Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.
Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

World News

Fresh news brought to you daily from around the world. Hot news, breaking stories as they happen.

Serena Williams Returns at Queen’s After Four-Year Absence

Serena Williams is set to make a surprise return to competitive tennis after nearly four years away from the sport, accepting a wildcard entry for the women’s doubles event at Queen’s Club later this month.

Get today's headlines by email

The 23-time Grand Slam singles champion will partner Canadian teenager Victoria Mboko at the WTA 500 tournament, which begins on 8 June in London. The appearance will mark Williams’ first competitive match since the 2022 US Open, ending an absence of 196 weeks from the tour.
Williams, now 44, stepped away from tennis in 2022, saying she had “evolved away” from the sport following one of the most successful careers in history. Speculation about a possible comeback emerged last year when her name appeared in the sport’s anti-doping testing pool. Those rumours intensified after she was listed among player reinstatements by the International Tennis Integrity Agency in February.
On Monday, Williams appeared to confirm the news through social media, posting a video of herself walking onto a tennis court alongside the message: “Guess everybody heard the news.” Another accompanying post read: “Good news travels fast.”
In a statement, Williams said Queen’s Club was the ideal venue for her return.
“Queen’s Club feels like the perfect place to begin this next chapter,” she said. “Grass has given me some of the most meaningful moments of my career and I'm excited to be back competing on one of the sport’s most iconic stages.”
Partnership with Rising Star
Williams will team up with 19-year-old Victoria Mboko, one of the brightest young talents in women’s tennis. Mboko, who has rapidly risen through the rankings, recently reached the third round of the French Open before losing to former Australian Open champion Madison Keys.
The Canadian has previously described Williams as her idol, making the partnership one of the most talked-about stories ahead of the tournament.
Wimbledon Questions Emerge
Williams’ return is likely to fuel speculation about a potential appearance at Wimbledon, which begins three weeks after Queen’s. The seven-time Wimbledon singles champion would require a wildcard to enter the tournament.
Her record on grass is among the strongest in the sport’s history, with seven singles and seven doubles titles at the All England Club.
Former world number one John McEnroe suggested a Wimbledon singles return could be the next step.
“If Serena Williams is the greatest of all time and is coming back, she's not coming back because she's happy to play,” McEnroe told TNT Sports. “She wants to win another major.”
One of Tennis’ Greatest Careers
Williams retired with 23 Grand Slam singles titles, the highest total in the Open era and second only to Margaret Court’s 24 major championships in women’s tennis history.
She spent 319 weeks ranked world number one and won 73 WTA singles titles. Alongside her sister Venus Williams, she captured 14 Grand Slam doubles crowns and three Olympic doubles gold medals, in addition to her singles gold medal at the London 2012 Olympics.
Williams also achieved a career Golden Slam in both singles and doubles, winning every Grand Slam title and Olympic gold during her career. Even after becoming a mother in 2017, she returned to reach four Grand Slam finals and re-enter the world’s top 10.
Her comeback at Queen’s will provide one of the most anticipated moments of the grass-court season and could signal a remarkable new chapter in an already historic career.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Compiled from various sources. 2 June 2026
webfact
webfact

Hungarian PM Moves to Remove President Sulyok

Hungary's new prime minister, Péter Magyar, has announced plans to amend the constitution to remove President Tamás Sulyok after the head of state refused to resign.

Get today's headlines by email

Magyar had pledged to replace Sulyok and other senior officials appointed during the rule of former prime minister Viktor Orbán. Following his landslide election victory in April, he renewed calls for the president to step down and set a deadline of 31 May for his resignation.
Sulyok, who became president in February 2024 with the backing of Orbán's Fidesz party, has repeatedly rejected those demands and insists he will complete his five-year term.
President Refuses to Resign
The dispute intensified on Monday after a meeting between the two men failed to produce a breakthrough.
Sulyok again refused to leave office, warning that the growing constitutional confrontation could deepen political divisions and damage Hungary's democratic reputation abroad.
Magyar has accused the president of acting in the interests of the previous government rather than serving as an impartial head of state. In a post on X, he criticised Sulyok for failing to defend vulnerable people, the rule of law and those facing political attacks.
Fidesz has condemned Magyar's efforts, describing his demand for the president's resignation as an "unlawful ultimatum".
Parliament Holds the Key
Magyar's Tisza party secured a two-thirds majority in parliament in April's election, giving it the power to amend Hungary's constitution.
The government is expected to use that authority to dismantle parts of the political system established during Orbán's 16 years in power. Magyar said the process of removing Sulyok could take about a month.
Although Hungary's presidency is largely ceremonial, the office retains several important powers, including approving public appointments and referring legislation back to parliament or to the constitutional court, potentially delaying government reforms.
On Monday, Sulyok continued to carry out presidential duties, announcing a number of military appointments on Facebook.
EU Funding and Future Reforms
The president warned that the political standoff could jeopardise efforts to unlock billions of euros in European Union funding that had been withheld over concerns about democratic standards under the Orbán government.
However, the EU indicated last week that reforms proposed by the new administration could clear the way for Hungary to receive €16.4 billion in funding.
Sulyok assumed office following the resignation of former president Katalin Novák, who stepped down amid controversy over the government's handling of a child sex abuse scandal.
Meanwhile, Magyar's government has proposed another constitutional amendment that would limit any future prime minister to a maximum of eight years in office, a move aimed at preventing a return to lengthy periods of rule such as Orbán's.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 2 June 2026

webfact
webfact

Football Great Kevin Keegan Discloses Cancer Battle

Former England captain and manager Kevin Keegan has disclosed that he has been diagnosed with stage four cancer, the most advanced stage of the disease, during an emotional appearance in Newcastle.

Get today's headlines by email

The 75-year-old said the illness was discovered after he underwent scans following a car accident that required surgery. Speaking at a live event at the Tyne Theatre and Opera House, Keegan explained that doctors identified the cancer while carrying out examinations ahead of the operation.
He told the audience that he was referred to a specialist, joking that he felt reassured when he learned the doctor supported Liverpool, one of his former clubs. Keegan recalled being surprised when the doctor described a treatment with a 33% success rate, saying he had expected a much higher figure. He added: “I'm still here at the moment.”
Keegan's family first revealed in January that he was receiving treatment after further investigations into ongoing abdominal symptoms.
Football Career
Keegan enjoyed a distinguished playing career with clubs including Liverpool F.C., Hamburger SV, Southampton F.C. and Newcastle United F.C.. He won the European Footballer of the Year award twice and was widely regarded as one of the leading players of his era.
After retiring, he managed Newcastle, Fulham F.C., the England national football team and Manchester City F.C..
Beyond football, Keegan became a prominent public figure through television appearances, advertising campaigns and even a brief music career, with his 1979 single Head Over Heels in Love reaching the UK charts.
Newcastle Legacy
Keegan remains one of the most influential figures in Newcastle's history. He oversaw the entertaining Newcastle side known as “The Entertainers”, which challenged for the Premier League title during the 1995-96 season.
Current Newcastle head coach Eddie Howe previously revealed that he sought advice from Keegan after taking charge of the club in 2021.
Despite Newcastle's disappointing league campaign this season, Keegan voiced strong support for Howe, praising him for delivering the club's first major domestic trophy in decades with last season's League Cup triumph.
Club Sends Support
Keegan also spoke about a possible return to St James’ Park, saying he would like the opportunity to say goodbye properly after feeling he never had the chance following his departure from the club in 2009.
Asked about the possibility of a statue in his honour, he said public recognition was less important than the reception he receives from supporters.
In a statement, Newcastle United F.C. expressed its support for Keegan and his family, describing him as a cherished figure whose passion, leadership and bond with the city helped create some of the club’s most memorable moments.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 2 June 2026
webfact
webfact

Mandelson Messages Reveal Concerns Over Starmer's Leadership

Documents released by the UK government have revealed private messages in which Lord Mandelson and senior ministers expressed concerns about Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Downing Street and Labour MPs.

