I'm more interested in Romney/Ryan's positions than the R platform.

Next ...

The best way to get you to change the subject is to point out how you support the guy and political party who want to see Israel go the way of Atlantis.

Next...

That is your fantasy.

If you think that Obama wants to help Israel for any reason other than to get votes, you are living in Wonderland and after November - one way or the other - votes are not going to matter to him any more.

Obama is a Christian.

Sure. In exactly the same way that he was for only traditional marriage until it was politically expediant to be for something else.

Obama is a Christian. Stop pretending he is a Muslim or not born in the USA. Please.

There goes that straw man again, Obama is Islam friendly, so much so that he can't stop apologizing every time a lynch mob decides to murder Americans for whatever excuse they think of, nor hesitating to throw U.S troops or Americas allies under a bus if it pleases the oil cartel and opens the spigot pouring filthy lucre into the Democrat campaign buckets.

Nearly missed this: Allows the antisemitic UNHRC to address the security council providing Syria, Obamas latest pet project, can be discussed.

http://exposingliberallies.blogspot.com/2012/07/obama-betrays-israel.html

Obama is a Christian. Stop pretending he is a Muslim or not born in the USA. Please.

Fair enough, but people should stop pretending that Romney is a Christian too,

American Jews still hope for PEACE in that region.

Forget the illegal settlement strawmen, Democrats do not believe Jerusalem is the capital of Israel - do you agree with the Dems?

Obama refuses to meet with the Israeli PM, instead chooses Letterman - do you agree with Obama?

The Dems removed from their platform the part about complete isolation of Hamas until it renounces terrorism, recognizes Israel's right to exist and abides by past agreements - do you agree with the Dems?

The Dems are no longer against the Palestinian "right of return" which will make Jews a minority in their own country - do you agree with the Dems?

Obama and the Dems want Israel to fall back to the thin, indefensible pre-1967 borders - do you agree them?

Never mind. As long as they believe in gay marriage and abortion with no restrictions none of that matters to the far left.

How's this for Fair 'n Balanced - Fox News hammering Romney for running a crap campaign and not being a real Republican...

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/09/11/caddell_on_romney_this_is_the_worst_campaign_in_my_lifetime.html

A great opinion piece on why NOT to vote for Obama.

Apologizing for America, appeasing our enemies, abandoning our allies and slashing our military are the hallmarks of Mr. Obama's foreign policy. The Obama economy, with its high unemployment, massive debt and out-of-control spending, has rightly demanded our attention. As we head to the polls in November, we cannot ignore what is an even more dismal national-security record. An America already weakened by four years of an Obama presidency will be unrecognizable after eight.http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444017504577646142541161820.html

Liz Cheney? Totally biased right wing zealot. Not even worth reading. But thanks!

American Jews still hope for PEACE in that region.

Forget the illegal settlement strawmen, Democrats do not believe Jerusalem is the capital of Israel - do you agree with the Dems?

Obama refuses to meet with the Israeli PM, instead chooses Letterman - do you agree with Obama?

The Dems removed from their platform the part about complete isolation of Hamas until it renounces terrorism, recognizes Israel's right to exist and abides by past agreements - do you agree with the Dems?

The Dems are no longer against the Palestinian "right of return" which will make Jews a minority in their own country - do you agree with the Dems?

Obama and the Dems want Israel to fall back to the thin, indefensible pre-1967 borders - do you agree them?

Never mind. As long as they believe in gay marriage and abortion with no restrictions none of that matters to the far left.

Those are only two issues of many, dude.

American Jews still hope for PEACE in that region.

Forget the illegal settlement strawmen, Democrats do not believe Jerusalem is the capital of Israel - do you agree with the Dems?

Obama refuses to meet with the Israeli PM, instead chooses Letterman - do you agree with Obama?

The Dems removed from their platform the part about complete isolation of Hamas until it renounces terrorism, recognizes Israel's right to exist and abides by past agreements - do you agree with the Dems?

The Dems are no longer against the Palestinian "right of return" which will make Jews a minority in their own country - do you agree with the Dems?

