Sanders transforms into contender, still pitches revolution

[up2u2]

Burger joints using kiosks.

Wal Mart switching over to Drones

Yup, that higher minimum wage is working wonders for the unemployed!

Boon Mee what have burger kiosks or drones got to do with understanding the economic and social benefits of a higher minimum wage? If a business can increase their profits by eliminating the cost of doing business they will do that whether the minimum wage is $1 per hour.

Yes raising the minimum wage will be a HUGE boost to business and generate employment growth the economic growth will dwarf any tax tinkering around the edges. The only drawback would be controlling hyperinflation and a wage explosion as companies vie for a shrinking employment market. Sometimes too much of a good thing can bite you in the ass. Also you generate innovation and entrepreneurs who can realise the seed capital required to launch competition into the market place driving the economy from the bottom up.

Your kiosk and drone technology disruption comment reflects the urgency of publicly funded education. The jobs of the future will not be flipping burgers or humping around department stores they will be high tech and skilled. You need an affordable and responsive higher education system to deliver the skilled people to the market place. Otherwise you will be importing them from Nations that do and paying a premium for them.

That will be the future whether Right Wingers want to accept it or not. America can no longer accept bumping along the bottom forever.

[chuckd]

Do you agree that the American tax payer should pay the $226,000 college tuition for this lady?

Do you think the taxpayer should fund military training or should those costs be paid by the individual military person?

Apple and oranges. I ask you also. Do you agree that the American tax payer should pay the $226,000 college tuition for this lady? Please answer yes or no.

Why is it apples and oranges? Military is okay to Socialise but education is not. The big bad government levies taxes and spends it on free training for military personnel so they can earn an income. Pure unadulterated Socialism. Giving away stuff for free aren't they?

If the young woman qualifies for University admission to a public not private University and the $226,000 relates to tuition fees only, then yes the taxpayer would fund her.

National Defense as a responsibility of the federal government is clearly spelled out in Article One, Section Eight of the US Constitution which spells out 17 clear duties of the government. National defense is listed in six of them.

Those clearly defined responsibilities are....

---------------------------------------------------------------------

To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian Tribes;

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;

To establish Post Offices and post Roads;

To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;

To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;

To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

To provide and maintain a Navy;

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings; —And

To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

It clearly is apples and oranges. College educations are not the responsibility of the federal government...national defense is.

[sirineou]

Do you think the taxpayer should fund military training or should those costs be paid by the individual military person?

Apple and oranges. I ask you also. Do you agree that the American tax payer should pay the $226,000 college tuition for this lady? Please answer yes or no.

Why is it apples and oranges? Military is okay to Socialise but education is not. The big bad government levies taxes and spends it on free training for military personnel so they can earn an income. Pure unadulterated Socialism. Giving away stuff for free aren't they?

If the young woman qualifies for University admission to a public not private University and the $226,000 relates to tuition fees only, then yes the taxpayer would fund her.

National Defense as a responsibility of the federal government is clearly spelled out in Article One, Section Eight of the US Constitution which spells out 17 clear duties of the government. National defense is listed in six of them.

Those clearly defined responsibilities are....

---------------------------------------------------------------------

To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian Tribes;

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;

To establish Post Offices and post Roads;

To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;

To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;

To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

To provide and maintain a Navy;

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings; —And

To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

It clearly is apples and oranges. College educations are not the responsibility of the federal government...national defense is.

Just because it is in the constitution , it does not mean that it is not socialist, or capitalist, or libertarian etc It only means that it is in the constitution.

[up2u2]

Don't care where it is spelled out. American military is based on a Socialist system. Government collects money and spends it on 'free stuff'. Thought you Capitalists were against 'free stuff'? chuckd

[sirineou]

Don't care where it is spelled out. American military is based on a Socialist system. Government collects money and spends it on 'free stuff'. Thought you Capitalists were against 'free stuff'? chuckd

They are, until it impacts their agenda .

Trump is a free market conservative, until his golf tournament left for Mexico.

Now he wishes he had build that wall already, because everyone knows golfers cant climb walls, what spiked shoes and all.

Republicans are simply schizophrenic.