Get today's headlines by email

The 1,500 pages of correspondence relate to Lord Mandelson’s appointment as the UK’s ambassador to the United States, a post he later lost because of his connections to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Among the messages, Lord Mandelson described No 10 as “beleaguered and bereft” and said it required a “complete revamp”. The exchanges also show discussions about Labour’s internal divisions, policy-making and Starmer’s authority during a major rebellion over welfare reforms.
Welfare Revolt Raises Leadership Fears
In June 2025, Lord Mandelson and then-Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden discussed government plans to reduce welfare spending by £5 billion by 2030. The proposals faced strong opposition from Labour MPs and were later significantly weakened.
As tensions mounted ahead of a parliamentary vote, McFadden wrote that MPs were “not moving”. Mandelson responded that the government could lose the vote and added: “I am not sure that Keir survives that.”
McFadden replied that Starmer was meeting the rebellion’s leaders and warned that defeat, withdrawal of the bill or major concessions would damage the prime minister’s authority. Mandelson agreed with the assessment.
Criticism of No 10
The documents also reveal concerns about the operation of Downing Street.
In July 2025, Mandelson and McFadden discussed Morgan McSweeney, who was serving as Starmer’s chief of staff. Mandelson said McSweeney appeared to have little confidence in the prime minister’s ability to reform No 10 and believed the priority should be maintaining support within the Parliamentary Labour Party.
Mandelson later wrote that he was “slightly losing faith in all this”.
In another exchange, he asked McFadden for his assessment of Downing Street. McFadden replied that the situation was “not good” and suggested advisers lacked clear direction.
Mandelson criticised the operation further, arguing that staff were not functioning effectively as a team and lacked leadership. He said many officials were uncertain about Starmer’s priorities and direction, later describing No 10 as “beleaguered and bereft”.
Debate Over Labour Priorities
Another message from McFadden appeared to criticise Labour backbench MPs, saying discussions often focused on identifying new sources of tax revenue to fund benefits rather than addressing broader policy questions.
A spokesperson for McFadden said his public position has consistently been that government should focus on improving people’s lives through work and opportunity, particularly for younger people.
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch seized on the disclosures, arguing they showed a gap between Labour’s private discussions and public statements.
Policy Concerns and Ambassador Appointment
The papers also contain messages between Mandelson and minister Torsten Bell discussing government policy development. Bell argued that too many people assumed policy-making was someone else’s responsibility, while Mandelson suggested weak policy inevitably led to poor outcomes.
The correspondence includes a handwritten note sent by Mandelson to then Foreign Secretary David Lammy in November 2024, before his appointment as ambassador. In it, Mandelson pledged that Lammy would not regret selecting him for the role.
The government published the documents after MPs voted earlier this year to require their release. Speaking in the House of Commons, Cabinet Office minister Darren Jones said the disclosure was among the largest government publications ever produced and had cost more than £1 million.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 2 June 2026
webfact
webfact

Court Rejects Rwanda’s £100m Claim Over UK Asylum Deal

The UK will not be required to pay Rwanda more than £100 million linked to the abandoned migrant deportation scheme launched under former prime minister Boris Johnson, after an international arbitration tribunal ruled in Britain’s favour.

Get today's headlines by email

The case arose after Rwanda accused the UK government of breaching a bilateral agreement following the cancellation of the asylum partnership in 2024. Rwanda sought two outstanding annual payments of £50 million each, along with compensation and interest.
Tribunal Sides With UK
The ruling followed a three-day hearing at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague. Judges found that the UK was not liable for the disputed payments after the scheme was terminated.
The tribunal rejected one £50 million claim by majority decision and unanimously dismissed the second £50 million claim. As a result, Rwanda’s demand for compensation was also unsuccessful.
A UK government spokesperson said the government had “robustly defended” its position and welcomed the ruling, noting that the tribunal had decided in Britain’s favour on all issues.
Scheme Ended After Change of Government
The asylum agreement was signed in 2022 between the UK and Rwanda. Under the arrangement, asylum seekers who reached Britain through irregular routes, including small-boat crossings and lorry journeys, could be relocated to Rwanda for processing.
The policy faced legal and political challenges from the outset. It was eventually declared unlawful by the UK Supreme Court.
After Keir Starmer and the Labour Party won the 2024 general election, the new government scrapped the programme. On his first full day in office, Starmer described the plan as “dead and buried” and dismissed it as a gimmick.
UK lawyers argued during the arbitration proceedings that it was entirely foreseeable the scheme would be abandoned following a change of government and that no further payments were owed.
Rwanda Cited Costs and Lack of Notice
Rwanda maintained that it had invested heavily in preparing for the partnership and claimed Britain had failed to meet its contractual obligations.
Rwandan Justice Minister and Attorney General Emmanuel Ugirashebuja told the court that the country had incurred significant costs and had not been given advance notice of the UK’s decision to end the arrangement. He said Rwandan officials learned of the move through media reports.
In legal submissions, Rwanda requested around £100 million in unpaid instalments, plus approximately £6 million in compensation and interest. Alternatively, it said it would accept a formal apology from the UK.
Costs and Wider Tensions
According to the UK government, only four people were relocated to Rwanda under the scheme, all on a voluntary basis. Britain had already paid Rwanda about £290 million before the policy was terminated.
The previous Conservative government had spent around £700 million on the programme before it was abandoned.
The ruling comes as relations between the two countries remain strained. The UK has reduced aid to Rwanda, alleging that Kigali supports the M23 rebel group operating in the neighbouring Democratic Republic of the Congo.



Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 2 June 2026
webfact
webfact

Iran Suspends US Talks Over Lebanon Ceasefire Dispute

Iran has suspended negotiations with the United States, blaming Israel's military operations in Lebanon for violating a broader ceasefire arrangement and raising fears that months of diplomacy could unravel.

Get today's headlines by email

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Tehran viewed the ceasefire as applying across all fronts, including Lebanon. He warned that any breach in Lebanon amounted to a breach of the entire agreement and held both Israel and the US responsible for the consequences.
An Iranian news agency linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps reported that Tehran had halted participation in talks aimed at ending the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, a key global oil shipping route.
Trump Signals Little Concern Over Pause
US President Donald Trump said Washington had not been formally notified of Iran's decision but suggested a pause in negotiations would not necessarily be unwelcome.
Speaking to NBC News, Trump said the two sides may have been talking too much and that a period of silence could be beneficial. He added that the US would maintain its blockade of Iranian ports if talks collapsed but indicated there were no immediate plans for further military escalation.
The diplomatic setback follows US strikes on Iranian radar and drone facilities over the weekend. Tehran responded by claiming it had targeted a military base in Kuwait that it said was involved in the American operation.
Lebanon Tensions Threaten Wider Conflict
Iran's move reflects growing anger over Israel's offensive in Lebanon. The situation appeared to worsen after Israel issued evacuation orders for residents in Beirut's southern suburbs.
Iran's military command warned residents in northern Israel to leave should Israel launch attacks on Beirut or the Dahieh district. Kuwait also advised citizens to remain indoors amid fears of an imminent escalation.
Iranian military officials warned that strikes on Beirut's southern suburbs would trigger retaliatory attacks against northern Israel and other military targets inside the country.
Trump said he had spoken with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and, through intermediaries, with Hezbollah representatives in an effort to secure a renewed ceasefire. He later claimed Netanyahu had agreed not to send troops into Beirut and that Hezbollah had agreed to halt attacks.
There was initially no confirmation from either Israel or Hezbollah. However, Lebanon's embassy in Washington later said both sides had accepted a reciprocal halt to attacks, including Israeli strikes on Beirut's southern suburbs.
Oil Market Concerns Grow
Iran's semi-official Tasnim news agency reported that Tehran would seek support from Yemen's Houthi movement to impose a second maritime blockade at the Bab al-Mandab Strait, another critical shipping route. The renewed tensions pushed oil prices close to $100 a barrel.
Iranian parliament speaker and chief negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf accused Washington of failing to uphold the ceasefire through both its blockade and support for Israeli operations.
Meanwhile, French President Emmanuel Macron held discussions with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, Trump and several Arab leaders, urging efforts to preserve the Lebanon ceasefire and reopen the Strait of Hormuz.
Nuclear Talks Remain Frozen
Iranian officials said discussions on the country's nuclear programme would remain on hold until issues surrounding the Strait of Hormuz were addressed.
Foreign ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said no detailed nuclear negotiations were currently taking place and insisted Tehran's immediate priority was ending the conflict. He also confirmed that Iran was seeking reparations from the United States and that any future agreement would require approval from the UN Security Council.
A proposed 14-point memorandum would establish a 60-day ceasefire while negotiations over Iran's nuclear programme continue.
Despite diplomatic efforts, major disagreements remain over sanctions relief, frozen Iranian assets and broader regional security arrangements. The latest exchanges highlighted the fragility of the ceasefire and the challenges facing attempts to secure a lasting settlement.



Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 2 June 2026

webfact
webfact

Iran accuses Trump of stalling nuclear talks

Iran has accused US President Donald Trump of delaying negotiations over a possible nuclear-related agreement, saying Washington is imposing “excessive demands”, as expectations of a breakthrough continue to shift in global markets.