Obama and the Dems want Israel to fall back to the thin, indefensible pre-1967 borders - do you agree them?

Never mind. As long as they believe in gay marriage and abortion with no restrictions none of that matters to the far left.

Those are only two issues of many, dude.

Yeah, I made a long list of those "many" and you STILL want to vote for Obama. After Israel suffers a tragic attack under a new Obama admin, I don't want to see you around here yapping against it. You will have had your chance to do something about it (vote) but will have chosen to turn your back on Israel by standing behind Obama.

Isreal smizreal!

I am happy to see the President's mouthpiece cleared the air about the reason for the invasions of our embassies and the killings of our diplomats around the world and that it had nothing to do with the US or administration policies. It's all about the movie.

Anybody want to buy a bridge?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What a load of crap. It is looking like the whole thing was planned and coordinated all over the region for the anniversary of 9/11 and the most likely suspects would be the Muslim Brotherhood.

I already posted this in the World News forum, but I thought I would post it here as well since it shows how Obama has lost touch with priorities and how Time magazine is sooo in the tank for him it's embarrassing. It was just last week that Bill Clinton was getting people to connect how good they felt when he was in office to today, under Obama. Now that has all be unraveled - at least for those of us old enough to remember - and the feeling is still familiar, but now it's how we felt under Jimmy Carter and the Iranian Hostage Crisis....

Wow, after trashing Romney for speaking out about the Obama admins initial reaction to the riot in Egypt, TIME magazine is already spinning some revisionist history in favor of the Obama administration. Here's the first line of their latest article...

Outrage was the Obama Administration’s first reaction, Wednesday morning, to attacks on U.S. diplomatic posts in Egypt and

Libya

— where four Americans were killed, including U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens.

Read more:

http://world.time.com/2012/09/12/after-benghazi-consulate-attack-whats-next-for-u-s-relations-with-libya-and-egypt/#ixzz26WNAXnpK

Outrage? Really? The first reaction - as everyone knows - didn't come the day AFTER the attacks on Wednesday morning. The first reaction on Tuesday was to apologize. Only after Romney pointed that out did the Obama admin condemn the attacks the next day, Wednesday. Even then, they started the condemnation with a qualifier...

"While the United States rejects efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others, we must all unequivocally oppose the kind of senseless violence that took the lives of these public servants," Obama said.

On this tragic day, after finally making a statement condemning the attack (but taking no questions), what was Obama's next reaction? To go to LAS VEGAS and raise some money for his campaign!!

On the day after the U.S. Ambassador to Libya and three other Americans were killed in Benghazi, the White House on Wednesday morning released a schedule showing that President Obama would continue with his planned campaign trip to Las Vegas.

Before he leaves, the schedule indicated, Obama will "deliver a statement" in the White House Rose Garden at 10:35 a.m., the White House said.

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/obamas-going-las-vegas

I have to admit that I never realized the extent that the mainstream media would lie to get their man elected, but it is becoming abundantly clear. Someone posted an article the other day that claimed that Republicans were angry at Romney for his statement about the latest incident in Egypt and included quotes critical of him. When I checked the quotes they were taken completely out of context and actually praised Romney for his statement. This really is the dirtiest presidential campaign that I can remember and the media are complicit.

Mark Steyn on Obama campaigning in Las Vegas after the attacks on American diplomatic stations in the Middle East:“I thought that thing last night with the president saying he had ‘a tough day’ and comparing the dead Americans in Libya to campaign supporters, which he did — I thought was one of the most disgraceful, inept and embarrassing performances by a head of state or government that I have ever seen. Every American should be ashamed of their president.”

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/09/14/mark_steyn_every_american_should_be_ashamed_of_their_president.html

Obama has a lot to answer for after what has been going on the last few days.

Is that flip flop thing the same as Obama being FOR same sex marriages before he was AGAINST same sex marriages before he was FOR same sex marriages?

Not the same at all. Obama didn't INVENT same sex marriage, and believe me gay people knew all along he was the best president in U.S. history for gay civil rights.

