.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png.8488ab72b8bb2e508209bfe3211b6e08.png)
2016 POSTER OF THE YEAR POLL - FINAL
364 members have voted
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
Announcements
-
Topics
-
-
Latest posts...
-
2
-
108
UK Pensioners in Thailand Face New Scrutiny Over Pension Fraud
I don't. Some of us like keep our financial affairs in order. But I admire your confidence that there will be no overreach. -
165
Lions and Tigers and Bears Oh My - How will Trump's Fascist Dictatorship Affect You?
How does a strong dollar cause inflation? -
97
Misogynistic Attacks Against Women Surge on Social Media Following Trump’s Election Win
Interesting you mention big tobacco. Now it's big food. As for big pharma caring about people what universe do you live in. Their interest is profit. Trillions of $ of it. -
106
Thailand goes all in on The Homosexual Movement
No link just your usual childish behaviour. -
106
Thailand goes all in on The Homosexual Movement
How come you are associating gay marriage rights with sex, sleaze and perversions? I think you need to evolve somewhat. -
24
Official: Trump Nominates RFK Jr. for Health Secretary
Ah, you’ve brought quite the gish gallop here—throwing in Fauci, gain-of-function, congressional testimony, and the New York Post for good measure. Let’s unpack your chaos. “Fauci changed the definition of gain-of-function” The definition debate exists because “gain-of-function” covers a broad spectrum of research. What Fauci and others pointed out is that NIH-funded research didn’t meet their established criteria for GOF involving dangerous pathogens. That’s not “changing” the definition—it’s clarifying boundaries. As for the NIH website update? It’s standard practice to update language for clarity—not a smoking gun. EcoHealth and spike proteins The congressional testimony confirms experiments involving bat coronaviruses, but no evidence shows these were precursors to SARS-CoV-2. Saying spike proteins “shouldn’t be there” ignores years of evolutionary virology that explains such features appearing naturally. Transparency wasn’t lacking here; some people just ignore the scientific consensus because it doesn’t fit their narrative. NIH “admitting” gain-of-function funding Tabak acknowledged a grant violation related to reporting—not evidence of a global conspiracy or pandemic origins. And Daszak’s and Baric’s statements to Congress reflect ongoing debates over how GOF is defined, not proof of wrongdoing or lab-origin. NYPost as gospel The New York Post isn’t a neutral observer; it leans heavily toward sensationalism. Just because it reports on testimony doesn’t mean it’s unbiased or that the testimony proves your argument. Finally, accusing others of being unwilling to change their minds while clutching at cherry-picked “evidence” isn’t exactly the self-awareness flex you think it is. Science evolves with evidence, but baseless insinuations and misinterpretations? Those don’t hold up. Try grazing on better sources next time. -
7
White Orb Emerges from Ocean Near Kuwait, Sparking Intense UFO Debate in U.S. Congress
Why would presumably any advanced civilization likely light years from Earth be interested in a planet whose people that can't even travel beyond its moon about 240,000 miles away? Especially given our Milky Way galaxy (almost 14 billion years old) is estimated to contain between 100 and 400 billion stars that could have more possibility of advanced civilizations. With Earth located in the Orion Arm, roughly halfway between the center and the edge of the Milky Way galaxy, I would expect that if there are even advanced civilizations within the Milky Way, I would expect more interest towards the galactic core area where stars are much more denser and more easily visited.
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
Recommended Posts