Get today's headlines by email

Oil prices have eased this week as reports persist that Washington and Tehran are edging towards a potential agreement after more than a month of negotiations without resolution.
President Donald Trump has not yet taken a final decision on the deal, which could extend the current ceasefire with Iran. A Situation Room meeting on Friday ended without any announcement, despite expectations that a “final determination” would be made.
Demands and disputed terms
US officials and regional counterparts have suggested a deal is close, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently predicting “good news” within hours, though Trump later said he would not “rush into” an agreement. Washington has outlined conditions including Iran never obtaining a nuclear weapon, reopening the Strait of Hormuz for unrestricted two-way shipping, and the removal of any mines in the waterway.
The agreement under discussion would extend a fragile ceasefire in place since early April, although both sides have accused each other of violations through continued strikes. US officials said a draft proposal would launch 60 days of further talks on Iran’s nuclear programme, but neither side has signed off.
Diplomatic tension and military warning
Iranian officials have rejected the US description of the deal. Mohsen Rezaei, a senior figure and former commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, said Washington was “betraying diplomacy” and acting through “excessive demands”, according to Iranian media reports.
A senior Arab mediator told NBC News that negotiators had already agreed terms of a truce days earlier in Doha, but both sides have delayed final approval, describing the situation as a “game of chicken and egg”.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Trump remained patient and sought a strong agreement preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, adding that any deal would be a good outcome. He also said the US was prepared to resume strikes if no agreement was reached, insisting the country was capable of acting globally if required.
Some changes have reportedly been made to draft text, though it remains unfinalised, according to Iranian media. Iranian officials say no final understanding has been reached and discussions are still focused on ending the war rather than detailed nuclear issues.
Oil market reaction
Oil prices fell as hopes of a deal increased. Brent crude traded about 1.8% lower at around $92 a barrel, with prices down almost 20% in May. The war and closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which about 20% of global oil previously flowed, has driven energy prices higher over the past three months.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 1 June 2
webfact
webfact

Zelenskyy alleges Russia trains abducted children

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has alleged that Russia is abducting Ukrainian children and training some of them to take part in combat against Ukrainians, according to comments made in an interview with CBS News.

Get today's headlines by email

He said Ukrainian authorities have evidence supporting the claim, though he did not provide specific details about what it includes. Zelenskyy suggested the practice goes beyond previously documented cases of Ukrainian children being taken to camps in Russia for what has been described as re-education or “Russification.”
Allegations of child abductions and training
He also said some of those children are later pushed towards the battlefield once they become older, describing them as being encouraged to fight against their own country.
The International Criminal Court has previously said Russia’s actions involving Ukrainian children may amount to war crimes. In 2023, it issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin, linked to what it described as the unlawful deportation of population, including children.
ICC scrutiny and Kremlin response
The Kremlin has rejected the allegations, describing the programme as a humanitarian effort aimed at caring for children displaced or orphaned by the conflict. Russian officials have also publicised images of Putin and Maria Lvova-Belova, who has been indicted by the ICC, meeting children involved in the programme.
Zelenskyy made his comments in an interview with CBS’s “Face the Nation,” recorded with journalist Margaret Brennan, where he also discussed broader concerns about the treatment of Ukrainian children in Russian custody.
Evidence claims and international reports
Zelenskyy said Ukraine has documented the abduction of at least 20,000 children and is seeking international assistance to locate and return them, adding that the true figure could be higher.
He reiterated that Ukrainian authorities believe children are being exposed to messaging that encourages hostility towards Ukraine and its people. “Yes, and they taught these children to hate their native country,” he said during the interview, according to CBS.
A report from the Yale School of Public Health’s Humanitarian Research Lab, which has examined allegations of war-related abuses, said in March that Russian energy firms Gazprom and Rosneft helped support the re-education of more than 2,000 Ukrainian children. The report also said these companies were indirectly benefiting from US consumer spending while under sanctions arrangements related to Russian oil exports.
The same report argued that temporary US sanctions relief on Russian oil shipments had contributed to financial gains for the companies involved. It added that Gazprom and Rosneft were, at the time of publication, among Russian state-linked entities connected to child deportation allegations that were continuing to generate revenue.
War prisoners and sanctions debate
Zelenskyy also addressed the issue of prisoner exchanges, saying Ukraine is willing to negotiate the return of its soldiers but not the exchange of children, which he argued would be unlawful under international humanitarian law.
He said Ukraine has raised the issue with US lawmakers and urged further sanctions against Russia in response to the alleged deportations and treatment of children. Zelenskyy also argued that easing sanctions on Russian oil sales indirectly benefits Russia’s military capability.
The US first issued a sanctions waiver in March to increase oil supply and stabilise global prices amid wider energy market pressures, later extending it twice. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the extensions were made following requests from several Asian countries seeking additional oil supplies.
Zelenskyy called on Congress to take further action, expressing hope that additional sanctions would be imposed in response to what he described as the targeting of Ukrainian children.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 1 June 2026
webfact
webfact

US Strike on Suspected Drug Boat Kills Three

The US military said it carried out a strike on a vessel in the eastern Pacific Ocean on Saturday, killing three men in what officials described as a counter-narcotics operation.

Get today's headlines by email

US Southern Command said intelligence indicated the vessel was travelling along known drug-trafficking routes and was involved in what it called “narco-trafficking” activities. In a statement posted on X, the command said the three men killed were “narco-terrorists” and that no US personnel were injured during the operation.
The attack came a day after another US strike on a separate vessel in the eastern Pacific also killed three men. The two incidents form part of a wider campaign targeting boats suspected of transporting narcotics through waters used by trafficking networks.
Rising death toll
The latest strikes were among four carried out over the past week. According to reports, the overall number of people killed in the US campaign has now exceeded 200 since the operations began last year. US authorities say the missions are aimed at disrupting maritime drug-smuggling routes linked to organised criminal groups.
The Trump administration has argued that the United States is engaged in an armed conflict with Latin American drug cartels, which it accuses of fuelling the flow of narcotics into the country. Officials have increasingly referred to traffickers as “narco-terrorists” and described the strikes as part of a broader effort against designated criminal organisations.
Legal concerns
However, the administration has not publicly released detailed evidence linking the targeted vessels to drug trafficking operations. The absence of publicly available proof has prompted criticism from legal experts and human rights groups, who have questioned whether the strikes comply with international law.
Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have described the operations as unlawful extrajudicial killings. Critics argue that, outside a recognised armed conflict, the use of lethal force is subject to strict legal limits and should only occur when necessary to protect life.
Ongoing debate
The strikes have become a growing source of controversy as the campaign expands across the eastern Pacific and Caribbean. While US officials maintain the operations are targeting drug-trafficking networks, opponents continue to question both the evidence used to identify targets and the legal basis for military action against suspected smugglers in international waters.
The latest operation was announced by US Southern Command, which said the vessel had been operating along established trafficking routes in the eastern Pacific. No further details were released about the identities of those killed or the specific location of the strike.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 1 June 2026
webfact
webfact

Pence Urges Trump to Scrap $1.8bn 'Anti-Weaponisation' Fund

Former US Vice-President Mike Pence has called on the Trump administration to abandon its proposed $1.8bn "anti-weaponisation fund", describing the initiative as "deeply offensive" and arguing it should never have been created.

Get today's headlines by email

The fund, announced earlier this month, is intended to compensate people who claim they were unfairly targeted by previous administrations through what officials describe as politically motivated prosecutions, or "lawfare".
Pence Condemns Plan
Speaking to NBC News, Pence said the proposal was a "bad idea from the start" and expressed concern that individuals involved in the 6 January 2021 attack on the US Capitol could receive compensation.
"It's deeply offensive to me that you could have a fund that could even possibly compensate people who assaulted police officers or vandalised the Capitol on January 6," Pence said. He added that he believed most Republicans and Americans shared that view.
Pence was present at the Capitol when supporters of President Donald Trump stormed the building in an attempt to disrupt the certification of the 2020 election result. Rioters threatened Pence, who was evacuated to a secure location before returning to oversee the formal confirmation of Joe Biden's election victory.
Link to IRS Settlement
The fund was established by the Department of Justice as part of a settlement with Trump over a lawsuit he filed against the Internal Revenue Service after his tax records were leaked.
Under the agreement, Trump dropped the case in exchange for an apology and the creation of the compensation programme.
The proposal has drawn particular scrutiny because many supporters of Trump who were prosecuted over the Capitol attack have indicated they intend to seek payments from the fund.
According to Department of Justice figures, nearly 1,600 people faced charges connected to the riot. Around 175 were accused of using a deadly or dangerous weapon or causing serious injury to law enforcement officers. Roughly 140 police officers were injured during the attack.
Trump later granted sweeping pardons to defendants involved in the riot after returning to office, including some who had admitted assaulting police officers.
Bipartisan Opposition
The fund has faced criticism from lawmakers in both parties.
Republican Senate leader John Thune said he was not a supporter of the proposal, while former Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell described it as "utterly stupid".
Republican Senator Thom Tillis called the initiative "stupid on stilts", and Republican Congressman Brian Fitzpatrick said he planned to introduce legislation aimed at blocking it.
However, some Republicans have defended the programme. Senator Tommy Tuberville argued that many Americans had been unfairly prosecuted following the January 6 investigations.
Legal Challenge
The fund's eligibility criteria appear broad. In a memo to Republican senators, acting Attorney General Todd Blanche argued that "tens of millions of Americans" had experienced improper government targeting and stressed that Democrats as well as Republicans would be able to apply.
On Friday, a federal judge temporarily halted the creation of the fund pending a hearing scheduled for 12 June.
In response, a Justice Department spokesperson said officials remained confident the programme was lawful and supported by legal precedent, adding that they would continue efforts to provide restitution to what they described as victims of government misconduct.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 1 June 2026
webfact
webfact

Israel Captures Beaufort Castle as Lebanon Offensive Expands

Israeli forces have captured the strategic Beaufort Castle in southern Lebanon, as the military expands its ground offensive against Hezbollah and pushes deeper into Lebanese territory.