They are for government staying out of our lives, until it come to , marriage, death, gays , abortion, religion, etc. etc

PS: republicans also confuse , investments, with free

A universal college education is not a free giveaway, it is an investment in the future of the country that would have returns far greater than the initial investment, so are roads, health insurance, prenatal care etc. etc

Edited June 5, 2016 by sirineou

[up2u2]

Chuckd is always whining on about Socialist 'free stuff'. Shouldn't he be hating on the military guys for sponging off the tax payer. Me, I think they deserve way more 'free stuff'. Imagine going to work and people shooting at you. Forget it. Damn straight you would be paying me a whole lot of 'free stuff'.

That golf saga was funny. Of all places for it to be rescheduled too. Mexico. That had to be a stitch up on Trump. The big orange blowfish hating on the Mexicans and next he loses a million dollar deal to Mexico. Now that's a swift kick in the Corporate nuts. lmao too funny.

[Boon Mee]

^

That is seriously 'messed up' for starters.

Military 'sponging' off the tax payers??? OK, you want to do the job they do and ask for a few well-deserved benefits, pal...

[sirineou]

^

That is seriously 'messed up' for starters.

Military 'sponging' off the tax payers??? OK, you want to do the job they do and ask for a few well-deserved benefits, pal...

He actually said the opposite

But he should have done it with pictures and used smaller words, He was after all talking to a Trump supporter.

[up2u2]

^

That is seriously 'messed up' for starters.

Military 'sponging' off the tax payers??? OK, you want to do the job they do and ask for a few well-deserved benefits, pal...

Nice try BM

[willyumiii]

Bernie has accomplished more in this one campaign than Clinton has in her entire political career

Even if he is not elected, Bernie Sanders has helped the country immensely.

He has opened the eyes of millions of Americans to the real issues that are really important to the working people of the country.

I won't list those issues here, yo have heard them in Bernie's speeches for many many years now.

He stays on topic and does not change his views every time the wind changes direction, like others do.

Even if things don't improve for working Americans over the next four or six years, they will change.

He has started a much needed revolution that will not die in November 2016.

Feel the Bern..for years to come!

[willyumiii]

Tax payer money should never under any circumstance go to finance private, especially "charter" or religious based/sponsored schools. In fact the right wing has been stealing tax money meant for public education to support their version of schooling for years, while cutting public education budgets. Tax on Wall Street criminals/banksters will pay for free tuition for public university. America and the capitalists need a well educated public, although they don't want a thinking or analytical person. Could be "dangerous" to the system. And before it even starts, liberal arts degrees are important, not just engineering, math etc. America is in dire need of critical thinkers, not taught in schools since the Reagan regime. Oh, teachers make too much money but it is OK for CEO's to acquire great wealth at the expense of the people? Warped logic. BTW, I grew up in a school teacher family. My mother taught school for some 40 years. Cousins taught school, one was married to the President of Stephen F. Austin University in Nacogdoches, Texas. I understand a bit about the importance of teachers.

Blaming teachers for the state of the education system is like blaming your doctor for the mess that the US healthcare system is in. Most do the best they can with the constraints imposed on them by the elected officials. The latter being typically too busy counting ."donations" rather than concerning themselves with the well being of the masses

Doctors are a big part of the problem in the American medical system.

In America people become doctors so they can become wealthy, not to help those in need.

They work hand in hand with greedy insurance companies and pharma corporations to squeeze every penny possible out of the sick and dying.

It's all about greed, and yes, doctors are very guilty.

In America, doctors, like lawyers are vultures, preying on and profiting from the suffering and misery of others.

Their victims are often financially ruined by them when they finish "helping" them.

Edited June 5, 2016 by willyumiii

[NumbNut]

^

That is seriously 'messed up' for starters.

Military 'sponging' off the tax payers??? OK, you want to do the job they do and ask for a few well-deserved benefits, pal...

He actually said the opposite

But he should have done it with pictures and used smaller words, He was after all talking to a Trump supporter.

Lol good one sirineou ha ha

[NumbNut]

Bernie has accomplished more in this one campaign than Clinton has in her entire political career

Even if he is not elected, Bernie Sanders has helped the country immensely.

He has opened the eyes of millions of Americans to the real issues that are really important to the working people of the country.

I won't list those issues here, yo have heard them in Bernie's speeches for many many years now.

He stays on topic and does not change his views every time the wind changes direction, like others do.

Even if things don't improve for working Americans over the next four or six years, they will change.

He has started a much needed revolution that will not die in November 2016.

Feel the Bern..for years to come!

