Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 671
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I am curious, tangaroa.

Akha beauty

No flash but another lightsource close to you.

Another Akha girl

Yes flash.

I would like to know how you lightened their faces.

Thanks.smile.png

Posted

^^^ I would have guessed the opposite way round DAL, 1st off camera flash, 2nd light from a fire maybe.

^Very unlikely. If a flash has been used on Akha beauty it came from the left and couldn't have been eminated from the camera. Shadow from the nose, etc

Fire light is always in movement which always produces shadows. There are bearly any shadows on Another Akha girl's face at all.

I'm very impressed with the amount of detail he's produced on her face given this low light situation. In fact her face looks so good I want to know how.

Posted

I am curious, tangaroa.

Akha beauty

No flash but another lightsource close to you.

Another Akha girl

Yes flash.

I would like to know how you lightened their faces.

Thanks.smile.png

No flash with any of them, guys. I wish I'd had the foresight to bring one (or indeed press my daughter into service as off-camera flash girl, haha).

No, these photo's were taken with available light only, primarily from bare light-bulbs, but augmented in some instances by the light from a stage.

There are some more pics HERE, if you guys are interested.

Posted

Akha Girl: 35mm f/1.4 1/1000/s at ISO2000 (I hadn't realised the shutter speed was so fast for this ... with hindsight, I would have reduced the ISO to 1000 or thereabouts, but in the heat of the moment ...)

Another Akha Girl: 35mm f/1.4 1/400/s at ISO2000

I deliberately tried not to use too high an ISO setting as I wanted to keep noise to a minimum. I'd chose the 35mm f1.4 lens as I knew I'd be shooting 'wide open' and I wanted something faster than my f/2.8 lenses. I didn't go with my 50mm f/1.2 as it's bloody tricky to get sharp shots at f/1.2 and more pertinently, I needed a wider angle to be able to capture the whole stage. I shot RAW and was able to recover quite a bit of detail from within the shadows. Indeed, if you compare the version of 'Akha Girl' that I posted on Facebook, you'll notice that the shadows are a great deal darker. I much prefer the image I posted here.

Posted

This is far from a great image, but it'll give you an idea of the area I was shooting in. There was a stage to my right and a covered area lit with a few bare bulbs to my left.

20141213-0N7A5271.jpg

20141213-0N7A5704.jpg

Posted

I like that, Shaggy. I like the balance in tones between the natural and incandescent light. I just wish there's been a (human) subject in the foreground. Nice job, though!

Posted

I spent New Years Day at the Doi Mae Salong Tea Festival ... here a few shots from the evening. No flash, just ambient light ... I was on my own!

1. 20150101-0N7A2141.jpg

2. 20150101-0N7A2146.jpg

3. 20150101-0N7A2179.jpg

4. 20150101-0N7A2346.jpg

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

05:30 in Ban Nor Lae...Smoke seeping from the 'kitchen' as Palaung ladies cook breakfast while the men still sleep...

16121735738_818a1f0d59_b.jpg

Posted

I hope I'll be allowed this slight diversion from night shots in Thailand. I think it usefully demonstrates how little depth of field you actually need to make captivating images in low-light ... this shot was captured at f/1.8. If you have time, check out his other images, they're all good.

https://500px.com/photo/95857515/the-streets-of-shanghai-06-by-xie-jl

These are fabulous and should give us food for thought to apply to Thailand (or wherever we may be) in future. Thanks for sharing!

Posted

It's the extended DOF that the mirrorless cameras provide that make them interesting to shoot at night.

Fuji XE-1 Voightlander 35mm (equal to 50mm) @ f2 - plenty of DOF even at this aperture. Bangkok night market and ice factory.

13319284815_d3e592188c_b.jpg

Posted

Surely the increased DOF is a function of having a crop-sensor, rather than it being mirrorless?

Again, cool edit, Fimgirl! I'd love to know how you get that cold, metallic look.

Posted

^^ Yea, my bad, I meant to say cropped and mirrorless.

The "look"- I upload into Niks Silver Effects and then back into Photoshop wherein I can adjust the "opacity" and "fill" sliders from within the layer and re-introduce colour to taste.

Hope that makes sense.

Posted

I hope I'll be allowed this slight diversion from night shots in Thailand. I think it usefully demonstrates how little depth of field you actually need to make captivating images in low-light ... this shot was captured at f/1.8. If you have time, check out his other images, they're all good.

https://500px.com/photo/95857515/the-streets-of-shanghai-06-by-xie-jl

Details of the first one :

Appareil E-M5
Objectif OLYMPUS M.17mm F1.8
Focale 17mm
Vitesse 1/40 s
Ouverture f/1.8
ISO/Film 1600 Photos shots with a fix focale 17 mm f/1,8 equivalent 35 mm ( have a look at the bottom of the page : M ZUIKO PREMIUM ) http://zuikopro.olympus-imaging.com/fr-fr/?icid=stage-4805867%20|%20Lenses%20-%20Learn%20more%20|%20%28stage-item%20stage-dark%20current%29 I can see we have a big depth of field; bigger than on the photo taken by Fimgirl ; 35 mm equivalent 50 mm f/2 ; excellent photo for all that ; I would like to shoot so beautiful photos ..Thanks . About mine; I have a bridge Lumix FZ 200 f/2,8 ; I cannot play in the same category tongue.png Thank you for the little ( slight ) diversion
Posted

This may be a poor offer to the topic as such but with a Fuji X-A1 at 16 mm 3.5 and 1/30 iso is up a bit at 800 , but from a slightly incoherent juxtaposition as well , I hope it is not offensive .

Big Night Out

DSCF1450.JPG

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...