That is a really wild claim, JT. How in the world would all gays somehow just know that Obama would be "the best president in U.S. history for gay civil rights"? I mean, Obama came out and said himself he was against gay marriage but somehow gays KNEW he didn't really feel that way? I would ask you for a link to support your wild claim, but I found one of my own that shows why you are totally right in this case and also explains that Obama Newsweek cover from last spring...

A prominent member of Chicago’s homosexual community claims Barack Obama’s participation in the “gay” bar and bathhouse scene was so well known that many who were aware of his lifestyle were shocked when he ran for president and finally won the White House.

“It was preposterous to the people I knew then to think Obama was going to keep his gay life secret,” said Kevin DuJan, who was a gossip columnist in Chicago for various blogs when Obama was living in the city as a community organizer and later a state senator.

DuJan, founder and editor of the Hillary Clinton-supporting website HillBuzz.org, told WND he has first-hand information from two different sources that “Obama was personally involved in the gay bar scene.”

“If you just hang out at these bars, the older guys who have been frequenting these gay bars for 25 years will tell you these stories,” DuJan said. “Obama used to go to the gay bars during the week, most often on Wednesday, and they said he was very much into older white guys.”

Obama, DuJan said, is “not heterosexual and he’s not bisexual. He’s homosexual.”

http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/claim-obama-hid-gay-life-to-become-president/

I'm suspicious about his claims to be a Christian too. From everything that has come out about him, he does not seem like the religious type.

Blimey the POTUS is a gay Muslim!

A communist gay Muslim.

A transcript release yesterday, of Romney talking to rich folks;

"There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it. That that's an entitlement. And the government should give it to them. And they will vote for this president no matter what...These are people who pay no income tax.

My job is is not to worry about those people. I'll never convince them they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives."

A transcript release yesterday, of Romney talking to rich folks;

"There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it. That that's an entitlement. And the government should give it to them. And they will vote for this president no matter what...These are people who pay no income tax.

My job is is not to worry about those people. I'll never convince them they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives."

Sounds like Romney's clinging to guns and religion moment.

I bet this gets more play in the media than the intelligence and foreign policy failures that led to our ambassador and 3 others getting killed in Libya.

To some, this is just too way out.

A transcript release yesterday, of Romney talking to rich folks;

"There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it. That that's an entitlement. And the government should give it to them. And they will vote for this president no matter what...These are people who pay no income tax.

My job is is not to worry about those people. I'll never convince them they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives."

Sounds like Romney's clinging to guns and religion moment.

I bet this gets more play in the media than the intelligence and foreign policy failures that led to our ambassador and 3 others getting killed in Libya.

Heh...you think the culture of dependency that Obama has fostered will want to vote for a guy who tells 'em to get off their asses and apply themselves?

A communist gay Muslim.

That was irony - right?

A communist gay Muslim.

That was irony - right?

That was a mis-reading of the report quoted about a dozen posts before this - 1339. It says there he was a 'community' organiser, not a 'communist' organiser. Although there's probably very little difference.

A transcript release yesterday, of Romney talking to rich folks;

"There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it. That that's an entitlement. And the government should give it to them. And they will vote for this president no matter what...These are people who pay no income tax.

My job is is not to worry about those people. I'll never convince them they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives."

Sounds like Romney's clinging to guns and religion moment.

I bet this gets more play in the media than the intelligence and foreign policy failures that led to our ambassador and 3 others getting killed in Libya.

Heh...you think the culture of dependency that Obama has fostered will want to vote for a guy who tells 'em to get off their asses and apply themselves?

If you looked at a list of all the people and corporations and do-good organizations in the US which get federal or State money, you would find that the bulk of the money (maybe not the bulk of the numbers) goes to well-off people. Everyone at least tries to scam the system. Even the people pretending to support supply-side economics (and 'pull yourself up by your own bootstraps' people) are getting federal hand-outs to an alarming degree. In the US (and many other places) the richer you are, the easier it is to scam the system.

Romney was talking about the 47% that do not pay federal income tax and he may have a point.