Has anyone else noticed that Andorra are clearly playing with 12 men. They have blatantly sneaked on a red plastic bag, which has been doing better than the combined Andorra defence. Unfortunately for Andorra the bag's positional sense is not too good and it has steadily been making its way up the field all game. Maybe it was thinking of grabbing one at the other end.

Unless someone opens the gates of the stadium then I don't think it will play too big a part in the second half.

Oh well its more entertaining than the Andorra effort.

Gerard MOM up to now for a nice finish and a good cross for Defoe to score.

I noticed the plastic bag was actively off-side!

I noticed the plastic bag was actively off-side!

yes more than can be said for the Andorra strike force... and I notice when tackled it did not go down like erm a bag of potatoes.. well it wouldn't would it

Well, we were only playing with ten men. Robinson popped out for a pint after ten minutes and didn't get back till the 89th .

Scotland won 6-0. Sorry for hijacking this thread.

Scotland won 6-0. Sorry for hijacking this thread.

I haven't seen a score like that for yonks!

Could it be another Argentina?

Scotland won 6-0. Sorry for hijacking this thread.

you failed to qualify the 6-0 win by mentioning it was against the Faroes (Islands I think not mummies). It must be a good feeling to have taken maximum points against the mighty Faroes. Just the tricky away leg to go and you can claim that elusive double.

Scotland won 6-0. Sorry for hijacking this thread.

you failed to qualify the 6-0 win by mentioning it was against the Faroes (Islands I think not mummies). It must be a good feeling to have taken maximum points against the mighty Faroes. Just the tricky away leg to go and you can claim that elusive double.

What is the population of Andora?

Scotland won 6-0. Sorry for hijacking this thread.

you failed to qualify the 6-0 win by mentioning it was against the Faroes (Islands I think not mummies). It must be a good feeling to have taken maximum points against the mighty Faroes. Just the tricky away leg to go and you can claim that elusive double.

So we still won 6-0. After just getting a draw 2-2 the last time we played them. Anyway what is the population of Andora?

Just googled and found out.

Andora 64,000

Faroes

July 2005 est. 47,017

- 2004 census 48,228

Just googled and found out.

Andora 64,000

July 2005 est. 47,017

- 2004 census 48,228

Now that's a very large place.Great to see the pommies have a good win.Must have done wonders for their confidence.

Just googled and found out.

Andora 64,000

July 2005 est. 47,017

- 2004 census 48,228

Now that's a very large place.Great to see the pommies have a good win.Must have done wonders for their confidence.

Just edited my last post.

Scotland won 6-0. Sorry for hijacking this thread.

you failed to qualify the 6-0 win by mentioning it was against the Faroes (Islands I think not mummies). It must be a good feeling to have taken maximum points against the mighty Faroes. Just the tricky away leg to go and you can claim that elusive double.

how anal are England anyway? names on the back of the shirt - whats that about? cant recall other teams doing that in qualifiers.

delusions of superiority me thinks.

Andora's population is less than the capacity at Old Trafford!

how anal are England anyway? names on the back of the shirt - whats that about? cant recall other teams doing that in qualifiers.

delusions of superiority me thinks.

Germany had names on their shirts http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2002390...6400716,00.html

Czech Republic also had names on their shirts.

So that's at least 3 teams who are anal. Or, who can afford the lettering. I think it's just that the jocks are too tight fisted to splash out on putting names on shirts. After all, they can be used again in the next match and it wouldn't be too prudent if they didn't have the same player in the same shirt, would it

Get a grip, game4shame, your'e talking <deleted>

how anal are England anyway? names on the back of the shirt - whats that about? cant recall other teams doing that in qualifiers.

delusions of superiority me thinks.

Germany had names on their shirts http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2002390...6400716,00.html

Czech Republic also had names on their shirts.

So that's at least 3 teams who are anal. Or, who can afford the lettering. I think it's just that the jocks are too tight fisted to splash out on putting names on shirts. After all, they can be used again in the next match and it wouldn't be too prudent if they didn't have the same player in the same shirt, would it

Get a grip, game4shame, your'e talking <deleted>

hook, line and sinker!!!

Im doing Sunday overtime at work - got to keep myself entertained somehow!!

I'm amazed that the name their backs were not sequined...

how anal are England anyway? names on the back of the shirt - whats that about? cant recall other teams doing that in qualifiers.

delusions of superiority me thinks.

Germany had names on their shirts http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2002390...6400716,00.html

Czech Republic also had names on their shirts.

So that's at least 3 teams who are anal. Or, who can afford the lettering. I think it's just that the jocks are too tight fisted to splash out on putting names on shirts. After all, they can be used again in the next match and it wouldn't be too prudent if they didn't have the same player in the same shirt, would it

Get a grip, game4shame, your'e talking <deleted>

hook, line and sinker!!!

Im doing Sunday overtime at work - got to keep myself entertained somehow!!

I'm amazed that the name their backs were not sequined...

they decided not to go for the sequined version as it might have attracted too many of the Sydney Swans fans away from Aussie Rules Football