Get today's headlines by email

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu described the seizure of the hilltop fortress as a "decisive stage" in Israel's campaign, while Lebanon accused Israel of escalating the conflict and inflicting collective punishment on civilians.
Historic Fortress Falls Again
Perched above the Litani Valley, Beaufort Castle has been a key military stronghold for centuries. Built by Crusaders around 900 years ago, the fortress overlooks large parts of southern Lebanon and has long held strategic importance.
Israel first captured the site during the 1982 Lebanon War before withdrawing from the area in 2000 as it ended its occupation of a self-declared security zone in southern Lebanon.
Following the latest operation, Netanyahu said Israel was taking the initiative across multiple fronts, including Lebanon, Gaza and Syria. He said the objective was to expand Israeli control over areas previously held by Hezbollah.
Defence Minister Israel Katz highlighted the symbolic value of the capture, noting that the Golani Brigade had once again raised the Israeli flag over the fortress more than four decades after first seizing it.
Ground Forces Push Further North
The capture comes as Israeli troops advance beyond the Litani River, the line that had largely defined the scope of earlier ground operations.
The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) also broadened evacuation warnings across southern Lebanon, urging residents to leave areas south of the Zahrani River. Military officials warned civilians to stay away from Hezbollah positions, facilities and weapons infrastructure.
An IDF spokesman said a significant number of ground troops were taking part in an operation that is continuing to expand into additional areas of southern Lebanon.
Israeli officials say the offensive has intensified in response to increased missile and drone attacks by the Iranian-backed Hezbollah movement on Israeli troops and communities near the border.
Fighting Continues on Both Sides
The conflict showed no signs of easing over the weekend.
Lebanon's Health Ministry said an airstrike near Hiram Hospital in the southern city of Tyre injured 13 medical workers and caused substantial damage to the facility.
Israel confirmed that another soldier had been killed, while schools in several northern communities were closed as a precaution amid security concerns.
On Saturday, Hezbollah fired around 25 projectiles towards northern Israel, prompting opposition politicians to demand stronger measures to protect border residents.
Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam accused Israel of pursuing a "scorched-earth policy" and carrying out collective punishment in southern Lebanon.
International Concern Grows
The latest escalation has prompted renewed international concern.
France has requested a meeting of the United Nations Security Council to discuss Israeli military operations in Lebanon.
President Emmanuel Macron called for an immediate end to the fighting, saying the current escalation in southern Lebanon could not be justified. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot also criticised the offensive.
Both Israel and Lebanon accuse each other of violating a ceasefire agreement that took effect last month and has since been extended twice. While the truce remains formally in place, continued attacks by both sides have undermined its effectiveness.
Despite the deteriorating situation, Israeli and Lebanese delegations are expected to hold a fourth round of talks in Washington this week.
Lebanese officials view negotiations as the only viable route towards reducing tensions, although Hezbollah is not participating in the discussions.
The conflict intensified in March after Hezbollah launched rockets into Israel following an Israeli strike that killed Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. Israel responded with a major air campaign and ground invasion.
Lebanese authorities say more than 3,300 people have been killed since then, while Israel reports 25 military deaths.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 1 June 2026
webfact
webfact

Nicola Sturgeon Says She's Paying for Husband's Crime

Scotland's former first minister Nicola Sturgeon has said she feels as though she is "serving a sentence for a crime I did not commit" following the admission by her estranged husband, Peter Murrell, that he embezzled more than £400,000 from the Scottish National Party (SNP).

Get today's headlines by email

In an interview with the BBC's Laura Kuenssberg, Sturgeon rejected calls to apologise for the scandal, insisting she was not responsible for Murrell's actions and had no knowledge of the wrongdoing. Murrell admitted embezzling party funds between 2010 and 2022 and is due to be sentenced later this month.
Sturgeon, who led the SNP from 2014 until 2023 and served as Scotland's first minister for more than eight years, said she would accept responsibility for her own decisions but would not apologise for crimes committed by someone else.
She argued that holding her accountable for Murrell's actions risked reinforcing the idea that women should bear responsibility for the conduct of men in their lives. While acknowledging the impact the affair has had on her personally and politically, she maintained that Murrell had deceived both the party and its leadership.
Emotional Account of Betrayal
The former first minister became emotional while describing gifts she received from Murrell that were later found to have been purchased using SNP funds.
Among them was a pendant from a Shetland jeweller that she said she treasured and wore frequently. Sturgeon said she believed it had been a thoughtful gift from her husband and found it painful to discover it had been bought with party money.
She said learning that items presented as personal gifts had been funded in that way caused her lasting distress and left her struggling to come to terms with what had happened.
Sturgeon also addressed questions about a luxury motorhome purchased with party funds and stored at Murrell's mother's property. She said she had no clear recollection of seeing the vehicle and would not have had any reason to suspect it belonged to the SNP.
Questions Over Party Oversight
Murrell, who served as SNP chief executive for more than two decades, resigned in March 2023 amid controversy over party membership figures. He was arrested weeks later as part of the police investigation into SNP finances known as Operation Branchform.
Sturgeon was also arrested and questioned during the inquiry but was released without charge. She stressed that prosecutors and investigators had not found evidence linking her to the embezzlement.
Asked whether she should bear responsibility given her role overseeing the party, Sturgeon said there had been no warnings about the criminal behaviour to which Murrell later pleaded guilty. She added that if information in the accounts had pointed to wrongdoing, investigators might have reached a different conclusion about her involvement.
She also rejected suggestions that her personal assets should be used to repay money lost through the embezzlement, saying she was not guilty of the offence and should not be expected to contribute to any recovery process.
Calls for Further Scrutiny
Sturgeon's comments prompted criticism from some political opponents and former SNP figures.
Former SNP MP Joanna Cherry said concerns centred not on Murrell's criminal actions but on whether legitimate scrutiny of the party's finances had been obstructed. Meanwhile, UK government minister Pat McFadden backed calls for a parliamentary inquiry into the affair, arguing that questions remained about the SNP's culture and governance.
Conservative shadow home secretary Chris Philp also supported an inquiry, saying public trust in politics had been damaged by the scandal.
However, Scotland's First Minister John Swinney rejected demands for a Holyrood investigation, arguing that the police inquiry and resulting guilty plea had already established the facts of the case.
Murrell remains in custody after pleading guilty and is scheduled to be sentenced on 23 June.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 1 June 2026
webfact
webfact

Hundreds Arrested After PSG Victory Sparks Chaos in France

Paris Saint-Germain's Champions League triumph was overshadowed by widespread unrest across France, leaving hundreds injured, dozens of police officers hurt and hundreds of people arrested, authorities said on Sunday.

Get today's headlines by email

French Interior Minister Laurent Nuñez said 219 people were injured during clashes linked to celebrations after PSG secured the European title. Eight people remained in serious condition. Among those injured were 57 police officers deployed to maintain order.
Authorities said 780 people had been arrested nationwide, with more than 450 placed in custody. In Paris alone, police made 480 arrests, including 277 people taken into custody. Eighty-two of those detained were minors.
Security Operation and Violence
Thousands of officers were deployed across the French capital following concerns that celebrations could turn violent. Despite the security presence, disturbances disrupted bus, train and rail services in parts of Paris.
Large crowds gathered on the Champs-Élysées after PSG's victory, with footage showing flares being set off, electric bicycles set ablaze and at least one shopfront damaged. Police used tear gas in an effort to disperse crowds in the city centre.
According to the Paris prosecutor's office, the arrests were linked to a range of alleged offences, including attacks on police officers, damage to property, theft and unlawful possession of weapons. Officials stressed that the figures remained provisional.
Deaths and Serious Injuries
A 24-year-old man was found dead near Porte Maillot on Paris's ring road after an incident that occurred as rioters attempted to block traffic overnight. The exact circumstances remain under investigation, although witnesses reported that the man was riding a motorcycle when he collided with concrete barriers.
Elsewhere in Paris, a teenager was left in critical condition following a brawl. Authorities have not confirmed whether the incident was directly connected to football-related disorder.
The unrest follows similar scenes seen when PSG won the competition last year, when celebrations also descended into violence and resulted in fatalities.
Authorities Promise Firm Response
With a victory parade scheduled for Sunday, security remained on high alert. Around 6,000 police officers were mobilised to oversee celebrations around the Eiffel Tower and other planned events, including a reception for the team hosted by French President Emmanuel Macron.
Nuñez defended the police response and pledged continued action against those responsible for the disturbances.
"We are a great country for maintaining public order. We allow freedom of assembly, but not excesses," he said.
The minister added that most supporters celebrated peacefully, while a minority sought to exploit the occasion to cause disorder.
Far-right leader Marine Le Pen criticised the violence, writing on social media that football victories should not result in riots and insecurity for residents.
PSG players are expected to take part in a parade through the Champ-de-Mars area near the Eiffel Tower later on Sunday as celebrations continue under heavy security.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 31 May 2026
webfact
webfact

Ferrari Faces Backlash in Bid to Take on China EVs

Ferrari's first electric vehicle has sparked criticism from investors, politicians and some loyal fans, overshadowing what was intended to be a landmark moment for the luxury carmaker as it responds to growing competition from Chinese electric vehicle manufacturers.