Words of wisdom willy, but maybe the electorate is not ready for integrity mate... mores the bloody pity!

[chuckd]

Don't care where it is spelled out. American military is based on a Socialist system. Government collects money and spends it on 'free stuff'. Thought you Capitalists were against 'free stuff'? chuckd

Of course you don't care where it is spelled out. You're not an American so you have no respect for the US Constitution, nor apparently Americans.

The American military is based on a Constitutional requirement.

I can show you literally hundreds of actions the government takes that are socialist in nature. The military is not one of them...but paying for some young girls $226,0000 overly liberal education is socialism at work.

Paying $75 million to build a wall on the SOUTHERN border of Mexico is certainly one of them that is socialistic. My guess is you liberals find nothing wrong with that.

Now I am tired of arguing with the dimwits so I bid you a fond adieu. Maybe I'll engage tomorrow or maybe, my "ignore" list will grow some.

Edited June 5, 2016 by chuckd

[up2u2]

Don't care where it is spelled out. American military is based on a Socialist system. Government collects money and spends it on 'free stuff'. Thought you Capitalists were against 'free stuff'? chuckd

Of course you don't care where it is spelled out. You're not an American so you have no respect for the US Constitution, nor apparently Americans.

The American military is based on a Constitutional requirement.

I can show you literally hundreds of actions the government takes that are socialist in nature. The military is not one of them...but paying for some young girls $226,0000 overly liberal education is socialism at work.

Paying $75 million to build a wall on the SOUTHERN border of Mexico is certainly one of them that is socialistic. My guess is you liberals find nothing wrong with that.

Now I am tired of arguing with the dimwits so I bid you a fond adieu. Maybe I'll engage tomorrow or maybe, my "ignore" list will grow some.

Of course the US Military is pure Socialism. It doesn't matter that it is mandated by the constitution the system of funding the Military is Socialist. No the 'Wall' is not Socialist as Trump states the American Taxpayer will not be paying for it. Liberals find nothing wrong with the 'Wall'? What parallel Universe did you fall into?

'fond adieu'? WHAT! you speak French? That would be a Socialist country wouldn't it? Sleeping with the enemy chuckd? You always do a runner when you are shown to be wrong. No need for name calling.

Edited June 5, 2016 by up2u2

[NumbNut]

Don't care where it is spelled out. American military is based on a Socialist system. Government collects money and spends it on 'free stuff'. Thought you Capitalists were against 'free stuff'? chuckd

Of course you don't care where it is spelled out. You're not an American so you have no respect for the US Constitution, nor apparently Americans.

The American military is based on a Constitutional requirement.

I can show you literally hundreds of actions the government takes that are socialist in nature. The military is not one of them...but paying for some young girls $226,0000 overly liberal education is socialism at work.

Paying $75 million to build a wall on the SOUTHERN border of Mexico is certainly one of them that is socialistic. My guess is you liberals find nothing wrong with that.

Now I am tired of arguing with the dimwits so I bid you a fond adieu. Maybe I'll engage tomorrow or maybe, my "ignore" list will grow some.

Of course the US Military is pure Socialism. It doesn't matter that it is mandated by the constitution the system of funding the Military is Socialist. No the 'Wall' is not Socialist as Trump states the American Taxpayer will not be paying for it. Liberals find nothing wrong with the 'Wall'? What parallel Universe did you fall into?

'fond adieu'? WHAT! you speak French? That would be a Socialist country wouldn't it? Sleeping with the enemy chuckd? You always do a runner when you are shown to be wrong. No need for name calling.

Lol

Good selection of posts there up2 with your 'military is socialism' theme, telling it like it is

Edited June 5, 2016 by NumbNut

[sirineou]

Don't care where it is spelled out. American military is based on a Socialist system. Government collects money and spends it on 'free stuff'. Thought you Capitalists were against 'free stuff'? chuckd

Of course you don't care where it is spelled out. You're not an American so you have no respect for the US Constitution, nor apparently Americans.

The American military is based on a Constitutional requirement.

I can show you literally hundreds of actions the government takes that are socialist in nature. The military is not one of them...but paying for some young girls $226,0000 overly liberal education is socialism at work.

Paying $75 million to build a wall on the SOUTHERN border of Mexico is certainly one of them that is socialistic. My guess is you liberals find nothing wrong with that.

