Yes and in this election the small parties were squeezed by the two major parties.
It seems symptomatic of the world today - Polarisation US/ China - Republican/Democrat - Black/White no room for a middle ground. I watch a lot of news channels one of which is Al Jazeera, another is CNN - CNN have a punch line for a thing called "at the table" - they say it's a place where people with differing political views "talk to each other" THEY DON'T - they talk AT each other from their own view point. I also watch the BBC which claims to be "unbiased" it isn't it looks at the world from the "western perspective".
Polarisation will cause nothing but trouble but I think it's here to stay.
But they're going to end up cutting a negative amount. Musk climbed down first from his 2 trillion claim, then it went down to 1 trillion, now it's at 150 billion and still filled with falsehoods.
On the other hand he did manage to slash employment at the enforcement division of the IRS. It's projected to cost the US roughly $500 billion yearly in revenues. At least. So even if we accept Musk's valuation of $150 billion in savings, it still amounts to a negative cut of $35O billion.
So you believe that cutting jobs, especially outside of the Government is good!
I thought trump and you MAGAmaniacs wanted employment to go up not down!
Of course the welfare bill will also have to up along with all the other social benefits and the actual costs of the goods as well.
Well (not) done Trump!!!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now