If his conviction were "final," then he couldn't appeal. A little glossary is just that, and used as shorthand. It's all a little more complicated, which is why I suggested you just use common sense.
Nothing that you quoted supports your belief.... it only illustrates your poor understanding.
Do you have evidence that the NY judge didn't fulfill his duties and sign the judgement delivered by the jury... I'm pretty sure you don't.
Good for you - no sarcasm.
I'm sure that many retirees would be willing/eager to pay double that price to join the Thai Universal Coverage or Social Security schemes, if they were available.
Indeed.. but look how reluctant he was to give up such basic information... why is that ?
Not enough to make a tracker accurately duplicate her trading results. Pelosi doesn't want any regulation on that practice, hee hee.
Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) is facing pushback from some members of her own party for defending the practice of members of Congress trading stocks while in office.
https://phillips.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=588
If there were regulation, then she could be investigated. Until then, you'll have to go with the obvious. 🙂
OK. Which countries have such laws? Are there any that aren't tyrannies or religiously dominated?
But to put this in perspective when someone calls me a bigot for claiming there are only two genders am I then allowed to file a complaint? I mean I would feel offended and I would consider that a hateful thing to call me. And if a jury agrees with me the person calling me that gets punished? Can't figure out how it ends? Guessing it ends when the majority is able to silence the minority. Doesn't sound like free speech to me.
Recommended Posts