Get today's headlines by email

The new Luce, designed with input from former Apple designer Sir Jony Ive, represents a major departure for a company best known for its petrol-powered supercars and distinctive engine sound. The launch attracted significant attention, with Italian President Sergio Mattarella and Pope Leo among those invited to preview the vehicle.



But the reaction quickly turned negative. Ferrari's shares fell 8% the day after the unveiling as social media users mocked the vehicle's appearance and its $640,000 price tag. The Luce is also Ferrari's first five-seater.
A Radical Departure
For decades, Ferrari resisted the shift toward electric vehicles even as much of the automotive industry embraced battery-powered technology.
While the Luce delivers supercar-level performance, accelerating from 0 to 60mph in about 2.5 seconds and reaching speeds above 190mph, much of the criticism has focused on its design rather than its capabilities.
Former Ferrari chairman Luca Cordero di Montezemolo said the model risked damaging the company's legacy and argued that it should not carry Ferrari's iconic badge.
Luxury car dealer and collector Shaun Baker was equally critical, saying the vehicle had weakened Ferrari's image as the world's most aspirational sports car brand.
Unlike traditional Ferraris, the Luce lacks the low-slung profile associated with the marque. As an EV, it also does away with the engine note that has long been central to Ferrari's appeal.
Italy's Deputy Prime Minister and Transport Minister Matteo Salvini questioned the design, saying the vehicle looked unlike a Ferrari and wondering what company founder Enzo Ferrari would have thought of it.
Online Backlash
The criticism spread rapidly online.
Some social media users compared the Luce to far cheaper electric cars, including models produced by Chinese manufacturers. Others posted AI-generated redesigns that they argued looked more in keeping with Ferrari's heritage.
Although some commentators praised the vehicle's styling, many others accused Ferrari of abandoning the identity that made it famous.
Ferrari chief executive Benedetto Vigna defended the project and rejected comparisons with lower-cost rivals, insisting the Luce reflects the company's commitment to innovation.
China Challenge
The controversy comes as Ferrari and other Western automakers face growing pressure from Chinese EV makers, which are increasingly competing in the premium segment once dominated by European and American brands.
China has become a major force in the electric vehicle industry thanks to extensive supply chains, lower production costs and strong domestic competition. Chinese manufacturers are producing increasingly sophisticated vehicles while pushing aggressively into overseas markets.
That challenge is particularly significant for luxury brands. Chinese consumers, a key market for Ferrari, now expect advanced technology, long driving ranges and competitive pricing.
Some Chinese performance EVs already rival established Western brands. The all-electric BYD Yangwang U9, for example, delivers supercar-level acceleration at a fraction of the Luce's price.
Changing Course
Ferrari's electric push comes at a time when some rivals are reassessing their EV ambitions.
Lamborghini has abandoned plans for a fully electric model, citing weak demand and continued customer preference for petrol-powered cars. Other manufacturers, including Porsche, Honda and Ford, have also scaled back electric vehicle programmes.
Analysts say Ferrari may be targeting a different audience with the Luce. Younger buyers tend to be more receptive to EVs, while the vehicle's unconventional design could attract customers who might not otherwise consider a Ferrari.
James Wong, a Singapore-based automotive analyst, said the interior design was impressive but argued that the vehicle as a whole was difficult to identify as a Ferrari.
Whether the backlash proves damaging remains unclear. Ferrari faced similar criticism when it launched the Purosangue SUV in 2022, yet the model went on to become a commercial success.
For now, however, the Luce has ignited a debate over Ferrari's future as it attempts to adapt to an industry increasingly shaped by electrification and competition from China.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?

Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 31 May 2026
webfact
webfact

Trump Administration Softens Tone on Green Card Policy

The Trump administration has sought to ease concerns over a recent immigration policy change after critics warned it could force large numbers of green card applicants to leave the United States to complete their residency applications abroad.

Get today's headlines by email

The clarification follows widespread concern sparked by new guidance issued last week by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), which appeared to significantly narrow the use of a process known as “adjustment of status.” The procedure allows certain immigrants sponsored by family members or employers to apply for permanent residency while remaining in the United States.
Initial Guidance Triggers Alarm
When announcing the policy, USCIS officials indicated that many immigrants seeking green cards would no longer be able to complete the process from within the country. A spokesperson said that individuals in the United States on temporary visas who wanted permanent residency would generally need to return to their home countries and apply through American consulates, except under extraordinary circumstances.
The announcement prompted concern among immigrants, legal experts and business groups. Critics argued that the change could affect hundreds of thousands of applicants and potentially leave some stranded overseas because of travel restrictions and entry limits affecting numerous countries.
Immigration attorneys also warned that requiring applicants to leave the country could introduce significant delays and uncertainty into an already complex immigration system.
DHS Seeks to Clarify Scope
Over the weekend, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) released a statement portraying the guidance as far less extensive than many had initially understood.
According to DHS, the policy largely reflects existing law and longstanding agency practice. The department stressed that eligible applicants would still be able to obtain green cards and said the guidance would primarily affect individuals deemed not to merit the discretionary benefit of applying from within the United States.
DHS stated that the policy “will not prevent any alien from obtaining a green card” if they properly qualify. It added that some applicants may ultimately be required to complete their cases through the Department of State overseas rather than through USCIS inside the country.
The department also emphasized that highly qualified workers and professionals who comply with immigration rules should not experience significant effects from the change.
Experts See Narrower Interpretation
Lynden Melmed, a former chief counsel at USCIS during the administration of President George W. Bush, said the latest DHS statement appears to narrow the interpretation of the earlier guidance.
Melmed noted that immigration officers have long exercised discretion when determining whether applicants may pursue adjustment of status in the United States, weighing both positive and negative factors in each case.
However, he said the policy is still likely to create additional hurdles for applicants and their attorneys. Those seeking to remain in the country while pursuing permanent residency may need to provide more evidence supporting their eligibility.
Melmed also said the administration’s differing explanations of the policy could create uncertainty among USCIS officers responsible for implementing the guidance.
While the administration has attempted to reassure applicants, he argued that the underlying policy is still likely to slow some legal immigration processes, even if officials are now presenting it in more limited terms.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 31 May 2026
webfact
webfact

Trump Warms Ties With Europe’s Last Dictator

Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko appears to be emerging from years of Western isolation as U.S. President Donald Trump moves to improve relations with one of Russia’s closest allies.

Get today's headlines by email

Earlier this month, Trump publicly thanked Lukashenko for his role in securing the release of political prisoners from Belarusian custody, praising his “cooperation and friendship.” Washington has also gradually eased some sanctions on Belarusian state institutions and companies that were imposed after Belarus supported Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine by allowing its territory to be used as a staging ground.
Lukashenko has responded positively, expressing hopes for a broader agreement with the United States and signaling interest in closer engagement with the Trump administration.
Opposition Figures Voice Concern
For many Belarusians, however, Lukashenko remains a deeply controversial figure. In power since 1994, he has been widely accused of suppressing political opposition, restricting independent media and overseeing extensive human rights abuses.
His government launched a sweeping crackdown after the disputed 2020 presidential election, which official results said he won with more than 80% of the vote. The election was widely viewed by critics and Western governments as fraudulent. Large-scale protests were followed by arrests, prosecutions and the imprisonment or exile of opposition figures.
Former Belarusian diplomat Pavel Slunkin said repression in Belarus has reached unprecedented levels in recent years. Meanwhile, Franak Viacorka, an adviser to exiled opposition leader Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, described Trump’s praise of Lukashenko as difficult to hear, though he acknowledged that prisoner releases had come at a diplomatic price.
Around 250 prisoners were released in March as part of efforts that coincided with the easing of certain U.S. sanctions. Nevertheless, according to a recent report by the United Nations, at least 1,131 people remain imprisoned on politically motivated charges.
Balancing Between Washington and Moscow
Lukashenko remains heavily dependent on Russian President Vladimir Putin, whom he has repeatedly described as a close ally. Belarus relies extensively on Russia economically and has allowed Moscow to station tactical nuclear weapons on its territory. The two countries also conducted joint nuclear-force exercises this month.
Despite warming ties with Washington, Belarus has continued military preparations. State media recently reported that Lukashenko ordered a selective mobilization exercise to improve military readiness. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has warned of unusual activity along Ukraine’s northern border with Belarus, although Lukashenko has denied plans to become directly involved in the war unless Belarus itself is attacked.
Some analysts have suggested that improved U.S.-Belarus relations could give Washington additional leverage in efforts to end the war in Ukraine. However, U.S. officials have said engagement with Belarus is separate from ongoing negotiations related to the conflict.
Search for International Legitimacy
Analysts say Lukashenko has long sought recognition from Western leaders while maintaining firm control at home. Previous attempts by Western governments to encourage reforms through engagement produced limited results and failed to significantly reduce Belarus’ dependence on Russia.
For Lukashenko, a future meeting with Trump at the White House or at Mar-a-Lago would represent a major diplomatic achievement. During a visit to Minsk in September, Trump envoy John Coale reportedly presented Lukashenko with White House-themed cuff links, a gesture viewed by some observers as symbolic of the improving relationship.
Opposition figures argue that such recognition would provide Lukashenko with the international legitimacy he has sought throughout his three decades in power, even as concerns over political repression in Belarus persist.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 31 May 2026



webfact
webfact

Trump Calls U.S. Court System ‘Rigged’ After Setbacks

President Donald Trump has denounced the U.S. judicial system as “rigged” following recent court decisions that blocked parts of his agenda, including a move involving the Kennedy Center and a ruling on his tariff policy.

