Jump to content

Deputy govt spokeswoman Sunisa detained by PDRC


Recommended Posts

Posted
poor judgement happens when tensions are high - she was released unharmed so hardly a biggie, at least she wasn't gunned down in a hail of bullets like the red murderers call justice
I honestly think im in a playground reading these responses.

Sent from my GT-S7562 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

you'd almost think the red muderers were throwing grenades into playgrounds after reading news headlines these last few days

People have died from both sides haven't they. This is what i don't like from either camp, point scoring. Grow up.

Sent from my GT-S7562 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

how many points for a 4 year old you sick POS

To imply that i condone the death of a child is too much, way too much. People are dying is that not enough for you?.....enlighten me.

Sent from my GT-S7562 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

To steer it back to the article; no one died on her little spontaneous shopping extravaganza that lacked forward thinking- just detained to be asked what the heck she was thinking- maybe NOT thinking was a contagious virus she got, after exposure to Ms. Swindler of the Isaan folk.

  • Like 1
  • Replies 238
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Even Farangs can't agree on the reasons why she was there and lots of insults and finger pointing done.

Nobody, I repeat NOBODY puts themselves into a situation that can escalate into a violent confrontation willingly unless they're either retarded or serving in an armed conflict, there's way too many variables to jeopardise yourself like that.

Okay, I'll entertain some of the posters about this, as in she willingly did this, for PR purposes or whatever, there's NO WAY she could have predicted what was going to happen,good or bad, even Stevie Wonder could see that.

Okay now onto the placing oneself in a situation that can turn to rat shyt and go from flash to bang in seconds... would you do that deliberately? would you put yourself into these situations personally? IF the answer is no, you would not, then please please for the love of God STOP taking your children to these protests due to the very nature of the ptential for violence, so that IF an incident occured, the little ones are at home, well away from harms way.. Use common sense, if you're all claiming tensions are high and things can get out of hand, do you want your kids to witness their parents getting beaten up, maimed or killed and vice versa, do you wish to see kids hurt and killed??

Nobody can predict where Terrorists can strike next, it's impossible to secure every location and potential target, but you can remain vigilant and minimise risks, I've see enough senseless killings out in Iraq, last thing I want os for the same thing to start happening in Thailand, and yes, I know it's happened, but not to the extent of the conflicts in places like Sri Lanka, and the likes of the Middle East. I've seen this in Northern Irelad in the 1980's and in the Mainland UK, sensless killing is all that it is..

protest all you want, just leave the kids at home with the Grandparents, stop exposing them to the potential flashpoints.

  • Like 1
Posted

People should get prison sentence even for less than this. This is now more than insane to say the least.

'Even for less than this'? Like what? Might want to think that one through. They detained her for what, one hour? Probably thinking, 'is she dumb enough to come here?' Maybe they wanted a urine sample to see what she was smoking haha.

The whole thing is laughable, can't believe people take this seriously.

She has no right to come to a Protest site.

The protest site is not own by her.

She does not have an invitation letter from Suthep.

Posted

I think if the guards had not detained her a lot worse could of happened.

Was she on a spying mission?

I knew this conspiracy rubbish would raise its ugly heads

Posted (edited)

People should get prison sentence even for less than this. This is now more than insane to say the least.

'Even for less than this'? Like what? Might want to think that one through. They detained her for what, one hour? Probably thinking, 'is she dumb enough to come here?' Maybe they wanted a urine sample to see what she was smoking haha.

The whole thing is laughable, can't believe people take this seriously.

She has no right to come to a Protest site.

The protest site is not own by her.

She does not have an invitation letter from Suthep.

She was detained whilst in a public place, yes?

She is a member of the public, yes?

Why should she need permission from Suthep to be there?

I wouldn't be surprised if her name is on a list for detention or worse if Suthep and his thugs end up in power, but at the moment he is not in power.

Maybe they were just practising?...

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

Edited by JAG
Posted

I think if the guards had not detained her a lot worse could of happened.

Was she on a spying mission?

Spying mission? So a bunch of people can illegally occupy streets and disrupt traffic and retail businesses and you are afraid their "rights" may be compromised by a single woman going to a beauty clinic? Would you send one of the most recognizable people, a spokesperson for goodness sake, single handedly on a spying mission?

Posted (edited)

People should get prison sentence even for less than this. This is now more than insane to say the least.

