated and (if guilty) punished for lying to Congress under oath or not?

...crickets

10 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

...crickets

Do you think people should be investigated and (if guilty) punished for lying to Congress under oath or not?

15 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Do you think people should be investigated and (if guilty) punished for lying to Congress under oath or not?

Do you think people who attempts to instigate a coup should be punished, or not?

Why are none of the Trump obsessed haters here able to answer questions.

I believed that generally speaking, people that break the law, be they left or right, should be held accountable.

It seems to me that perjury and contempt of Congress going unpunished is a slippery slope, and that the statute of limitations should be at least 14 years,

1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

Why are none of the Trump obsessed haters here able to answer questions.

I believed that generally speaking, people that break the law, be they left or right, should be held accountable.

It seems to me that perjury and contempt of Congress going unpunished is a slippery slope, and that the statute of limitations should be at least 14 years,

So there should be consequences for people who defy or refuse congressional subpoenas?

42 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

It seems to me that perjury and contempt of Congress going unpunished is a slippery slope, and that the statute of limitations should be at least 14 years,

At least 14 years. And any sentence handed down must be served in full, cannot be commuted, and the perpetrator can never be pardoned.

Meanwhile, your 'slippery slope' started getting precipitously so back around 1992 with Caspar Weinberger, indicted for lying to Congress on the Iran Contra affair but pardoned by H.W. Bush who was Reagan's VP when the whole s__tshow unravelled.

You guys just can't help (deluding) yourselves, can you?

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Oh, you're too quick for me!

Getting back on topic: Do you think people should be investigated and (if guilty) punished for lying to Congress under oath or not?

Back on topic, do you think this is a genuine investigation, or one instigated by unhappiness from Trump with Powell?

1 hour ago, NanLaew said:

At least 14 years. And any sentence handed down must be served in full, cannot be commuted, and the perpetrator can never be pardoned.

Meanwhile, your 'slippery slope' started getting precipitously so back around 1992 with Caspar Weinberger, indicted for lying to Congress on the Iran Contra affair but pardoned by H.W. Bush who was Reagan's VP when the whole s__tshow unravelled.

You guys just can't help (deluding) yourselves, can you?

So, do you think people should be investigated and (if guilty) punished for lying to Congress under oath or not?

1 hour ago, stevenl said:

Back on topic, do you think this is a genuine investigation, or one instigated by unhappiness from Trump with Powell?

Answer my question, and I'll answer yours.

Do you think people should be investigated and (if guilty) punished for lying to Congress under oath or not?

12 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Answer my question, and I'll answer yours.

Do you think people should be investigated and (if guilty) punished for lying to Congress under oath or not?

I asked you before you asked me.

Nut if you really want to punish people for lying to Congress, Bondi, Noem, Patel are all gone and the supreme court would be significantly reduced in numbers.

12 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

So, do you think people should be investigated and (if guilty) punished for lying to Congress under oath or not?

What's the point in badgering for a yes or no response when it is obvious that, regardless of what you or I consider as the appropriate procedures for investigation and punishment if found guilty of lying to Congress, they can be summarily dismissed as a no nevermind by whichever Ron, George or Donald is president?

2 minutes ago, stevenl said:

I asked you before you asked me.

Nut if you really want to punish people for lying to Congress, Bondi, Noem, Patel are all gone.