Get today's headlines by email

In a lengthy post on Truth Social on Saturday, Trump argued that both the legal and political systems were unfairly stacked against him. He said voters were aware of those problems and pointed to his election victory as evidence of public support, vowing to continue fighting against what he described as a biased system.
Kennedy Center Dispute
Trump’s latest criticism followed a ruling by U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper that halted plans to rename the Kennedy Center and prevented a proposed summer closure of the performing arts venue for renovations.
The president targeted Cooper, who was appointed by former President Barack Obama, and claimed the judge had a conflict of interest because of his wife, attorney Amy Jeffress. Trump described Jeffress as politically aligned with his opponents and argued that her professional connections made it impossible for him to receive fair treatment in court.
Jeffress is a partner at the law firm Hecker Fink, which represented writer and columnist E. Jean Carroll in her successful civil lawsuits against Trump involving sexual abuse and defamation claims.
Trump alleged that Cooper should have disclosed those connections and suggested the judge’s actions could have long-term consequences for the Kennedy Center, predicting the institution could ultimately face closure.
Focus on Carroll Investigation Reports
The president also referred to recent media reports suggesting the Justice Department was examining whether Carroll committed perjury during civil litigation against him.
However, the reports were complicated by statements from the top federal prosecutor in Chicago, who said his office had not opened a criminal investigation into the 82-year-old columnist.
The issue has become part of a broader effort by Trump to challenge legal outcomes that have gone against him, a pattern that has continued throughout his second term.
Renewed Anger Over Tariff Ruling
Trump also criticized the Supreme Court’s February decision striking down most of his sweeping tariff programme. The court ruled that key elements of the policy exceeded the president’s constitutional authority.
In his post, Trump argued that the decision would force the government to return large sums of tariff revenue. He claimed the ruling would result in repayments amounting to $149 billion and renewed his criticism of the refund process.
The refunds are being handled by U.S. Customs and Border Protection, which collects duties and tariffs on imported goods. The agency is currently returning more than $160 million to importers and customs brokers who paid tariffs that were later invalidated by the courts.
Ongoing Attacks on the Judiciary
Trump has repeatedly criticized judges and courts when rulings have gone against his administration. His latest comments continue a pattern of public attacks on members of the judiciary, including federal judges and, at times, conservative Supreme Court justices whose decisions have conflicted with his policy objectives.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 31 May 2026

webfact
webfact

Hegseth Tells Asia Allies to Boost Defence Spending

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has sought to reassure Asia-Pacific allies that Washington remains committed to the region despite its involvement in other global security challenges, including the conflict with Iran.

Get today's headlines by email

Speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, Hegseth rejected suggestions that the United States was shifting its attention away from Asia.
He said Washington was capable of managing multiple security priorities simultaneously and remained focused on projecting power in the Pacific alongside its allies.
“People want to conflate that we have global obligations with the turning of our backs to this region,” Hegseth said, adding that the US was continuing to work closely with partners while also addressing concerns such as preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.
His remarks came after questions from Shinjiro Koizumi, who raised concerns that some countries might seek to undermine confidence in the US alliance network.
Taiwan Arms Concerns Addressed
Hegseth also responded to concerns over US weapons deliveries after Washington suspended a reported $14 billion arms package for Taiwan in order to preserve munitions during the Iran conflict.
He insisted the issue should not be linked to broader US commitments in Asia, arguing that American stockpiles remained strong and that the country retained the capacity to increase weapons production if necessary.
According to Hegseth, the US remained well positioned to meet its defence obligations and support partners across the region.
Call for Greater Military Spending
A central theme of Hegseth’s address was the need for Asian allies to increase defence spending. Repeating a message he delivered at last year’s forum, he suggested countries should aim to spend 3.5% of gross domestic product on defence.
He praised nations including South Korea, Japan, Australia and the Philippines for strengthening military investment and cooperation with the United States.
Hegseth argued that military capability, rather than diplomatic rhetoric alone, was essential for maintaining regional stability.
“Rules are great, but if you can't back them up with hard power, the rules are not worth the paper they are written on,” he said, calling for more military assets and fewer discussions.
His comments contrasted with those of To Lam, who had earlier urged greater dialogue as a means of managing regional tensions.
Hegseth also criticised countries he described as “freeloaders”, specifically naming New Zealand. New Zealand’s defence minister later rejected the characterisation, saying the country was increasing military spending after years of underinvestment and was moving towards spending up to 2% of GDP on defence.
Softer Tone Towards China
The defence secretary’s remarks on China were noticeably less confrontational than in previous years.
While warning about China’s growing military capabilities, Hegseth said the United States was seeking stability rather than confrontation. He acknowledged that regional partners preferred a balance of power and did not want escalating tensions.
Speaking weeks after talks between President Donald Trump and President Xi Jinping in Beijing, Hegseth avoided strong language on Taiwan and emphasised the goal of preserving peace and prosperity across the region.
China’s decision not to send its defence minister to the forum for a second consecutive year drew attention. Instead, Beijing dispatched a lower-level delegation, a move some observers viewed as a slight against the conference while others saw it as an effort to avoid direct public confrontation with Washington.
Analysts said Asian nations could remain uneasy about growing competition between the US and China. Muhammad Faizal Bin Abdul Rahman said many countries in the region continued to favour neutrality and stability, warning that rivalry between the two powers could heighten regional concerns.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 31 May 2026

webfact
webfact

Artists Exit Trump-Linked US 250th Concert Series

Several performers have withdrawn from a concert series tied to President Donald Trump’s celebrations marking the 250th anniversary of the United States, prompting the president to take a more prominent role in the event by hosting its opening ceremony.

Get today's headlines by email

Organizers of the Great American State Fair announced that Trump will lead the opening ceremony on June 24, ahead of a series of concerts planned on Washington’s National Mall between June 25 and July 10.
The event is being organized by Freedom 250, a White House-backed initiative created by executive order. The group was established as an alternative to celebrations being coordinated by the nonpartisan United States Semiquincentennial Commission, also known as America250.
Artists Cite Concerns Over Political Links
The announcement follows the withdrawal of several scheduled performers, including The Commodores, Martina McBride, Morris Day, Bret Michaels and Young MC.
Many of the artists who stepped away said they had not initially understood the political connections of the event.
McBride said she had agreed to perform after being told it was a nonpartisan celebration, but later concluded that description was inaccurate. Young MC made similar remarks, saying organizers had not disclosed political involvement when he accepted the booking. He later described the situation as a "bait-and-switch."
Michaels, who previously appeared on Trump's television show The Celebrity Apprentice and has spoken positively about him in the past, also withdrew. He said the event had become more divisive than the national celebration he believed he had signed up for and added that he and his team had received threats linked to his possible participation.
Trump Responds
Trump dismissed concerns from the departing performers, writing on social media that they were getting "the yips." He also suggested that he could effectively replace them as the event’s main attraction.
Freedom 250 has maintained that its goal is to celebrate the nation rather than advance a political agenda. Spokesperson Rachel Reisner said the organization remains committed to delivering a major public celebration on the National Mall and respects the decisions of artists who choose not to participate.
She said the event would focus on commemorating 250 years of American history, culture and freedom.
Some Performers Remain
Not all artists have withdrawn.
Vanilla Ice, a longtime Trump supporter who has performed at Mar-a-Lago, said he was honoured to take part. Rapper Flo Rida had not publicly announced any change to his participation plans.
The lineup has also attracted attention because of the inclusion of Milli Vanilli. The pop duo famously lost its Grammy Award after it emerged that the group's frontmen had not sung on the recordings released under their name. One of the original vocalists behind the recordings said she was surprised to see Milli Vanilli listed. However, surviving member Fab Morvan is still expected to perform.
Meanwhile, Freedom Williams said he disagrees with Trump politically but intends to perform despite criticism. His involvement has also prompted objections from Robert Clivillés, who said he was not consulted about the appearance and did not endorse it.
Organisers Defend Event
Freedom 250 said artists remain free to decide whether to participate and stressed that the celebration is intended to bring Americans together.
The organization said it remains focused on delivering what it described as a unique national event marking the country's 250th anniversary.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 31 May 2026

webfact
webfact

Emerging Iran Deal Threatens Netanyahu’s Legacy

When the United States and Israel launched coordinated strikes against Iran in February, President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu publicly celebrated what they described as a historic partnership.