'Even for less than this'? Like what? Might want to think that one through. They detained her for what, one hour? Probably thinking, 'is she dumb enough to come here?' Maybe they wanted a urine sample to see what she was smoking haha.

The whole thing is laughable, can't believe people take this seriously.

She has no right to come to a Protest site.

The protest site is not own by her.

She does not have an invitation letter from Suthep.

This just reinforces the mindset indoctrination Suthep expressed on camera in an interview; that, "We [he and his colleagues] are the owners of Thailand." Now, if that is not an autocratic statement that reveals his true intent, nothing is.

Edited by unanimosity
Posted

Detained! You mean kidnapped.

Opposite day is it? Or drama queen time? She was in no way kidnapped, held ransom, violated. You're simply exaggerating and twisting the truth.

Posted

Huh! So you don't understand that Stevie Wonder's spying, too. He's just been pretending all those years!!!!!

Seriously, Fat Haggis you are so right. I'm less than sure who disturbs me most in the current situation, those who are taking paramilitary action, and certainly like the paramilitary dress option, or the idiots that are pretending that this is all a jamboree to take the kids to, encourage the teenage daughter to meet her friends at, snap a few selfies at and take a look at the stalls.

I go further than Haggis in saying not only is the situation dangerous, but that the young should be encouraged to take a more considered view. Thailand is a very immature democracy, if democracy at all. The ill-considered football supporter, sloganizing, type of view that is modelled to young people, maybe even required of them by their parents, will not move Thailand toward democratic maturity.

Most considered opinion seems of the conclusion that Thailand is a kleptocracy. Political leaders are there to plunder, whether that be for their benefit or that of those in their network. It's very hard to argue against that view. A good starting point is to look at Suthep and the Shinawatras. Shades of degree, yes, but shades of intent, no. Instead of blind, sloganizing, support for the currently available elites, maybe the point is to feel that Thailand is worth better than a choice amongst thieves. Maybe it will never be, maybe it can never be, so ingrained is feudalism in Thailand, but in this football supporter maelstrom, people have even forgotten that as an ideal! And if it is a choice between thieves, it's quite possible that those with the highest satisfaction from the lowest headline figure from their skulduggery lay not in civilian Government.

Posted

Im glad to hear that she was released and that she was not injured.

Its not ok what they did but its good that Suthep and the other leaders ordered her release.

Hopefully this gets a sustainable ending soon...im coming back to BKK in 3 days please guys have everything

fixed and back to normal before then wai2.gif

Posted

Detained! You mean kidnapped.

Opposite day is it? Or drama queen time? She was in no way kidnapped, held ransom, violated. You're simply exaggerating and twisting the truth.

So how would you define being taken against your will and held by a mob with no authority to do so? Wake up lad, even Suthep recognized the egregious error of this.

Posted

Detained! You mean kidnapped.

Opposite day is it? Or drama queen time? She was in no way kidnapped, held ransom, violated. You're simply exaggerating and twisting the truth.

So how would you define being taken against your will and held by a mob with no authority to do so? Wake up lad, even Suthep recognized the egregious error of this.

ok there are clips on youtube that shows what actually hapend and a backstory to this.

Points of interest:

1) Miss Sunisa called a reporter saying she would be there that day. the reporter called PDRC

2) Miss Sunisa had 4(?) guards with her that ran away when the crowd saw her and was blowing whistles at her the crowd was angry with her being there. (not weird considering current events, and BTW this is a crowd not a mob they arent violent)

3) at first the guards wanted to escort her to her car but she refused. (saying she didnt dare to go with her as she is a woman and they are men and wanted to call her own escort....the guards who left her and ran away?)

4) PDRC leaders was upset and ordered her release not being fully briefed or what happend!

5) eventually they had to mask her and escort her back to her car. (her escort back was constituted by men and women for her personal safety and comfort doesnt feel like kidnapping to me).

Argument:

it could be claimed that she was arrested but it can also be claimed they where protecting her...the truth is probably a little of both but her safety was undoubtedly a serious issue.

Outcome:

She walked away without being hurt or injured in anyway. (what would happend with suthep if the government had managed to arrest him)

Link

if you wanna see what happend its avaliable on youtube I will try to find the link again and post it here.