Now I am tired of arguing with the dimwits so I bid you a fond adieu. Maybe I'll engage tomorrow or maybe, my "ignore" list will grow some.

"Section 8. The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States; but all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; "

when you copied and pasted the part of the constitution that you thought supported your position, you neglected to post the above part, I am sure not on purpose.

Operative words being

" provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States "

So both Common Defense and General Welfare is in the Constitution, .

but according to you using general funds for the common defense is not socialistic but using common funds to provide for the general welfare is?

Because??????

[jmd8800]

Here ya go: A leftie posting an infographic!!!

Actually there is a lot of infographics among the left on Twitter. Infographics fit cell phone and tablets much better and they can done on the fly. I use Twitter to get a wide ranges of views that I can choose to pursue or reject reading further. If you want to see the radical voices in the world ..look on Twitter. Those radical voices are the future. We old folks are not.

This was part of an interview with Jake Tapper and Sanders.

[NovaBlue05]

He has been quite a gentleman toward Hillary considering she is the poster child for pretty much everything he campaigns against.

Him and Trump can play good cop/bad cop.

Bernie: "Yes, I think it could pose a problem"

Trump: "She needs to go to jail!"

[CWMcMurray]

Rather half a loaf than nothing. That works for any party or ideology.

But why start negotiations at a half a loaf and then settling for crumbs?

[helpisgood]

Apple and oranges. I ask you also. Do you agree that the American tax payer should pay the $226,000 college tuition for this lady? Please answer yes or no.

Why is it apples and oranges? Military is okay to Socialise but education is not. The big bad government levies taxes and spends it on free training for military personnel so they can earn an income. Pure unadulterated Socialism. Giving away stuff for free aren't they?

If the young woman qualifies for University admission to a public not private University and the $226,000 relates to tuition fees only, then yes the taxpayer would fund her.

National Defense as a responsibility of the federal government is clearly spelled out in Article One, Section Eight of the US Constitution which spells out 17 clear duties of the government. National defense is listed in six of them.

Those clearly defined responsibilities are....

---------------------------------------------------------------------

To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian Tribes;

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;

To establish Post Offices and post Roads;

To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;

To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;

To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

To provide and maintain a Navy;

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings; —And

To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

It clearly is apples and oranges. College educations are not the responsibility of the federal government...national defense is.

Yes, the Constitution does state Congress "shall have the power" to provide for a military and a defense of the land (Funny, it doesn't state "must"). However, it does not state that Congress shall pour amazingly inordinate sums of the taxpayers' money into the hands of the military-industrial complex especially when so much of that money could be more wisely spent on the welfare of its citizenry.

And, as Sirineou pointed out above, US Congress (not to mention that the States who, under their own constitutions, may also fund universities) has the power to fund universities if they so choose. My guess is that there are no US Supreme Court cases that prevent Congress from doing so, with perhaps some restrictions maybe having to do with religion (Establishment Clause) and maybe something else.

So, I really do not see how you have a constitutional argument here.

PS, I had to delete a couple of quotes to allow this to upload.

Edited June 6, 2016 by helpisgood

[Usernames]

Bill Clinton has just told Bernie Sanders' supporters that they are "toast." Now, you know what the Clintons think of you. They're going to bull rush you and stomp on you like you never existed. http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/282287-bill-clinton-to-sanders-supporters-they-will-be-toast

[tx22cb]

Bill Clinton has just told Bernie Sanders' supporters that they are "toast." Now, you know what the Clintons think of you. They're going to bull rush you and stomp on you like you never existed. http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/282287-bill-clinton-to-sanders-supporters-they-will-be-toast

Why is it that (a minority of) Bernie supporters are so fond of heckling other candidates' events? Trump. Clinton.

Just reflects badly on them, and erodes Bernie's moral high ground.

Or are these agents agitateurs really Trump/Clinton supporters in disguise?!

[Jingthing]

Bill Clinton has just told Bernie Sanders' supporters that they are "toast." Now, you know what the Clintons think of you. They're going to bull rush you and stomp on you like you never existed. http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/282287-bill-clinton-to-sanders-supporters-they-will-be-toast

They were HECKLING him. I'd say that comment was rather mild in that context. It's kind of sleazy that you failed to mention the context.

Cheers.