Get today's headlines by email

Just three months later, that military campaign appears to be giving way to a US-led diplomatic effort with Iran, leaving Netanyahu with limited influence over the outcome.
According to Israeli sources, the prime minister has avoided publicly criticizing Trump but has privately acknowledged that Israel has little leverage over the ongoing negotiations. Since a ceasefire was announced in April, Netanyahu has repeatedly urged Washington to resume broader military pressure on Iran, arguing that continued operations could weaken or even topple the Iranian government. The White House, however, has instead pursued a diplomatic path.
Israeli officials fear that any interim agreement that does not remove Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium could leave Tehran with a future route to developing nuclear weapons.
Israeli Frustration Over US Approach
The emerging negotiations have fueled growing frustration within Israel’s leadership.
One Israeli official said Netanyahu had advocated targeting Iran’s oil infrastructure as a way to further strain the country’s economy and weaken the regime. Concerns have also been raised that easing economic restrictions on Iran could strengthen the government financially and help it recover from the conflict.
Some Israeli figures have expressed disappointment more directly, arguing that Washington’s shift toward diplomacy has come at Israel’s expense.
Lebanon has become another point of contention. Iran is reportedly seeking provisions that would include a ceasefire in Lebanon, where the United States has already sought to limit Israeli military activity. At the same time, Hezbollah has intensified drone attacks against Israeli forces and communities near the northern border.
Netanyahu has responded by ordering an expansion of Israeli military operations in Lebanon, insisting that Israel will continue acting against security threats despite international pressure.
The issue has also created tensions inside Israel’s governing coalition. Far-right ministers Itamar Ben Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich have both demanded a tougher military response.
A Different Strategy Than in 2015
Israel’s reaction to the current negotiations differs sharply from Netanyahu’s campaign against the 2015 Iran nuclear agreement negotiated under former President Barack Obama.
At that time, Netanyahu openly challenged Washington and delivered a controversial speech to the US Congress warning against the deal. Such a confrontation appears unlikely now, given the political importance of his relationship with Trump and the risks associated with publicly opposing him ahead of elections.
Instead, Israeli sources say Netanyahu has directed criticism toward members of the US negotiating team, including Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff, accusing them of steering Trump toward a diplomatic settlement.
Others suggest Israel misjudged Trump’s political priorities. According to a source familiar with discussions between the two countries, Trump became increasingly concerned that he was being portrayed domestically as following Netanyahu’s lead into a wider Middle East conflict and sought to demonstrate that he remained in control of US policy.
Legacy and Election Risks
The outcome of the Iran conflict could have significant political consequences for Netanyahu.
The campaign against Iran was expected to become a central element of his effort to reshape his legacy following the Hamas attacks of October 2023. Instead, public opinion appears divided.
Polling by the Institute for National Security Studies found that many Israelis believe the country’s position regarding Iran has worsened since October 2023, while nearly half think Israel has either lost or is unlikely to win the confrontation with Tehran.
Some Israeli officials believe Trump may seek to offset Netanyahu’s political difficulties by promoting normalization efforts between Israel and Arab states, expanding the framework of the Abraham Accords, or offering public displays of support before Israeli elections.
For Netanyahu, however, the stakes extend beyond immediate politics. For decades, he has built his political identity around confronting Iran’s nuclear ambitions through military pressure and close cooperation with Washington. If a US-Iran agreement ultimately preserves the Iranian regime and leaves key aspects of its nuclear program unresolved, critics argue it could undermine one of the defining themes of his political career.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 31 May 2026
webfact
webfact

Why U.S. Allies Aren't Buying Trump's Israel Push

President Donald Trump’s attempt to link a potential agreement with Iran to a major expansion of the Abraham Accords has been met with a muted response across the Middle East, with diplomats and analysts questioning whether the proposal is politically realistic.

Get today's headlines by email

Trump suggested this week that several Arab and Muslim-majority countries should establish diplomatic relations with Israel as part of a broader arrangement tied to ending tensions with Iran. Yet none of the countries he named have publicly endorsed the idea, and Israel itself has responded cautiously.
Analysts said the proposal appeared to come unexpectedly and lacks the diplomatic groundwork usually required for such a significant regional initiative.
Mediators See Themselves as Contributors
Several of the countries Trump mentioned, including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Egypt and Turkey, have played key roles in diplomatic efforts involving Washington and Tehran.
Regional officials argue that these states have already contributed to stability efforts and may not view normalization with Israel as an appropriate condition for supporting a wider agreement with Iran.
A senior Pakistani diplomat said Gulf countries have already absorbed substantial economic and security costs from regional escalation. Requiring them to take on additional political risks by normalizing ties with Israel while the Gaza conflict continues could deepen existing divisions.
Countries including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Jordan, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates have also faced Iranian threats or retaliation despite not directly participating in military action against Iran.
Gaza War Complicates Diplomatic Ambitions
The ongoing war in Gaza remains one of the biggest obstacles to expanding the Abraham Accords.
While several Arab governments have strengthened unofficial ties with Israel in recent years and increasingly regard Iran as a strategic threat, public sentiment throughout much of the Arab and Muslim world remains strongly critical of Israel.
Trump first floated the proposal in a Truth Social post, arguing that countries benefiting from U.S. diplomatic efforts should join the Abraham Accords. He specifically called on Saudi Arabia and Qatar to participate and even suggested that Iran could eventually become part of the framework.
The Abraham Accords, launched during Trump's first term, led several Arab states, beginning with the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain in 2020, to establish formal relations with Israel, reshaping regional alliances.
Limited Enthusiasm From Israel
The White House defended Trump's position, saying that expanding the Abraham Accords has long been a priority and could complement a broader peace arrangement involving Iran.
However, diplomats involved in regional discussions said they had not experienced significant pressure from Washington to join the accords. Two Middle Eastern diplomats told NBC News they did not feel substantial pressure from the administration.
The reaction from Israel was similarly restrained. Although Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has long championed expanding the accords, neither he nor senior government allies publicly embraced Trump's latest proposal.
An Israeli government official reiterated support for widening the circle of peace but stopped short of endorsing any direct linkage between an Iran agreement and normalization efforts.
Analysts Question Practicality
Experts say the subdued response reflects a broader tendency among regional governments to treat some of Trump's statements cautiously.
According to analysts, Israel would welcome expanded ties with countries such as Saudi Arabia, but linking that objective to negotiations with Iran may complicate both issues rather than advance them.
As a result, many of the governments whose cooperation Trump seeks appear reluctant to view the proposal as a serious or workable diplomatic framework.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 31 May 2026
webfact
webfact

Trump's Health Reports Highlight Limits of Transparency

The annual medical examination of a US president has become a fixture of modern American politics, serving not only as a health assessment but also as a public demonstration of fitness for office.

Get today's headlines by email

That dynamic was on display again after President Donald Trump underwent his latest physical examination at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. The White House released a memo from Trump's physician stating that the president was in "excellent health" and fully capable of carrying out his duties, while recommending additional exercise and weight loss.
The report said Trump had strong heart, lung and neurological function. It also noted that bruising visible on his hand was consistent with minor irritation from frequent handshakes while taking aspirin as a preventative cardiovascular measure. The president's abstinence from alcohol and tobacco was also highlighted.
Public disclosure remains voluntary
Despite the attention surrounding presidential health, there is no legal requirement for a US president to release medical records. Like all Americans, presidents are protected by medical privacy laws.
According to medical ethicist and presidential health historian Jacob Appel, the information released after presidential check-ups should be viewed cautiously because administrations control what is disclosed.
Presidential health reports often include routine medical details. Past reports have documented issues such as skin lesions, hearing loss and other age-related conditions.
At the same time, national security concerns can influence decisions about disclosure. Information about a president's health is not only available to the American public but also to foreign governments and intelligence agencies.
Long history of secrecy
Presidential health was often concealed from the public in earlier eras.
In 1919, Woodrow Wilson suffered a debilitating stroke that severely limited his ability to govern during the final months of his presidency. The seriousness of his condition was largely hidden from the public.
Similarly, the White House downplayed the effects of Franklin D. Roosevelt's paralysis from polio, rarely showing him using a wheelchair.
Greater transparency began emerging during the administrations of Lyndon B. Johnson and later Gerald Ford, who pushed for the public release of some medical information despite resistance from physicians.
Questions about presidential health continued into later administrations. Ronald Reagan disclosed his Alzheimer's diagnosis several years after leaving office, prompting debate about whether symptoms may have emerged during his presidency.
Age fuels growing scrutiny
Interest in presidential health has intensified as the United States has elected increasingly older leaders.
Trump first entered office at age 70 and returned for a second term at 78. His predecessor, Joe Biden, entered the White House at 78 and left office at 82.
Political historian Matt Dallek said concerns about age have elevated scrutiny of presidential medical reports to a level not seen with younger presidents such as Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama.
Biden's age and fitness became a major issue during the 2024 election campaign and ultimately contributed to his withdrawal from the race. Republicans later accused his administration of concealing signs of decline, allegations rejected by Biden's team.
Trump has also faced growing questions about his health. Recent polling found many Americans expressing doubts about his mental acuity and physical fitness for office, while another survey suggested nearly half of respondents considered him too old to serve as president.
Even so, Trump declared after his latest examination that "everything checked out perfectly", underscoring how presidential health reports continue to function as both medical updates and political messaging.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 31 May 2026
webfact
webfact

UK to Trial AI Age Checks for Asylum Seekers

The UK government will begin using artificial intelligence to help estimate the age of asylum seekers from next year, as part of efforts to identify adults who falsely claim to be children when arriving in the country.

