Large 2016 establishment field has NH GOP leaders on edge

[webfact]

Large 2016 establishment field has NH GOP leaders on edge
By JULIE PACE

MANCHESTER, N.H. (AP) — The Republican establishment has flexed its muscle in New Hampshire's presidential primaries for years. But in the unpredictable 2016 election, the state's standard political playbook faces challenges on two fronts.

Donald Trump's brash brand of populism is resonating with voters, and he's sustained a commanding lead in statewide preference polls for months. While several experienced politicians are well-liked, some party elites fear none will emerge as a consensus choice in time for the Feb. 9 primary, allowing Trump to win a plurality.

"If the center-right doesn't coalesce here, it runs the risk of allowing a far-right, ideological candidate to go unchecked," said Tom Rath, a New Hampshire-based Republican strategist backing Ohio Gov. John Kasich.

Kasich is competing most directly for support with New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and Florida Sen. Marco Rubio. Some centrist voters are fond of former Hewlett-Packard chief executive Carly Fiorina, but she is lagging behind the others.


A decisive victory in New Hampshire could reset a race dominated by Trump's unexpected durability. A weak showing would leave the establishment — generally understood to mean party leaders and insiders, mainstream donors and other influential figures who avoid the ideological extreme — with few options for a quick rebound.

The primary is sandwiched between contests in Iowa and South Carolina that favor conservatives. Centrist candidates will have to survive the Southern states that vote in the delegate-rich contests March 1 — Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia — before the race turns to more hospitable territory.

With less than two months until voting begins, some in New Hampshire's establishment see Christie as best-positioned to carry their presidential hopes out of New England. Christie has been a constant presence in New Hampshire for months, despite being largely ignored in national political circles, and has begun to pull in big endorsements.

"The excitement is with Governor Christie," said Jeb Bradley, the state Senate majority leader. Bradley endorsed Christie this month and said that among the experienced politicians running, "he represents the best chance to win."

Still, Bradley added, "Mr. Trump is pretty strong."

Trump, a billionaire real estate mogul and reality television star, has shown little sympathy for the establishment's woes.

"I'm sorry I did this to you, but you got to get used to it," Trump said on "Fox News Sunday."

Republican leaders are worried about more than Trump. Some are equally wary of Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, an uncompromising conservative deemed unelectable as president by some GOP leaders, ultimately siphoning off Trump's support.

Even if Christie's standing strengthens, it's unlikely he can clear the field before the primary. Kasich and Bush are largely staking their bids on New Hampshire, where they are spending significant time and money. Rubio has endeared himself to more mainstream Republicans despite being ushered into office as part of the 2010 tea party wave. His advisers believe he can pull support from a broader pool of voters than can the three governors.

"People who have traditionally been active in the party are spread across a whole series of major candidates," said Judd Gregg, a Bush supporter and former U.S. senator from New Hampshire. It's not like 2012, Gregg said, when most officeholders past and present backed Mitt Romney, the eventual nominee.

To Fergus Cullen, a former New Hampshire GOP chairman, the establishment candidates are "all so clustered that anyone can win that bracket."

So far, Republican operatives — some insisting on anonymity to discuss private conversations — say there is no organized effort to persuade one of those candidates to leave the race before the primary in order to narrow voters' choices. But there have been preliminary discussions about what to do if four or five of those candidates finish within a few percentage points of each other in New Hampshire and all want to stay in the race.

Republicans have discussed asking a party leader such as Romney or U.S. House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., to step in at that point and help broker exits for some candidates. These strategists said Romney and Ryan have not been approached about doing that and probably wouldn't be until after the primary.

Cullen said he hopes the whittling down happens "organically." He suggested that even if the experienced politicians finished bunched together, those at the bottom may have no choice but to step aside.

"A pretty good candidate is going to finish sixth or seventh in New Hampshire," he said.


-- (c) Associated Press 2015-12-14

[Traveling Sailor]

I Love it!

"I'm sorry I did this to you, but you got to get used to it," Trump said on "Fox News Sunday."

I doubt very much that Trump is sorry. And, I doubt very much that the majority of voters are sorry. I hope that this 2016 election totally up-ends the "establishment" in both parties and finally, after many years, the president is elected by the people and for the people, not by the 10%, for the 10%..

[willyumiii]

The Republican party has never looked so bad or so redicilous.

After cndidates like GW and Palin, that is saying a lot.

R.I.P. G.O.P.

[Pinot]

I Love it!

"I'm sorry I did this to you, but you got to get used to it," Trump said on "Fox News Sunday."

I doubt very much that Trump is sorry. And, I doubt very much that the majority of voters are sorry. I hope that this 2016 election totally up-ends the "establishment" in both parties and finally, after many years, the president is elected by the people and for the people, not by the 10%, for the 10%..

My hopes are different. I don't care who the Democrats elect as long as they win (and they will). The policies of HRC are not that different from Bernie Sanders. All the Democratic policies are a polar opposite of the radical Republican party.

The wingnut Republican lemmings are walking off a cliff in step whistling "Yankee Doodle Dandy". All the idiots are opposed to the progress on human rights especially women's rights, made in the twentieth century. All the lemmings are for forced births, more guns and more pollution. None of them recognize human climate change. They want less regulation of wall street and more money in politics from the elite wingnut billionaires and corporations. They want fewer people allowed to vote, the fewer the better because they only appeal to old white men. They can't wait to get into the White House, so they can start more wars. They love war.They are weak, fearful and just a pathetic group of candidates. Trump and Cruz are leading the race. The worst scenario possible is playing out for the Republicans. They are the butt of every late night joke.

The absolute most important thing the next POTUS will do, is choose Supreme Court Justices. America and the world can't afford one more wingnut Supreme and that's why there has to be a Democrat in the White House.

I'm not worried about a Republican being elected President. The purity test that has been administered by Fox News, so that all of them spout the same nonsense, insures that a Republican doesn't have a prayer.

Every Republican candidate is unelectable and will get trounced in the general election. Yeah, the GOP leaders should be on edge. There is a slow motion massive trainwreck coming.

Edited December 15, 2015 by Pinot

[Traveling Sailor]

Well. so far, I have not seen ANY candidate that I like. I don't trust Hillary as far as I can throw a grand piano. IMO she is a liar and a cheat and an Iranian lover. But then, IMO Kennedy was the last great POTUS and look what happened to him. Perhaps it is time to complete my bucket list.