[Usernames]

Sanders needed to protect Dems against Clinton, Inc. Progressive liberal activist Susan Sarandon expects indictment of Hillary. Says it is inevitable. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/susan-sarandon-says-hillary-clinton-899084

[NovaBlue05]

Bill Clinton has just told Bernie Sanders' supporters that they are "toast." Now, you know what the Clintons think of you. They're going to bull rush you and stomp on you like you never existed. http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/282287-bill-clinton-to-sanders-supporters-they-will-be-toast

Why is it that (a minority of) Bernie supporters are so fond of heckling other candidates' events? Trump. Clinton.

Just reflects badly on them, and erodes Bernie's moral high ground.

Or are these agents agitateurs really Trump/Clinton supporters in disguise?!

There are a lot of special interest groups, G. Soros, La Raza, probably dozens of others who fund rent-a-mobs to advance their vision of "democracy". They clearly may back a particular candidate but aren't officially associated with that campaign

[Jingthing]

Sanders needed to protect Dems against Clinton, Inc. Progressive liberal activist Susan Sarandon expects indictment of Hillary. Says it is inevitable. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/susan-sarandon-says-hillary-clinton-899084

Sarandon is rather batty. Hillary won't be indicted. She's the only choice now other than the vile monster.

[sgtsabai]

Ignore the ignoramus right wing know-nothing troll. Damn, I go up to Nong Khai for a day and night and I'm a page & 1/2 behind...lol. The reading list is long, I don't open my laptop for purposes like this while on R&P....lol. Enjoy or read 'em and weap:.......



http://www.commondreams.org/news/2016/06/04/fueling-sanders-turnout-hope-california-reports-record-surge-new-voters........................

http://www.truthdig.com/report/print/sanders_to_clinton_yes_trumps_foreign_policy_20160604................................

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/06/05/bernie-sanders-eyeing-a-contested-convention-urges-press-to-hold-off-on-calling-race/.......................

http://www.nationofchange.org/news/2016/06/05/bringing-back-bill/....................

http://www.nationofchange.org/news/2016/06/05/trump-responds-accusations-racism-fake-photo-black-supporters/.........................

http://crooksandliars.com/2016/06/soldier-youre-fired-donald-trump-fired?utm_source=Crooks+and+Liars+Daily+Newsletter&utm_campaign=6aeda6622a-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_d4904be7bc-6aeda6622a-327017065...............................

http://www.truthdig.com/avbooth/print/left_right_center_hillary_clintons_speech_20160603...........................

http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-dem-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/06/sanders-equates-clinton-with-trump-on-foreign-policy-223914.............................

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/06/05/hillary-clinton-wavers-on-second-amendment-right-to-bear-arms/.......................

http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-dem-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/06/sanders-clinton-foundation-223915.............................

http://www.truthdig.com/report/print/shut_down_the_democratic_national_convention_20160605.........................

http://www.truthdig.com/report/print/bill_clintons_legacy_of_denial_20160605.........................

http://www.opednews.com/articles/49-Days-From-CA-Primary-to-by-Rob-Kall-2016-Democratic-Convention_2016-Presidential-Primary-Candidates_Bernie-Or-Bust_Bernie-Sanders-160604-751.html................................

[sgtsabai]

I'll remove from my next lists of posts. They are coming and Clintonistas will not like. I'm truly afraid that Clintons will loose the election if elevated to empress to be. On the other hand, never in my life time have I seen two more undeserving, evil candidates for president. While the Republican Party has a nut case fascist for it's candidate, he got there more or less honestly, certainly can't say the same for Clintons.

[Jingthing]

Progressive Jews for Bernie are ready to support Hillary Clinton. So should ALL progressives.

For progressive Jews seeking their footing after the demise of the Sanders presidential campaign, the comments were also a sign that party infighting between supporters of Hillary Clinton and of Sanders is a luxury they can no longer afford.

“I have hope that people will understand how big the threat is on our country with having Donald Trump as president,” said Stosh Cotler, CEO of Bend the Arc, a progressive Jewish advocacy group focused on domestic issues. “We have people who support Bernie and people who support Clinton and I hope we can all put our weight behind the nominee,” Cotler said. She noted that the group’s PAC Bend the Arc Jewish Action will endorse whomever candidate is chosen as the Democratic nominee.

http://forward.com/news/342120/what-will-bernie-sanderss-jewish-backers-do-now-that-primary-battle-is-over/?attribution=home-hero-item-text-1