  • Like 1
Posted

The constant references to female members of the caretaker government and their aides only being interested in shopping expeditions and beauty therapies is becoming increasingly tiresome.

The point surely is that any individual, particularly a female, should be able to move freely around Thailand without threats or intimidation regardless of their political persuasion

Also crushingly boring are the constant references to individuals, particularly females, as 'slaves', 'puppets', 'mouthpieces' of Thaksin. Of course they are supporters of the exiled premier, and would, no doubt, welcome his return to Thailand.

So, please, less of the childish references to 'shopping expeditions', 'beauty treatments', 'puppets' and 'mouthpieces' and let's have more mature and grown up debate about this very serious political crisis

out of curiosity, are you from St Just?
Posted

" PDRC core figures such as Suthep Thaugsuban and Sathit Wongnongtoei were reportedly alarmed by the detaining, announcing on stage that guards and protesters must refrain from using violence. Reporters said Mr. Suthep was visibly upset by the development. "

It was wrong and it was corrected.

Well done Suthep - at least he did the decent thing.

Makes a change - usually when the guards do something underhand that is recorded by the media (e.g. armed Popcorn men), Suthep's standard response has been that the armed men are not members of his peace-loving PDRC guards.

Posted

sunisa she dont have to come to our zone.

this is not the zone for the government but for us.

i think she go to different place is not the problem.

but not come here !!

Posted

I think if the guards had not detained her a lot worse could of happened.

Was she on a spying mission?

Yeh, she is a real spy threat. Everyone knows who she is. Even the guards knew.

Sent from my iPad using Thaivisa Connect Thailand

Posted

The fact, if you read the BP article, that a photographer was forewarned of LT Sunisa's 'performance' does suggest that this was a pre-planned publicity stunt.

Far from it being a kidnapping, it seems that Lt Sunisa should have thanked the PDRC guards for ensuring her safe departure from an area she had entered to try to provoke a reaction.

Posted

Bangkok post link removed. Forum rule 31) Bangkok Post do not allow quotes from their news articles or other material to appear on Thaivisa.com. Neither do they allow links to their publications. Posts from members containing quotes from or links to Bangkok Post publications will be deleted from the forum. Please note that this is a decision by the Bangkok Post, not by Thaivisa.com and any complaints or other issues concerning this rule should be directed to them.

Posted

The fact, if you read the BP article, that a photographer was forewarned of LT Sunisa's 'performance' does suggest that this was a pre-planned publicity stunt.

Far from it being a kidnapping, it seems that Lt Sunisa should have thanked the PDRC guards for ensuring her safe departure from an area she had entered to try to provoke a reaction.

So being kidnapped, threatened, held against one's will and then released "generously" is something to be grateful for. Should she send some souvenir and greeting card to her kidnappers?

I truly believe that some people here are out of their mind.

Posted

Is anybody still wondering why YL is spending most of her time in hiding?

Sutheps thugs are detaining people in the street and holding them for questioning, it is about time that the thugs were brought to book. Poor girl must have been terrified, she is only just older than a child. (and very pretty)wub.png

Incorrect Sutheps thugs, as you call them (Suthep's thugs is what you might mean) are not thugs. If they were they would have kicked her head in or something equally as horrid. Suthep himself said that he doesn't want the security to behave like this so you have to comment on the wider picture rather than post according to your preferred ideology. Secondly, this woman is a First Lieutenant - not an innocent child on the street. She is also on Thaksin's payroll, so I think she may well have had the presence of mind to deal with it in an adult way - and not with childish unintelligent comments that we often see on Thai Visa.

  • Like 1
Posted

Posted Today, 21:17

sunisa she dont have to come to our zone.

this is not the zone for the government but for us.

i think she go to different place is not the problem.

but not come here !!

Ponchi. Omg! Your Zone! By what authority? I guess that would be occupation. I, therefore, assume you'd be happy, for instance, for farangs to declare no-go zones in, for example, parts of Thonglor and Ekamai, also by virtue of occupation?

  • Like 1
Posted

<script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

The fact, if you read the BP article, that a photographer was forewarned of LT Sunisa's 'performance' does suggest that this was a pre-planned publicity stunt.

Far from it being a kidnapping, it seems that Lt Sunisa should have thanked the PDRC guards for ensuring her safe departure from an area she had entered to try to provoke a reaction.

Google her name, she has history.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...