Tottenham Thread

[smokie36]

9 hours ago, Bredbury Blue said:

At this point last season you were 7 points behind. At one point you looked like challenging but imploded (vs Chelsea?). You finished 11 points behind the winner.

At the same point this season (now) you're 7 points behind the leader Chelsea...

 

 

<deleted> has that got to do with this season?

[Bredbury Blue]

Just pointing out that you're in a great place right now (again).

[Rc2702]

1 hour ago, Bredbury Blue said:

Just pointing out that you're in a great place right now (again).
 

Couple of hatchet jobs is all that is required to put a dent on spurs's season. Slick but lightweight squad. Needs enforcements.

[3 minus 2]

3 hours ago, wilai said:

^"er , not what he said which was ;

 

 

^Try reading the first post at the top of this page (made by you!). An incorrect interpretation of Bangrak Bob's post (you quoted it yourself)!) and nothing whatsoever to do with the post you now conveniently refer to!..... Kao Chai Mai?  Like I said earlier....welcome back!

 

3 hours ago, wilai said:

^"er , not what he said which was ;

 

 

^Try reading the first post at the top of this page (made by you!). An incorrect interpretation of Bangrak Bob's post (you quoted it yourself)!) and nothing whatsoever to do with the post you now conveniently refer to!..... Kao Chai Mai?  Like I said earlier....welcome back!

i aint 'interpreteting' anything it's all there in the post i quoted, but there you go something else for you to nit  pic and bore us all with, nuthin much changes so it seems   

[BangrakBob]

^ To be fair he is correct, I was speaking about Spurs Vs City, thought it obvious. 

[balo]

I'm really enjoying watching Spurs this season, every week is another highlight, just hope we can go all the way. And Kane is going nowhere.

[wilai]

3 hours ago, BangrakBob said:

^ To be fair he is correct, I was speaking about Spurs Vs City, thought it obvious. 

It was....to almost everyone

[carmine]

Vertonghen's injury not as bad as first thought and will miss the next six weeks.  Have to say though, i really don't like the idea of Wimmer in a back three.  He'll get caught out.  Carter-Vickers looked completely comfortable but isn't he more right sided?

 

[alfieconn]

Just now, carmine said:

Vertonghen's injury not as bad as first thought and will miss the next six weeks.  Have to say though, i really don't like the idea of Wimmer in a back three.  He'll get caught out.  Carter-Vickers looked completely comfortable but isn't he more right sided?

 

 

That's if Wimmer plays carms, could be Davies, but i'm sure Wimmer will be ok in that postion, already played their this season, IPWT

[carmine]

5 minutes ago, alfieconn said:

 

That's if Wimmer plays carms, could be Davies, but i'm sure Wimmer will be ok in that postion, already played their this season, IPWT

 

Yes and remember his mistake was responsible for one of Chelsea's goal.  Don't mind him in a back four but in a three worries me.  But, as you say, Poch might well go for Davies.

 

But, seriously does it matter as i read on the City thread that BB doesn't think its worth them turning up.  Strange though considering he thinks they are an improved side at this stage of the season as opposed to last!  i too look at the City side and it oozes that Pep golden touch of coaching genius!

Edited January 20, 2017 by carmine

[alfieconn]

15 minutes ago, carmine said:

 

Yes and remember his mistake was responsible for one of Chelsea's goal.  Don't mind him in a back four but in a three worries me.  But, as you say, Poch might well go for Davies.

 

But, seriously does it matter as i read on the City thread that BB doesn't think its worth them turning up.  Strange though considering he thinks they are an improved side at this stage of the season as opposed to last!  i too look at the City side and it oozes that Pep golden touch of coaching genius!

 

That was when he played left back which is definitely not his position.

[Bredbury Blue]

^BB doesn't think its worth them turning up"

I didn't post that if you mean me and not Bangrak Bob. I responded, to Chicog's post of an article which implied it wasn't worth city turning up, sarcastically. ..take another read. We have all been watching football long enogh to know that predicting the final result is very difficult...as that wise man used to say, "it's a funny old game Saint".

[carmine]

Team i'm expecting today;

 

                                        Lloris

 

                              Dier   Toby    Davies

 

          Walker         Wanyama   Dembele     Rose

 

                     Dele              Kane          Eriksen

[alfieconn]

41 minutes ago, carmine said:

Team i'm expecting today;

 

                                        Lloris

 

                              Dier   Toby    Davies

 

          Walker         Wanyama   Dembele     Rose

 

                     Dele              Kane          Eriksen

 

Could  well be Davies over Wimmer taking into account City don't play too many long balls ! still had a worry about this game until i saw that City are favourites, take a draw if i'm being honest !