Get today's headlines by email

The Home Office has awarded a contract to develop and test facial age-estimation software that analyses photographs taken at the border. Officials say the technology could help detect adults attempting to access support and legal protections reserved for children.
However, human rights groups and social work professionals have raised concerns about the reliability of the technology, warning that mistakes could leave vulnerable young people without the protections they are entitled to receive.
New tool aimed at disputed age claims
Unaccompanied children seeking asylum in the UK are placed in local authority care rather than standard asylum accommodation and receive additional legal safeguards.
The government argues that some adults have sought to exploit these arrangements by claiming to be minors. According to Home Office figures, more than 6,400 people who said they were children underwent age assessments in the year ending March 2026. Of those cases, 43% were ultimately assessed as adults.
Minister for Border Security and Asylum, Alex Norris, said false age claims had diverted resources away from children who genuinely needed support.
He said the new technology would help authorities identify people attempting to misuse the system while ensuring those entitled to protection received it.
Testing and rollout plans
The Home Office first announced plans to explore AI-based facial age estimation last year. Since then, officials have conducted testing using images from people of different ethnicities and genders, including groups represented within the asylum-seeking population.
Although the technology has been tested, the results have not yet been used to make operational decisions.
Under the newly awarded contract, Harlow-based IT supplier Akhter Computers Ltd will continue development and testing of the system before a wider rollout planned for mid-2027. The contract is valued at £322,000 over three years.
The first live trial is expected to take place next year at the Western Jet Foil processing centre in Dover.
Officials say the software will not replace existing procedures. Border Force officers currently assess age by reviewing documents and considering an individual's appearance and behaviour. The AI system will be used only as an additional tool when doubts remain about a person's age.
Concerns over accuracy
Questions about age assessment have persisted for years. A report by the government's independent immigration inspector found examples of adults being treated as children as well as children being wrongly classified as adults.
The report concluded that, without a completely reliable method of determining age, errors were unavoidable and could have serious consequences, particularly when children are denied rights and protections.
Social workers continue to carry out detailed assessments when an asylum seeker's age is challenged. The British Association of Social Workers warned that introducing AI into the process could increase safeguarding risks.
Professor Sam Baron, the organisation's interim chief executive, said age assessment was a complex task best handled by trained professionals rather than through technological shortcuts.
Human rights groups oppose scheme
Human Rights Watch has called on the government to abandon the project altogether.
Anna Bacciarelli, a senior AI researcher at the organisation, described the technology as unproven and questioned whether facial age estimation can accurately determine a person's age in asylum cases.
She argued that using the technology on vulnerable refugee children could undermine their rights and expose them to a process that lacks sufficient evidence of effectiveness.
The government has previously said facial age estimation represented the most cost-effective option available for supporting age assessments. Critics, however, maintain that significant concerns remain over both its accuracy and its ethical implications.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 30 May 2026
webfact
webfact

John Bolton Calls Iran Deal a US Setback

Former national security adviser John Bolton has criticised a proposed agreement between Washington and Tehran, describing it as a major setback for the United States and arguing that domestic political concerns are shaping the Trump administration’s approach.

Get today's headlines by email

Speaking on NewsNation’s Elizabeth Vargas Reports on Thursday, Bolton said the administration was pursuing the arrangement because of worries about fuel prices and their potential impact on upcoming midterm elections rather than broader strategic considerations.
“It’s a big defeat for the United States,” Bolton said, adding that he believed concerns about gasoline prices were the primary factor driving the negotiations.
Proposed ceasefire extension
The tentative agreement, first reported by Axios, would take the form of a 60-day memorandum of understanding aimed at extending a fragile ceasefire and reopening the Strait of Hormuz.
The arrangement is designed to ease economic pressure on both the United States and Iran. Under the proposal, Iran would agree not to charge tolls to commercial vessels using the waterway and would remove mines from the strait.
The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world’s most important shipping routes, carrying more than one-fifth of global oil and gas supplies.
In return, the United States would lift its naval blockade and provide certain sanctions waivers that would allow Iran to sell oil more freely. Washington would also agree to begin discussions on wider sanctions relief.
Nuclear commitments under discussion
The memorandum would include a pledge by Iran not to pursue nuclear weapons. However, Tehran has made similar assertions in the past, and those claims have been questioned by non-proliferation specialists.
According to the Axios report, early negotiations would focus on the future of Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium and on how any future uranium enrichment activities would be handled.
The proposed framework would leave several major issues to be negotiated during the 60-day period.
Concerns over Iran’s intentions
Bolton argued that Iran could use the agreement to strengthen its position while talks continue.
He said Tehran may seek to benefit from sanctions relief and renewed oil sales while delaying decisions on the most difficult issues. According to Bolton, such a process could allow Iran to rebuild financial resources and military capabilities while reducing the economic pressure facing the government.
Bolton also suggested that Iranian leaders may believe US willingness to use force in the region could weaken as the midterm elections approach.
“They think we’ve got a short attention span, we’re obsessed by the elections,” he said.
Election-year criticism
During the interview, host Elizabeth Vargas noted that President Donald Trump had recently said he was not focused on the midterm elections.
Bolton rejected that claim, arguing that electoral considerations were central to the administration’s calculations.
He said reopening the Strait of Hormuz could increase energy supplies, potentially lowering global oil prices, reducing fuel costs for American consumers and easing inflationary pressures.
According to Bolton, the administration views those economic effects as beneficial to its political prospects ahead of November’s elections.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 30 May 2026
webfact
webfact

US Judge Orders Trump Name Removed From Kennedy Center

A federal judge has ordered the removal of Donald Trump’s name from the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, ruling that the Washington DC institution cannot be formally renamed without approval from Congress.

Get today's headlines by email

US District Judge Christopher Cooper directed the Trump administration to remove all signage bearing Trump’s name and delete references to a “Trump Kennedy Center” from official materials within 14 days.
Court Says Congress Controls the Name
In his ruling, Cooper said federal law clearly establishes the venue as a memorial to former President John F. Kennedy and leaves no authority for the center’s board to change its name on its own.
“The Kennedy Center’s organic statute makes crystal clear that the Center is to be named for President Kennedy,” Cooper wrote. He added that Congress originally gave the institution its name and only Congress has the power to alter it.
The judge concluded that the board had exceeded its legal authority by approving the renaming.
The decision came in a lawsuit filed by Joyce Beatty, a Democratic congresswoman from Ohio who serves on the Kennedy Center’s board through her position in Congress.
The White House did not immediately comment on the ruling.
Renaming Followed Trump Takeover
The dispute stemmed from changes made after Trump returned to office. In February last year, he appointed himself chairman of the Kennedy Center’s board of trustees, describing the move as a “take-over”.
He subsequently removed existing board members and installed new appointees. In December, the restructured board voted to add Trump’s name to the institution, a move seen as part of a broader effort by the administration to reshape cultural organisations in the US capital.
At the time, Joe Kennedy III, a former Massachusetts congressman and great-nephew of President Kennedy, questioned whether such a change was legally possible.
He argued that the venue was established by federal law as a memorial to Kennedy and could not simply be renamed by board action.
Backlash From Arts Community
The renaming effort prompted significant opposition within the arts sector.
Several performers and organisations cancelled appearances at the venue in protest, including a scheduled run of the award-winning musical Hamilton.
Leadership changes also followed. National Symphony Orchestra executive director Jean Davidson left to lead the Wallis Annenberg Center for the Performing Arts in Los Angeles. Richard Grenell, a Trump ally who played a prominent role in efforts to reshape the institution and challenge what he described as “woke” culture, later stepped down as president of the center.
The Kennedy Center remains one of the United States’ most prominent cultural institutions and receives federal funding. It has traditionally enjoyed support from both major political parties.
Wider Plans Face Challenges
Under Trump, the venue increasingly became a platform for administration initiatives. It hosted events including an appearance by FIFA president Gianni Infantino ahead of the World Cup draw and other White House-linked functions.
The center is also preparing for a two-year closure after trustees approved a major renovation programme. Officials said the project would begin following Independence Day celebrations in July, with a reopening planned once work is completed.
The Kennedy Center case is one of several legal disputes involving Trump’s plans for Washington. Other proposals, including a large ballroom at the White House site and a “Victory Arch” near national monuments, have also faced court challenges. Congressional Republicans have additionally proposed renaming the Kennedy Center’s Opera House after First Lady Melania Trump.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 30 May 2026

webfact
webfact

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications
Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.