Edited January 21, 2017 by alfieconn

[carmine]

6 minutes ago, alfieconn said:

 

Could  well be Davies over Wimmer taking into account City don't play too many long balls ! still had a worry about this game until i saw that City are favourites, take a draw if i'm being honest !

 

This game is a measure of where we are.  If this side is capable of winning the league they will go for the jugular and expose City, be ruthless with controlled power and pace on both wings.  And if we do,  it will set down a marker for the remainder of the season.

 

For these reasons i hope and expect us to win convincingly.  But then again, its a funny old game!  0-2 for me.

[Bredbury Blue]

^"until i saw that City are favourites"

Really? With whom?

I think for the first time in a long time vs spurs at home, spurs are very much favourites for this game with anybody who knows anything about football. We'll be doing well to get anything out of the game...but first goal will be vital.

[alfieconn]

12 minutes ago, Bredbury Blue said:

^"until i saw that City are favourites"

Really? With whom?

I think for the first time in a long time vs spurs at home, spurs are very much favourites for this game with anybody who knows anything about football. We'll be doing well to get anything out of the game...but first goal will be vital.
 

 

With every bookmaker out there but perhaps they don't know too much about football  

 

Let me give you a little tip, always best to do your homework before posting otherwise you could look like a muppet.

 

Sort By:FavouriteName
Man CityWWLWWL	6/5	23/20	23/20	11/10	23/20	23/20	23/20	23/20	11/10	23/20	11/10	23/20	11/10	23/20	23/20	15/13	11/10	11/10	6/5	11/10	6/5	10/9	6/5	23/20		10/9	10/9	23/20
Draw	12/5	12/5	5/2	23/10	5/2	12/5	5/2	23/10	5/2	12/5	23/10	12/5	51/20	5/2	5/2	12/5	27/11	12/5	5/2	27/11	127/50	12/5	5/2	12/5		12/5	12/5	5/2
TottenhamWWWWWW	13/5	13/5	5/2	5/2	13/5	13/5	13/5	5/2	5/2	13/5	5/2	13/5	5/2	13/5	13/5	5/2	28/11	13/5	5/2	28/11	13/5	5/2	28/11	13/5		5/2	13/5	13/5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited January 21, 2017 by alfieconn

[uptheos]

Right across the board

http://www.oddschecker.com/football/english/premier-league/man-city-v-tottenham/winner

[Bredbury Blue]

3 hours ago, uptheos said:

Right across the board

http://www.oddschecker.com/football/english/premier-league/man-city-v-tottenham/winner

 

Not being knowledgeable on betting, if those odds say City ARE favourites then you spurs fans want to get your money on a spurs win don't ya.

[uptheos]

48 minutes ago, Bredbury Blue said:

 

Not being knowledgeable on betting, if those odds say City ARE favourites then you spurs fans want to get your money on a spurs win don't ya.

 

It would take a brave man to have a substantial bet on City getting beaten at home and don't forget draw you lose.

[smokie36]

8 hours ago, Bredbury Blue said:

 

Not being knowledgeable on betting, if those odds say City ARE favourites then you spurs fans want to get your money on a spurs win don't ya.

 

I'm not a gambler.

[3 minus 2]

potentially swansea do us a favour, lets hope we can take advantage.

[Bredbury Blue]

^I was wondering who you support.

[3 minus 2]

team as expected barring wimmer in for verity, not  a fan tbh, but hey in poch we trust  

[3 minus 2]

posted this on the scouce thread 10 mins ago,' disagree wwith hoddle yeah  looks balanced but with cities pace and guile  wimmer is efinatly exploitable behind rose'.

[3 minus 2]

we've riden the storm , lets be having a goal soon spurs

[3 minus 2]

deli's been half a yard a way from gettin g on a ball through the middle twice now

[3 minus 2]

sori wimmer is a <deleted> liabilty

[3 minus 2]

h/t 0-0 some solid and some shocking defending  and more thsn a touch of luck to get us in to half time level. think pep will bring his new boy on in the 2 nd, a touch of pace when they've out numbered us on the break ish  and we'll be <deleted>. on the bright side in the 2 nd half  going forward and around their box i cant imagine us being any less effective !!!!

[balo]

Not looking good this , we've been lucky so far . Best we can hope for is a draw here if City continue the pressure.